Advertisement

Journal of Statistical Theory and Practice

, Volume 1, Issue 2, pp 253–264 | Cite as

Sample Size Re-Estimation: Nonparametric Approach

  • Z. Govindarajulu
Article

Abstract

A question of importance that arises in clinical trials pertains to the number of additional observations, if any, that are required beyond those initially planned. This has been answered in the case of two-treatment double blind clinical experiment via a nonparametric approach in which the mean and the variance of the underlying populations are not functionally related. In this paper, a totally nonparametric approach is taken. We will be interested in testing the equality of two treatment effects against the alternative that one effect is stochastically larger than the other. Using Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon test criterion, the robustness of the sample size in terms of the level of significance and power of a specified nonparametric alternative is established. This procedure is applied to the data pertaining to blood cholesterol levels in samples drawn from two different age groups.

AMS Subject Classification

62G10 

Keywords

Robustness Clinical trials Double-blind experiment Sample size re-estimation Arbitrary populations 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anscombe, F.J., 1952. Large sample theory of sequential estimation, Proceedings of Cambridge Philosophical Society, 48, 600–607.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Dixon, W., Massey, F., 1969. Introduction to Statistical Analysis, Third Edition, McGraw Hill, New York, Table 2.29, 17–18.MATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Govindarajulu, Z., 2002. Robustness of sample size re-estimation procedure in clinical trials, Advances in Methodological and Applied Aspects of Probability and Statistics, N. Balakrishnan (Ed.), Taylor & Francis, New York, 383–398.Google Scholar
  4. Govindarajulu, Z., 2003. Robustness of sample size re-estimation procedure in clinical trials (arbitrary populations), Statistics in Medicine, 22, 1819–1828, “correction,” ibid. 2004, 23, 2779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Govindarajulu, Z., 2004. Sequential Statistics, World Scientific Publishing Co., New Jersey, p. 217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hamilton, M.A., A.J. Collings, 1991. Determining the appropriate sample size for nonparametric tests for location shift. Technometrics, 33, 327–337.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Noether, G.E., 1987. Sample size determination for some common nonparametric tests. Journal of American Statistical Association, 82, No. 398, 645–647.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Serfling, R.J., 1980. Approximation Theorems of Mathematical Statistics, John Wiley and Sons, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Shih, W.J., 1992. Sample size re-estimation in clinical trials, Biopharmaceutical Sequential Applications (Ed. K.E. Peace) Marcel Dekker Inc., New York, 285–301.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Grace Scientific Publishing 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of StatisticsUniversity of KentuckyUSA

Personalised recommendations