Skip to main content
Log in

Identification of Dispersion Effects in Replicated Two-Level Fractional Factorial Experiments

  • Published:
Journal of Statistical Theory and Practice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Tests for dispersion effects in replicated two-level factorial experiments assuming a location-dispersion model are presented. The tests use individual measures of dispersion that remove the location effects and also provide an estimate of pure error. Empirical critical values for two such tests are given for two-level full or regular fractional factorial designs with 8, 16, 32, and 64 runs. The powers of the tests are examined under normal, exponential, and Cauchy distributed errors. Our recommended test uses dispersion measures calculated as deviations of the data values from their cell medians, and this test is illustrated via an example.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aitkin, M. (1987). Modelling variance heterogeneity in normal regression using GLIM. Appl. Stat., 36, 332–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ankenman, B. E., and A. M. Dean. 2003. Quality improvement and robustness via design of experiments. In Handbook of statistics, ed. C. R. Rao, and R. Khattree, vol. 22, 263–317. Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, M. S., and D. G. Kendall. 1946. The statistical analysis of variance-heterogeneity and the logarithmic transformation. Suppl. J. R. Stat. Soc., 8, 128–138.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Bergman, B., and A. Hynén. 1997. Dispersion effects from unreplicated designs in the 2kp series. Technometrics, 39, 191–198.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Box, G. E., and R. D. Meyer. 1986. Dispersion effects from fractional designs. Technometrics, 28, 19–27.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Box, G. E. P. 1988. Signal-to-noise ratios, performance criteria, and transformations. Technometrics, 30, 1–17.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Box, G. E. P., W. G. Hunter. and J. S. Hunter. 1978. Statistics for experimenters: An introduction to design, data analysis, and model building. New York, NY, John Wiley & Sons.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Brenneman, W. A., and V. N. Nair. 2001. Methods for identifying dispersion effects in unreplicated factorial experiments. Technometrics, 43, 388–405.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M., and A. Forsythe. 1974. Robust tests for the equality of variances. J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 69, 364–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bursztyn, D., and D. M. Steinberg. 2006. Screening experiments for dispersion effects. In Screening: Methods for experimentation in industry, drug discovery, and genetics, ed. A. M. Dean and S. M. Lewis. 21–47. New York, NY: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, R. D., and S. Weisberg. 1983. Diagnostics for heteroscedasticity in regression. Biometrika, 70, 1–10.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Dean, A., and D. Voss. 1999. Design and analysis of experiments. New York, NY, Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dingus, C. A. V. 2005. Designs and methods for the identification of active location and dispersion effects. Ph.D. thesis, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haaland, P., and M. O’Connell. 1995. Inference for effect-saturated fractional fatorials. Technometrics, 37, 82–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, A. C. 1976. Estimating regression models with multiplicative heteroscedasticity. Econometrica, 44, 461–465.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lenth, R. V. 1989. Quick and easy analysis of unreplicated factorials. Technometrics, 31, 469–473.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Levene, H. 1960. Robust tests for equality of variances. In Contributions to probability and statistics: Essays in honor of Harold Hotelling, ed. I. Olkin, S. G. Ghurye, W. Hoeffding, W. G. Madow, and H. B. Mann, Stanford, CA, Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackertich, N. A., J. C. Benneyan, and P. D. Kraus. 2003. Alternate dispersion measures in replicated factorial experiments. Unpublished manuscript. http://www1.coe.neu.edu/∼benneyan/papers/doe_dispersion.pdf

  • McGrath, R. N., and D. K. J. Lin. 2001a. Confounding of location and dispersion effects in unreplicated fractional factorials. J. Quality Technol, 33, 129–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, R. N., and D. K. J. Lin. 2001b. Testing multiple dispersion effects in unreplicated two-level fractional factorial designs. Technometrics, 43, 406–414.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, A. 2005. The analysis of unreplicated factorial experiments using all possible comparisons. Technometrics, 47, 51–63.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, D. C. 2009. Design and analysis of experiments. 7th ed. New York, NY, John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nair, V. J., and D. Pregibon. 1988. Analyzing dispersion effects from replicated factorial experiments. Technometrics, 30, 247–257.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Pan, G. 1999. The impact of unidentified location effects on dispersion—effects identification from unreplicated designs. Technometrics, 41, 313–326.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Pignatiello, J. J., and J. S. Ramberg. 1985. Discussion of “Off-line Quality Control, Parameter Design, and the Taguschi Method” by R.N. Kackar. J. Quality Technol., 17, 198–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pignatiello, J. J., and J. S. Ramberg. 1987. Comments on “Performance Measures Independent of Adjustment: An Explanation and Extension of Taguchi’s Signal-to-noise Ratios.” Technometrics, 29, 274–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verbyla, A. P. 1993. Modelling variance heterogeneity: residual maximum likelihood and diagnostics. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B, 55, 493–508.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, P. C. 1989. Tests for dispersion effects from orthogonal arrays. Comput. Stat. Data Anal., 8, 109–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, D. A., A. M. Dean, M. D. Wiers, and B. A. Hartlaub. 1992. Nonparametric rank based main effects test procedures for the two-way layout in the presence of interaction. J. Nonparametric Stat., 1, 241–252.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfinger, R. D., and R. D. Tobias. 1998. Joint estimation of location, dispersion, and random effects in robust design. Technometrics, 40, 62–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, C. F. J., and M. Hamada. 2000. Experiments: Planning, analysis, and parameter design optimization. New York, NY, John Wiley & Sons.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Angela Dean.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dingus, C., Ankenman, B., Dean, A. et al. Identification of Dispersion Effects in Replicated Two-Level Fractional Factorial Experiments. J Stat Theory Pract 7, 687–702 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/15598608.2013.781851

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15598608.2013.781851

Keywords

Navigation