Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Need for E-Learning Strategies: Higher Education Institutions and Their Responses to a Changing Environment

  • Published:
Tertiary Education and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Integrating e-Learning in their educational delivery and support processes is one way of strategy formation higher education institutions can deploy to respond to their changing environment. In this article, the focus of such a strategy formation is on three strategic choices: traditional, face-to-face, campus-based education (back-to-basics), flexible on-campus delivery of education (stretching-the-mould) or anytime, anywhere education (worldcampus). Results of a quantitative study showed that higher education institutions with a worldcampus strategy differ from higher education institutions with a back-to-basics strategy because they have a stronger focus on ‘increasing access,’ ‘offering logistic flexibility,’ and ‘use of ICT for income generation.’ By doing so, these higher education institutions aim to respond to an environment that is becoming increasingly market-oriented and competitive.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Asplund, G., & Asplund, G. (1982). An integrated development strategy. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates, T. (1997). Restructuring the university for technological change. Paper presented to The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, What Kind of University, London, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates, T. (2000). Managing technological change. Strategies for college and university leaders. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boezerooij, P. (2006). E-Leaming strategies of higher education institutions: An exploratory study into the influence of environmental contingencies on strategic choices of higher education institutions with respect to integrating e-leaming in their educational delivery and support processes. Enschede, The Netherlands: CHEPS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boezerooy, P., Cordewener, B., & Liebrand, W. (2007). Strategic advantages of collaboration on ICT in Dutch higher education; the SURF approach. Educause Review, 42(3), 66–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chevaillier, T. (2002). University governance and finance: The impact of changes in resource allocation on decision making structures. In A. Amaral, G.A. Jones & B. Karseth (Eds.), Governing higher education: National perspectives on institutional governance. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B.R. (1998). Creating entrepreneurial universities: Organisational pathways of transformation. Oxford: IAU Press by Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collis, B.A., & Gommer, E.M. (2001). Stretching the mold, or a new economy? Scenarios for the university in 2005. Educational Technology, 41(3), 5–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collis, B.A., & Moonen, J. (2001). Flexible learning in a digital world: Experiences and expectations. London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collis, B.A., & van der Wende, M.C. (Eds.). (2002). Models of technology and change in higher education. An international comparative survey on the current and future use of ICT in Higher Education. Enschede, The Netherlands: University of Twente.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, J.A. (2005). All globalization is local: Countervailing forces and the influence on higher education markets. Paper CSHE. Berkely, eScholarship Repository, University of California. Retrieved April, 2005, from https://doi.org/repositories.cdlib.org/cshe/CSHE-l-05/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckel, P.D., Couturier, L., & Luu, D.T. (2005). Peering around the bend: The leadership challenges of privatization, accountability, and market-based state policy. Washington DC: American Council of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisser, P. (2001). Using information and communication technology. A process of change in higher education. Enschede, The Netherlands: Twente University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M. (1991). The new meaning of educational change. New York: Instructors College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, M. (2001). Modern university governance—a national perspective. Paper presented at the Conference on the Idea of the University: Enterprise or Academy? The Australian Institute and Manning Clark House, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, N. (2003). Learning technology in higher education in the UK: Trends, drivers and strategies. In M.C. van der Wende & M. van der Ven (Eds.), The use of ICT in higher education; A mirror of Europe. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Lemma.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meek, V.L. (2002). On the road to mediocrity? Governance and management of Australian higher education in the market place. In A. Amaral, G.A. Jones, & B. Karseth (Eds.), Governing higher education: National perspectives on institutional governance. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Middlehurst, R. (2003). Cooperation, competition and ICT: Challenges and choices for higher education institutions. In M.C. van der Wende & M. van der Ven (Eds.), The use of ICT in higher education; A mirror of Europe (pp. 253–275). Utrecht, The Netherlands: Lemma.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. (1983). The professional bureaucracy. In H. Mintzberg (Ed.), Structure in fives. Designing effective organisations (pp. 189–213). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B., & Lampel, J. (1998). Strategy safari. A guided tour through the wilds of strategic management. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oblinger, D.G., & Hawkins, B.L. (2005). The myth about E-learning. Educause Review, 40(4), 14–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2005). E-learning in tertiary education, where do we stand? Paris: OECD.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Onderwijsraad (2005). Bijdragen van onderwijs aan het Nederlandse Innovatiesysteem; Een advies. [Comments from higher education to the Dutch Innovation system; an advice] Den Haag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, M.W., & Dill, D.D. (1997). Understanding the competitive environment of the postsec-ondary knowledge industry. In M.W. Peterson, D.D. Dill, L.A. Mets & Associates (Eds.), Planning and management for a changing environment. A handbook on redesigning postsecondary institutions. San Francisco: Jossey Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C.K., & Hamel, G. (1994). Strategy as a field of study: why search for a new paradigm? Strategic Management Journal, 15, 5–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. (2005). From flowers to palms: 40 years of policy for online learning. ALT-J, Research in Learning Technology, 13(2), 93–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sporn, B. (1999). Adaptive university structures. An analysis of adaptation to socio-economic environments of US and European Universities. London: Jessica Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoner, J.A.F., & Freeman, R.E. (1989). Management, 4th edition. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suhre, C., & Janssen, E. (forthcoming). Internationalisation of Dutch higher education. Utrecht, The Netherlands: SURFfoundation.

  • SURFfoundation (2006). SURF strategic plan. Thinking ahead. Utrecht, The Netherlands: SURFfoundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J., & Miroiu, A. (2002). Policy-making: strategic planning and management of higher education. Bucharest: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Wende, M., & van der Ven, M. (Eds.). (2003). The use of ICT in higher education; A mirror of Europe. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Lemma.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D. (2000). Managing strategy. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wills, S., & Yetton, P. (1997). Strategy and information technology. In P. Yetton (Ed.), Managing the introduction of technology in the delivery and administration of higher education. Canberra: Evaluations and Investigations Programme, DEST.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zemsky, R., & Massy, W.F. (2004). Thwarted innovation, what happened to e-leaming and why, A final report for the Weather station Project of the Learning Alliance at the University of Pennsylvania in cooperation with the Thomson Corporation, PA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Petra Boezerooij.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Boezerooij, P., van der Wende, M. & Huisman, J. The Need for E-Learning Strategies: Higher Education Institutions and Their Responses to a Changing Environment. Tert Educ Manag 13, 313–330 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1080/13583880701535471

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13583880701535471

Navigation