Advertisement

Journal of Statistical Theory and Practice

, Volume 9, Issue 3, pp 463–478 | Cite as

Three Categories of Minimum Cost Systematic Full 2n Factorial Designs

Article

Abstract

Full 2n factorial experiments are often conducted sequentially run after run. A full 2n factorial experiment has a total of 2n! permutations among its 2n runs but not all of these 2n! permutations produce runs sequences with good statistical properties. In fact, the standard runs order is not economic (requiring a large number of factor level changes between runs), and does not produce time-trend-resistant main effects. Four main algorithms exist for sequencing runs of the full 2n factorial experiment such that: (1) main effects and/or two-factor interactions are orthogonal to the linear/quadratic time trend and/or (2) the number of factor level changes between runs (i.e., cost) is minimal = (2n − 1) or minimum. This article proposes, through using the generalized foldover scheme and the interactions-main effects assignment, three categories of systematic full 2n factorial designs where main effects and/or two-factor interactions are linear/quadratic trend free and where the number of factor level changes is minimal (i.e., (2n − 1)) or less than that of existing algorithms. These three categories are called (i) minimal-cost full 2n factorial designs, (ii) minimum-cost linear-trend-free full 2n factorial designs, and (iii) minimum-cost linear and quadratic-trend-free full 2n factorial designs. A comparison with existing systematic full 2n factorial designs reveals that the proposed systematic 2n designs compete well regarding minimization of the number of factor level changes (i.e., cost) or regarding protection of main effects and/or two-factor interactions against the linear/quadratic time trend.

Keywords

Sequential factorial experimentation Time-trend-free run orders Number of factor level changes and the experimental cost Runs sequencing algorithms Interactions-main effects assignment Generalized foldover scheme 

AMS Subject Classification

62K15 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cheng, C. S., and M. Jacroux. 1988. The construction of trend-free run orders of two-level factorial designs. J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 83, 1152–1158.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cheng, C. S., and D. M. Steinburg. 1991. Trend robust two-level factorial designs. Biometrika, 78(2), 325–336.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Correa, A. A., P. Grima, and X. Tort-Martorell. 2009. Experimentation order with good properties for 2k factorial designs. J. Appl. Stat., 36(7), 743–754.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Coster, D. C., and C. S. Cheng. 1988. Minimum cost trend-free run orders of fractional factorial designs. Ann. Stat., 16, 1188–1205.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cox, D. R. 1951. Some systematic experimental design. Biometrika, 38, 312–323.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cui, X., and P. W. John. 1998. Time trend free run orders with minimum level changes. Commun. Stat. Theory Methods, 27, 55–68.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Daniel, C., and F. Wilcoxon. 1966. Factorial 2p−q plans robust against linear and quadratic effects. Technometrics, 8, 259–278.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. Dickinson, A. W. 1974. Some run orders requiring a minimum number of factor level changes for the 24 and 25 main effect plans. Technometrics, 16, 31–37.MATHGoogle Scholar
  9. Draper, N. R., and D. M. Stoneman. 1968. Factor level changes and linear trends in eight-run two-level factorial designs. Technometrics, 10, 301–311.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hilow, H. M. 2013. Comparison among run order algorithms for sequential factorial experiments. J. Comput. Stat. Data Anal., 58, 397–406.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Joiner, B. L., and C. Campbell. 1976. Designing experiments when run order is important. Technometrics, 18, 249–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Martin, R. J., G. Jones, and J. A. Eccleston. 1998. Eight-run two-level factorial designs under dependence. Metrika, 48, 127–139.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mee, R. W., and A. V. Romanova. 2010. Constructing and analyzing two-level trend robust designs. Qual. Eng., 22, 306–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Olguin, J., and T. Fearn. 1997. A new look at half-normal plots for assessing the significance of contrasts for unreplicated factorials. Appl. Stat., 46(4), 449–462.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Grace Scientific Publishing 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Mathematics DepartmentThe University of JordanAmman, JubiehaJordan

Personalised recommendations