Journal of Transatlantic Studies

, Volume 11, Issue 2, pp 213–230 | Cite as

No Surrender? The legacy of the Ulster Solemn League and Covenant

  • Jane G. V. McGaugheyEmail author


This article examines the legacy of covenanting language and imagery in Northern Ireland. Although the media has spent the last 40 years portraying Ian Paisley as the political heir of Sir Edward Carson, the leader of the Free Presbyterian Church is much more of a seventeenth century Protestant extremist than a modern political figure. As such, Dr Paisley has consistently turned to the 1638 Scottish Covenant as the only true document that informs Ulster Protestantism. Despite the fanfare surrounding its appearance in 1912, the Ulster Covenant is a forgotten relic of the Unionist past compared to the enduring legacy of the Great War.


unionism Northern Ireland Protestantism solidarity leadership 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Throughout the article, the capitalised term ‘Unionist’ refers specifically to members of the Ulster Unionist Party (UUP). The term ‘unionist’ spelled in the lowercase refers to the larger unionist community in the north of Ireland who wished to maintain the British connection, including members of Ian Paisley’s Democratic Unionist Party (DUP). The author would like to thank the Deputy Keeper of the Records for permission to publish from the material held at the Public Record Office of Northern Ireland, captain R.H. Lowry for permission to publish from the Montgomery Papers and Lord Craigavon for permission to publish from the Craigavon Papers.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bryan Coll, ‘Northern Ireland’s Election: Surprise Results, Failed Alliances’, May 7, 2010, Time,,8599,1987776,00.html (accessed June 25, 2011). The 2010 election was a disaster for Peter Robinson, the DUP leader and the First Minister of Northern Ireland, and for the UUP leader Sir Reg Empey Robinson was able to rise from the ashes and win the East Belfast seat in the 2011 assembly elections, whereas the UUP was relegated to fourth place at Stormont. See Henry McDonald, ‘Northern Ireland Assembly Election: Ulster Unionists Head for Fourth Place’, May 7, 2011, The Guardian, (accessed June 7, 2012).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    David McKittric, ‘No more “Dr No”: Meet the New Ian Paisley’, November 15, 2007, The Independent, (accessed June 7, 2012).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Professor C.A.M. Nobles in association with Dr Ian R.K. Paisley, ‘The United States’ Debt to Ulster: A Call to Remembrance and Action’, February 2, 1998, available on The European Institute of Protestant Studies website at ArtKey=dupusa (accessed June 7, 2012). Bob Jones was also a frequent contributor to the Protestant Telegraph, the newspaper most affiliated with Paisley.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    “‘Who We Are,” The Free Presbyterian Church of North America’, available on the FPCNA, (accessed June 7, 2012).
  6. 6.
    ‘Messages by Harold Paisley’, the Voices for Christ, (accessed June 7, 2012)
  7. 6a.
    Lloyd Mackey, ‘Ottawa Watch: Conflict and the Paisleys’, May 10, 2007, available on the Canadian Christianity website at (accessed June 7, 2012).Google Scholar
  8. 7.
    Ian Jack, ‘Never Say Never’, November 1, 2008, The Guardian, Scholar
  9. 8.
    Gerry Adams, A Fascinating, Gracious Man’, March 6, 2008, The Guardian, (accessed June 7, 2012).Google Scholar
  10. 9.
    Jenny McCartney, ‘Papal Visit: Is Richard Dawkins Turning into Ian Paisley?’, September 18, 2010, The Telegraph, (accessed June 7, 2012).Google Scholar
  11. 10.
    Ian McAllister, ‘The Devil, Miracles and the Afterlife: The Political Sociology of Religion in Northern Ireland’, The British Journal of Sociology, 33, no. 3 (1982): 343, 331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 11.
    Donald Harman Akenson, God’s Peoples: Covenant and Land in South Africa, Israel and Ulster (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1992), 6.Google Scholar
  13. 12.
    Alvin Jackson, ‘Unionist Myths, 1912 - 1985’, Past and Present, 136 (1992): 184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 13.
    Roy Foster, Modern Ireland, first published 1988 (London: Penguin Press, 1989), 78.Google Scholar
  15. 14.
    For more on the siege mentality’s role in fashioning unionist Ulstermen’s modern identity, see Jane G.V. McGaughey, Ulster’s Men: Protestant Unionist Masculinities and Militarization in the North of Ireland, 1912–1923 (Montreal and Kingston: McGill Queen’s University Press, 2012), 42–3 and 150–2.Google Scholar
  16. 15.
    Akenson, God’s Peoples, 150Google Scholar
  17. 15a.
    David Officer, ‘“For God and for Ulster”: The Ulsterman on the Somme’, in History and Memory in Modern Ireland, ed. Ian McBride (Cambridge: CUP, 2001), 162. By the end of the twentieth century, Northern Ireland included among its Protestant denominations Independent Methodists, Free Methodists, Free Presbyterians, non-subscribing Presbyterians, evangelical Presbyterians, Pentecostals, Church of the Latter-Day Saints, Church of the Nazarene, Church of God, Church of Christ and the Church of Ireland. SeeGoogle Scholar
  18. 15b.
    Philip Orr, New Light on the Covenant People, Fortnight, No. 297, Supplement: Free Thought in Ireland (Jul-Aug., 1991), 15.Google Scholar
  19. 16.
    David W Miller, Queen’s Rebels: Ulster Loyalism in Historical Perspective (Dublin: Gill and MacMillan, 1978), 119.Google Scholar
  20. 17.
    For examples of the unionist anti-Home Rule sentiment, see Northern Whig, September 30, 1912; Belfast News-Letter, September 30, 1912; The Voice of Ulster (1913)Google Scholar
  21. 17a.
    Arthur Balfour, Nationality and Home Rule (London: Longmans, Green and Co., 1913)Google Scholar
  22. 17b.
    Ernest W Hamilton, The Soul of Ulster (London: Hurst & Blackett Ltd., 1917)Google Scholar
  23. 17b.
    P. Kerr-Smiley, The Peril of Home Rule (London: Cassell & Co., 1911)Google Scholar
  24. 17c.
    Jeremiah MacVeagh, Home Rule: Rome Rule (London: The Morning Leader, 1912)Google Scholar
  25. 17d.
    S. Rosenbaum, ed., Against Home Rule: The Case for Union (London: Frederick Warne, 1912)Google Scholar
  26. 17e.
    Pembroke Wicks, The Truth About Home Rule (London: Sir Isaac Pitman & Sons Ltd, 1913).Google Scholar
  27. 18.
    Editorial, Belfast News-Letter, April 10, 1912, 4.Google Scholar
  28. 19.
    David Trimble, The Foundation of Northern Ireland (Lurgan: Ulster Society Publications Ltd., 1991), 1.Google Scholar
  29. 20.
    Trimble, The Foundation of Northern Ireland, 31.Google Scholar
  30. 21.
    William T Laprade, ‘The Present Status of the Home Rule Question’, The American Political Science Review 6, no. 4 (1912): 543–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 22.
    Morning Post quoted in Belfast News-Letter, September 30, 1912.Google Scholar
  32. 23.
    The Public Record Office of Northern Ireland (PRONI) cites that 237,368 men signed the Ulster Covenant while the Women’s Declaration received 234,046 signatures. See ‘The Ulster Covenant - Introduction’, 2007, available on the PRONI website at (accessed June 7, 2012); Wicks, The Truth About Home Rule, 92
  33. 23a.
    Richard S. Grayson, Belfast Boys: How Unionists and Nationalists Fought and Died Together in the First World War (London: Continuum, 2010), 3.Google Scholar
  34. 24.
    Arrival of Sir Edward Carson. An Enthusiastic Welcome, Belfast News-Letter, September 19, 1912, 5.Google Scholar
  35. 25.
    Ulster’s Decisive Stand, Belfast Evening Telegraph, September 24, 1912, 4.Google Scholar
  36. 26.
    Jackson, ‘Unionist Myths’, 165.Google Scholar
  37. 27.
    Belfast News-Letter, September 30, 1912.Google Scholar
  38. 28.
    Daniel J. Elzar, ‘The Political Theory of Covenant: Biblical Origins and Modern Developments’, Publius, 10, no. 4 Covenant, Polity and Constitutionalism (1980): 11.Google Scholar
  39. 29.
    Jackson, ‘Unionist Myths’, 171.Google Scholar
  40. 30.
    National Archives (NA), CO 904/27/2, Ulster Volunteer Force Pledge, ‘For the Preservation of the Peace’.Google Scholar
  41. 31.
    Northern Whig, September 30, 1912.Google Scholar
  42. 32.
    Belfast News-Letter, September 30, 1912. This promotion of the Protestant religion as the heart of the unionist movement was later made great use of by pro-Paisley publications in the 1960s and 1970s, in particular the Protestant Telegraph, as a means of legitimising Ian Paisley’s authority within the unionist community to the detriment of others, in particular the prime minister of the day. For an example of this use of the covenanting past to fracture the unionist movement at the end of the Stormont era, see ‘Carson’s UVF’, Protestant Telegraph, January 30, 1971, 6.Google Scholar
  43. 33.
    Northern Whig, September 30, 1912.Google Scholar
  44. 34.
    The Ulster Division sustained the fourth highest number of casualties among British troops on 1 July 1916 with 5100 casualties including 210 officers. The ‘butcher’s bill’ for Ulster was some 2500 dead. See PRONI, D.3835/E/2/10/2, Nugent papers, letter from General Sir Oliver Nugent to Lady Nugent, July 3, 1916; Officer, ‘For God and for Ulster’, 160.Google Scholar
  45. 35.
    McGaughey, Ulster’s Men, 88, 95, 97–109.Google Scholar
  46. 36.
    John Keegan, The Face of Battle: A Study of Agincourt, Waterloo and the Somme (London: Jonathan Cape, 1976), 223.Google Scholar
  47. 37.
    ‘The Glory of Ulster’, Northern Whig, July 7, 1916, 4.Google Scholar
  48. 38.
    ‘References in the Churches. Tributes by Belfast Ministers’, Northern Whig, July 10, 1916, 6.Google Scholar
  49. 39.
    Akenson, God’s Peoples, 201.Google Scholar
  50. 40.
    Officer, ‘For God and for Ulster’, 182; Lt.-Colonel WA. Shooter OBE, Ulster’s Part in the Battle of the Somme: 1st July to 15th November, 1916 (Belfast: The Northern Whig Ltd., 1966), 10.Google Scholar
  51. 41.
    ‘Ulster Will Write’, Reprinted in the Belfast Evening Telegraph, September 28, 1912, 5.Google Scholar
  52. 42.
    PRONI, D627/435/53, The Covenant with God & Brethren: The Pledge to the Ulster Division and Lloyd George’s Proposals, 1918.Google Scholar
  53. 43.
    David G Boyce, ‘British Opinion, Ireland, and the War, 1916–1918’, The Historical Journal, 17, no. 3 (1974:, 588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 44.
    PRONI, D.1507/A/13/18, Carson papers, letter from R. Dawson Bates to Carson, 31 August 1915.Google Scholar
  55. 45.
    PRONI, 6627/435/53, The Covenant with God & Brethren: The Pledge to the Ulster Division and Lloyd George’s Proposals, 1918.Google Scholar
  56. 46.
  57. 47.
  58. 48.
    ‘Leader’, Irish Times, June 16, 1918, 1.Google Scholar
  59. 49.
    Irish Daily Telegraph, June 22, 1918, quoted in PRONI, D627/435/53.Google Scholar
  60. 50.
    Miller, Queen’s Rebels, 108.Google Scholar
  61. 51.
    PRONI, D627/435/83A, letter from Hugh de Fellenberg Montgomery to Col. R.G. Sharman-Crawford, May 15, 1920.Google Scholar
  62. 52.
    Akenson, God’s Peoples, 183.Google Scholar
  63. 53.
    ‘The Victory Twelfth’, Belfast News-Letter, July 14, 1919, 5.Google Scholar
  64. 54.
    Lord Craigavon, November 21, 1932, House of Commons Debates, Northern Ireland, vol. 17, col. 73; Protestant Telegraph, January 30, 1971.Google Scholar
  65. 55.
    The full text of the 1643 Solemn League and Covenant can be found in Samuel Rawson Gardiner, The Constitutional Documents of the Puritan Revolution, 1628–1660. 3rd ed. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1906), 267–71.Google Scholar
  66. 56.
    F.P. Crozier, A Brass Hat in No Man’s Land (London: Jonathan Cape, 1930), 21.Google Scholar
  67. 57.
    ‘State Funeral of Lord Carson’, Northern Whig, October 28, 1935, 4.Google Scholar
  68. 58.
    J.W. Nixon, March 5, 1931, HC Debs. NI, vol. 13, col. 132.Google Scholar
  69. 59.
    Mr H. Diamond, January 16, 1962, HC Debs. NI, vol. 50, col. 1122; PRONI, D.1415/B/34, Craigavon papers, FH. Crawford, ‘The Arming of Ulster: Fred Crawford’s Account’, 68; ‘The Ulster Covenant’, Protestant Telegraph, September 26, 1970, 6.Google Scholar
  70. 60.
    Mr H. Diamond, January 16, 1962, HC Debs. NI, vol. 50, col. 1122.Google Scholar
  71. 61.
    ‘The Price of Valour at the Somme’, Belfast News-Letter, July 1, 1966, 3.Google Scholar
  72. 62.
    Jackson, ‘Unionist Myths’, 168.Google Scholar
  73. 63.
    Jackson, ‘Unionist Myths’, 169; ‘Ulster Must not Yield’, Protestant Telegraph, July 12, 1972, 1. In one of Paisley’s more amusing uses of the Carson legacy, he availed himself of the statue of Sir Edward for cover when throwing snowballs at Seéan Lemass during the Irish Taoiseach’s visit to Stormont in 1965. See, David Sharrock, ‘After 50 Turbulent Years, Stormont Shakes off Heavy Chains of History’, March 9, 2007, The Sunday Times, (accessed June 7, 2012).Google Scholar
  74. 64.
    ‘Paisley Men Rally on a Windswept Mountain’, The Times (London), February 7, 1981, 3.Google Scholar
  75. 65.
    Martha Abele MacIver, ‘Ian Paisley and the Reformed Tradition’, Political Studies XXXV (1987): 367–8.Google Scholar
  76. 66.
    The Free Presbyterian Church began its North American chapters in 1976, first in Toronto, Canada, and then in Greenville, South Carolina and Newtown Square, Pennsylvania. A theological seminary was established in Greenville in 1982. All of these congregations were answerable to the Ulster presbytery until the formation of a distinct Free Presbyterian Church of North America in 2004. The new church sought to ‘foster and maintain fraternal relations’ between North America and Ulster, and ministers previously sent out to work in North America were able to hold dual membership in both presbyteries, maintaining the transatlantic connection. See A Brief History of the Free Presbyterian Church of North America’, available at the FPCNA website at (accessed June 7, 2012).
  77. 67.
    PRONI, CAB/9/B/300/3, Law and order in Northern Ireland: reports of speeches made by Rev. Ian Paisley and ministers of the Free Presbyterian Church, speech delivered by Rev. Paisley at Ballinran, December 16, 1966, 2.Google Scholar
  78. 68.
    ‘O’Neill The Bridge-Builder’, Protestant Telegraph, May 28, 1966, 2.Google Scholar
  79. 69.
    ‘Fighting Speech in Ulster Hall’, Belfast News-Letter, April 18, 1966, 7.Google Scholar
  80. 70.
    Jack, ‘Never Say Never’, The Guardian, November 1, 2008, 52.Google Scholar
  81. 71.
    The Revivalist, June 1980, 32 and October 1982, 10 quoted in MacIver, ‘Ian Paisley and the Reformed Tradition’, 367.Google Scholar
  82. 72.
    ‘This Man Paisley’, The Hamilton Advertiser, March 31, 1967, 3.Google Scholar
  83. 73.
    A wide selection of Paisley’s speeches, sermons and past publications can be found online at the European Institute of Protestant Studies, (accessed June 7, 2012); ‘Ulster’s Armageddon’, Protestant Telegraph, May 17, 1969, 4; MacIver qualifies Paisley’s theory of covenant as both a blend of Scottish and Ulster historical rejection of Roman Catholicism and also, more subtly, as Knox’s interpretation of the Old Testament notion of a social-political covenant that shapes the proper foundation, goals and laws of the political community. See, MacIver, ‘Ian Paisley and the Reformed Tradition’, 361.
  84. 74.
    A Brief History of the Free Presbyterian Church of North America’, available on the FPCNA website at (accessed June 7, 2012). There are also congregations in Australia and missionary programmes in India, Jamaica, Kenya, the Republic of Ireland, Spain, the Philippines and Germany.
  85. 75.
    Dr Ian R.K. Paisley, speech at the Ulster Democratic Unionist Party Conference, May 8, 2004, available on the EIPS website at (accessed June 7, 2012).Google Scholar
  86. 76.
    Gardiner, The Constitutional Documents, 267–71.Google Scholar
  87. 77.
    ‘Paisley 100 will Shadow the Pope’, The Times (London), May 25, 1981, 24; ‘Paisley Demonstrators Penned in Side Street’, The Times (London), May 31, 1982, 2; ‘Protestors Held after Scuffle’, The Times (London), June 1, 1981, 4; ‘Security Leak to Paisley puts Princess at Risk’, The Times (London), June 2, 1981, 1; ‘Petition to the Queen’, Protestant Telegraph, June 8, 1968, 7; ‘Petition to the Queen’, Protestant Telegraph, May 31, 1969, 4; The Revivalist (March 1982), 13 quoted in MacIver, ‘Ian Paisley and the Reformed Tradition’, 370; ‘Disappointed Commission says Britain Reneged’, The Times (London), July 10, 1981, 1. See also Paisley’s sermon ‘None Dare Call it Treason’, October 22, 2000, available on the EIPS website at (accessed June 7, 2012).
  88. 78.
    MacIver, ‘Ian Paisley and the Reformed Tradition’, 371.Google Scholar
  89. 79.
    Akenson, God’s Peoples, 287; ‘The Covenanters’ Dilemma or “to be or not to be”?’, Protestant Telegraph, April 27, 1968, 11.Google Scholar
  90. 80.
    Protestant Telegraph, January 30, 1971; Jackson, ‘Unionist Myths’, 185.Google Scholar
  91. 81.
    Protestant Telegraph, May 17, 1969.Google Scholar
  92. 82.
  93. 83.
    Dr Ian R.K. Paisley, ‘The Pre-eminence of Our Lord Jesus Christ’, transcript of the Free Presbyterian Church of Ulster Golden Jubilee Thanksgiving Service, March 25, 2001, available on the EIPS website at (accessed June 7, 2012).Google Scholar
  94. 84.
    ‘Ulster’s Solemn League and Covenant’, Protestant Telegraph, September 30, 1967, 12.Google Scholar
  95. 85.
    Peter Robinson, ‘Call for Pan-Unionist Celebration of Ulster Covenant’, July 23, 2009, available on the DUP website at ID=1046 (accessed June 7, 2012); ‘Minister to Help Bodies Plan Ulster Day Events’, September 29, 2009, Newsletter, (accessed June 7, 2012).Google Scholar
  96. 86.
    Arlene Foster, February 23, 2010, Northern Ireland Assembly Official Report (Hansard), 372–3.Google Scholar
  97. 87.
    ‘Order launches 1912 Covenant Celebrations’, June 21, 2010, Newsletter, (accessed June 7, 2012); ‘Ulster Covenant 100th Anniversary 1912–2012 Catalogue’, available on the Grand Orange Lodge website at (accessed June 7, 2012). This use of material culture to celebrate the centenary is not just a hang-over from the 2011 royal wedding of the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge; reproductions of Sir Edward Carson’s stern profile were legion during the anti-Home Rule campaign from 1912 to 1914, including postcards, charity stamps, lapel badges, porcelain busts and other knick-knacks. See, Jackson, ‘Unionist Myths’, 172.
  98. 88.
    Planned commemorations for the centenary of the Great War are a global phenomenon and have been ‘in the works’ for several years. The Imperial War Museum in London will be one of the key focal points for numerous ceremonies and events, but others have also been discussed in the British House of Lords, the Australian and Canadian governments and the United States Congress. See, Imperial War Museum, ‘Centenary’, available on the IWM website at (accessed June 7, 2012); House of Lords Main Chamber Debates (Hansard), March 22, 2011; Anzac Centenary’, available on the Australian Government website at (accessed June 7, 2012)
  99. 88a.
    David Frum, ‘Canada Approaches an Opportunity to Honour its Own’, August 2, 2009, National Post, (accessed June 7, 2012); ‘Princess Patricia’s Canadian Light Infantry 100th Anniversary’, May 27, 2011, available at (accessed June 7, 2012); Library of Congress, “110th Congress (2007–2008), H.R. 6960 - To Establish the World War I Centennial Commission to Ensure a Suitable Observance of the Centennial of World War I’, September 18, 2008, available on the Library of Congress website at (accessed June 7, 2012).Google Scholar
  100. 89.
    In his first address as the First Minister of Northern Ireland on the anniversary of the Somme in 2009, Peter Robinson highlighted all of the reasons why the Great War continues to be the most powerful symbol for and definition of unionists across the generations. He noted that Ulstermen had ‘fought for their King and country, to protect the United Kingdom from the dangers of German militarism and to preserve our democratic way of life’. He continued that: ‘here in Ulster, the name of the 36th Division will live forever because of the extraordinary courage and resilience shown by the men who left our shores to fight and die in France. In my own East Belfast constituency, Number 6 District Loyal Orange Lodge holds their annual parade to remember those who died. I am aware of similar events being held throughout the country… As we look backwards, we can do so with pride: pride in the fact that the men of Ulster proved their value and their mettle in the face of enemy fire. As war correspondent Philip Gibbs said of the 36th Division on 1st July 1916: ‘their attack was one of the finest displays of courage in the world’. They overcame incredible odds to achieve their objectives on the first day and in so doing secured a place in the annals of the history of the Commonwealth that will never be erased. See Peter Robinson, ‘Remembering the Bravery & Sacrifice of an Earlier Generation’, July 1, 2009, available on the DUP website at (accessed June 7, 2012).

Copyright information

© Board of Transatlantic Studies 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Canadian Irish StudiesConcordia UniversityMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations