Abstract
This paper examines innovations in strategic faculty hiring emphasizing interdisciplinarity at two major public research universities in the USA. The research investigated how and why the Pennsylvania State University and the University of Wisconsin-Madison chose to pursue interdisciplinary faculty recruitment, how it was structured, and how it was intended to cause changes in academic work at each university. The paper analyzes how the interdisciplinary aims of those innovations intersected with competitive pressures, resource acquisition strategies, and organizational problems. Implications are discussed in the last section.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abbott, A. (2002). The disciplines and the future. In S. Brint (Ed.), The future of the city of intellect (pp. 205–230). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Alexander, F. K. (2001). The silent crisis: The relative fiscal capacity of public universities to compete for faculty. The Review of Higher Education, 24(2), 113–129.
Alpert, D. (1985). Performance and paralysis: The organizational context of the American research university. Journal of Higher Education, 56, 241–281.
Brint, S. (2005). Creating the future: ‘New directions’ in American research universities. Minerva, 43(1), 23–50.
Brown, N. (Ed.). (1994, April 18). The future of the Life Sciences at Penn State—A report of the Life Sciences Study Group to President Joab Thomas. University Park: Pennsylvania State University.
Burgan, M. (2005). Superstars and rookies of the year: Faculty hiring practices in the postmodern age. Research & Occasional Paper Series: CSHE.10.05. Center for Studies in Higher Education, University of California at Berkeley.
Chait, R. (2002). The ‘academic revolution’ revisited. In S. Brint (Ed.), The future of the city of intellect (pp. 293–321). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Clark, B. (1984). The organizational conception. In B. Clark (Ed.), Perspectives on higher education: Eight disciplinary perspectives and comparative views (pp. 106–131). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Epton, S. R., Payne, R. L., & Pearson, A. W. (1983). Managing interdisciplinarity research. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Feller, I. (2002). New organizations, old cultures: Strategy and implementation of interdisciplinary programs. Research Evaluation, 11, 109–116.
Feller, I. (2005). Who races with whom; who is likely to win (or survive); why. Paper presented at the symposium The Future of the American Public Research University, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.
Friedman, R., & Friedman, R. C. (1982). The role of university organized research units in academic science. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University, Center for the Study of Higher Education/Center for the Study of Science Policy, Institute for Policy Research and Evaluation.
Geiger, R. L. (1990). Organized research units—Their role in the development of university research. Journal of Higher Education, 61, 1–19.
Geiger, R. L. (2004). Knowledge and money: Research universities and the paradox of the marketplace. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Gumport, P. (2002). Universities and knowledge: Restructuring the City of Intellect. In S. Brint (Ed.), The future of the city of intellect (pp. 47–81). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Ikenberry, S., & Friedman, R. (1972). Beyond academic departments: The story of institutes and centers. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Jencks, C., & Riesman, D. (1968). The academic revolution. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
June, A. W. (2008, August 15). Public colleges fight raids on faculties. Chronicle of Higher Education, p. A1.
Kerr, C. (1982). The uses of the university (3rd ed.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Klein, J. T. (1990). Interdisciplinarity: History, theory, and practice. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.
Larson, D. J. (2007, July 18). Memo to Department Heads in the Eberly College of Science Promotion and Tenure, 2007/2008.
Lattuca, L. R. (2001). Creating interdisciplinarity: Interdisciplinary research and teaching among college and university faculty. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.
Lattuca, L. (2002). Learning interdisciplinarity: Sociocultural perspectives on academic work. Journal of Higher Education, 73(6), 711–739.
Mallon, W., & Bunton, S. (2005). Characteristics of research centers and institutes at U.S. medical schools and universities. Washington, DC: Association of American Medical Colleges.
Miles, M., & Huberman, A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
National Academies. (2005). Facilitating interdisciplinary research. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Pell, E. (2004, March 2). The challenges of public research universities. Paper presented at the Research Universities Colloquium, Department of Education Policy Studies, Penn State University, PA.
Pennsylvania State University (University Futures Committee). (1993). Preserving tradition, planning for change: Report of the university future committee. University Park, PA: Author.
Pennsylvania State University. (2002). Office of the vice president for research strategic plan 2002–2005. University Park, PA: Author.
Pennsylvania State University. (2005). Office of the vice president for research strategic plan 2005–2008. University Park, PA: Author.
Pennsylvania State University. (2007, January 30). Revision of administrative guidelines for HR-23: Promotion and tenure procedures and regulations (Advisory and Consultative Report), Appendix I, Senate Committee on Faculty Affairs. University Park, PA.
Remick, F. J. (2000). Barriers to organized interdisciplinary research in a university environment. In R. Roy (Ed.), The Interdisciplinary imperative: Interactive research and education, still an elusive goal in academia (pp. 153–166). Lincoln, NE: Writers Club.
Rhoades, G. (2000). Who’s doing it right? Strategic activity in public research universities. The Review of Higher Education, 24, 41–66.
Rhoten, D. (2004). Interdisciplinary research: Trend or transition. Items & Issues, 5, 6–11.
Rogers, E. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: Free Press.
Roy, R. (2000). Interdisciplinarity in America 1949–1999. In R. Roy (Ed.), The interdisciplinary imperative: Interactive research and education, still an elusive goal in academia (pp. 209–229). Lincoln, NE: Writers Club.
Sa, C. (2008). ‘Interdisciplinary strategies’ in U.S. research universities. Higher Education, 55(5), 537–552.
Spanier, G. (1995, January 15). Inaugural address. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University, Office of the President.
Strout, E. (2007, September 10). Berkeley will receive 8113-million gift to help endow 100 faculty chairs. Chronicle of Higher Education.
University of Wisconsin-Madison. (2003). Report of the ad hoc advisory committee to evaluate the Cluster Hiring Initiative. Madison, WI: Author.
University of Wisconsin-Madison. (2007). Cluster Hiring Initiative evaluation report 2006–2007 (Draft manuscript). Madison, WI: Author.
Ward, D. (1995). A vision for the future—Priorities for UW-Madison for the next decade. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin-Madison, Office of the Chancellor.
Weingart, P. (2000). Interdisciplinarity: The paradoxical discourse. In P. Weingart & N. Stehr (Eds.), Practising interdisciplinarity (pp. 25–41). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Yin, R. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sâ, C.M. Strategic Faculty Hiring in Two Public Research Universities: Pursuing interdisciplinary connections. Tert Educ Manag 14, 285–301 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1080/13583880802481682
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13583880802481682