Advertisement

Journal of Statistical Theory and Practice

, Volume 11, Issue 4, pp 531–552 | Cite as

Beyond Q—Q plots: Some new graphical tools for the assessment of distributional assumptions and the tail behavior of the data

Article

Abstract

We introduce some new approaches for the graphical assessment of distribution of the data that supplement the existing graphical methods. Analogous to Q–Q plots and P–P plots, we introduce plots based on arc length and area of surface of revolution of the density function. Thus, our method indirectly makes use not only of density assumed but also of the derivatives thereof. We illustrate, by using several examples, that these plots help us identify the correct distribution and also rule out the incorrect possibilities. We further consider the problem of assessing the behavior of the data toward the tail and develop graphical tools to identify the closest potential probability distribution for the tail. Examples based on real data are provided.

Keywords

Andrews plot arc length area of surface of revolution geometric curvature graphical testing Khattree–Naik curves tail behavior 

AMS Subject Classification

62-09 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andrews, D. F. 1972. Plots of high dimensional data. Biometrics 28:125–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bourne, M. 2014. Applications of differentiation. https://doi.org/www.intmath.com.
  3. Khattree, R., and D. N. Naik. 1999. Applied multivariate statistics with SAS software, 2nd. Cary, NC: SAS Institute. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  4. Khattree, R., and D. N. Naik. 2000. Multivariate data reduction and discrimination with SAS software. Cary, NC: SAS Institute. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  5. Khattree, R., and D. N. Naik. 2002a. Andrews plots for mutivariate data: some new suggestions and applications. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 100:411–25.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Khattree, R., and D. N. Naik. 2002b. Association in contingency tables, correspondence analysis, and (modified) Andrews plots. In Goodness-of-fit tests and model validity, ed. C. Huber-Carol, N. Balakrishnan, M. S. Nikulin, and M. Meshah, 311–26. Boston, MA: Birkhäuser.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Myslivec, J. 2014. R documentation – andrews{andrews}. https://doi.org/cran.r-project.org/web/packages/andrews.
  8. Stewart, J. 2006. Calculus, early transcendentals, 6th ed. Belmont, CA: Thomson Books/Cole.Google Scholar
  9. TC2000 software. 2010. TC2000 software. Version 7. https://doi.org/www.tc2000.com.

Copyright information

© Grace Scientific Publishing, 20 Middlefield Ct, Greensboro, NC 27455 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mathematics and StatisticsOakland UniversityRochesterUSA
  2. 2.Statistical Sciences and ProgrammingAllerganIrvineUSA

Personalised recommendations