Advertisement

Journal of Transatlantic Studies

, Volume 12, Issue 3, pp 282–303 | Cite as

‘A transatlantic buzz’: flying saucers, extraterrestrials and America in postwar Germany

  • Greg EghigianEmail author
2013 Donald Cameron Watt prize winner

Abstract

The years 1946–1960 saw a wave of reports of flying saucer sightings on both sides of the Atlantic. To date, however, few scholars have examined how the phenomenon moved across states and regions, what responses it garnered and what impact it had on contemporary thought and values. This article examines how the mainstream press and public intellectuals in postwar West and East Germany reported on and discussed flying saucer reports. The evidence shows that both cold war geopolitics and the occult were used to explain sightings, but that suspected American influences and anti-American sentiments figured heavily in how most reports were interpreted. Flying saucers thus functioned as cyphers for considering alien influences in postwar society.

Keywords

UFOs flying saucers press Germany anti-Americanism 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    David Clarke, The UFO Files: The Inside Story of Real-life Sightings (London: Bloomsbury, 2012), Kindle edition, Location 658–80.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    ‘Paranormal Beliefs Come (Super)Naturally to Some’, Gallup, https://doi.org/www.gallup.com/poll/19558/paranormal-beliefs-come-supernaturally-some.aspx (accessed July 9, 2013).
  3. 3.
    Erich Goode, The Paranormal: Who Believes, Why They Believe, and Why It Matters (Amherst: Prometheus, 2011)Google Scholar
  4. 3a.
    Alexander Wendt and Raymond Duvall, ‘Sovereignty and the UFO’, Political Theory 36 (2008): 607–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 3b.
    Brenda Denzler, The Lure of the Edge: Scientific Passions, Religious Beliefs, and the Pursuit of UFOs (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2001).Google Scholar
  6. 4.
    Denzler, Lure of the Edge, 34–67; David Michael Jacobs, The UFO Controversy in America (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1975).Google Scholar
  7. 5.
    Curtis Peebles, Watch the Skies! A Chronicle of the Flying Saucer Myth (Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press, 1994).Google Scholar
  8. 6.
    Bridget Brown, They Know Us Better Than We Know Ourselves: The History and Politics of Alien Abduction (New York: New York University Press, 2007)Google Scholar
  9. 6a.
    Jodi Dean, Aliens in America: Conspiracy Cultures from Outerspace to Cyberspace (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1998)Google Scholar
  10. 6b.
    Elaine Showalter, Hystories: Hysterical Epidemics and Modern Culture (New York: Columbia University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
  11. 7.
    See, for instance, the work of the Mutual UFO Network (MUFON), reportedly with chapters in 25 countries today, https://doi.org/www.mufon.com (accessed August 11, 2013).
  12. 8.
    One of the few to take the international and global aspects of UFO sightings seriously has been Alexander C. T. Geppert, ‘Extraterrestrial Encounters: UFOs, Science, and the Quest for Transcendence, 1947–1972’, History and Technology 28 (2012): 335–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 9.
    The term UFO first started being used widely in the German press around the summer of 1954.Google Scholar
  14. 10.
    Brett Holman, ‘The Air Panic of 1935: British Press Opinion Between Disarmament and Rearmament’, Journal of Contemporary History 46 (2011): 288–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 11.
    Alexander C. T. Geppert, ‘European Astrofuturism, Cosmic Provincialism: Historicizing the Space Age’, in Imagining Outer Space: European Astroculture in the Twentieth Century, ed. Alexander C. T. Geppert (Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2012), 3–24; ‘Rethinking the Space Age: Astroculture and Technoscience’, History and Technology 28 (2012): 219–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 12.
    By the term ‘flying saucer phenomenon’, I will be referring to the reports of flying saucer and alien sightings as well as to the speculations about their significance.Google Scholar
  17. 13.
    Clarke, UFO Files, Location 685–734.Google Scholar
  18. 14.
    Nigel Watson, ed., The Scareship Mystery: A Survey of Worldwide Phantom Airship Scares, 1909–1918 (Corby: Domra, 2000)Google Scholar
  19. 14a.
    Robert E. Bartholomew and George S. Howard, UFOs and Alien Contact: Two Centuries of Mystery (Amherst: Prometheus Books, 1998).Google Scholar
  20. 15.
    Historian Brett Holman discusses this phenomenon and has posted primary sources on the subject on his blog, airminded.org (accessed July 18, 2013). The University of London also hosted a workshop on the topic of turn-of-the-century invasion scares in Britain in November 2013. See invasionscares.files.wordpress.com/2012/09/empire-in-peril-cfp.pdf (accessed July 18, 2013).Google Scholar
  21. 16.
    ‘Radio Listeners in Panic, Taking War Drama as Fact’, New York Times, https://doi.org/www.war-of-the-worlds.org/Radio/Newspapers/Oct31/NYT.html (accessed July 19, 2013); Hadley Cantril, The Invasion from Mars: A Study in the Psychology of Panic (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1940).Google Scholar
  22. 17.
    Report of Meetings of the Office of Scientific Intelligence Scientific Advisory Panel on Unidentified Flying Objects, January 14–18, 1953, 8, CUFON, https://doi.org/www.cufon.org/cufon/robert.htm (accessed July 19, 2013; ‘Foo-Fighter’, Time 45 (January 15, 1945): 72.
  23. 18.
    ‘Passauer Nachrichten’, Passauer Neue Presse 62 (August 8, 1947): 4.Google Scholar
  24. 19.
    ‘Fliegende Untertassen’, Mittelbayerische Zeitung 57 (July 18, 1947): 1.Google Scholar
  25. 20.
    ‘Die fliegenden Untertassen’, Passauer Neue Press 60 (August 1, 1947): 4l; ‘Fliegende Untertassen’, Mittelbayerische Zeitung 55 (July 11, 1947): 2.Google Scholar
  26. 21.
    ‘Transatlantisches Sausen’, Der Spiegel 29 (1947): 19.Google Scholar
  27. 22.
    ‘Made in Russia?’, Mittelbayerische Zeitung 31 (March 13, 1950): 2.Google Scholar
  28. 23.
    Michael D. Swords, ‘UFOs, the Military, and the Early Cold War Era’, in UFOs and Abductions: Challenging the Borders of Knowledge, ed. David M. Jacobs (Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 2000), 82–121.Google Scholar
  29. 24.
    ‘Begleitmusik’, Die Zeit, August 15, 1946, https://doi.org/www.zeit.de/1946/26/begleitmusik (accessed May 21, 2013).
  30. 25.
    Clarke, The UFO Files, Location 809–12.Google Scholar
  31. 26.
    Donald Keyhoe, The Flying Saucers Are Real (New York: Fawcett, 1950), 175.Google Scholar
  32. 27.
    Desmond Leslie and George Adamski, Flying Saucers Have Landed (New York: British Book Centre, 1953).Google Scholar
  33. 28.
    David Clarke and Andy Roberts, Flying Saucerers: A Social History of UFology (Loughborough: Alternative Albion, 2007), 18–52.Google Scholar
  34. 29.
    See, for instance, ‘Steht die Erde unter Kontrolle?’, Die Zeit, May 27, 1954, https://doi.org/www.zeit.de/1954/21/steht-die-erde-unter-kontrolle (accessed May 22, 2013).
  35. 30.
    ‘Flugzeuge von unbekannten Planeten’, Mittelbayerische Zeitung 14 (February 1, 1950): 6.Google Scholar
  36. 31.
    Claus Jacobi, ‘Ein Spuk fliegt um die Welt: “Fliegende Untertassen”, Wyschinsld und Mars’, Die Zeit, March 30, 1950, https://doi.org/www.zeit.de/1950/13/ein-spuk-fliegt-um-die-welt (accessed 22 May 2013).
  37. 32.
    ‘“Untertassen” über Berlin’, Hamburger Abendlblatt 145 (June 26, 1954): 16; ‘Unübertreffliche “Untertassen-Sensation”’, Passauer Neue Presse 140 (November 24, 1952): 2; ‘Weiße Kugel über Regensburg’, Mittelbayerische Zeitung 104 (September 2, 1950): 14; ‘Die “Untertasse” spukt immer noch’, Passauer Neue Presse 48 (April 27, 1950): 3Google Scholar
  38. 33.
    ‘Fliegende Untertassen — eine neue Waffe’, Passauer Neue Presse 56 (May 16, 1950): 1.Google Scholar
  39. 34.
    ‘Allgemeiner Angstcomplex’, Hamburger Abendblatt 66 (March 18, 1950): 8. See also, ‘Unter der Lupe betrachtet: Fliegenden-Untertassen-Psychose’, Passauer Neue Presse 69 (June 11, 1952): 1.Google Scholar
  40. 35.
    ‘Fliegende Untertassen: Besucher aus dem All’, Der Spiegel 17 (1954): 26–30; Hilde Hoff, ‘Knder — auch in Marktpartner’, Die Zeit, March 18, 1954, https://doi.org/www.zeit.de/1954/11/kinder-auch-ein-marktpartner (accessed May 22, 2013)Google Scholar
  41. 35.
    Eka von Merveldt, ‘Amerika ist immer noch die neue Welt’, Die Zeit, December 17, 1953, https://doi.org/www.zeit.de/1953/51/amerika-ist-immer-noch-die-neue-welt (accessed May 22, 2013); ‘Das stärkste Bollwerk’, Mittelbayerische Zeitung 32 (March 15, 1950): 1.Google Scholar
  42. 36.
    Vanessa Conze, ‘Abendland gegen Amerika! “Europa” als antiamerikanisches Konzept im westeuropäischen Konservatismus (1950–1970) — Das CEDI und die Idee des “Abendlandes”’, in Antiamerikanismus im 20. Jahrhundert: Studien zu Ost- und Westeuropa, ed. Jan C. Behrend, Árpad von Klimó, and Patrice G. Poutros (Bonn: Dietz, 2005), 204–24Google Scholar
  43. 36a.
    Jost Hermand, ‘Resisting Boogie-Woogie Culture, Abstract Expressionism, and Pop Art: German Highbrow Objections to the Import of “American” Forms of Culture, 1945–1965’, in Americanization and Anti-Americanism: The German Encounter with American Culture after 1945, ed. Alexander Stephan (New York: Berghahn, 2005), 67–77.Google Scholar
  44. 37.
    Hans Haffner, ‘Schluß mit dem Untertassen-Spuk?’, Die Zeit, September 2, 1954, https://doi.org/www.zeit.de/1954/35/schluss-mit-dem-untertassen-spuk (accessed May 22, 2013).Google Scholar
  45. 38.
    Karl Bednarik, Der junge Arbeiter von heute — Ein neuer Typ (Stuttgart: Gustav Kilpper, 1953), 107–17.Google Scholar
  46. 39.
    Claus Jacobi, ‘Panische Solidarität’, Die Zeit, April 20, 1950, https://doi.org/www.zeit.de/1950/16/panische-solidaritaet (accessed May 22, 2013).Google Scholar
  47. 40.
    ‘Marsmenschen unter Schutz’, Hamburger Abendblatt 146 (June 26, 1953): 10.Google Scholar
  48. 41.
    Grete von Urbanitzky, ‘Sind die Himmlischen vogelfrei?’, Die Zeit, December 9, 1954, https://doi.org/www.zeit.de/1954/49/sind-die-himmlischen-vogelfrei (accessed May 22, 2013).Google Scholar
  49. 42.
    ‘Untertassen-Scherben’, Die Zeit, December 16, 1954, https://doi.org/www.zeit.de/1954/49/sind-die-himmlischen-vogelfrei (accessed May 22, 2013).
  50. 43.
    ‘Sendboten ferner Welten’, Hamburger Abendblatt 169 (July 24–25, 1954): 16.Google Scholar
  51. 44.
    ‘Das Geheimnis der “Fliegenden Untertassen” gelüftet?’, Mittelbayerische Zeitung 42 (April 8, 1950): 2; ‘Das Rätsel der “fliegenden Untertassen”: Raumschiffe, Scherzartikel, oder Massensuggestion’, Passauer Neue Presse 37 (March 30, 1950): 2; ‘Machen “Marsmenschen” Erkundungsflüge?’, Passauer Neue Presse 25 (March 2, 1950): 3.Google Scholar
  52. 45.
    ‘Geheimnisse: Die Untertassen-Saga’, Der Spiegel 11 (1952): 16–18.Google Scholar
  53. 46.
    The Parisian spiritualist and fortune teller Madame Zaepffel, for instance, was reported to have predicted around the New Year holiday that the ‘secret of the flying saucers’ would be revealed to all in 1955. ‘Rätsel der “Fliegenden Untertassen” wird gelöst’, Hamburger Abendblatt 304 (December 31, 1954–January 2, 1955): 38.Google Scholar
  54. 47.
    ‘Jedem sein Miniatur-Heimkraftwerk’, Die Zeit, September 26, 1957, https://doi.org/www.zeit.de/1957/39/jedem-sein-miniatur-heimkraftwerk (accessed May 22, 2013).
  55. 48.
    ‘Das Leben im Weltall: Wissenschaftliche Vergleiche mit der Erde/Gibt es noch Überraschungen?’ Hamburger Abendblatt 151 (July 3–4, 1954): 16.Google Scholar
  56. 49.
    ‘Untertassen-Menschen: Absolute unverletzlich’, Der Spiegel 36 (1952): 17.Google Scholar
  57. 50.
    ‘Theologen über Untertassen’, Hamburger Abendblatt 182 (August 9, 1954): 8.Google Scholar
  58. 51.
    ‘Kam Gott im Weltraumschiff?’, Die Zeit, February 26, 1960, https://doi.org/www.zeit.de/1960/09/kam-gott-im-weltraumschiff (accessed May 22, 2013). This kind of work and reasoning has been referred to as ‘pseudoarchaeology’ by historian Garrett Fagan and has enjoyed great popularity since the 1950s. See Garrett G Fagan, ed., Archaeological Fantasies: How Pseudoarchaeology Misrepresents the Past and Misleads the Public (New York: Routledge, 2006).Google Scholar
  59. 52.
    ‘Sie fliegen aber doch’, Der Spiegel 13 (1950): 33–5; ‘“Untertasse” besucht Nürnberg’, Mittelbayerische Zeitung 36 (March 25, 1950): 2.Google Scholar
  60. 53.
    ‘Hitler baut am Südpol Untertassen’, Passauer Neue Presse 165 (October 19, 1954): 2.Google Scholar
  61. 54.
    Matthias Häusler, ‘Zwischen Vernichtung und Pardon: Die Konzentrationslager in “Deutsch-Südwestafrika” (1904–1908)’, Zeitschrift für Geschichtswissenschaft 61 (2013): 601–620Google Scholar
  62. 54a.
    Jürgen Zimmerer, ‘The First Genocide of the Twentieth Century: The German War of Destruction in South-West Africa (1904–1908) and the Global History of Genocide’, in Lessons and Legacies VIII: From Generation to Generation, ed. Doris L. Bergen (Northwestern University Press, 2008), 34–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 55.
    Ulrike Lindner, ‘Transnational Movements between Colonial Empires: Migrant Workers from the British Cape Colony in the German Diamond Town Lüditzerbucht’, European Review of History 16 (2009): 679–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 56.
    Clarke and Roberts, Flying Saucerers, 31.Google Scholar
  65. 57.
    Edgar Sievers, Flying Saucer über Südafrika: Zur Frage der Besuche aus dem Weltenraum (Pretoria: Sagittarius, 1955), 12.Google Scholar
  66. 58.
    Ibid., 22.Google Scholar
  67. 59.
    Ibid., 74–90, 129–40.Google Scholar
  68. 60.
    Ibid., 268.Google Scholar
  69. 61.
  70. 62.
    Ibid., 390.Google Scholar
  71. 63.
    Daniel Joseph Walther, Creating Germans Abroad: Cultural Policies and National Identity in Namibia (Athens: Ohio University Press, 2002), 154.Google Scholar
  72. 64.
    ‘Und ich sage Ihnen, es gibt keine fliegenden Untertassen’, Hamburger Abendblatt 267 (November 14, 1950): 2; ‘Fliegende Bananen’, Mittelbayerische Zeitung 80 (July 8, 1950): 9; ‘Stalin spurlos verschwunden’, Mittelbayerische Zeitung, Beilage MZ am Rosenmontag, (February 20, 1950): 1.Google Scholar
  73. 65.
    ‘Vögel, Flugzeuge, Ballone, Schwindel: Untersuchung über “Fliegende Untertassen”’, Hamburger Abendblatt 15 (February 8, 1962): 2; ‘Rätsel der “Fliegenden Untertassen” gelöst’, Passauer Neue Presse 140 (September 6, 1955): 2; ‘Es gibt keine “fliegende Untertassen”’, Passauer Neue Presse 79 (May 21, 1955): 17.Google Scholar
  74. 66.
    A.F. Marfeld, Das Weltall und Wir: Von Ewigkeit zu Ewigkeit (Berlin: Argon, 1959), 106Google Scholar
  75. 66a.
    Leo Nitschmann, ‘Mit kleinem Fernrohr auf dem Balkon’, Die Zeit, June 27, 1957, https://doi.org/www.zeit.de/1957/26/mit-kleinem-fernrohr-auf-dem-balkon (accessed May 22, 2013).Google Scholar
  76. 67.
    ‘Braun glaubt nicht an Untertassen’, Hamburger Abendblatt 229 (October 2–3, 1954): 10.Google Scholar
  77. 68.
    Siegfried Georg Fudalla, Die Gegenwart als Patient: Ein Zeitkritisches Buch (Bern: Alfred Scherz, 1960), 172–3. See alsoGoogle Scholar
  78. 68a.
    Jens Ivo Engels, Naturpolitik in der Bundesrepublik: Ideenwelt und politische Verhaltensstile in Naturschutz und Umweltbewegung 1950–1980 (Paderborn: Ferdinand Schöningh, 2006), 79–86.Google Scholar
  79. 69.
    ‘Der Weltraum rückt uns näher’, Die Zeit, January 10, 1957, https://doi.org/www.zeit.de/1957/02/der-weltraum-rueckt-uns-naeher (accessed May 22, 2013).
  80. 70.
    Hermann Bausinger, Volkskultur in der technischen Welt (Stuttgart: W. Kohlhammer, 1961), 75–6.Google Scholar
  81. 71.
    One such sighting occurred over Stralsund and Rügen in January 1955. See ‘Geschäftstüchtige FDJ’, Die Zeit, January 20, 1955, https://doi.org/www.zeit.de/1955/03/geschaeftstuechtige-fdj (accessed May 22, 2013).
  82. 72.
    ‘250 Forrestals’, Neues Deutschland 148 (June 28, 1949): 2.Google Scholar
  83. 73.
    Günter G Barlin, ‘Der Strandvogel von Florida’, Berliner Zeitung 31 (February 6, 1955): 3Google Scholar
  84. 74.
    Heinz Horster, ‘Der Reisende der Untertasse’, Berliner Zeitung 119 (August 18, 1953): 6; ‘Neues aus Amerika’, Berliner Zeitung 63 (March 15, 1950): 3.Google Scholar
  85. 74.
    ‘Siegeszug des Fragebogens’, Neue Zeit 69 (March 22, 1950): 1.Google Scholar
  86. 75.
    ‘Fliegende Untertasse’, Neue Zeit 60 (March 11, 1950): 2.Google Scholar
  87. 76.
    ‘Endlich auch in Berlin!’, Berliner Zeitung 71 (March 24, 1950): 6.Google Scholar
  88. 77.
    ‘Lob der technischen Phantasie’, Neues Deutschland 59 (February 28, 1960): 4; ‘Völkerverbindendes Theater’, Neues Deutschland 186 (July 3, 1959): 7; ‘Wenn der Marsmensch kommt’, Neue Zeit 47 (February 25, 1958): 4; ‘Ironisches Konterfei der Erde’, Neue Zeit 192 (May 3, 1957): 4.Google Scholar
  89. 78.
    ‘Marsmenschen und die Atombombe’, Neue Zeit 256 (October 30, 1960): 6.Google Scholar
  90. 79.
    Thomas Haury, ‘Die “Dollarkönige”: Der Antiamerikanismus der DDR’, in Amerika und Europa, Mars und Venus? Das Bild Amerikas in Europa, ed. Rudolf von Thadden und Alexandre Escudier (Göttingen: Wallstein, 2004), 65–85.Google Scholar
  91. 80.
    ‘“Untertassen” sollen Geld erpressen’, Berliner Zeitung 86 (April 13, 1950): 1.Google Scholar
  92. 81.
    ‘“Untertassen”-Panik in München’, Neues Deutschland 89 (April 16, 1950): 2.Google Scholar
  93. 82.
    Friedrich Wolf, Menetekel oder die Fliegenden Untertassen (Berlin: Aufbau, 1961), 165.Google Scholar
  94. 83.
    Ibid., 407.Google Scholar
  95. 84.
    Ibid., 134.Google Scholar
  96. 85.
    ‘Seit fünf Tagen umkreist Sputnik 2 die Erde’, Neues Deutschland 265 (November 8, 1957): 2; Stefan Heym, ‘Offen gesagt’, Berliner Zeitung 277 (November 29, 1953): 2.Google Scholar
  97. 86.
    ‘Nicht gegen einander’, Neue Zeit 80 (April 4, 1950): 1Google Scholar
  98. 87.
    ‘Positives Kulturbewußtsein’, Neue Zeit 100 (April 29, 1950): 2.Google Scholar
  99. 88.
    CG Jung, Ein moderner Mythus: Von Dingen, die am Himmel gesehen werden (Zürich and Stuttgart: Rascher-Verlag, 1958). The book was translated into English by Richard Francis Carrington Hull and published in 1959 under the title Flying Saucers: A Modern Myth of Things Seen in the Skies. In order to avoid confusion, I will cite references in both the original German edition (hereafter, EmM) and the English translationGoogle Scholar
  100. 88a.
    C.G Jung, Flying Saucers: A Modern Myth of Things Seen in the Skies (New York: MJF Books, 1978), hereafter, FS. When quoting, however, I will rely on the Hull translation, unless otherwise noted.Google Scholar
  101. 89.
    Letter to Weltwoche (Zurich), 22 (July 9, 1954), reproduced in FS, 131–3.Google Scholar
  102. 90.
    Letter to Donald E. Keyhoe, August 16, 1958, reproduced in Ibid., 137–8. According to one of his biographers, however, there is evidence that, despite his public comments to the contrary, Jung himself privately believed that flying saucers were extraterrestrial in nature. See Deirdre Bair, Jung: A Biography (Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Company, 2003), 572–3.Google Scholar
  103. 91.
    EmM, 8–9 and FS, 6–7.Google Scholar
  104. 92.
    EmM, 13–14, 17–18 and FS, 10, 15–16.Google Scholar
  105. 93.
    EmM, 24–25 and FS, 22.Google Scholar
  106. 94.
    Franz Schonauer, ‘Immer noch fliegende Untertassen’, Die Zeit, May 15, 1958, https://doi.org/www.zeit.de/1958/20/immer-noch-fliegende-untertassen (accessed May 22, 2013); ‘Himmlische Zeichen’, Der Spiegel 12 (March 19, 1958): 61–2.Google Scholar
  107. 95.
    Richard Noll, The Jung Cult: Origins of a Charismatic Movement (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994), 202–17.Google Scholar
  108. 96.
    William Tsutsui, Godzilla on My Mind: Fifty Years of the King of Monsters (New York: Palgrave, 2004)Google Scholar
  109. 96a.
    J.J. King, ‘The (Un)lucky Dragon: Monstrous Futures’, Futures, 31 (1999): 117–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. 96b.
    Chon Noriega, ‘Godzilla and the Japanese Nightmare: When “Them” is U.S.’, Cinema Journal, 27 (1987): 63–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. 97.
    James R. Lewis, ‘UFOs and Folklore’, in Folklore: An Encyclopedia of Beliefs, Customs, Tales, Music, and Art, ed. Charlie T. McCormick and Kim Kennedy (Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO, 2011), 1219–22Google Scholar
  112. 97a.
    Thomas E. Bullard, The Myth and Mystery of UFOs (Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 2010)Google Scholar
  113. 97b.
    Albert A. Harrison, Starstruck: Cosmic Visions in Science, Religion, and Folklore (New York: Berghahn, 2007)Google Scholar
  114. 97c.
    Diana G. Tumminia, ed., Alien Worlds: Social and Religious Dimensions of Extraterrestrial Contact (Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
  115. 98.
    Charles A. Ziegler, ‘Analysis of the Roswell Myth: A Traditional Folk Motif Clothed in Modern Garb’, in UFO Crash at Roswell: The Genesis of a Modern Myth, Benson Saler, Charles A. Ziegler, and Charles B. Moore (Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press, 1997), 30–73.Google Scholar
  116. 99.
    Geppert, ‘Extraterrestrial Encounters’, 351.Google Scholar
  117. 100.
    Wendt and Duvall, ‘Sovereignty and the UFO’, 611.Google Scholar
  118. 101.
    See, for instance, George M. Eberhart, UFOs and the Extraterrestrial Contact Movement: A Bibliography, 2 Vol. (Metuchen, NJ: Scarecrow Press, 1986).Google Scholar
  119. 102.
    Christopher F. Roth, ‘UFology as Anthropology: Race, Extraterrestrials, and the Occult’ in E.T. Culture: Anthropology in Outerspaces, ed. Debbora Battaglia, (Durham: Duke University Press, 2005), 38–93.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Board of Transatlantic Studies 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of HistoryPenn State UniversityState CollegeUSA

Personalised recommendations