Abstract
The purpose of the study is to identify the patterns of change in higher education institutions. It examines the contexts of the changing quality assurance mechanisms used by the different types of higher education institutions in England, Japan, and New York State between 2001 and 2007. The paper argues that there were no clear patterns of institutional change in terms of speed, intensity, extensiveness, momentum, trajectory, and consequence between centralized and decentralized institutions and public and private institutions. The study suggests three points for explanation why institutional types do not shape certain patterns of institutional change. The first point is that institutional change heavily relies on agents’ interactions. The second point is that the ideas of centralized or decentralized and private or public per se are becoming ambiguous in the market or market-like systems. The third point is that the relationship between the central authorities and the institutions is far more significant than the types of institutions in the formation of particular patterns of institutional change.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Altbach, P., & Levy, D. (Eds.). (2005). Private higher education: A global revolution. Rotterdam: Sense.
Archer, M. (1984). Social origins of educational systems. London: Sage.
Askling, B., & Henkel, M. (2000). Higher education institutions. In M. Kogan, M. Bauer, I. Bleiklie, & M. Henkel. (Eds.), Transforming higher education (pp. 85–100). London: Jessica
Kingsley Becher, T., & Kogan, M. (1992). Process and structure in higher education. London: Routledge.
Berdahl, R. O. (1971). Statewide coordination of higher education. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
Clark, B. (1998). Creating entrepreneurial universities: Organizational pathways of transformation. Oxford: International Association of Universities Press/Pergamon.
Committee of Vice-Chancellors and Principals. (1985). Report of the Steering Committee for Efficiency Studies in Universities. London: CVCP.
Dill, D. (1999). Academic accountability and university adaptation: The architecture of an academic learning organization. Higher Education, 38(2), 127–154.
Geiger, R. (1986). Private sectors in higher education: Structure, function and change in eight countries. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge: Polity.
Ichikawa, S. (2004). Shiritsudaigaku no tokuse to jyosei seisaku [The characteristics of private universities and state’s funding policy]. Research on University Funding and Management, 1, 171–185.
Kaneko, M. (2006). Nihon gata shiritu daigaku no tenkanten [Turning points of Japanese version of private universities]. IDE, 481, 48–54.
Levy, D. (1986). Private education: Studies in choice and public policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Marginson, S. (2007). The public/private divide in higher education: A global revision. Higher Education, 53(3), 307–333.
McLendon, M. K. (2003). Setting the governmental agenda for state decentralization of higher education. The Journal of Higher Education, 74(5), 479–515.
Meek, V. L. (2002). Changing patterns in modes of co-ordination of higher education. In J. Enders & O. Fulton (Eds.), Higher education in a globalising world (pp. 53–72). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
Musselin, C. (2005). Change or continuity in higher education governance? Lessons drawn from twenty years of national reforms in European countries. In I. Blieklie & M. Henkel (Eds.), Governing knowledge (pp. 65–80). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
PROHPE (Program for Research on Private Higher Education). PROHPE working papers. Retrieved May 1, 2008, from https://doi.org/www.albany.edu/dept/eaps/prophe/publication/publication.html
Pusser, B., Slaughter, S., & Thomas, S. (2006). Playing the board game: An empirical analysis of university trustee and corporate board interlocks. The Journal of Higher Education, 77(5), 747–775.
Slaughter, S., & Rhoades, G. (2004). Academic capitalism and the new economy. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
St. John, E., & Parsons, M. (2004). Public funding of higher education: Changing contexts and new rationales. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Teichler, U. (2008). Diversification? Trends and explanation of the shape and size of higher education. Higher Education, 56(3), 349–379.
US Department of Education. (2006). A Test of leadership: Charting the future of US higher education. Washington, DC: USDE.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yokoyama, K. The Patterns of Change in Higher Education Institutions: The context of the changing quality assurance mechanisms in England, Japan, and New York State. Tert Educ Manag 16, 61–80 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1080/13583881003629848
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13583881003629848