Advertisement

Journal of Statistical Theory and Practice

, Volume 6, Issue 3, pp 443–451 | Cite as

Nonparametric Regression When Estimating the Probability of Success: A Comparison of Four Extant Estimators

  • Rand R. Wilcox
Article

Abstract

For the random variables Y, X1,..., Xp, where Y is binary, let M(x1,..., xp) = P(Y = 1

(X1,... Xp) = (x1,... xp)). The article compares four smoothers aimed at estimating M(x1,...,xp), three of which can be used when p > 1. Evidently there are no published comparisons of smoothers when p > 1 and Y is binary. One of the estimators stems from Hosmer and Lemeshow (1989, 85), which is limited to p = 1. A simple modification of this estimator (called method E3 here) is proposed that can be used when p > 1. Roughly, a weighted mean of the Y values is used, where the weights are based on a robust analog of Mahalanobis distance that replaces the usual covariance matrix with the minimum volume estimator. Another estimator stems from Signorini and Jones (1984) and is based in part on an estimate of the probability density function of X1,..., Xp. Here, an adaptive kernel density estimator is used. No estimator dominated in terms of mean squared error and bias. And for p = 1, the differences among three of the estimators, in terms of mean squared error and bias, are not particularly striking. But for p > 1, differences among the estimators are magnified, with method E3 performing relatively well. An estimator based on the running interval smoother performs about as well as E3, but for general use, E3 is found to be preferable. The estimator studied by Signorini and Jones (1984) is not recommended, particularly when p > 1.

AMS Subject Classification

62G08 62G05 

Keywords

Kernel estimators Logistic regression Smoothers 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cleveland, W. S. 1979. Robust locally weighted regression and smoothing scatterplots. J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 74, 829–836.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Efromovich, S. 1999. Nonparametric curve estimation: Methods, theory and applications. NewYork, Springer-Verlag.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Eubank, R. L. 1999. Nonparametric regression and spline smoothing. New York, Marcel Dekker.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Fan, J. 1993. Local linear smoothers and their minimax efficiencies. Ann. Stat., 21, 196–216.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fan, J., and I. Gijbels. 1996. Local polynomial modeling and its applications. Boca Raton, FL, CRC Press.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. Fox, J. 2001. Multiple and generalized nonparametric regression. Thousands Oaks, CA, Sage.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Green, P. J., and B. W. Silverman. 1993. Nonparametric regression and generalized linear models: A roughness penalty approach. Boca Raton, FL, CRC Press.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. Györfi, L., M. Kohler, A. Krzyzk, and H. Walk. 2002. A distribution-free theory of nonparametric regression. New York, Springer Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Härdle, W. 1990. Applied nonparametric regression. Econometric Society Monographs No. 19. Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hastie, T. J., and R. J. Tibshirani. 1990. Generalized additive models. New York, Chapman and Hall.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. Hoaglin, D. C. 1985. Summarizing shape numerically: The g-and-h distributions. In Exploring data tables, trends, and shapes, ed. D. Hoaglin, F. Mosteller, and J. Tukey, 461–515. New York, Wiley.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. Hosmer, D. W., and S. Lemeshow. 1989. Applied logistic regression. New York, Wiley.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. Kay, R. and S. Little. 1987. Transformation of the explanatory variables in the logistic regression model for binary data. Biometrika, 74, 495–501.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Rousseeuw, P. J., and A. M. Leroy. 1987. Robust regression & outlier detection. New York, Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Signorini, D. F., and M. C. Jones. 2004. Kernel estimators for univariate binary regression. J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 99, 119–126.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Silverman, B. W. 1986. Density estimation for statistics and data analysis. New York, Chapman and Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Wilcox, R. R. 2005. Introduction to robust estimation and hypothesis testing, 2nd ed. San Diego, CA, Academic Press.zbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Grace Scientific Publishing 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations