Advertisement

Journal of Statistical Theory and Practice

, Volume 12, Issue 1, pp 136–150 | Cite as

On the optimality of blocked main effects plans with even number of runs

  • Rita SahaRay
  • Ganesh Dutta
Article
  • 1 Downloads

Abstract

In this article, experimental situations are considered where a main effects plan is to be used to study m two-level factors using n runs, n≡2 (mod 4), which are partitioned into b blocks, with the ith block having size ki, where \(\sum _{i = 1}^b{k_i} = n\) and kis are not necessarily equal. Assuming the block sizes to be even for all blocks, optimal designs are identified with respect to type 1 optimality criteria in the class of designs providing estimation of all main effects orthogonal to the block effects. In practice, such orthogonal estimation of main effects is often a desirable condition. In some wider classes of m two-level blocked main effects plans, where the block sizes can be even or odd, D- and Ε-optimal designs are also characterized. Simple construction methods for these optimal designs, based on Hadamard matrices, Pn matrices, and Kronecker product, are also presented.

Keywords

Design matrix Hadamard matrix Kronecker product type 1 criteria 

AMS Subject Classification

62K05 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bose, Μ., and S. Bagchi. 2007. Optimal main effect plans in blocks of small size. Statistics & Probability Letters 77:142–47. doi:10.1016/j.spl.2006.06.011.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cheng, C. S. 1980. Optimality of some weighing and 2” fractional factorial designs. Annals of Statistics 8:436–46. doi:10.1214/aos/l 176344963.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Das, Α., and A. Dey. 2004. Optimal main effect plans with nonorthogonal blocks. Sankhyā 66:378–84.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Dutta, G., and R. SahaRay. 2015. D- and E- optimal blocked main effects plans with unequal block sizes when n is odd. Statistics & Probability Letters 107:37–43.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Jacroux, M. 2008. A note on the construction of optimal main effects plans in blocks of size two. Statistics & Probability Letters 78:2366–70. doi:10.1016/j.spl.2008.02.014.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Jacroux, M. 2011a. On the D-optimality of orthogonal and nonorthogonal blocked main effects plans. Statistics & Probability Letters 81:116–20. doi:10.1016/j.spl.2010.09.026.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Jacroux, M. 2011b. On the D-optimality of nonorthogonal blocked main effects plans. Sankhyā B 73:62–69. doi:10.1007/sl3571-011-0023-y.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jacroux, M. 2013. A note on the optimality of 2-level main effects plans in blocks of odd size. Statistics & Probability Letters 83:1163–66. doi:10.1016/j.spl.2013.01.005.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jacroux, M., and Κ. Β. Dichone. 2014. On the E-optimality of blocked main effects plans when n≡3 (mod 4). Statistics & Probability Letters 87:143–48. doi:10.1016/j.spl.2014.01.005.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jacroux, M., and Κ. Β. Dichone. 2015. On the E-optimality of blocked main effects plans when n≡2 (mod 4). Sankhyā Β 77:165–74. doi:10.1007/sl3571-014-0090-y.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. Jacroux, M., C. S. Wang, and J. C. Masaro. 1983. On the optimality of chemical balance weighing designs. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 8:231–40. doi:10.1016/0378-3758(83)90041-l.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Liski, E. P., N. K. Mandai, Κ. R. Shah, and Β. Κ. Sinha. 2002. Topics in optimal design. Lecture notes in statistics, Vol. 163. New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mead, R. 1988. The design of experiments: Statistical principles for practical application. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Mukerjee, R., A. Dey, and K. Chatterjee. 2002. Optimal main effects plans with non orthogonal blocking. Biometrika 89 (1):225–29. doi:10.1093/biomet/89.1.225.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Pearce, S. C. 1964. Experimenting with blocks of natural size. Biometrics 20:699–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Raghavarao, D. 1962. Symmetrical unequal block arrangements with two unequal block sizes. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 33:620–623.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Raghavarao, D. 1971. Constructions and combinatorial problems in design of experiments. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. Wojtas, M. 1964. On Hadamard’s inequality for the determinants of order non-divisible by 4. Colloquium Mathematicum 12:73–83. doi:10.4064/cm-12-l-73-83.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Grace Scientific Publishing, 20 Middlefield Ct, Greensboro, NC 27455 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Applied Statistics DivisionIndian Statistical InstituteKolkataIndia
  2. 2.Basanti Devi CollegeKolkataIndia

Personalised recommendations