Advertisement

Journal of Statistical Theory and Practice

, Volume 3, Issue 3, pp 627–643 | Cite as

Asymptotic Power of CvM Statistics for Exponentiality Against Weibull and Gamma Alternatives

  • Michael A. StephensEmail author
Article
  • 1 Downloads

Abstract

Cramér-von Mises (CvM) tests for the exponential distribution are discussed, particularly when the scale parameter must be estimated from the given sample. The methods used in the paper are based on components of the statistics; this leads to a matrix formulation discretizing previous analytic techniques. Some comparisons are made between the two methods. Plots are given of the eigenfunctions which arise in the analysis. Plots are also given of asymptotic powers of the tests statistics against local Weibull and Gamma alternatives; these show the Anderson-Darling statistic to be the most powerful. The power of the best component is found, and shown to be comparable to the Likelihood Ratio statistic and greater than that of the entire statistic. Some connections with Neyman smooth tests are pointed out.

Key-words

Components EDF statistics Goodness-of-fit Optimum component tests 

AMS Subject Classification

62G10 62G20 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, T.W., Darling, D.A., 1952. Asymptotic theory of certain goodness of fit criteria based on stochastic processes. Ann. Math. Statist. 23, 193–212.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Darling, D.A., 1955. The Cramér-Smirnov test in the parametric case. Ann. Math. Statist. 26, 1–20.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Durbin, J., 1973. Weak convergence of the sample distribution function when parameters are estimated. Ann. Statist. 1, 279–290.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Durbin, J., Knott, M., 1972. Components of Cramér-von Mises statistics, I. J. R. Statist. Soc. B 34, 290–307.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. Durbin, J., Knott, M., Taylor, C.C., 1975. Components of Cramér-von Mises statistics, II. J. R. Statist. Soc. B 37, 216–237. Corrigendum, 39, 394 (1977).zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. Johnson, N.L., Kotz, S., 1970. Distributions in Statistics. Volume 1: Continuous Univariate Distributions. Houghton Mifflin, Boston.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Lockhart, R.A., Stephens, M.A., 2008. On Two Groups of Tests for Exponentiality with Similar Powers. Unpublished Research Report.Google Scholar
  8. Rayner, J.C.W., Best, D.J., 1989. Smooth Tests of Goodness-of-Fit. Oxford University Press, New York.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. Rayner, J.C.W., Best, D.J., 1990. Smooth Tests of Goodness of Fit: An Overview. International Statistical Review, 58 (1), 9–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Stephens, M.A., 1974. Components of goodness-of-fit statistics. Annals de l’Institut Henri Poincaré, Ser. B 10, 37–54.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. Stephens, M.A., 1976. Asymptotic results for goodness-of-fit statistics with unknown parameters. Ann. Statist. 4, 357–369.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Stephens, M.A., 1986. Tests for the Exponential Distribution. Chap. 10 in Goodness-of-Fit techniques, d’Agostino, R.B., Stephens, M.A. (editors). Marcel Dekker, New York.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. Sukhatme, S., 1972. Fredholm determinant of a positive definite kernel of a special type and its application, Ann. Math. Statist. 43, 1914–1926.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Watson, G.S., 1967. Some problems in the statistics of directions. Bulletin of the Int. Statist. Inst. Conf., 36th Session.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Grace Scientific Publishing 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Statistics and Actuarial SciencesSimon Fraser UniversityBurnabyCanada

Personalised recommendations