Skip to main content
Log in

Top Team Structures in UK Higher Education Institutions: Composition, Challenges, and Changes

  • Published:
Tertiary Education and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Higher education institutions (HEIs) worldwide have been undergoing significant levels of structural change for a number of years, ranging from minor re-alignments of roles and responsibilities to radical changes such as the creation of new roles and new models of operating. This article discusses some initial findings from a recent UK-focused research project that investigated the challenges and changes associated with the composition of “top management team” (TMT) structures in HEIs. Using the key findings from desk research and empirical investigation in a sample of UK institutions, the article identifies some of the key changes in the roles and responsibilities of the TMT, and identifies examples of good “practice” or “process’ within institutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ancona, D., & Nadler, D. (1989). Top hats and executive tales. Sloan Management Review, 31(1), 19–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bensimon, E.M., & Neumann, A. (1993). Redesigning collegiate leadership: Teams and teamwork in higher education. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmeli, A., & Schaubroeck, J. (2006). Top management team behavioural integration, decision quality and organisational decline. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(5), 441–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B. (1998). Creating entrepreneurial universities: Organizational pathways of transformation. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein, S., & Hambrick, D. (1996). Strategic leadership: Top executives and their effects on organisations. St Paul, MN: West Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gioia, D.A., & Thomas, J.B. (1996). Identity, image and issue interpretation: Sensemaking during strategic change in academia. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(3), 370–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hambrick, D.C. (1994). Top management groups: A conceptual integration and reconsideration of the ‘team’ label. In B.M. Staw & L.L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behaviour (pp. 171–214). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hambrick, D.C. (1995). Fragmentation and the other problems CEOs have with their top management teams. California Management Review, 37(3), 110–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herb, E., Leslie, K., & Price, C. (2001). Teamwork at the top. McKinsey Quarterly, 2001(2), 32–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarzabkowski, P. (2003). Strategic practices: An activity theory perspective on continuity and change. Journal of Management Studies, 40(1), 23–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarzabkowski, P., & Searle, R.H. (2004). Harnessing diversity and collective action in the top management team. Long Range Planning, 37(5), 399–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarzabkowski, P., & Wilson, D.C. (2002). Top teams and strategy in a UK university. Journal of Management Studies, 39(3), 355–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, R. (2003). Lambert review of business-university collaboration. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNay, I. (1995). From the collegial academy to corporate enterprise: The changing cultures of universities. In T. Schuller (Ed.), The changing university? (pp. 105–115). Buckingham: SRHE and Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Middlehurst, R. (2004). Changing internal governance: A discussion of leadership roles and management structures in UK universities. Higher Education Quarterly, 58(4), 258–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M.E., Lorsch, J.W., & Nohria, N. (2004). Seven surprises for new CEOs. Harvard Business Review, 82(10), 62–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shattock, M. (1970). A changing pattern of university administration. Universities Quarterly, 24(3), 310–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sloman, A. (1964). A university in the making. London: British Broadcasting Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J. (2006). ‘Big is beautiful.’ Organisational change in universities in the United Kingdom: New models of institutional management and the changing role of academic staff. Higher Education in Europe, 31(3), 251–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitchurch, C. (2004). Administrative managers—A critical link. Higher Education Quarterly, 58(4), 280–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitchurch, C. (2006). Who do they think they are? The changing identities of professional administrators and managers in UK higher education. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 28(2), 159–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiersema, M.F., & Bantel, K.A. (1992). Top management team demography and corporate strategic change. Academy of Management Journal, 35(1), 91–121.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steve Woodfield.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Woodfield, S., Kennie, T. Top Team Structures in UK Higher Education Institutions: Composition, Challenges, and Changes. Tert Educ Manag 13, 331–348 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1080/13583880701535521

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13583880701535521

Navigation