Abstract
The universities in Europe are finding themselves in a turbulent environment. They are exposed to global and European developments. This article links changes in the structure, culture, and policy of universities to these developments and changes in the broader-than-national environment. The central question is, in short: what is globalisation doing to universities? It is often feared or expected that globalisation leads to more uniformity and homogenisation. On the basis of case studies, this hypothesis is critically assessed. The model of change in universities turns out to be local variations on global and European themes and developments. This model can be called “the Networked University.”
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amaral, A., Fulton, O., & Larsen, I. M. (2003). A managerial revolution? In A. Amaral, V. Lynn Meek, & I. M. Larsen (Eds.), The higher education managerial revolution? (pp. 275–296). Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer.
Beck, U. (1997). Was ist globalisierung? Irrtümer des Globalismus—Antworten auf Globalisierung. Frankurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Beck, U. (2001). World risk society. Malden, MA: Polity Press.
Castells, M. (1996). The rise of the network society. The information age (Vol. 1). Oxford: Blackwell.
Castells, M. (1997). The power of identity. The information age (Vol. 2). Oxford: Blackwell.
Castells, M. (1998). End of millennium. The information age (Vol. 3). Oxford: Blackwell.
Castells, M. (2000). Materials for an exploratory theory of the network society. British Journal of Sociology, 51(1), 5–24.
Clark, B. R. (1998). Creating entrepreneurial universities. Organizational pathways of transformation. Oxford: Pergamon/IAU Press.
Clark, B. R. (2004). Delineating the character of the entrepreneurial university. Higher Education Policy, 17(4), 355–370.
Currie, J., DeAngelis, R., de Boer, H., Huisman, J., & Lacotte, C. (2003). Globalizing practices and university responses: European and Anglo-American differences. Westport, CT: Praeger.
De Boer, H. (2003). Institutionele verandering en professionele autonomie. Enschede: CHEPS/UT.
Denzin, N. K. (1978). The research act. A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. New York: McGraw Hill.
De Wit, K. (2003). The consequences of European integration for higher education. Higher Education Policy, 16(2), 161–178.
De Wit, K. (2006, August 30–September 1). How universities perceive and manage globalisation and Europeanisation. Paper presented at the 28th annual EAIR Forum, Rome, Italy.
De Wit, K. (2008). Universiteiten in Europa in de 21e eeuw. Netwerken in een samenleving in verandering. Gent: Academia Press.
Dill, D. D. (1997). Effects of competition on diverse institutional contexts. In M. W. Peterson, D. D. Dill, & L. A. Mets (Eds.), Planning and management for a changing environment: A handbook on redesigning postsecondary institutions (pp. 88–105). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Dill, D. D., & Sporn, B. (1995). University 2001: What will the university of the twenty-first century look like? In D. D. Dill & B. Sporn (Eds.), Emerging patterns of social demand and university reform: Through a glass darkly (pp. 212–236). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Enders, J., & Fulton, O. (2002). Blurring boundaries and blistering institutions: An introduction. In J. Enders & O. Fulton (Eds.), Higher education in a globalising world (pp. 1–14). Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer.
Feagin, J. R., Orum, A. M., & Sjoberg, G. (1991). A case for the case study. Chapel Hill/London: University of North Carolina Press.
Giddens, A. (2000). Runaway world: How globalization is reshaping our lives. London: Profile Books.
Gornitzka, A., & Maassen, P. (2006). Europese universiteiten tussen markt en overheid. In K. De Wit, L. Dom, C. Gijselinckx, J. Peeraer, & K. Stassen (Eds.), Onderwijs en samenleving. Thema’s in het werk van J.C. Verhoeven (pp. 99–117). Leuven: Acco.
Hartley, J. F. (1994). Case studies in organizational research. In C. Cassell & G. Symon (Eds.), Qualitative methods in organizational research. A practical guide (pp. 208–229). London/Thousand Oaks/New Delhi: Sage.
Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2001). Multi-level governance and European integration. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Huisman, J., & van der Wende, M. (2004). The EU and Bologna: Are supra- and international initiatives threatening domestic agendas?, European Journal of Education, 39(3), 349–357.
Maassen, P. (1996). Governmental steering and the academic culture. Utrecht: De Tijdstroom.
Meek, V. L. (2002). Changing patterns in modes of co-ordination of higher education. In J. Enders & O. Fulton (Eds.), Higher education in a globalising world (pp. 53–71). Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer.
Moravcsik, A. (1998). The choice for Europe: Social purpose and state power from Messina to Maastricht. New York/London/Ithaca: Cornell University Press/UCL Press.
Neave, G. (2001). The European dimension in higher education: An excursion into the modern use of historical analogues. In J. Huisman & P. Maassen (Eds.), Higher education and the nation state (pp. 13–73). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Neave, G., & van Vught, F. (Eds.). (1991). Prometheus bound: The changing relationship between government and higher education in Western Europe. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Powell, W. W. (1990). Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. Research in Organizational Behaviour, 12, 295–336.
Sporn, B. (1999). Adaptive university structures. An analysis of adaptation to socioeconomic environments of US and European universities. London: Jessica Kingsley.
Stake, R. E. (1994). Case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 236–272). Thousand Oaks/London/New Delhi: Sage.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1994). Grounded theory methodology. An overview. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 273–285). Thousand Oaks/London/New Delhi: Sage.
Stromquist, N. (2002). Education in a globalized world. The connectivity of economic power, technology, and knowledge. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Thys-Clément, F., & Wilkin, L. (1998). Strategic management and universities: Outcome of a European survey. Higher Education Management, 10(1), 13–27.
Vaira, M. (2004). Globalisation and higher education organizational change: A framework for analysis. Higher Education, 48(4), 483–510.
Williams, G. (Ed.). (2003). The enterprising university: Reform, excellence and equity. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Witte, J. (2006). Change of degrees and degrees of change: Comparing adaptations of European higher education systems in the context of the Bologna process. Enschede: CHEPS.
Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research. Design and methods. London: Sage.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
de Wit, K. The Networked University: The structure, culture, and policy of universities in a changing environment. Tert Educ Manag 16, 1–14 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1080/13583880903335464
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13583880903335464