Advertisement

Journal of Transatlantic Studies

, Volume 10, Issue 3, pp 201–221 | Cite as

Dreaming of Christian nations in the USA and Russia: the importance of history

  • John AndersonEmail author
Article

Abstract

This paper explores the continuing resonance of the Christian nation idea in the USA and Russia, focusing in particular on how appeals to history serve to justify contemporary political positions. Whilst President Obama seeks to distance himself from the exclusivist connotations of this discourse, conservative religious and political leaders argue that if public policy ignores the Christian heritage the country is doomed to moral and political decline. Across the Atlantic similar discourses have begun to gain prominence in the Russian Federation, sometimes taken up by Russian presidents, and are used by Orthodox religious leaders to defend institutional advantage. In both countries, this has led to campaigns to ensure that the teaching of history to the young gives due attention to the religious roots of national identity Yet, such arguments often rely on a particular and contested reading of history, and their public restatement has the potential to undermine the international image of both countries.

Keywords

Russia USA Christianity nationalism history 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    A recording of Obama’s comments can be found at: https://doi.org/www.youtube.com/watch?v=QIVd7YT0oWA&feature=player_embedded (accessed July 25, 2010).
  2. 2.
    Bases of the Social Concept of the Russian Orthodox Church, 2000, henceforth cited as Social Concept. Russian and English texts of his document can be found at: https://doi.org/www.mospat.ru/ru/documents/social-concepts/ (accessed June 4, 2009).
  3. 3.
    J. Ratzinger, Europe: Today and Tomorrow (San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 2007) includes some of the current Pope’s thoughts on Christianity and European identity.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    A. Smith, Chosen Peoples: Sacred Sources of National Identity (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003), 25.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    See their introduction and conclusion to P. Goff and K. Dunn, eds., Identity and Global Politics: Empirical and Theoretical Elaborations (New York: Palgrave, 2004), 1–8 and 237–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    R. Brubaker, ‘Religion and Nationalism: Four Approaches’, Nations and Nationalism 18, no. 1 (2012): 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    S. Huntington, Who Are We? The Challenges to American National Identity (New York: Simon & Schuster, 2004).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. Anderson, ‘Rocks, Art and Sex: The Culture Wars Come to Russia?’, Journal of Church and State (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    I am using ‘conservative’ to cover American Christians who adhere to traditional understandings of religious teachings and of sexual morality, though it should be stressed that it would be wrong to suggest that all conservative American Christians share the political agenda of the organised Christian Right. In the USA, there is also an ‘Christian left’ that includes some evangelicals, including the promoters of the Social Gospel at the end of the nineteenth century, religious civil rights activists, Christian peace campaigners and evangelicals on the left like Jim Wallis. Their voice has largely been eclipsed by louder and shriller voices in recent decades. In the Russian case, I am referring to the positions articulated by the leadership of the Russian Orthodox Church, though the overwhelming majority of all Russian Christians share the same position on sexual morality, and there is a far more conservative wing to the Orthodox Church that deems much of the hierarchy as hopelessly ‘liberal’.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    https://doi.org/www.wallbuilders.com/ABTOverview.asp (accessed October 20, 2011).
  11. 11.
    D. Barton, ‘Is President Obama Correct: Is America No Longer a Christian Nation?’, https://doi.org/www.wallbuilders.com/LIBissuesArticles.asp?id=23909 (accessed October 19, 2011).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    C. Smith, Christian America? What Evangelicals Really Want (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2000). Smith’s study suggested that many conservative Christians though a Christian nation was more likely to be built through religious change at the individual level than through political action.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    H. Heclo, ‘Is America a Christian Nation?’, Political Science Quarterly 123, no. 1 (2007): 65–6.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    A. Smith, National Identity (London: Penguin, 1991), 11.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ibid., 10.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    G Ilyichev and B. Klin, ‘Results of Poll on Attitudes Towards Religion’, Izvestiya, December 23, 2006Google Scholar
  17. 16a.
    I. Konovalov, ‘The Unchurched’, Nezavisimaya gazeta-religii, July 1, 2009.Google Scholar
  18. 17.
    A. Popov, ‘Pyrrhic Victories of Metropolitan Kirill’, Nezavisimaya gazeta, January 22, 2003.Google Scholar
  19. 18.
    ‘Holiday of Equidistance’, Portal credo, August 1, 2003. Portal-credo is an independent Russian religious news service whose home page can be found at: https://doi.org/www.portal-credo.ru/. Most of the material is in Russian but a small minority of reports is translated into English.
  20. 19.
    Religare — Religiya I CMI at http://www.religara.ru2_42432.html (accessed September 9, 2011); F. Weir, ‘Russia Emerges as Europe’s Most God-Believing Nation’, in Christian Science Monitor (2011). https://doi.org/www.csmonitor.com/World/Europe/2011/0506/Russia-emerges-as-Europe-s-most-God-believing-nation (accessed September 11, 2011).Google Scholar
  21. 20.
    cf. Ilyichev and Klin, ‘Results of Poll on Attitudes Towards Religion’; Konovalov, ‘The Unchurched’.Google Scholar
  22. 21.
    J.D. Hunter, Culture Wars — The Struggle to Define America (New York: Basic Books, 1991), 50.Google Scholar
  23. 22.
    C. Cherry, ed., God’s New Israel: Religious Interpretations of American Destiny, rev. ed. (Chapel Hill and London: The University of North Carolina Press, 1998), 19.Google Scholar
  24. 23.
    S. Friend Harding, The Book of Jerry Falwell: Fundamentalist Language and Rhetoric (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000), 165.Google Scholar
  25. 24.
    J. Meacham, American Gospel: God, The Founding Fathers, and the Making of a Nation (New York: Random Books, 2006), 41–2.Google Scholar
  26. 25.
    E. Guastad and L. Schmidt, The Religious History of America: The Heart of the Story from Colonial Times to Today (New York: Harper Collins, 2002), 37.Google Scholar
  27. 26.
    Cherry, God’s New Israel, 25.Google Scholar
  28. 27.
    Quoted in L. Baritz, City on a Hill: A History of Ideas and Myths in America (New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1964), 16.Google Scholar
  29. 28.
    Meacham, American Gospel, 80–1.Google Scholar
  30. 29.
    ‘The Founders as Christians’, https://doi.org/www.wallbuilders.com/LIBissuesArticles.asp?id=78(accessed December 2, 2011).
  31. 30.
    M. Noll, America’s God: From Jonathan Edwards to Abraham Lincoln (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002), 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 31.
    Ibid., 203.Google Scholar
  33. 32.
    http://www.wallbuilders.com/LIBissuesArticles.asp?id=100766#Treaty of Tripoli (accessed November 2, 2011).Google Scholar
  34. 33.
    Meacham, American Gospel, 103.Google Scholar
  35. 34.
    Guastad and Schmidt, The Religious History of America, 134.Google Scholar
  36. 35.
    Ibid., 127–31.Google Scholar
  37. 36.
    Guastad and Schmidt, The Religious History of America, 34; Meacham, American Gospel, 22, 96–7, 105.Google Scholar
  38. 37.
    Interfax, 28 June 2008 (Interfax is an official Russian news agency with an English language religion page that can be found at: https://doi.org/www.interfax-religion.com/)
  39. 38.
    W van den Bercken, Holy Russia and Christian Europe (London: SCM Press, 1999), 75.Google Scholar
  40. 39.
    G Hosking, Russia and the Russians: From the Earliest Times till 2001 (London: Penguin Books, 2001), 39–40.Google Scholar
  41. 40.
    M. Kirill, ‘After the Stupor’, Trud, May 16, 1998; wherever possible I have tried to refer to Russian language sources but in some cases, as here, I have also made use of the translations provided by Paul Steeves at: https://doi.org/www.www2.stetson.edu/~psteeves/relnews/.Google Scholar
  42. 41.
    Interfax, 6 January 2000Google Scholar
  43. 42.
    J. Anderson, ‘Putin and the Russian Orthodox Church: Asymmetric Symphonia?’ Columbia Journal of International Affairs 61, no. 1 (2007): 185–204.Google Scholar
  44. 43.
    Bercken, Holy Russia and Christian Europe, 146.Google Scholar
  45. 44.
    Hosking, Russia and the Russians, 39–40Google Scholar
  46. 45.
    Ibid., 100–4.Google Scholar
  47. 46.
    Ibid., 107; Smith, Chosen Peoples, 103.Google Scholar
  48. 47.
    D. Rowland, ‘Moscow — The Third Rome or the New Israel’, The Russian Review 55 (1996): 591–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 48.
    Quoted in R. Pipes, Russian Conservatism and its Critics: A Study in Political Culture (New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 2005), 100.Google Scholar
  50. 49.
    Hosking, Russia and the Russians, 275–6.Google Scholar
  51. 50.
    Hunter, Culture Wars, 68–9.Google Scholar
  52. 51.
    Noll, America’s God, 9.Google Scholar
  53. 52.
    T. Jelen, ‘In Defence of Religious Minimalism’, in Wall of Separation? Debating the Public Role of Religion, ed. M. Segers and T. Jelen (Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 1998), 20.Google Scholar
  54. 53.
    Quoted in C.C. Wilcox and T. Jelen, ‘Religion and Politics in an Open Market: Religious Mobilization in the United States’, in Religion and Politics in Comparative Perspective: the One, the Few and the Many, ed. T. Jelen and C. Wilcox (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002), 294.Google Scholar
  55. 54.
    Quoted in Noll, America’s God, 10.Google Scholar
  56. 55.
    Cherry, God’s New Israel, 13.Google Scholar
  57. 56.
    Meacham, American Gospel, 177.Google Scholar
  58. 57.
    G. Parsons, Perspectives on Civil Religion (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2002), 1–2.Google Scholar
  59. 58.
    Cherry, God’s New Israel, 16.Google Scholar
  60. 59.
    See the discussion in N. Gvosdev, An Examination of Church-State Relations in the Byzantine and Russian Empires with an Emphasis on Ideology and Models of Interaction (Lewiston: Edwin Mellen Press, 2001).Google Scholar
  61. 60.
    On Petrine reforms and their consequences see J. Cracraft, The Church Reform of Peter the Great (London: Macmillan, 1971).Google Scholar
  62. 61.
    H. Rogger, Russia in the Age of Modernisation and Revolution, 1881–1917 (Harlow: Longman, 1983), 66–7.Google Scholar
  63. 62.
    J. Anderson, ‘The Council for Religious Affairs and the Shaping of Soviet Religious Policy’, Europe-Asia Studies 43, no. 4 (1991): 689–710.Google Scholar
  64. 63.
    cf. J. Anderson, Religion, State and Society in the Soviet Union and the Successor States (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994)Google Scholar
  65. 63a.
    Z. Knox, Russian Society and the Orthodox Church: Religion in Russia after Communism (London: Routledge, 2005)Google Scholar
  66. 63b.
    I. Papkova, The Orthodox Church and Russian Politics (New York: Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
  67. 64.
    A. Agadjanian, ‘Religious Pluralism and National Identity in Russia’, Special Issue of the International Journal on Multicultural Societies (2000): 106.Google Scholar
  68. 65.
    Metropolitan Nikolai, Letter to the editor, Nezavisimaya gazeta December 16, 1996.Google Scholar
  69. 66.
    This low figure is contested by Orthodox leaders, with Patriarchal spokesman Fr Vsevolod Chaplin claiming in 2006 that around a quarter of the population attend church weekly and around 80% of the population were baptised. Mir religii 6 July 2006 (accessed September 28, 2006); one study reported in mid-2009 suggested that just 3% attended on a weekly basis. Konovalov, ‘The Unchurched’.Google Scholar
  70. 67.
    Portal-credo, 23 July 2007 at https://doi.org/www.portal-credo.ru/site/index.php?act=english&id=266 (accessed June 15, 2010).
  71. 68.
    Quoted in D. Davis, ‘Moments of Silence in America’s Public Schools: Constitutional and Ethical Considerations’, Journal of Church and State, 45, no. 3 (2003): 430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 69.
    R. Kunzman, Write these Laws on your Children: Inside the World of Conservative Christian Homeschooling (Boston: Beacon Press, 2010).Google Scholar
  73. 70.
    ‘Providing a Realistic View of History, Government and Economics Based upon the Foundational Truths of Scripture’, https://doi.org/www.abeka.com/ChristianSchool/SubjectInfo/ (accessed October 20, 2011).
  74. 71.
    cf. J. McKinley, ‘Texas Conservatives Win Curriculum Change’, New York Times, March 12, 2010, https://doi.org/www.nytimes.com/2010/03/13/education/13texas.html (accessed August 18, 2011).Google Scholar
  75. 72.
    C. McGreal, ‘Texas School Board Rewrites US History with Lessons Promoting God and Guns’, The Guardian, May 16, 2010, https://doi.org/www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/may/16/texas-schools-rewrites-us-history (accessed August 12, 2011).Google Scholar
  76. 73.
    J. Lepore, The White’s of their Eyes: The Tea Party’s Revolution and the Battle over American History (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2010), 13–16 discussing a Texas School Board discussion of the need for a more patriotic teaching of historyGoogle Scholar
  77. 73a.
    G Adams, ‘Texas Schoolbook Massacre Rewrites American History’, The Independent, March 28, 2010, https://doi.org/www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/texas-schoolbook-massacre-rewrites-american-history-1929320.html (accessed August 18, 2011).Google Scholar
  78. 74.
    G Scharrer, ‘Conservative Group Slams Texas’ School History Standards’, February 15, 2011, https://doi.org/www.mysanantonio.com/news/education/article/Conservative-group-slams-Texasschool-history-1015088.php (accessed August 18, 2011); see the Thomas B. Fordham’s own survey of press responses to its report at: https://doi.org/www.edexcellence.net/news-commentary/in-the-news/the-state-of-state-us.html (accessed October 25, 2011).Google Scholar
  79. 75.
    McGreal, ‘Texas School Board Rewrites’.Google Scholar
  80. 76.
    Interview with the Patriarch, Kommersant Daily, January 9, 2003.Google Scholar
  81. 77.
    Y. Tabak, ‘Rights Defenders Exorcise Demons’, Nezavisimaya gazeta-religii, June 18, 2003.Google Scholar
  82. 78.
    Interfax, December 12, 2003.Google Scholar
  83. 79.
    Social Concept II, 3Google Scholar
  84. 80.
    Press Service of the Department of External Relations of the Moscow Patriarchate, 17 March 2000.Google Scholar
  85. 81.
    ‘Spiritual-Moral Training to be Required in schools in Three Years’, Portal credo, August 18, 2009, https://doi.org/www.portal-credo.ru/site/?act=news&id=72422 (accessed October 28, 2009).
  86. 82.
    One needs to be careful of assuming that all those accepting a Christian Right agenda are committed to building a Christian nation. For example, Richard Land, the militantly conservative leader of the US Southern Baptists, eschews such a goal as impractical in what is essentially a neo-pagan society, but does argue that without shared values a democratic republic cannot survive. B. Hankiss, Uneasy in Babylon: Southern Baptist Conservatives and American Culture (Tuscaloosa and London: University of Alabama Press, 2002), 24, 63–4.Google Scholar
  87. 83.
    S. Filatov, ‘Patriarch Kirill: Two Years of Dreams, Hopes and an Uncomfortable Reality’, in Pravoslavnaya tserkov’ pri novom patriarkhe, ed. A. Malashenko and S. Filatov (Moscow: Rospen, 2012), 9–68.Google Scholar
  88. 84.
    Bercken, Holy Russia and Christian Europe, 4–5; Boyd, The Myth of a Christian Nation; Fr G. Chistyakov, ‘In Search of the “Russian idea”: A View from Inside the Russian Orthodox Church’, in Religion and Identity in Modern Russia: The Revival of Orthodoxy and Islam, ed. J. Johnson, M. Stepaniants and B. Forest (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2005), 61.Google Scholar
  89. 85.
    For an overview of religion and US foreign policy, see L. Marsden, For God’s Sake: The Christian Right and US Foreign Policy (London: Zed Books, 2008).Google Scholar
  90. 86.
    On religion in Russian foreign policy, see R. Blitt, ‘Russia’s “Orthodox” Foreign Policy: The Growing Influence of the Russian Orthodox Church in Shaping Russia’s Policies Abroad’, University of Tennessee College of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 131, 14 December 2010, at: https://doi.org/www.papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1725522##(accessed March 14, 2011).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Board of Transatlantic Studies 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of International RelationsSt. Andrews UniversitySt. AndrewsScotland

Personalised recommendations