Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Academic and Managerial Skills of Academic Deans: A self-assessment perspective

  • 10.1080/13583880802481740
  • Published:
Tertiary Education and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Brazilian higher education institutions face a complex and challenging environment as the national market in education is becoming more competitive. International investment, a decrease in the population of potential students, and the proliferation of innumerable small institutions add to this complexity. Organizations are becoming flatter and the key managers within them are deans. Although deans are required to act as managerial experts, they are usually selected from the teaching body of the institution. In this paper, a group of deans from a large private institution gave their self-assessment of their academic and managerial skills. The results revealed that they tend to have a high perception of their managerial skills, even though they have no previous managerial experience or formal training. This underlines that senior academic administrators cannot simply assume that deans, by the nature of their work environment, are proficient in managerial skills; neither that they can easily identify inadequacies nor have them self-corrected. To accomplish the necessary institutional changes to face the complexities of the current globalized education market, a new assessment culture has to be implemented in the academic environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackerman, P. L., Kanfer, R., & Goff, M. (2002). What we really know about our abilities and our knowledge. Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 587–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Addison Wesley Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boud, D., & Falchikov, N. (1989). Quantitative studies of student self-assessment in higher education: A critical analysis of findings. Higher Education, 18, 529–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Boer, H., & Goedegebuure, L. (2006). On limitations and consequences of change: Dutch University governance in transition. Tertiary Education and Management, 7, 163–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deem, R. (2004). The knowledge worker, the manager-academic and the contemporary UK University: New and old forms of public management. Financial Accountability & Management, 20, 107–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dibden, A. J. (1968). Academic deanship in American Colleges and Universities. Carbondale and Edwardsville, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, D. (2006). Strangers to ourselves? Psychologist, 19, 600–603.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, D., Heath, C., & Suls, J. M. (2004). Flawed self-assessment: Implications for health, education, and the workplace. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5, 69–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durand, J., & Pujadas, C. (2004). Self-assessment of governance teams in an Argentine private university: Adapting to difficult times. Tertiary Education and Management, 10, 27–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlinger, J. (2008). Skill level, self-views and self-theories as sources of error in self-assessment. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(1), 382–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feltner, B. D., & Goodsell, D. R. (1972). The academic dean and conflict management. Journal of Higher Education, 43, 692–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galbo, C. (1998). Helping adults learn. Thrust for Educational Leadership, 27, 13–15, 35–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillet-Karam, R. (1999). Midlevel management in the Community College: A Rose Garden? In R. Gillet-Karam (Ed.), New directions for community colleges (pp. 5–11). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glasman, N. S., & Heck, R. H. (1996). Role-based evaluation of principals: Developing an appraisal system. In K. Leithwood, J. Chapman, D. Corson, P. Hallinger, & A. Hard (Eds.), International handbook of educational leadership and administration (pp. 369–394). Boston, MA: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gmelch, W. H., & Miskin, V. D. (1993). Strategic leadership skills for department chairs. Boston, MA: Anker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gmelch, W. H., Wolverton, M., & Wolverton, M. L. (1999). The impact of role conflict and ambiguity on academic deans. Journal of Higher Education, 70, 80–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1989). Organizational ecology. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heck, R. H., Johnsrud, L. K., & Rosser, V. J. (2000). Administrative effectiveness in higher education: Improving assessment procedures. Research in Higher Education, 41, 663–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holm-Nielsen, L. B., Thorn, K., Brunner, J. J., & Balan, J. (2005). Regional and international challenges to higher education in Latin America. In H. de Witt, I. C. Jaramillo, J. Gacel-Avila, & J. Knight (Eds.), Higher education in Latin America. The international dimension (pp. 39–69). Washington, DC: World Bank. https://doi.org/siteresources.worldbank.org/INTLACREGTOPEDUCATION/Resources/Overview_of_HE_in_LAC.pdf. Retrieved June 15, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huisman, J., de Boer, H., & Goedegebuure, L. (2006). The perception of participation in executive governance structures in Dutch universities. Tertiary Education Management, 12, 227–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, R. L. (1955). Skills of an effective administrator. Harvard Business Review, 33, 33–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kogan, M., & Hanney, S. (2000). Reforming higher education. London: Jessica Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruger, J., & Dunning, D. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1121–1134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lapworth, S. (2004). Arresting decline in shared governance: Towards a flexible model for academic participation. Higher Education Quarterly, 58, 299–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazzeretti, L., & Tavoletti, E. (2006) Governance shifts in higher education: A cross-national comparison. European Educational Research Journal, 5, 18–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marginson, S., & Considine, M. (2000). The Enterprise University: Power, governance and reinvention in Australia. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meek, V. L. (2003). Governance and management of Australian higher education: Enemies within and without. In A. Amaral, V. L. Meek, & I. M. Larsen (Eds.), The Higher Education managerial revolution? (Higher Education Dynamics) (pp. 179–202). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mignot-Gérard, S. (2002). Deconstructing leadership and governance systems within universities. Paper presented at the Consortium of Higher Education Researchers 15 th Annual Conference, Vienna. https://doi.org/74.125.95.104/search?q=cache:yOhFYidziMIJ:; https://doi.org/www.iff.ac.at/hofo/CHER_2002/pdf/ch02mign.pdf+%22Mignot+G%C3%A9rard%22+%22Deconstructing+Leadership+*+ Governance%22&hl=p+-BR&ct=clnk&cd=1&gl=br. Retrieved October 14, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, V. C. (1981). Deaning. Chicago, IL: University of Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norusis, M. J. (1994). SPSS professional statistics 6.1. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, T. O., & van Fleet, D. D. (2004). The ongoing legacy of RL Katz: An updated typology of management skills. Management Decision, 42, 1297–1308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickard, M. J. (2007). The new Bloom’s taxonomy: An overview for family and consumer sciences. Journal of Family and Consumer Sciences Education, 25, 45–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, R. E., Faerman, S. R., Thompson, M. P., & McGrath, M. (2004). Competências Gerenciais. Campinas: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rich, D. (2006). Academic leadership and the restructuring of higher education. New directions for higher education, 134, 37–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosser, V. J., Johnsrud, L. K., & Heck, R. H. (2003). Academic deans and directors: Assessing their effectiveness from individual and institutional perspectives. Journal of Higher Education, 74, 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santiago, R., Carvalho, T., Amaral, A., & Meek, V. L. (2006). Changing in the middle management of higher education institutions: The case of Portugal. Higher Education, 52, 215–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarros, J. C., Gmelch, W. H., & Tanewski, G. A. (1998). The academic dean: A position in need of compass and clock. Higher Education Research & Development, 17, 65–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sundström, A. (2005). Self-assessment of knowledge and abilities: A literature study. [Monograph on the internet]. Umeâ: Department of Educational Measurement, Umeâ University [cited 2007, December 5]. 54:43. https://doi.org/www.umu.se/edmeas/publikationer/pdf/EM541.pdf Retrieved April 7, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundström, A. (2006). Beliefs about perceived competence: A literature review. [Monograph on the internet]. Umeâ: Department of Educational Measurement, Umeâ University [cited 2007, December 5]. 55:72. https://doi.org/www.umu.se/edmeas/publikationer/pdf/Em%20nr%2055.pdf Retrieved April 7, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, A., & Bryan, R. A. (1991). The academic dean: Dove, dragon, and diplomat. New York: American Council of Education and Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Twombly, S. B. (1992). The process of choosing a dean. Journal ofHigher Education, 63, 654–683.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waugh, W. L., Jr. (2003). Issues in university governance: More “professional” and less academic. ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 585, 84–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolverton, M., Montez, J., & Gmelch, W. H. (2000). The roles and challenges of deans. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Sacramento, CA [cited 2007, August 8]. https://doi.org/eric.ed.gov/ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2sql/content_storage_01/0000019b/80/16/d4/58.pdf Retrieved December 15, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolverton, M., & Poch, S. (2000). The nexus between academic deans and corporate CEOs: An opportunity in the making. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Education Research Association, New Orleans, LA [cited 2007, August 5]. https://doi.org/eric.ed.gov/ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2sql/content_storage_01/0000019b/80/16/44/7b.pdf Retrieved December 15, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolverton, M., Wolverton, M. L., & Gmelch, W. H. (1999). The impact of role conflict and ambiguity on academic deans. Journal of Higher Education, 70, 80–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Forensic Medicine and Ethics, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

    Mârcia Vieira da Motta

  2. Centro Universitârio Ibero-Americano, Brazil

    Valmor Bolan

Authors
  1. Mârcia Vieira da Motta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Valmor Bolan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mârcia Vieira da Motta.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vieira da Motta, M., Bolan, V. Academic and Managerial Skills of Academic Deans: A self-assessment perspective. Tert Educ Manag 14, 303–316 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1080/13583880802481740

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13583880802481740

Search

Navigation