Journal of Transatlantic Studies

, Volume 11, Issue 3, pp 278–291 | Cite as

Multilateralism, but not as we know it: Anglo-American economic diplomacy in South America during the Second World War

  • Thomas C. MillsEmail author


This article explores the economic diplomacy between the United States and Great Britain in South America during the Second World War. The dominant theme presented in the existing relevant literature on this subject is one whereby the US promoted a multilateral economic system, based on equal access to markets and resources, against the opposition of a British government determined to protect a closed trading system. The situation that arose in South America was markedly different. It was Britain that promoted multilateralism in South America, based on the belief that such a system would provide the surest means of protecting its interests in this region. The US, on the other hand, prioritised security concerns and short-term economic gains over the promotion of a multilateral trading system in its policy towards South America. In exploring this alternative situation that arose in South America, this article represents a challenge to traditional conceptions of Anglo-American economic diplomacy during the Second World War.


Anglo-American relationship South America post-war planning economic diplomacy multilateralism 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Paul Kennedy, The Rise and Fall of Great Powers: Economic Change and Military Conflict from 1500 to 2000 (London: Fontana Press, 1988), 364-5.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ibid., 459-65; and Randall B. Woods, ‘FDR and the Triumph of American Nationalism’, Presidential Studies Quarterly 19, no. 3 (1989): 569.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ronald Hyam, Britain’s Imperial Century, 1815-1914: A Study of Empire and Expansion, 3rd ed. (Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2002), 58–60; andCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 3a.
    Sir Robert Marett, Latin America: British Trade and Investment (London: Charles Knight, 1973), 6–7, 11.Google Scholar
  5. 4.
    Joseph Smith, Illusions of Conflict: Anglo-American Diplomacy Toward Latin America, 1865-1896 (Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1979), 120-9Google Scholar
  6. 4a.
    J. Fred Rippy, South America and Hemisphere Defense (Louisiana, LA: Louisiana State University Press, 1941), 47.Google Scholar
  7. 5.
    Emily S. Rosenberg, World War I and the Growth of United States Predominance in Latin America (New York: Garland, 1987), 37–55.Google Scholar
  8. 6.
    Ibid., 59-65; Rippy, South America and Hemisphere Defense, 49.Google Scholar
  9. 7.
    Rippy, South America and Hemisphere Defense, 49; David Green, The Containment of Latin America: A History of the Myths and Realities of the Good Neighbor Policy(Chicago: Quadrangle Books, 1971), 19Google Scholar
  10. 7a.
    Lloyd C. Gardner, Economic Aspects of New Deal Diplomacy, 2nd ed. (Boston: Beacon Press, 1971; first published 1964), 51-2Google Scholar
  11. 7b.
    Rory Miller, Britain and Latin America in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries (London: Longman, 1993), 207; and Marett, Latin America, 13.Google Scholar
  12. 8.
    Winston S. Churchill, The Second World War, 6 vols. (London: Cassel, 1948-1954).Google Scholar
  13. 9.
    For Churchill’s concerns when writing his account of the war see David Reynolds, ‘Roosevelt, Churchill, and the Wartime Anglo-American Alliance, 1939-1945: Towards a New Synthesis’, in The ‘Special Relationship’: Anglo-American Relations since 1945, eds. Roger Louis and Hedley Bull (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986), 17Google Scholar
  14. 9a.
    Ritchie Ovendale, Anglo-American Relations in the Twentieth Century (Basingstoke: Macmillan Press, 1998), 39Google Scholar
  15. 9b.
    Mark A. Stoler, Allies in War: Britain and America Against the Axis Powers, 1940-1945(London: Hodder Arnold, 2005), xxi–xxii; andGoogle Scholar
  16. 9c.
    David Reynolds, In Command of History: Churchill Fighting and Writing the Second World War (New York: Basic Books, 2007).Google Scholar
  17. 10.
    See, for example, H.C. Allen, Great Britain and the United States: A History of Anglo-American Relations, 1783-1952 (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1955)Google Scholar
  18. 10a.
    Herbert Feis, Churchill, Roosevelt, Stalin: The War They Waged and the Peace They Sought, 2nd ed. (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1967; first published 1957)Google Scholar
  19. 10b.
    John L. Snell, Illusion and Necessity: The Diplomacy of Global War, 1939-1945 (Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin, 1963)Google Scholar
  20. 10c.
    Russell Buchanan, The United States and World War II (New York: Harper & Row, 1964); andGoogle Scholar
  21. 10d.
    Gaddis Smith, American Diplomacy During the Second World War, 1941-1945 (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1965). When Churchill did deal with Anglo-American economic diplomacy he tended to gloss over any disagreements raised by the issue. See Churchill, The Second World War, 3: 386-8, 392-3, 397.Google Scholar
  22. 11.
    Richard Gardner, Sterling-Dollar Diplomacy: Anglo-American Collaboration in the Reconstruction of Multilateral Trade (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1956). For more on multilateralism, seeGoogle Scholar
  23. 11a.
    G. John Ikenberry, ‘Rethinking the Origins of American Hegemony’, Political Science Quarterly 104, no. 3 (1984): 382Google Scholar
  24. 11b.
    Dick Steward, Trade and Hemisphere: The Good Neighbor Policy and Reciprocal Trade (Columbia: University of Missouri Press, 1975), 12.Google Scholar
  25. 12.
    Frederick Benham, Great Britain Under Protection (New York: Macmillan, 1941), 90-102.Google Scholar
  26. 13.
    Randall B. Woods, A Changing of the Guard (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1990), 18.Google Scholar
  27. 14.
    For the Atlantic Charter, see Foreign Relations of the United States [hereafter FRUS], 1941, vol. 1 (Washington DC: USGPO, 1958), 367-9. For the Master Lend-Lease Agreement, see Department of State Bulletin, February 28, 1942 (Washington DC: USGPO, 1942). For the Bretton Woods Agreements, see Department of State Publication No. 2866: Proceedings and Documents of the United Nations Monetary and Financial Conference, Bretton Woods, New Hampshire, July 1-22, 1944 (Washington DC: USGPO, 1948).Google Scholar
  28. 15.
    Gardner, Sterling-Dollar Diplomacy, 7-16; Cordell Hull, The Memoirs of Cordell Hull, 2 vols. (New York: Macmillan, 1948), 1: 81-6, 363-5. For further examples of this thesis by officials who participated in wartime diplomacy, seeGoogle Scholar
  29. 15a.
    Herbert Feis, The Sinews of Peace (New York: Harper & Bothers, 1944), chap. 3Google Scholar
  30. 15b.
    E.F Penrose, Economic Planning for Peace (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1953), chap. 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 16.
    William Appleman Williams, The Tragedy of American Diplomacy, 3rd ed. (New York: WW. Norton, 1972; first published 1959), chap. 5. Further revisionist examples ofGoogle Scholar
  32. 16a.
    Williams’ ‘open door’ thesis include Walter LaFeber, America, Russia and the Cold War, 1945-1992, 7th ed. (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1993; first published 1966), chap. 1Google Scholar
  33. 16b.
    Barton J. Bernstein, American Foreign Policy and the Origins of the Cold War’, in The Politics and Policies of the Truman Administration, ed. Barton J. Bernstein (Chicago: Quadrangle Books, 1970), 15-61Google Scholar
  34. 16c.
    Thomas G Paterson, ‘The Quest for Peace and Prosperity: International Trade, Communism and the Marshall Plan’, in Cold War Critics: Alternatives to American Foreign Policy in the Truman Years, ed. Thomas G. Paterson (Chicago: Quadrangle Books, 1971), 78-112.Google Scholar
  35. 17.
    Gabriel Kolko, The Politics of War: Allied Diplomacy and the World Crisis of 1943-1945 (London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1968), 242-66.Google Scholar
  36. 18.
    Gardner, Economic Aspects of New Deal Diplomacy.Google Scholar
  37. 19.
    Kolko, The Politics of War, chap. 12; Gardner, Economic Aspects of New Deal Diplomacy, 275-88.Google Scholar
  38. 20.
    Key works include Roger Louis, Imperialism at Bay: The United States and the Decolonization of the British Empire, 1941-1945 (Oxford: Clarendon, 1977)Google Scholar
  39. 20a.
    Christopher Thorne, Allies of a Kind: The United States, Britain, and the War against Japan, 1941-1945 (London: Hamilton, 1978)Google Scholar
  40. 20b.
    Robert M. Hathaway, Ambiguous Partnership: Britain and America, 1944-1947 (New York: Columbia University Press, 1981)Google Scholar
  41. 20c.
    David Reynolds, The Creation of the Anglo-American Alliance, 1937-1941: A Study in Competitive Cooperation (London: Europa Publications, 1981); andGoogle Scholar
  42. 20d.
    Donald Cameron Watt, Succeeding John Bull-America in Britain’s Place, 1900-1975: A Study of the Anglo-American Relationship and World Politics in the Context of British and American Foreign-Policy-making in the Twentieth Century (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 21.
    Woods, A Changing of the Guard. See also Woods, ‘FDR and the Triumph of American Nationalism’, 567-81; Randall B. Woods, ‘FDR and the New Economic Order’, in FDR’s World: War, Peace, and Legacies, eds. David B. Woolner, Warren F Kimball and David Reynolds (Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan, 2008), 175-92.Google Scholar
  44. 22.
    Alan P. Dobson, US Wartime Aid to Britain, 1940-1946 (London: Croon Helm, 1986). See alsoGoogle Scholar
  45. 22a.
    Alan P. Dobson, The Politics of the Anglo-American Economic Special Relationship, 1940-1987 (Brighton: Wheatsheaf, 1988), chap. 2.Google Scholar
  46. 23.
    See, for example, Christopher Hitchens, Blood, Class and Nostalgia: Anglo-American Ironies (London: Vintage, 1990), chap. 8Google Scholar
  47. 23a.
    Georg Schild, Bretton Woods and Dumbarton Oaks: American Economic and Political Post-War Planning in the Summer of 1944 (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1995), 80-4Google Scholar
  48. 23b.
    Jonathan %Fenby, Alliance: The Inside Story of How Roosevelt, Stalin and Churchill Won One War and Began Another (London: Simon & Schuster, 2006), 59–60.Google Scholar
  49. 24.
    For the US challenge to Britain in South-East Asia see Walter LaFeber, ‘Roosevelt, Churchill, and Indochina, 1942-1945’, American Historical Review 80, no. 5 (1975): 1277-95. For the Middle East see Hitchens, Blood, Class and Nostalgia, chap. 8Google Scholar
  50. 24a.
    Sean Dennis Cashman, America, Roosevelt, and World War II (New York: New York University Press, 1989), 341-5Google Scholar
  51. 24b.
    John A. DeNovo, ‘The Culbertson Economic Mission and Anglo-American Tensions in the Middle East, 1944-1945’, Journal of American History 63, no. 4 (1977): 913-36. For North Africa, seeGoogle Scholar
  52. 24c.
    Harold G. Marcus, Ethiopia, Great Britain and the United States, 1941-1974: The Politics of Empire (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1983); andGoogle Scholar
  53. 24d.
    Robert Vitalis, ‘The “New Deal” in Egypt: The Rise of Anglo-American Commercial Competition in World War II and the Fall of Neocolonialism’, Diplomatic History 20, no. 2 (1996): 211-39.Google Scholar
  54. 25.
    The exceptions to this are a small number of studies exploring Anglo-American relations in particular South American countries during the war. See E.L. Peffer, ‘Cordell Hull’s Argentine Policy and Britain’s Meat Supply’, Inter-American Economic Affairs 10, no. 3 (1956): 3–21Google Scholar
  55. 25a.
    Nicholas Bowen, ‘The End of British Economic Hegemony in Argentina: Messersmith and the Eddy-Miranda Agreement’, Inter-American Economic Affairs 28, no. 4 (1975): 3–24Google Scholar
  56. 25b.
    Nicholas Bowen, ‘Britain, Argentina, and the United States, 1938-1946: Conflict and Collaboration with the Atlantic Triangle (unpublished PhD thesis, Cambridge University, 1975); and Marcelo de Paiva Abreu, Anglo-Brazilian Economic Relations and the Consolidation of American Pre-Eminence in Brazil, 1930-1945’, in Latin America, Economic Imperialism and the State: The Political Economy of the External Connection from Independence to the Present, ed. Christopher Abel and Colin M. Lewis (London: Institute of Latin American Studies, 1985), 379-93. See also the author’s own recent work on the topicGoogle Scholar
  57. 25c.
    Thomas C. Mills, Anglo-American Economic Diplomacy During the Second World War and the Electrification of the Central Brazilian Railway’, Diplomacy and Statecraft 20 (2009): 69–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 25d.
    Thomas C. Mills, ‘The “Hemisphere Isolationists” and Anglo-American Economic Diplomacy during the Second World War’, Journal of Transatlantic Studies 9, no. 1 (2011): 63–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 26.
    Alec Campbell, ‘Anglo-American Relations, 1939-1946: A British View’, in Argentina Between the Great Powers, 1939-46, eds. Guido di Telia and Donald Cameron Watt (Oxford: Macmillan, 1989), 1–17; Warren F Kimball, ‘“The Juggler”: Franklin D. Roosevelt and Anglo-American Competition in Latin America’, in Argentina Between the Great Powers, 1939-46, eds. Guido di Telia and Donald Watt, 18-33. Kimball’s essay is expanded upon inGoogle Scholar
  60. 26a.
    Warren F Kimball, The Juggler: Franklin Roosevelt as Wartime Statesman (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1991), 107-25.Google Scholar
  61. 27.
    Laurence Duggan, The Americas: The Search for Hemisphere Security (New York: Henry Holt, 1949), 74-5.Google Scholar
  62. 28.
    Reynolds, The Creation of the Anglo-American Alliance, 272; James MacGregor Burns, Roosevelt: The Soldier of Freedom (New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1970), 491.Google Scholar
  63. 29.
    Victor Buhner-Thomas, British Trade with Latin America in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries (London: Institute of Latin American Studies, 1998), 12; and Hathaway, Ambiguous Partnership, 22.Google Scholar
  64. 30.
    For criticisms of British censorship policy, see ‘Senators Defeat Clipper Mail Curb’, New York Times, February 16, 1940, 9; ‘Charges British Sell Goods Given Them to Carry on War’, Chicago Illinois Tribune, July 1, 1941, 1; Statement by Louis C. Rabaut (Dem.-Mich.), Congressional Record, November 13, 1941, 77th Congress, 1st Session, 8844. Regarding economic warfare see Franklin Johnston, ‘How Britain’s Blacklists and Censorship Affect American Traders’, Export Trade and Shipper, March 3, 1941, 4; Buenos Aires to Foreign Office, July 7, 1941, Ministry of Economic Warfare Records, The National Archives of the United Kingdom, Kew, London [hereafter TNA] FO 837/198; and ‘Exporters Charge British Re-sales’, New York Times, July 6, 1941, 1, 2. Regarding Britain’s export policy see Grigsby to Campbell, May 26, 1941, Foreign Office General Correspondence TNA: FO 371/25989/A4507 [hereafter cited as TNA: FO 371 with file numbers]; and Washington to Foreign Office. TNA: FO 371/25989/A5599; Washington to Foreign Office, July 4, 1941. TNA: FO 371/25989/A5384.Google Scholar
  65. 31.
    McDonald to McCabe, January 26, 1942, Disposition of Lend-Lease Materials Abroad, Box 104, General Subject File, Office of Lend-Lease Administration, Foreign Economic Administration [FEA], Record Group 169 (RG169), United States National Archives and Records Administration, College Park, Maryland [hereafter NARA].Google Scholar
  66. 32.
    ‘Statement by Sir John Reith in answer to question by Arthur Henderson’, March 4, 1940, FO 371/25093/W3929, TNA; Overton to Leith-Ross, January 7, 1941. TNA: FO 371/28738/W390; Mather-Jackson minute, June 16, 1941, Perowne to Grubb, June 25, 1941. TNA: FO 371/25989/A4507; ‘U.K. Export to S. America: A US Complaint Unjustified’, Financial Times, July 8, 1941, ‘United Kingdom Trade Policy in Latin America’, State Department Decimal File, 610.4117/22 [hereafter cited by decimal reference], RG59, NARA; Ashton minute, July 7, 1941, Foreign Office to Washington, July 12, 1941, FO 371/25989/A5384, TNA; and Washington to Foreign Office, July 18, 1941. TNA: FO 371/25989/A5601.Google Scholar
  67. 33.
    ‘Correspondence Respecting the Policy of His Majesty’s Government in Connexion with the Use of Materials Received Under the Lend-Lease Act’, Cmd. 6331, September 10, 1941, Parliamentary Papers 1940-41, vol. 3: United States No. 2 (London: HMSO, 1941). For censorship, see Memo of conversation between Moffat and Lothian, FRUS, 1939, vol. 2, 267. For blacklisting, see Foreign Office to Washington, October 9, 1941. TNA: FO 371/28752/W12610; and Reading to Helm, October 10, 1941. TNA: FO 371/28752/W12610.Google Scholar
  68. 34.
    British exports to South America declined from a pre-war figure of £34.2 million to just £27.3 million in 1941. This decline was most marked in those products specifically targeted by British policies, such as manufactures containing steel and iron. See Statistical Digest of the War (London: HMSO, 1951), 162, 166.Google Scholar
  69. 35.
    State Department to London, January 20, 1942, FRUS, 1942, vol. 5, 283-4; State Department to representatives in American Republics, January 28, 1942, FRUS, 1942, vol. 5, 285-6; Memo from British embassy, February 26, 1942, Memos Relating to General Latin American Affairs, Office of American Republic Affairs [OARA], Box 6, RG59, NARA; Edminster for Acheson, December 26, 1941, 621.4117/19, RG59, NARA; and State Department to American Diplomatic and Consular Offices in the other American Republics, March 25, 1942, 610.4117/23A, RG59, NARA.Google Scholar
  70. 36.
    Memo by unknown for Bonsai, April 14, 1942, Memos Relating to General Latin American Affairs, OARA, Box 6, RG59, NARA.Google Scholar
  71. 37.
    ‘Memorandum Respecting the Anglo-United States-Brazilian Triangle’ by Gallop, July 15, 1942, FO 371/30369/A6565, TNA.Google Scholar
  72. 38.
    Perowne minute, February 27, 1942. TNA: FO 371/30500/A1516.Google Scholar
  73. 39.
    Dean G. Acheson, Present at the Creation: My Years in the State Department (New York: WW. Norton, 1969), 31.Google Scholar
  74. 40.
    Acheson to American Diplomatic and Consular Offices in the other American Republics, July 10, 1942, 610.4117/30A, RG59, NARA.Google Scholar
  75. 41.
    Chapin to Duggan, April 6, 1942, 610.4117/31, RG59, NARA.Google Scholar
  76. 42.
    Dawson to State Department, August 5, 1942, 610.4117/42, RG59, NARA; Bowers to State Department, July 31, 1942, 610.4117/40, RG59, NARA; Bliss Lane to State Department, August 21, 1942, 610.4117/44, RG59, NARA; Cross to State Department, September 1, 1942, 610.4117/48, RG59, NARA; Gallop minute, November 17, 1942. TNA: FO 371/30516/A10550; Brickell to Foreign Office, October 21, 1942, Sands untitled report, December 9, 1942. TNA: FO 371/30516/A10693; and Nosworthy to Scott, November 15, 1942. TNA: FO 371/30369/A11219.Google Scholar
  77. 43.
    Butler minute, September 5, 1942. TNA: FO 371/30516/A8229; Perowne to Campbell, October 31, 1942. TNA: FO 371/30516/A8581; and Washington Chancery to South American department, July 9, 1942, TNA FO 371/30516/A6602.Google Scholar
  78. 44.
    Randall B. Woods, The Roosevelt Foreign Policy Establishment and the ‘Good Neighbor’: The United States and Argentina, 1941-1945 (Lawrence: Regents Press, 1979), 23-4; andGoogle Scholar
  79. 44a.
    Max Paul Freidman, Nazis and Good Neighbors: The United States Campaign Against the Germans of Latin America in World War II (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003), 78-9.Google Scholar
  80. 45.
    Sumner Welles, The Time for Decision (London: Hamish Hamilton, 1944), 187.Google Scholar
  81. 46.
    Grubb to Perowne, January 21, 1943. TNA: FO 371/33903/A959.Google Scholar
  82. 47.
    Extract from letter of July 1942 from the Treasury department to Rockefeller. TNA: FO 371/33901/A3135; and ‘Internal Revenue Code’, 1942, ‘Trade Promotion’ Folder, Box 31, Subject File, Records of the Office of the Administrator, FEA, RG169, NARA.Google Scholar
  83. 48.
    ‘President of US Chamber of Commerce on “American Century”’, South American Journal, June 26, 1943, 338; and ‘The Future of Investment in Latin America’, South American Journal, March 11, 1944, 150.Google Scholar
  84. 49.
    Perowne memo, December 29, 1942. TNA: FO 371/30516/A12124; Kelly to Eden, February 19, 1943. TNA: FO 371/33907/A2855; Playfair minute, April 16, 1943. TNA: FO 371/33907/A3590; and Washington to Foreign Office, April 29, 1943. TNA: FO 371/339 08/A3996.Google Scholar
  85. 50.
    Campbell to Perowne, September 4, 1942, FO 371/30516/A8580, TNA; Perowne to Campbell, October 31, 1942, ‘The US and Great Britain in Latin America’ memo by Perowne, December 29, 1942. TNA: FO 371/30516/A12124; ‘Commercial Policy in Regard to Latin America’, undated. TNA: FO 371/33908/A4370; Campbell to Perowne, September 4, 1942. TNA: FO 371/30516/A8580; Perowne to Campbell, October 31, 1942. TNA: FO 371/30516/A8581; ‘Future British Trade Relations with Latin America’, February 13, 1943. TNA: FO 371/33907/A1710; Humphreys paper, undated [March 1943]. TNA: FO 371/33903/A2213; Playfair minute for Bewley, Rowe-Dutton, Waley, April 16, 1943. TNA: FO 371/33907/A3590.Google Scholar
  86. 51.
    Dobson, The Politics of the Anglo-American Economic Special Relationship, 37-8.Google Scholar
  87. 52.
    ‘War Cabinet Lord President’s Committee. Conclusions of a Meeting of the Committee held on Friday, May 21, 1943 at 10.30a.m.’, ‘Commercial Policy in Latin America’. TNA: FO 371/33908/A4800.Google Scholar
  88. 53.
    Aide-Memoire from British embassy in Washington, July 9, 1943, Folder 216, Box 59, Cordell Hull Papers, Cambridge University Library [CUL]; Memo of conversation, July 10, 1943, Folder 216, Box 59, Hull Papers, CUL; and Washington to Foreign Office, July 10, 1943. TNA: FO 371/33909/A6498.Google Scholar
  89. 54.
    ‘Notes on a Visit to Washington and Ottawa’ by Gallop, March 14, 1944. TNA: FO 371/35185/AS1621; Duggan, The Americas, 102; Gordon Connell-Smith, The Inter-American System (London: Oxford University Press, 1966), 128; ‘British Activities in the Other American Republics’, January 30, 1945, Box 13, Memorandums of the Division of American Republic Analysis and Liaison, OARA, RG59; Memorandum of conversation, July 17, 1944, memorandum of conversation, January 23, 1944, Folder 216, Box 59, Hull Papers, CUL; Buenos Aires to State Department, March 31, 1944, 735.41/29, RG59, NARA.Google Scholar
  90. 55.
    Max Paul Friedman, Nazis and Good Neighbors: The United States Campaign against the Germans of Latin America in World War II (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003), 189-90; C.C. Concanon, ‘The Trade Outlook for Medicinals and Pharmaceuticals’, Export Trade and Shipper, January 1, 1940, 8; and Graham D. Taylor, ‘The Axis Replacement Program: Economic Warfare and the Chemical Industry in Latin America, 1942-44’, 159.Google Scholar
  91. 56.
    Mills, ‘Anglo-American Economic Diplomacy’, 69-85.Google Scholar
  92. 57.
    Campbell, ‘Anglo-American Relations’, 15.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Board of Transatlantic Studies 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Politics, Philosophy and ReligionLancaster UniversityLancasterUK

Personalised recommendations