Skip to main content
Log in

Women, Research Performance and Work Context

  • Published:
Tertiary Education and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article presents findings from a qualitative study focused on the conditions that support high research productivity in women. Interviewees were all active researchers and many were national or international leaders in their respective fields. While personal factors such as motivation, focus, and good scholarly habits were identified as influencing their research success, interviewees also placed significant emphasis on aspects of their workplace culture and practice (teaching and research connections, degrees of flexibility, work–family interface) that they felt were equally important in determining their options and opportunities for conducting research. This suggests that universities concerned with enhancing the research performance of staff need to recognize—and respond to—how workplace dynamics and culture shape individual research participation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acacio, F.B., Baldassar, L., Broom, K., Hayes, C., Ellis-Rowan, J., Kirkpatrick, D., et al. (1996). Great performers: Women who research. In L. Lord, A. Kinnear, F. McKenzie, & L. Pike (Eds.), Dancing on the glass ceiling: New century, new workplace, new leaders: Proceedings of the 4th International Women in Leadership Conference (pp. 63–70). Perth: Edith Cowan University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, M., & Castleman, T. (2001). Fighting the pipeline theory. In A. Brooks & A. Mackinnon (Eds.), Gender and the restructured university: Changing management and culture in higher education (pp. 151–165). Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armenti, C. (2004). Women faculty seeking tenure and parenthood: Lessons from previous generations. Cambridge Journal of Education, 34(1), 65–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asmar, C. (1999). Is there a gendered agenda in academia? The research experience of female and male PhD graduates in Australian universities. Higher Education, 38(3), 255–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagilhole, B. (1993). Survivors in a male preserve: A study of British women academics’ experiences and perceptions of discrimination in a UK university. Higher Education, 26(4), 431–447.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagilhole, B., & White, K. (2003). Created in their image: An analysis of male cultural hegemony in higher education in Australian and the United Kingdom. In B. Groombridge & V. Mackie (Eds.), Re-searching research agendas: Women, research and publication in higher education. Proceedings of the Australian Technology Network—Women’s Executive Development (ATNWEXDEV) 2003 Research Conference (pp. 1–12). Perth: Curtin University of Technology Learning Support Network.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, S., & Bentley, R. (2005, November). Women in research: Discussion paper. Prepared for the Australian Vice-Chancellors’ National Colloquium of Senior Women Executives.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brew, A. (1999). Research and teaching: Changing relationships in a changing context. Studies in Higher Education, 24(3), 291–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Britton, C. (1999). Supporting women in research. In S. Hatt, J. Kent, & C. Britton (Eds.), Women, research and careers (pp. 69–88). Houndsmills: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruneau, W. A., & Savage, D. C. (2002). Counting out the scholars: How performance indicators undermine universities and colleges (A CAUT Series Title). Toronto: James Lorimer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, D. E., & Astin, H. S. (1990). Life cycle, career patterns and gender stratification in academe: Breaking myths and exposing truths. In S. Stiver Lie & V. E. O’Leary (Eds.), Storming the tower: Women in the academic world (pp. 89–107). London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deane, E., Johnson, L., Jones, G., & Lengkeek, N. (1996). Women, research and research productivity in the post-1987 universities: Opportunities and constraints. University of Western Sydney, Nepean: Department of Employment, Education, Training and Youth Affairs, Evaluations and Investigations Program, Higher Education Division.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dever, M., Boreham, P., Haynes, M., Kubler, M., Laffan, W., Western, M., et al. (2008). Gender differences in early post-PhD employment in Australian universities: The influence of the PhD experience on women’s academic careers. Brisbane: The University of Queensland Social Research Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devos, A. (2000). WomenResearch21: Responding to the issues for beginning women academics. HERDSA News, 22(2), 11–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doherty, L., & Manfredi, S. (2005). Improving women’s representation in senior positions in the higher education sector, stage 1 findings. Oxford: Centre for Diversity Policy Research, Oxford Brookes University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drago, R. W., & Colbeck, C. (2005). Accept, avoid, resist: Faculty members’ response to bias against caregiving … and how departments can help. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 37(6), 10–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forster, N. (2000). A case study of women academics’ views on equal opportunities, career prospects and work-family conflicts in a British university. Women in Management Review, 15(7), 316–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, M. F., & Colatrella, C. (2006). Participation, performance, and advancement of women in academic science and engineering: What is at issue and why. Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(3), 377–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, M. F., & Faver, C. A. (1985). Men, women and publication productivity: Patterns among social work academics. Sociological Quarterly, 26(4), 537–549.

    Google Scholar 

  • French, N., Massy, W., & Young, K. (2001). Research assessment in Hong Kong. Higher Education, 42(1), 35–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallos, J. V. (1996). On becoming a scholar: One woman’s journey. In P. J. Frost & M. S. Taylor (Eds.), Rhythms of academic life: Personal accounts of careers in academia (pp. 11–18). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godden, J. (1996). From new to successful researcher: Enhancing the research skills of academics. In J. Godden, A. Brew, & E. Roe (Eds.), Learning research skills: Programs and issues: Reports on the research skills development program for academic staff 1990–1995 (pp. 4–15). Sydney: University of Sydney Centre for Teaching and Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottlieb, E. E., & Keith, B. (1997). The academic research-teaching nexus in eight advancedindustrialized countries. Higher Education, 34(3), 397–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, R. (2004). Knowledge production and the research-teaching nexus: The case of the built environment disciplines. Studies in Higher Education, 29(6), 709–726.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groombridge, B., & Worden, S. (2003). Values, visions, strategies and goals: Is coaching a viable pathway? In B. Groombridge & V. Mackie (Eds.), Re-searching research agendas: Women, research and publication in higher education: Proceedings of the Australian Technology Network-Women’s Executive Development (ATN-WEXDEV) 2003 Research Conference (pp. 117–185). Perth: Learning Support Network, Curtin University of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harley, S. (2003). Research selectivity and female academics in UK universities: From gentleman’s club and barrack yard to smart macho? Gender and Education, 15(4), 377–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J., & March, H. W. (1996). The relationship between research and teaching: A meta-analysis. Review of Higher Education, 66, 507–542.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgs, J. (2003). Making a difference. In H. Edwards, D. Baume, & G. Webb (Eds.), Staff and educational development: Case studies, experience and practice from higher education (pp. 29–36). Sterling, VA/London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobson, J., Jones, G., & Deane, E. (2005). The research assistant: Silenced partner in Australia’s knowledge production? Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 27(3), 357–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, T. C. (1996). Rounding corners: An African American female scholar’s pretenure experiences. In P. J. Frost & M. S. Taylor (Eds.), Rhythms of academic life: Personal accounts of careers in academia (pp. 193–199). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, D. (1997). Women’s perceptions of research. In R. Murray-Harvey & H. C. Silins (Eds.), Proceedings of the Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia (HERDSA) 1997 International Conference (pp. 390–396). Adelaide: HERDSA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kvande, E. (2005). Embodying male workers as fathers in a flexible working life. In D. Morgan, B. Brandth, & E. Kvande (Eds.), Gender, bodies and work (pp. 75–89). Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyvik, S., & Smeby, J.-C. (1994). Teaching and research: The relationship between the supervision of students and faculty research performance. Higher Education, 28, 227–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, P., & Malina, D. (1994). Caught between two worlds: Mothers as academics. In S. Davies, C. Lubelska, & J. Quinn (Eds.), Changing the subject: Women in higher education (pp. 29–41). Bristol: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loumansky, A. Goodman, S., & Jackson, A. (2007). Women and work/life balance. In P. Cotterill, S. Jackson, & G. Letherby (Eds.), Challenges and negotiations for women in higher education (pp. 223–240). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundy, K., & Warme, B. (1990). Gender and career trajectory: The case of part-time faculty. Studies in Higher Education, 15(2), 207–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mace, J. (2000). The RAE and university efficiency. Higher Education Review, 32(2), 17–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morley, L. (2003). Quality and power in higher education. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakhaie, M. R. (2002). Gender differences in publication among university professors in Canada. Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, 39(2), 151–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noordenbos, G. (1992). Explanations for differences in publication rates between male and female academics and between productive and less productive women. Bulletin de Methologie Sociologique, 35, 22–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Laughlin, E., & Bischoff, L. (2005). Balancing parenthood and academia: Work/family stress as influenced by gender and tenure status. Journal of Family Issues, 26(1), 79–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, S. M. (1996). Research, teaching and service: Why shouldn’t women’s work count? Journal of Higher Education, 67(1), 46–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poole, M. (1991). Establishing a research culture. HERDSA News, 13(2), 3–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poole, M., Bornholt, L., & Summers, F. (1997). An international study of the gendered nature of academic work: Some cross-cultural explorations. Higher Education, 34(3), 373–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Probert, B. (2005). ‘I just couldn’t fit it in’: Gender and unequal outcomes in academic careers. Gender, Work and Organization, 12(1), 50–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsden, P. (1999). Predicting institutional research performance from published indicators: A test of a classification of Australian university types. Higher Education, 37(4), 341–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsden, P., & Moses, I. (1992). Associations between research and teaching in Australian higher education. Higher Education, 23(3), 273–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samble, J. N. (2008). Female faculty: Challenges and choices in the United States and beyond. New Directions for Higher Education, 143, 55–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sellers, J. (2007). Imaging ‘career’: Part-time working, full-time living. In P. Cotterill, S. Jackson, & G. Letherby (Eds.), Challenges and negotiations for women in higher education (pp. 201–221). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J. (2007). The teaching-research nexus: A model for institutional management. Higher Education, 54(6), 867–884.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toren, N. (1993). The temporal dimension of gender inequality in academia. Higher Education, 25(4), 439–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Towers, I., Duxbury, L., & Thomas, J. (2005, March 21–23). Shifting boundaries: Technology, time, place and work. Paper presented at the 23rd Annual International Labour Process Conference, Glasgow. Retrieved October 25, 2008, from https://doi.org/www.hrm.strath.ac.uk

    Google Scholar 

  • Trower, C.A. (2006). What new scholars want. In G.M. Bataille & B.E. Brown (Eds.), Faculty career paths: Multiple routes to academic success and satisfaction (pp. 76–86). Westport, CT: Praeger/American Council on Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, K., & Wolf-Wendel, L. (2004). Fear factor: How safe is it to make time for family? Academe, 90(6), 16–19.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maryanne Dever.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dever, M., Morrison, Z. Women, Research Performance and Work Context. Tert Educ Manag 15, 49–62 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1080/13583880802700107

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13583880802700107

Navigation