Journal of Transatlantic Studies

, Volume 10, Issue 4, pp 358–373 | Cite as

Shale gas and renewables: divergence or win-win for transatlantic energy cooperation?

  • Marianne HaugEmail author


The recent emphasis in Europe on sustainable energy differs from the North American emphasis on fossil fuels as secure and low-cost energy source. Priorities and policies to meet energy security, sustainability and competitiveness goals started to diverge between the transatlantic partners. New alliances formed to address changing market realities, climate change concerns and access to energy in poorer countries. Shale gas and renewables emerged as potential game changers. Instead of driving the transatlantic energy partnership apart, the pursuit of different alliances, policies and technologies explores complementary pathways to meet common goals. The sustained, public and private commitment in the USA to develop and scale up shale gas technology and Europe’s leadership in renewable market transformation provide win-win outcomes for transatlantic as well as global energy cooperation.


transatlantic energy relations energy security energy policy goals shale gas renewable energy 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    International Energy Agency (IEA), Shared Goals, IEA, (accessed on May 20, 2012).
  2. 2.
    Bryan Walsh, ‘This Rock Could Power The World: Why Shale Can Solve the Energy Crisis’, Time Magazine, April 11, 2011, 177, no. 14, Environmental SpecialGoogle Scholar
  3. 2a.
    John Deutch, ‘The Good News About Gas: The Natural Gas Revolution and Its Consequences’, Foreign Affairs 90, no. 1 (2011): 82–93Google Scholar
  4. 2b.
    European Renewable Energy Council (EREC), ‘RE-Thinking 2050: Making the EU 100% Renewables-Based’, EREC, (accessed May 20, 2012)
  5. 2c.
    Price Waterhouse (PwC), ‘Moving towards 100% Renewable Electricity in Europe and North Africa by 2050’, PwC, (accessed May 24, 2012)
  6. 3.
    US Energy Information Administration (EIA), Annual Energy Outlook 2012 — Early Release Overview’, May 20, 2012), 9.
  7. 4.
    European Commission-Market Observatory for Energy, ‘Key Figures — June, 2011’, (accessed May 20, 2012).
  8. 5.
    European Commission, Energy 2020 — A Strategy for Competitive, Sustainable and Secure Energy (Luxembourg: Publication Office of the European Union, 2011).Google Scholar
  9. 6.
    European Commission, ‘Energy Roadmap 2050’, COM (2011) 885 final,, (accessed May 24, 2012), 7.
  10. 7.
    International Energy Forum (IEF), ‘Dialogue Plays a Key Role in Building the International Trust and Understanding Necessary to Achieve Global Energy Security’, IEF,, (accessed May 24, 2012).
  11. 8.
    US State Department, ‘Major Economies Process for Energy Security and Climate Change’, US State Department, July 20, 2012).
  12. 9.
    European Union, ‘EUR-Lex: Directive Establishing a Scheme for Gree Union,, (accessed May 30, 2012).
  13. 10.
    European Commission, Energy 2020, 4.Google Scholar
  14. 11.
    International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA), ‘Creation of IRENA’, IRENA, (accessed June 1, 2012).
  15. 12.
    European Commission, ‘On Security of Energy Supply and International Cooperation —The EU Energy Policy: Engaging with Partners beyond Our Borders’, European Commission, (accessed May 20, 2012).
  16. 13.
    European Commission, ‘Mediterranean Solar Plan, Strategy Paper’, European Commission, (accessed May 5, 2012)
  17. 14.
    Nadejda Komendantovaa and others, ‘Perception of Risks in Renewable Energy Projects: The Case of Concentrated Solar Power in North Africa’, Energy Policy 40 (2012): 103–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 15.
    IHS Global Insights, The Economic and Employment Contributions of Shale Gas in the United States (Washington, DC: IHS Press, 2012), 4.Google Scholar
  19. 16.
    Howard Rogers, ‘Shale Gas — The Unfolding Story’, Oxfords Review of Economic Policy 27 (2011): 140.Google Scholar
  20. 17.
    US Department of Energy/Energy Information Administration (US DOE/EIA), ‘World Shale Gas Resources: An Initial Assessment of 14 Regions Outside the United States’, USDOE/EIA, (accessed May 4, 2012).
  21. 18.
    Clayton M. Christensen, The Innovator’s Dilemma (Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 1997).Google Scholar
  22. 19.
    Florence Gény, ‘Can Unconventional Gas be a Game Changer in European Gas Markets’, Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, NG 46, December 2010, 24–39.Google Scholar
  23. 20.
    The US Department of Energy (DOE) initiated an evaluation of the geology and production engineering of non-conventional oil and gas in 1976. In collaboration with the Gas Technology Institute, a private/public consortium of producers, universities, service companies and geological services spent USD 700 million alone on RD&D during the 1978–2004 period, even before development investment by the medium tier oil and gas companies and Majors.Google Scholar
  24. 21.
    Gény, ‘Can Unconventional Gas’, 56–8.Google Scholar
  25. 22.
    International Energy Agency (IEA), Are We Entering a Golden Age of Gas? World Energy Outlook 2011 Special Report (Paris: OECD/IEA, 2011), 111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 23.
    RT News, ‘Shaken Plans: Exxon Mobil drops Polish Shale Gas Exploration’, (accessed 20 June, 2012).
  27. 24.
    Gény, ‘Can Unconventional Gas’, 99–101.Google Scholar
  28. 25.
    International Energy Agency (IEA), Are We Entering, 164.Google Scholar
  29. 26.
    Jinsheng Wang, David Ryan, and Edward J. Anthony, ‘Reducing the Greenhouse Gas Footprint of Shale Gas’, Energy Policy 39 (2011): 8196–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 26a.
    Eleanor Stephenson, Alexander Doukasa, and Karena Shaw, ‘Greenwashing Gas: Might a “Transition Fuel” Label Legitimize Carbon-Intensive Natural Gas Development?’, Energy Policy 46 (2012): 452–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 27.
    Michelle Michot Foss, ‘The Outlook for US Gas Prices in 2020: Henry Hub at $3 or $10’, Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, NG 58, December 2011, 60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 28.
    International Energy Agency (IEA), Golden Rules for a Golden Age of Gas, World Energy Outlook 2012, Special Report on Unconventional Gas (Paris: OECD/IEA, 2012), 9.Google Scholar
  33. 29.
    International Energy Agency (IEA), Golden rules for a Golden Age, 10.Google Scholar
  34. 30.
    International Energy Agency (IEA), Renewables Information 2011 (Paris: OECD/IEA, 2012), 3. The data quotes use the IEA methodology for renewables statistics. Please note that the 13% compared to 16% based on the substitutions methodology used by REN21.Google Scholar
  35. 31.
    International Energy Agency (IEA), Renewables, 19.Google Scholar
  36. 32.
    REN21, ‘Renewables 2005 Global Status Report’, (accessed May 20, 2012), 19; International Energy Agency (IEA), ‘Contribution of Renewables to Energy Security’, IEA, (accessed May 24, 20120).
  37. 33.
    International Energy Agency (IEA), World Energy Outlook 2011 (Paris: OECD/IEA, 2011), 510 and 528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 34.
    International Energy Agency (IEA), ‘RD&D Statistics Database’, (accessed May 2, 2012).
  39. 35.
    Frankfurt School/UNEP Collaborating Center/Bloomberg New Energy Finance, ‘Global Trends in Renewable Energy Investment’, (accessed May 12, 2012).
  40. 36.
    US Departments of Energy (DOE), ‘DSIRE Database for State Incentives for Renewables and Efficiency’, (accessed May 10, 2012).
  41. 37.
    US Department of Energy, ‘American Recovery & Reinvestment Act — Renewable Energy Projects’, US Department of Energy,
  42. 38.
    REN21, ‘Renewables Global Status Report 2012’, REN21, (accessed June 20, 2012), 60 and 61.
  43. 39.
    Estimate based on Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit (BMU), ‘Monitoring der Kosten und Nutzen der Wirkung des Ausbau erneuerbarer Energien im Strom und Wärmebereich 2011’,; and Erneuerbare Energien in Zahlen, Juli 2012, (accessed August 20, 2012)
  44. 40.
    Rebecca Henderson and Richard G. Newell, eds., Accelerating Energy Innovation: Insights from Multiple Sectors (Chicago: University of Chicago Press for National Bureau of Economic Research, 2011).Google Scholar
  45. 41.
    UNFCCC, ‘The Green Climate Fund — Financial, Technology and Capacity Building Support’, UNFCCC, (accessed May 24, 2012).

Copyright information

© Board of Transatlantic Studies 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Energy Policy and Sustainable DevelopmentUniversity of HohenheimStuttgartGermany

Personalised recommendations