Advertisement

Journal of Statistical Theory and Practice

, Volume 1, Issue 3–4, pp 347–356 | Cite as

On Some Results of C. Radhakrishna Rao Applicable to the Analysis of Multi-Environment Variety Trials

Article

Abstract

The analysis of results of a series of experiments repeated at several environments with the same set of plant varieties (genotypes) is usually based on a mixed effects model. Because of possible different responses of the varieties to variable environmental conditions, the standard mixed model for that analysis becomes questionable. Therefore, a more general mixed model is to be considered. However, in its most general form it involves usually a large number of variance and covariance components to be estimated. This causes computational problems, even when using advanced algorithms, unless some simplifying structures are imposed on the general covariance matrix. It has appeared, that these problems can be avoided when adopting a classic method proposed by Rao (1972). This method has been explored recently by Calinski, Czajka, Kaczmarek, Krajewski, and Pilarczyk (2005). The purpose of the present paper is to show the use of that and some other theoretical results of C. Radhakrishna Rao in detail.

AMS Subject Classification

62F10 and 62K10 

Keywords

General mixed effects model Generalized lattice design Series of experiments Variance-covariance components estimation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Caliński, T., Czajka, S., Kaczmarek, Z., Krajewski, P., Pilarczyk, W., 2005. Analyzing multi-environment variety trials using randomization-derived mixed models. Biometrics, 61, 448–455.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Demidenko, E., 2004. Mixed Models: Theory and Applications. Wiley, Hoboken, New Jersey.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Denis, J.-B., Piepho, H.-P., van Eeuwijk, F. A., 1997. Modelling expectation and variance for genotype by environment data. Heredity, 79, 162–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gilmour, A. R., Thompson, R., Cullis, B. R., 1995. Average information REML: An efficient algorithm for variance parameter estimation in linear mixed models. Biometrics, 51, 1440–1450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gogel, B. J., Cullis, B. R., Verbyla, A. P., 1995. REML estimation of multiplicative effects in multi-environment variety trials. Biometrics, 51, 744–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Nair, K. R., 1944. The recovery of inter-block information in incomplete block designs. Sankhyā, 6, 383–390.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Nelder, J. A., 1954. The interpretation of negative components of variance. Biometrika, 41, 544–548.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Nelder, J. A., 1965. The analysis of randomized experiments with orthogonal block structure. Proceedings of the Royal Society, Series A, 283, 147–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Nelder, J. A., 1968. The combination of information in generally balanced designs. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 30, 303–311.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Patterson, H. D., Silvey, V., 1980. Statutory and recommended list trials of crop varieties in the United Kingdom (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 143, 219–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Patterson, H. D., Thompson, R., 1975. Maximum likelihood estimation of components of variance. In Corsten, L. C. A. and Postelnicu, T. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th International Biometric Conference, 197–207. Editura Academiei, Bucureşti.Google Scholar
  12. Patterson, H. D., Williams, E. R., 1976. A new class of resolvable incomplete block designs. Biometrika, 63, 83–92.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Rao, C. R., 1947. General methods of analysis for incomplete block designs. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 42, 541–561.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Rao, C. R., 1956. On the recovery of inter-block information in varietal trials. Sankhyā, 17, 105–114.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. Rao, C. R., 1959. Expected values of mean squares in the analysis of incomplete block experiments and some comments based on them. Sankhyā, 21, 327–336.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. Rao, C. R., 1970. Estimation of heteroscedastic variances in linear models. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 65, 161–172.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rao, C. R., 1971. Estimation of variance and covariance components—MINQUE theory. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 1, 257–275.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rao, C. R., 1972. Estimation of variance and covariance components in linear models. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 67, 112–115.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rao, C. R., 1973. Representations of best linear unbiased estimators in the Gauss-Markoff model with a singular dispersion matrix. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 3, 276–292.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rao, C. R., 1979. MINQUE theory and its relation to ML and MML estimation of variance components. Sankhyā, Series B, 41, 138–153.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. Rao, C.R. and Kleffe, J., 1988. Estimation of Variance Components and Applications. North-Holland, Amsterdam.MATHGoogle Scholar
  22. Rao, C.R. and Toutenburg, H., 1999. Linear Models: Least Squares and Alternatives. Springer, New York.MATHGoogle Scholar
  23. Smith, A., Cullis, B., Gilmour, A., 2001a. The analysis of crop variety evaluation data in Australia. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Statistics, 43, 129–145.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Smith, A., Cullis, B., Thompson, R., 2001b. Analyzing variety by environment data using multiplicative mixed models and adjustments for spatial field trend. Biometrics, 57, 1138–1147.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. White, R. F., 1975. Randomization in the analysis of variance. Biometrics, 31, 555–571.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Yates, F., 1936a. Incomplete randomized blocks. Annals of Eugenics, 7, 121–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Yates, F., 1936b. A new method of arranging variety trials involving a large number of varieties. Journal of Agricultural Science, 26, 424–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Yates, F., 1939. The recovery of inter-block information in variety trials arranged in three-dimensional lattices. Annals of Eugenics, 9, 136–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Yates, F., 1940a. Lattice squares. Journal of Agricultural Science, 30, 672–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Yates, F., 1940b. The recovery of inter-block information in balanced incomplete block designs. Annals of Eugenics, 10, 317–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Yates, F., Cochran, W. G., 1938. The analysis of groups of experiments. Journal of Agricultural Science, 28, 556–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Grace Scientific Publishing 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mathematical and Statistical MethodsAugust Cieszkowski Agricultural University of PoznańPoland

Personalised recommendations