Is contemplation a separate stage of change to precontemplation?
- 184 Downloads
Background: Fundamental to a stage-based model of health behavior change is the assumption that there is non-linearity (or discontinuity) in the relationship between predictors and outcomes across stage boundaries. There is, however, little evidence to suggest the stages of the transtheoretical model (TTM) meet this assumption. Purpose: The aim of this study was to extend previous work on discontinuity in prediction to the TTM stage boundary between precontemplation and contemplation, and to test the homogeneity of the contemplation stage of change. Method: Repeated measures design with telephone surveys conducted two weeks apart. Participants were 708 randomly selected smokers, aged 18-40 years, in the precontemplation and contemplation stages of change. Results: An initial test of the stage boundary between precontemplation and contemplation revealed greater predictive power of a multivariate model in the precontemplation stage. Some evidence of discontinuity in prediction was found within the contemplation stage, between those “open to the possibility” of quitting and those “actually thinking about it.” The discontinuity at the TTM boundary was reduced following the exclusion of precontemplators not interested in quitting and when those thinking about quitting within contemplation were also excluded. Conclusion: The stage boundary between precontemplation and contemplation was not strongly supported, and there was weak evidence of a discontinuity within contemplation. The findings question the utility of the current operationalization of the TTM stage boundary.
Key wordssmoking cessation transtheoretical model stages of change precontemplation contemplation
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Borland, R., Yong, H.-H., King, B., Cummings, K. M., Fong, G. T., Elton, T. E., et al. (2004). Use of and beliefs about ‘light’ cigarettes in four countries: Findings from the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Survey. Nicotine and Tobacco Research, 6(Suppl. 3), S311-S321.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- DiClemente, C. C., Prochaska, J. O., Fairhurst, S. K., Velicer, W. F., Velasquez, M. M., & Rossi, J. S. (1991). The process of smoking cessation: An analysis of precontemplation, contemplation and preparation stages of change. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 295–304.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Menard, S. (1995). Applied logistic regression analysis (Sage University paper series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, series No. 07-106). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Segan, C. J., Borland, R., & Greenwood, K. M. (2006). Do trans-theoretical model measures predict forward stage transitions in smoking cessation? Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
- Sutton, S. (1996). Can ’stages of change’ provide guidance in the treatment of addictions? A critical examination of Prochaska and DiClemente’s model. In G. Edwards & C. Dare (Eds.), Psychotherapy, psychological treatments, and the addictions (pp. 189–205). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar