Skip to main content
Log in

The Effective Teacher’s Characteristics as Perceived by Students

  • Published:
Tertiary Education and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Students (N = 1,883) from 10 European countries answered a web questionnaire pertaining to three dimensions of what they expect and what they experience from their teachers. The dimensions were personality, classroom environment, and teaching style characteristics. Parametric statistics identified high communalities among variables, while gender, program type, and program level were found to have an influence on factor groupings. Overall, the gap between the expected xand the experienced proved to be overwhelmingly significant.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrami, P. C., d’Apollonia, S., & Cohen, P. A. (1990). The validity of student ratings of instruction. What we know and what we don’t know. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 219–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abrami, P. C., d’Appollonia, S., & Rosenfield, S. (1997). The dimensionality of student rating of instruction: What we know and what we do not. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook on theory and research (Vol. 2, pp. 321–359). New York: Agathon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Addison, W. E., Best, J., & Warrington, J. D. (2006). Student perceptions of course difficulty and their ratings of the instructor. College Student Journal, 40(2), 409–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aleamoni, L. M. (1999). Student rating myths versus research facts from 1924 to 1998. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 13, 153–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Algozzine, B., Beattie, J., Bray, M., Flowers, C., Gretes, J., Howley, L., et al. (2004). Student evaluations of college teaching: A practice in search of principles. College Teaching, 52(4), 134–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, T., & Blattner, N. (2003). Guarding against potential bias in student evaluations: What every faculty member needs to know. College Teaching, 51(1), 27–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Chaim, D., & Zoller, U. (2001). Self-perception versus students’ perception of teachers’ personal style in college science and mathematics courses. Research in Science Education, 31, 437–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beran, T., Violato, C., & Kline, D. (2007). What’s the “use” of student ratings of instruction for administrators? One university’s experience. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 37(1), 27–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berk, R. A. (2005). Survey of 12 strategies to measure teaching effectiveness. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 17(1), 48–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodie, D. A. (1998). Do students report that easy professors are excellent teachers? Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 28(1), 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Centra, J. A. (2003). Will teachers receive higher student evaluations by giving higher grades and less course work? Research in Higher Education, 44(5), 495–518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cothran, D. J., Kulinnab, P. H., & Garrahy, D. A. (2002). “This is kind of giving a secret away …”: Students’ perspectives on effective class management. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19, 435–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramer, K. M., & Alexitch, L. R. (2000). Student evaluations of college teaching: Identifying sources of bias. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 30(2), 143–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Apollonia, S., & Abrami, P. C. (1997). Navigating student ratings of instruction. American Psychologist, 52(11), 1198–1208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, K. A. (1976). Students’ views of the superior teacher. Research in Higher Education, 5(3), 243–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, K. A. (1983). The perceived instructional effectiveness of college teachers as related to evaluations they receive from students. Research in Higher Education, 18(1), 103–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, K. A. (1986). The perceived instructional effectiveness of college teachers as related to their personality and attitudinal characteristics: A review and synthesis. Research in Higher Education, 24(2), 139–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, D. L., & Kent, B. K. (1998). Associations between teacher personality and classroom environment. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 33, 5–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth, D. F. (2001). The Professor’s guide to teaching: Psychological principles and practices. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald, A. G., & Gillmore, G. M. (1997). Grading leniency is a removable contaminant of student ratings. American Psychologist, 52, 1209–1217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kher, N., Molstad, S., & Donahue, R. (1999). Using humor in the college classroom to enhance teaching effectiveness in “dread courses”. College Student Journal, 33(3), 400–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, D. J. (2007). I’ve studied so hard for this course, but don’t get it!: Differences between student and faculty perceptions. College Student Journal, 41(1), 22–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malikow, M. (2007). Professors’ irritating behaviour study. College Student Journal, 41(1), 25–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W., & Dunkin, M. J. (1997). Students’ evaluations of university teaching: A multidimensional perspective. In R. P. Perry & J. C. Smart (Eds.), Effective teaching in higher education: Research and practice (pp. 241–320). New York: Agathon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W., & Roche, L. A. (1997). Making students’ evaluations of teaching effectiveness effective. American Psychologist, 52(11), 1187–1197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moos, R. H. (1979). Evaluating educational environments: Procedures, measures, findings and policy implications. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, H. G., Rushton, J. P., & Paunonen, S. V. (1990). Teacher personality traits and student instructional ratings in six types of university courses. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 250–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naftulin, D. H., Ware, J. E., & Donnelly, F. A. (1973). The Doctor Fox lecture: A paradigm of educational seduction. Journal of Medical Education, 48(July), 630–635.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okapala, C. O., & Ellis, R. R. (2005). The perceptions of college students on teacher quality: A focus on teacher qualifications. Education, 126(2), 374–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renaud, R. D., & Murray, H. G. (1996). Aging, personality, and teaching effectiveness in academic psychologists. Research in Higher Education, 37, 323–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seldin, P. (1980). Successful faculty evaluation programs: A practical guide to improve faculty performance and promotion/tenure decision. Crugers: Coventry Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seldin, P. (2006). Evaluating faculty performance: A practical guide to assessing teaching, research, and service. Boston: Anker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torok, S. E., McMorris, R. F., & Lin, W.-C. (2004). Is humor an appreciated teaching tool? Perceptions of professors’ teaching styles and use of humor. College Teaching, 52(1), 14–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wierstra, R. A., Kanselaar, G., van der Linden, J. L., & Lodewijks, H. C. (1999). Learning environment perceptions of European university students. Learning Environments Research, 2(1), 79–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, S., & Shaw, D. G. (1999). Profiles of effective college and university teachers. Journal of Higher Education, 70(6), 670–686.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, L. (2004). Do university students’ thinking styles matter in their preferred teaching approaches? Journal of Psychology, 37, 1551–1564.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, L., Huang, J., & Zhang L. (2005). Preferences in teaching styles among Hong Kong and US university students. Journal of Psychology, 39, 1319–1331.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charles H. Bélanger.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bélanger, C.H., Longden, B. The Effective Teacher’s Characteristics as Perceived by Students. Tert Educ Manag 15, 323–340 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1080/13583880903335456

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13583880903335456

Navigation