Advertisement

Journal of Transatlantic Studies

, Volume 13, Issue 3, pp 279–298 | Cite as

Fighting for oil in the skies? The case of the KC-X programme

  • Alexandre VautraversEmail author
Article

Abstract

Some of the most crucial US Air Force (USAF) aircraft today are over 60 years old. How much longer will it be before replacing the aging fleet of tanker airplanes? After three, maybe four successive stalls, the competition between the Boeing and EADS KC-X programmes has heated up. But in spite of its considerable experience and generous budget, the Department of Defence showed its limits when trying to manage such a high-stake project. After a decade-long saga, several questions remain: will the US Air Force receive the asset it really needs? Is this multi-billion dollar programme simply a subsidy in disguise for Boeing? And, by the way, does USAF really need new refuelling tankers?

Key words

procurement US Air Force refuelling aircraft boeing airbus corruption subsidies 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Robert F. Dorr ‘Black Monday: Analyzing the Huge U.S. Defense Cuts’, Combat Aircraft 10, no. 3 (June/July 2009): 6–7.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    ‘Sticker Shock: Estimating the Real Cost of Modern Fighter Aircraft’, Occasional Report, defense-aerospace.com, 12 July 2009. USAF, Committee Staff Procurement Backup Book, FY2009 Budget Estimates, Washington DC, February 2008. (All websites accessed: 8 September 2013).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Government Accountability Office (GAO), Defense Acquisitions, Assessments of Selected Major Weapon Programs, Report to Congressional Committees, GAO-06-391, Washington DC, March 2006.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Armed Forces Special Operations Command (AFSOC).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    ‘CSAR-X Canceled for Convenience’, Defense Industry Daily, 3 June 2009. https://doi.org/www.defenseindustrydaily.com/gao-re-csarx-recompete-the-contract-03082/
  6. 6.
    Robert F. Dorr ‘Black Monday’, op.cit. P. 7.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Oreste Foppiani and Alexandre Vautravers ‘The Joint Strike Fighter: Between Technological Challenges, Political-Industrial Competition, and Reality’, Crossroads 10, no. 1. https://doi.org/www.webasa.org/Pubblicazioni/Foppiani-Vautravers_2011_1.pdf
  8. 8.
    Oreste Foppiani and Alexander Vautravers ‘The JSF: Between Technological Challenges, Political and Industrial Reality Competition’, RMS No. Aviation and No. 5, 2010.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Robert F. Dorr ‘T-6 Texan II Confronts Opportunities and Challenges’, Air International 5 (May 2010): 14–15.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    ‘Boeing Given Nod on Tanker Lease’, Military-Aerospace Technology Magazine 1, no. 2 (May 1, 2002).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Charles Pope ‘Pentagon Finalizes Boeing Tanker Deal: Agreement Keeps Alive Everett’s 767 Line’, Seattle Post-Intelligencer, 7 November 2003. https://doi.org/www.seattlepi.com/business/147286_tankers07.html.
  12. 12.
    John A. Tirpak ‘Tanker’, op.cit..Google Scholar
  13. 13.
  14. 14.
    George Cahlink ‘Ex-Pentagon Procurement Executive Gets Jail Time’, Govexec.com, 1 October 2004. https://doi.org/www.govexec.com/dailyfed/1004/100104g1.htm
  15. 15.
    Rebecca Leung ‘Cashing In For Profit? Who Cost Taxpayers Billions in Pentagon Biggest Scandal in Years?’, CBS, 5 January 2005. https://doi.org/www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/01/04/60II/main664652.shtml
  16. 16.
    John A. Tirpak ‘Tanker’, op.cit.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Joseph L. Galloway, Air Force Allowed Boeing to Rewrite Terms of Tanker Contract, Documents Show’, Commondreams.org, 28 March 2004. https://doi.org/www.commondreams.org/headlines04/0328-09.htm. Joe Galloway, Air Force Boeing Let Rewrite Contract’, Military.com, 31 March 2004. https://doi.org/www.military.com/NewContent/0, 13190, Galloway_033104, 00.html.
  18. 18.
    Joseph L. Galloway, Air Force Allowed Boeing to Rewrite Terms of Tanker Contract, Documents Show’, Commondreams.org, 28 March 2004. https://doi.org/www.commondreams.org/headlines04/0328-09.htm. Joe Galloway, Air Force Boeing Let Rewrite Contract’, Military.com, 31 March 2004. https://doi.org/www.military.com/NewContent/0, 13190, Galloway_033104, 00.html
  19. 19.
    Joseph L. Galloway, Air Force Allowed Boeing to Rewrite Terms of Tanker Contract, Documents Show’, Commondreams.org, 28 March 2004. https://doi.org/www.commondreams.org/headlines04/0328-09.htm. Joe Galloway, Air Force Boeing Let Rewrite Contract’, Military.com, 31 March 2004. https://doi.org/www.military.com/NewContent/0, 13190, Galloway_033104, 00.html
  20. 20.
    Dominic Gates ‘Boeing’s Dilemma: If Company Loses Appeal Tanker, it Shoulds Throw in the Towel’, The Seattle Times, 12 June 2008. https://doi.org/seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/boeingaerospace/2004472174_tanker12.html.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Charles Pope ‘Pentagon’, op.cit. John A. Tirpak ‘Tanker Twilight Zone’, AirForce-Maga-zine 87, no. 2 (February 2004). https://doi.org/www.airforce-magazine.com/MagazineArchive/Pages/2004/February% 202004/0204tanker.aspx
  22. 22.
    Jean-Pierre Casamayou Guillaume Steuer, ‘Airbus-Boeing Battle in the Tanker’, Air & Cosmos, 2188 (October 20, 2009): 10–14.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Graham Warwick ‘Rejigs Boeing KC-767 Modification, Testing to Meet Schedule’, Flight International, 27 November.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Luca Peruzzi ‘Italian Budget Crunch Threatens AMX Fleet’, Flight International, 8 April 2009. Tom Kington ‘Italian Air Force 1st Nicknames Tanker “I Have a Dream”“, Defense News, 15–21 June, 2009. https://doi.org/www.defensenews.com/osd_story.php?sh=VSDP&i=4143681
  25. 25.
    Japanese Ministry of Defense ‘KC-767 Tanker Aircraft Transportation for Delivery Delays’, 16 March, 30 July, 2007.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Boeing ‘Boeing Delivers 4th KC-767 Tanker to Japan Ministry of Defense’, https://doi.org/boeing.mediaroom.com/index.php?s=43&item=1028
  27. 27.
    Future Strategic Tanker Aircraft (FSTA).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Craig Holye ‘UK Signs £ 13 Billion Tanker Deal’, Flight International, 27 March 2008. https://doi.org/www.flightglobal.com/articles/2008/03/27/222521/uk-signs-13-billion -tanker-deal.html
  29. 29.
    Australian Department of Defence, Senator Robert Hill Press Conference Transcript, 16 April 2004. https://doi.org/www.defence.gov.au/minister/HillTranscripttpl.cfm?CurrentId=3748
  30. 30.
    Craig Hoyle ‘Quantas Receives Second A330 for Australia’s KC-30 Tanker Conversion’, Flight International. 25 June ‘KC-30A Multi-Role Tanker Transport’, Royal Australian Air Force. https://doi.org/www.raaf.gov.au/aircraft/kc30a.aspx
  31. 31.
    EADS ‘United Arab Emirates Orders the A330 MRTT Air to Air Refuielling Aircraft from EADS’, 25 February 2008. https://doi.org/classic.eads.net/1024/en/pressdb/archiv/2008/2008/all/20080225_eads_mrtt_uae.html. AFP ‘UAE to Buy Three Airbus Aircraft Refueling’, Khalej Times, 20 February.
  32. 32.
    Craig Hoyle ‘Saudi Arabia Picks EADS to Supply Three A330-Based Tankers’, Flight Global, January 3. Pierre Tran ‘Saudi Arabia Buys 3 A330s From France’, Defense News, 27 July 2009. https://doi.org/www.defensenews.com/story.php?i=4206646&c=EUR&s=AIR
  33. 33.
    Airbus Wins an Order from India for Icts Airborne Refueling Tanker Jet’, Daily Post, 26 May.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    ‘IAF’s Rs 6,000-cr Tender Cancelled Refueling Aircraft’, Neelam Mathews ‘Cancellation of Indian Industry Concerns Midair Refuelers’, Aviation Week, 12 January.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    ‘KC-767 Common Widebody Tanker & Transport’, Global Security. https://doi.org/www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/aircraft/kc-767.htm
  36. 36.
    ‘KC-X Requirements’, Global Security. https://doi.org/www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/aircraft/kc-x-rfp.htm. U.S. Air Force, Air Force Posts KC-X Request for Proposals’, 30 January 2007. wwwafmil>/news/storyasp?storyID=123039273
  37. 37.
    ‘KC-30’ Global Security. https://doi.org/www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/aircraft/kc-30.htm; http://www.northropgrumman.com/kc30/
  38. 38.
    Boeing ‘Boeing Submits KC-767 Advanced Tanker Proposal to U.S. Air Force’, Press Releases, 11 April 2007, 3 January 2008. https://doi.org/www.boeing.com/news/releases/2007/q2/070411b_nr.html; http://www.boeing.com/news/releases/2007/q2/070411b_nr.html
  39. 39.
    Michael Bruno ‘Dual Sourcing Tanker unfeasible, Wynne Says’, Aerospace Daily & Defense Report, Aviation Week, 20 September 2007. https://doi.org/abcnews.go.com/Technology/story?id=3630041&page=1Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Jean-Pierre Casamayou Guillaume Steuer, Airbus-Boeing. op.cit. ‘Size matters in U.S. Air Force KC-X Contest’, Flight International, 21 January 2008.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Amy Butler, A. Davis Fulghum, Robert Wall ‘Northrop / EADS Refueler U.S. Clinches Deal’, Aviation Week, 29 February. ‘KC-45 Tanker Replacement Program’, Global Security. https://doi.org/www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/aircraft/kc-45.htm. USAF ‘Tanker Contract Award Announced’, Official website of the U.S. Air Force, 8 March 2008. https://doi.org/www.940wg.afrc.afmil/news/storyasp?id=123089448
  42. 42.
    USAF, Air Force Officials Sponds to Boeing Protest’, Official website of the U.S. Air Force, 12 March 2008. wwwafmil/news/storyasp?id=123089878; https://doi.org/boeing.com/news/releases/2008/q1/080311b_nr.html. Boeing ‘Boeing Protests U.S. Air Force Tanker Contract Award’, 11 March 2008. https://doi.org/boeing.com/news/releases/2008/q1/080311b_nr.html. ‘GAO back Boeing Tanker Protest’, King 5 News, 18 June 2008.
  43. 43.
    Leslie Wayne ‘Boeing wins Reviews Another Shot at U.S. Tanker Contract’, New York Times, 18 June 2008. https://doi.org/www.nytimes.com/2008/06/18/business/worldbusiness/18iht-19tanker.13808649.html?_r=1Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    ‘KC-X: GAO Sustains Boeing Protest’, Defense Industry Daily, 25 June 2010. https://doi.org/www.defenseindustrydaily.com/KC-X-GAO-Sustains-Boeing-Protest-04936/. GAO Decision, Matter of: The Boeing Company, Washington, DC, 18 June 2008. https://doi.org/www.gao.gov/decisions/bidpro/311344.htm
  45. 45.
    Dominic Gates ‘Boeing’s Dilemma’, op.cit.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Integrated Flight Air Refueling Assessment (IFARA).Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    ‘KC-X: GAO Sustains’, op.cit.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Jean-Pierre Casamayou Guillaume Steuer, Airbus-Boeing. op.cit.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    ‘KC-X - Boeing Protest’, Global Security. https://doi.org/www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/aircraft/kc-x-protest.htm. Robert J. https://doi.org/www.lockheedmartin.com/news/speeches/stevens-06032008.html. Stevens ‘The Current State of Transatlantic Defense Industrial Relations’, Remarks by the Chairman, President, and CEO of Lockheed Martin, the Security and Defence Agenda Conference on NATO in the Next Decade, Brussels, 3 March 2008. https://doi.org/www.lockheedmartin.com/news/speeches/stevens-06032008.html.
  50. 50.
  51. 51.
    ‘KC-X Tanker Replacement Program’, Global Security. https://doi.org/www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/aircraft/kc-x.htm.
  52. 52.
    John J. Kruzel ‘Pentagon Reopens Bidding on Tanker Contract’, Washington, DC: DoD, July 9, 2008. https://doi.org/wwwdefense.gov/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=50453. https://doi.org/www.nytimes.com/2008/07/10/business/10tanker.html?_r=1&hp. Leslie Wayne, Air Force to Reopen Bidding on Tanker Contract’, New York Times, 10 July 2008. https://doi.org/www.nytimes.com/2008/07/10/business/10tanker.html?_r=1&hpGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Amy Butler ‘Pentagon Issues New Tanker Bid Parameters’, Aviation Week, 6 August. DoD, DoD Announces Termination of KC-X Tanker Solicitation (Washington, DC, 10 September 2008). https://doi.org/wwwdefense.gov/releases/release.aspx?releaseid=12195
  54. 54.
    Reuters ‘U.S. Air Force General Urges Quick Action on Tanker,’ 3 September 2008.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    DoD ‘DoD Announces Termination of KC-X Tanker Solicitation’, 10 September 2008. https://doi.org/wwwdefense.gov/releases/release.aspx?releaseid=12195. Dana Hedgpeth ‘Pentagon Postpones Tanker Competition: punted Decision to Next Administration’, Washington Post, 11 September. https://doi.org/www.defenseindustrydaily.com/the-usafs-kcx-aerial-tanker-rfp-03009/ ‘The USAF’s KC-X Aerial Tanker RFP’, Defense Industry Daily (DID), 20 May 2010. https://doi.org/www.defenseindustrydaily.com/the-usafs-kcx-aerial-tanker-rfp-03009/
  56. 56.
    Andrea Shalal-Esa, Alabama Lawmakers Say Pentagon Tanker Rules Unfair’, Reuters, 27 October 2009. https://doi.org/www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE59Q50F20091027?pageNumber=1&virtualBrandChannel=11604.
  57. 57.
    Air Force Material Command ‘KC-X Modernization Program. Solicitation Number: FA8625-10R-6600-SpecialNotice’, 25 September 2009. https://doi.org/boeing.mediaroom.com/index.php?s=43&item=1102. Boeing ‘Boeing to Offer NewGen Tanker to U.S. Air Force’, St. Louis, 4 March 2010. https://doi.org/boeing.mediaroom.com/index.php?s=43&item=1102 Jean-Pierre Casamayou Guillaume Steuer, Airbus-Boeing. op.cit. Amaani Lyle ‘SECDEF Announces Return of KC-X Program’, U.S. Air Force official website, 16 September 2009. wwwafmil/news/story.asp?id=123168125; https://doi.org/www.af.mil/news/storyasp?id=123168125. August Cole and Peter Sanders, ‘Air Force Tanker Contest Resumes: Competing Boeing and Northrop-Airbus Bids Are Expected in Third Round’, Wall Street Journal, 25 September 2009. https://doi.org/www.online.wsj.com/article/SB125383323357539115.html. Jim Wolf and Andrea Shalal-Esa ‘Corrected: Pentagon Says New Tanker Rules “crystal clear’’, Reuters, 24 September 2009. https://doi.org/www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE58N34E20090924.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Christopher Drew ‘$ 35 Billion Tanker Contract Opens’, New York Times, 25 September 2009. Michelle Dunlop ‘Boeing-Airbus Tanker Battle Resumes Today’, Herald Net, 25 September 2009. https://doi.org/www.heraldnet.com/article/20090925/NEWS01/709259825
  59. 59.
    Jean-Pierre Casamayou Guillaume Steuer, Airbus-Boeing. op.cit. ‘Size Matters in U.S. Air Force KC-X Contest’, Flight International, 21 January 2008.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Amy Butler ‘Officially Out of Northrop Grumman KC-X’, Aviation Week, March 9. https://doi.org/www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/aircraft/kc-x-recompete.htm. ‘KC-X Tanker Re-Account’, Global Security. https://doi.org/www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/aircraft/kc-x-recompete.htm. John Ostrower ‘Northrop Grumman Declines to Bid on Latest KC-X RFP’, Flight International, 9 March.
  61. 61.
    Aircraft Refueling: EADS will Submit a Tender Solo’, The Tribune, April 20. https://doi.org/www.online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704448304575196062161714870.html. Josh Mitchell ‘EADS Tanker Re-Enters Bidding’, Wall Street Journal, 21 April 2010. https://doi.org/www.online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704448304575196062161714870.html.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Amy Rolph, Air Force Delays Tanker Contract’, Herald Net, June 27, 2010. https://doi.org/www.heraldnet.com/article/20100619/BIZ/706199937
  63. 63.
    ‘KC-X Tanker Replacement Program’, Global Security. https://doi.org/www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/aircraft/kc-x.htm
  64. 64.
    GAO, Military Aircraft: DOD Needs to Determine Its Aerial Refueling Requirements (Washington, DC, June 2004). GAO-04-349. https://doi.org/www.iwar.org.uk/news-archive/gao/dod-aerial-refueling/d04349.pdfGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    ‘Thin Skin’, Aviation Week & Space Technology, 70, no. 10 (9 March, 2000): 18.Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    ‘KC-135’, Global Security. https://doi.org/www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/aircraft/kc-135e.htm
  67. 67.
    ‘Size matters’, Flight International, op.cit.Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Oreste Foppiani Alexander Vautravers ‘The JSF’, op.cit.Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Tony Cappacio ‘Boeing Defeats EADS for $35 Billion Air Force Tanker Program’, Blom-berg, 25 February 2011. https://doi.org/www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-02-24/boeing-wins-35b-air-force-tanker-deal.html
  70. 70.
    Tony Cappacio ‘Boeing Projected to Face $300 Million Overrun on Tanker Contract’, Seattle Times.https://doi.org/seattletimes.com/html/businesstechnology/201540023_tanker25.html. Amy Buttler ‘Boeing Liable For KC-46 Overage’, Aviation Week, 29 June 2011.
  71. 71.
    GAO, GAO-13-294SP Defense Acquisitions Assessments of Selected Weapon Programs, GAO, Washington D.C, March 2013, p. 91–92. https://doi.org/www.gao.gov/assets/660/653379.pdf
  72. 72.
    Dave Majumdar ‘USAF and Boeing Complete KC-46 Critical Design Review’, Flightglo-bal. https://doi.org/www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/usaf-and-boeing-complete-kc-46-critical-design-review-390198/
  73. 73.
    Boeing ‘US Air Force, Boeing Finalize KC-46A Tanker Aircraft Design’, News Release. https://doi.org/boeing.mediaroom.com/US-Air-Force-Boeing-Finalize-KC-46A-Tanker-Aircraft-Design. ‘New Tanker Shapes Up’, Combat Aircraft 14 (9): 10.
  74. 74.
    Rick Plumlee ‘McConnell Air Force Base to Receive New KC-46A Tankers’, The Wichita Eagle, 21 May 2013. https://doi.org/www.kansas.com/2013/05/21/2812800/air-force-to-announce-tanker-decision.htmlGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Josh Rogin ‘Obama Seeks to Delay Tanker, Cancel Bomber’, CQ Politics News, 9 March 2009. https://doi.org/www.cqpolitics.com/wmspage.cfm?parm1=5&docID=news-000003070256
  76. 76.
    Daniel Reiner, Jacques Gautier, André Vallini, and Xavier Pintat, Pour en finir avec ‘l’Europe de la defense’ - Vers une defense européenne, Commission des affaires étrangères, de la defense et des forces armées, Paris, 3 juillet 2013. https://doi.org/www.senat.fr/notice-rapport/2012/r12-713-notice.html

Copyright information

© Board of Transatlantic Studies 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.International Relations DepartmentWebster UniversityGenevaSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations