Advertisement

Journal of Transatlantic Studies

, Volume 9, Issue 4, pp 326–341 | Cite as

Mutual interests? US public diplomacy in the 1980s and Nicolas Sarkozy’s first trip to the United States

  • Giles Scott-SmithEmail author
Article

Abstract

In July 1985 Nicolas Sarkozy, then a young mayor of the outer Parisian suburb of Neuilly, was invited to visit the US as a ‘grantee’ on the State Department’s International Visitor Leadership Program (IVLP). This article traces the operation of the IVLP in Western Europe in the 1980s, the importance of the ‘successor generation’ in US strategy, and the background to and meaning of Sarkozy’s invitation and trip. The argument is that while the IVLP can be interpreted as a form of US power projection and ‘informal empire’, Sarkozy’s experience instead illustrates the mutual interests involved and the ways in which a participant can benefit by steering the Program according to their own agenda.

Keywords

cultural diplomacy public diplomacy exchange programmes transatlantic relations American-French relations 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Testimony of Steven Emerson before the United States House of Representatives Committee on Foreign Affairs, Subcommittee on Terrorism, Nonproliferation, and Trade, 31 July 2008. Report available online at https://doi.org/www.foreignaffairs.house.gov/110/eme073108.pdf (accessed 19 June 2009).
  2. 2.
    Sherry Mueller, ‘Professional Exchanges, Citizen Diplomacy, and Credibility,’ in America’s Dialogue with the World, ed. William Kiehl (Washington, DC: Public Diplomacy Council, 2006), 63.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    See https://doi.org/www.cerclejefferson.org/contenu.asp (accessed 22 June 2009).
  4. 4.
    ‘j’ai eu la joie de visiter les Etats-Unis et d’aller à la dècouverte de cet immense pays lors de ce voyage exceptionnel.’ Sarkozy’s letter is available at https://doi.org/exchanges.state.gov/media/pdfs/iv/cerclejefferson-eng.pdf (accessed 19 June 2009).
  5. 5.
    The only record that could be traced was the short report by Monya Hudsick, ‘French Presidential Elections Exemplify IVLP Success’, NCIV (National Council of International Visitors) Network News, June 2007, available online at http://www.rue89.com/files/docUS. pdf (accessed 19 June 2009). The report pointed to the fact that four members of Sarkozy’s new cabinet were also IVLP alumni: Prime Minister Francois Fillon (grantee in 1984), Minister of State for Ecology Alain Juppè (1978), Minister of Housing Christine Boutin (1992), and Minister of Immigration Brice Hortefeux (1985).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sophie Pedder, ‘Atypically French: Sarkozy’s Bid to be a Different Kind of President’, Foreign Affairs (May/June 2007).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    See Nicolas Sarkozy, Libre (Paris: Editions Robert Laffont, 2001) and Tèmoignage (Paris: XO Editions, 2006), translated as Testimony: France, Europe, and the World in the Twenty-First Century (New York: Harper Perennial, 2007).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    ‘France will take full NATO membership again, with greater military role’, New York Times, 11 March 2009.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sarkozy made this statement during a visit to New York to commemorate 9/11 in September 2006. See ‘France politics: beyond these shores’, Economist Intelligence Unit, 27 October 2006.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    US Embassy Paris to Department of State, 4 August 2005, available at https://doi.org/wikileaks.nl/cable/2005/08/05PARIS5335.html (accessed 17 December 2010).
  11. 11.
    US Embassy Paris to Department of State, 6 September 2006, available at https://doi.org/wikileaks.nl/cable/2006/09/06PARIS5974.html (accessed 17 December 2010).
  12. 12.
    Nicholas Cull describes briefly how the IVLP visit of FW de Klerk in 1976, and his request to explore American social diversity in its cities, had a profound impact on his thinking and may have contributed to his transformation of South Africa later. See Cull, The Cold War and the United States Information Agency (Cambridge: Cambridge University press, 2008), 339.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    On US post-WW II public diplomacy see Frank Ninkovich, The Diplomacy of Ideas: US Foreign Policy and Cultural Relations 1938–1950 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981)Google Scholar
  14. 13a.
    Yale Richmond, Cultural Exchange and the Cold War: Raising the Iron Curtain (University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2003)Google Scholar
  15. 13b.
    Brian McKenzie, Remaking France: Americanization, Public Diplomacy, and the Marshall Plan (New York, NY: Berghahn Books, 2005)Google Scholar
  16. 13c.
    Ken Osgood, Total Cold War: Eisenhower’s Secret Propaganda Battle at Home and Abroad (Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas, 2006). On Germany, in many ways the model for later efforts, seeGoogle Scholar
  17. 13d.
    H.W. Johnston, ‘United States Public Affairs Activities in Germany, 1945–1955’, PhD dissertation, Columbia University, 1956Google Scholar
  18. 13e.
    H. Kellermann, Cultural Relations as an Instrument of US Foreign Policy: The Educational Exchange Program between the United States and Germany 1945–1954 (Washington, DC: Department of State, 1978)Google Scholar
  19. 13g.
    S. Duggan, ‘The Politics of US-German Educational Exchange: Perspectives of German Decision-makers’, PhD dissertation, Stanford University, 1988Google Scholar
  20. 13h.
    O. Schmidt, ‘Civil Empire by Cooptation: German-American Exchange Programs as Cultural Diplomacy, 1945–61’, PhD dissertation, Harvard University, 1999.Google Scholar
  21. 14.
    For the history of the IVLP see G. Scott-Smith, Networks of Empire: The US State Department’s Foreign Leader Program in the Netherlands, France, and Britain 1950–1970 (Brussels: Peter Lang, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 15.
    Volker Berghahn, American and the Intellectual Cold Wars in Europe (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2001), xvi.Google Scholar
  23. 16.
    G. John Ikenberry and Charles Kupchan, ‘Socialization and Hegemonic Power’, International Organization, 44/3 (Summer 1990): 283. On informal empire see the seminal article byCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 16a.
    J. Gallagher and R. Robinson, ‘The imperialism of free trade’ Economic History Review 6 (1953): 1–15. Victoria de Grazia has argued that ‘if we hold to orthodox definitions, we miss the specific powers accumulating to the leading capitalist state in the twentieth century. These powers derived [...] from recognizing the advantages that derived from that position and developing these into a system of global leadership.’CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 16b.
    Victoria de Grazia, Irresistible Empire (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2005), 6.Google Scholar
  26. 17.
    USIA was renamed the United States International Communication Agency during 1979–1983, but for the sake of consistency the acronym USIA will be used here throughout.Google Scholar
  27. 18.
    The International Visitor Program: A Review, Directorate for Educational and Cultural Affairs, USIA, April 1981, 4–5.Google Scholar
  28. 19.
    ‘Foreign Leaders and Specialists’, n.d. [early 1960s], Group IV Box 153 Folder 21, Archive of the Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Special Collections, University of Arkansas Libraries, Fayetteville (hereafter CU).Google Scholar
  29. 20.
    ‘The CU Program Concept’, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, 1 October 1973, 1 (quoted in Sherry Mueller, ‘US Exchange of Persons Programs: A Question of Quality’.)Google Scholar
  30. 21.
    NSC Undersecretaries Committee to President Carter, ‘Study of international exchange’, 10 August 1977, Declassified Documents Reference System.Google Scholar
  31. 22.
    On Wick, see Alvin Snyder, Warriors of Disinformation (New York: Arcade, 1995).Google Scholar
  32. 23.
    See the NED’s history at https://doi.org/www.ned.org/about/nedhistory.html (accessed 14 January 2010).
  33. 24.
    NSDD 130, 6 March 1984, available at https://doi.org/www.fas.org/irp/offdocs/direct.htm (accessed 14 January 2010).
  34. 25.
    Geoffrey Middlebrook, ‘The Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs and American Public Diplomacy during the Reagan Years: Purpose, Policy, Program, and Performance’, PhD dissertation, University of Hawaii, 1995, 126–89, 308–25.Google Scholar
  35. 26.
    See Cull, The Cold War, p. 207; Scott-Smith, Networks of Empire, pp. 287–89; Martin Klimke, The Other Alliance: Global Protest and Student Unrest in West Germany and the U.S., 1962–1972 (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
  36. 27.
    See Kenneth Adler, ‘The Successor Generation: Why, Who, and How’, in The Successor Generation: International Perspectives of Postwar Europeans, ed. Stephen Szabo (London: Butterworths, 1983). Adler refers to three models that investigate the meaning of a ‘political generation’: the experiential model (‘shared politically relevant experiences’); the life-cycle model (‘the values and attitudes of young people... change with maturation’); the interaction model (‘each generation... reacting against the values of the previous one’). Adler concludes: ‘If either the experiential or the interaction model of political generations is valid, then analysis of intergenerational differences becomes a most important tool in helping to predict social or political change.’ Adler, ‘The Successor Generation’, p. 7.Google Scholar
  37. 28.
    See James Huntley, An Architect of Democracy (Washington, DC: New Academia, 2006), 258.Google Scholar
  38. 29.
    ‘The Successor Generation: Its Challenges and Responsibilities’, The Atlantic Council’s Working Group on the Successor Generation, January 1981. Report available at https://doi.org/www.acus.org/docs/8101-Successor_Generations_Challenges_Responsibilities.pdf (accessed 14 January 2010).
  39. 30.
    On the Dutch situation see Remco van Diepen, Hollanditis: Nederland en het Kernwapendebat 1977–1987 (Amsterdam: Bert Bakker, 2004).Google Scholar
  40. 31.
    EUR/P Steve Steiner to Interagency Working Group on Public Diplomacy, 7 December 1982, Declassified Documents Reference System, Roosevelt Study Center, Middelburg, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  41. 32.
    Hans Tuch, Communicating with the World (New York, NY: St Martins Press, 1990), 41. See alsoCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 32a.
    Tuch, Arthur Burns and the Successor Generation (Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 1988).Google Scholar
  43. 33.
    The State Department maintains an IVP alumni list of current leaders who have been on the Program at https://doi.org/exchanges.state.gov/ivlp/alumni.html (accessed 15 January 2010). On Balkenende, see
  44. 33a.
    G. Scott-Smith, ‘The Ties That Bind: De Amerikaanse vorming van Jan Peter Balkenende’, De Groene Amsterdammer, 1 February 2008.Google Scholar
  45. 34.
    Geir Lundestad, The United States and Western Europe since 1945 (Oxford: W Oxford University Press, 2005), 214Google Scholar
  46. 34a.
    Frèdèric Bozo, ‘Before the Wall: French Diplomacy and the Last Decade of the Cold War, 1979–89’, in The Last Decade of the Cold War: From Conflict Escalation to Conflict Transformation, ed. Olav Njølstad (London: Frank Cass, 2004), 289–90.Google Scholar
  47. 35.
    John H. Kelly (Political-Military Officer, US Embassy Paris, 1976–80), interview with Thomas Stern, 12 December 1994, ADST Full interview at https://doi.org/memory.loc.gov/cgibin/query/D?mfdip:5:./temp/~ammem_cXe1:: (accessed 1 July 2009).
  48. 36.
    Michael Harrison, ‘The Successor Generation, Social Change and New Domestic Sources of Foreign Policy in France’, in Szabo (ed.), The Successor Generation, p. 28.Google Scholar
  49. 37.
    Terence Catherman, interview with G. Lewis Schmidt, 25 January 1991, Foreign Affairs Oral History Collection, Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training, Washington DC (hereafter ADST). See the full interview at https://doi.org/lcweb2.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/S?ammem/mfdipbib:@field(AUTHOR + @od1(Catherman,+ Terrence)) (accessed 19 June 2009).
  50. 38.
    See Augustin Scalbert, ‘Un soup©on de vantardise sur les CV ministèriels,’ Rue89, 18 September 2007. Available online at https://doi.org/www.rue89.com/2007/09/18/un-soupcon-de-vantardise-sur-les-cv-ministeriels (accessed 19 June 2009). On US interest in and support for the Institute during the 1950s and 1960s, see Scott-Smith, Networks of Empire, pp. 338–39.Google Scholar
  51. 39.
    Sarkozy, Testimony, p. v.Google Scholar
  52. 40.
    Maarten van der Roest, Nicolas Sarkozy (Soesterberg: Aspekt, 2008), 28–48. Mayors of French districts are elected by the members of the council. Sarkozy beat Pasqua by a single vote.Google Scholar
  53. 41.
    US Embassy Paris to USIA, 16 October 1984, Grantee File: Nicolas Sarkozy, archive of Meridian International, Washington, DC (hereafter MI). Meridian is a private institution based in Washington DC that runs cultural exchange programmes for the US government on a contractual basis. Its archive is currently closed but the aim is to make it available for public use in the future.Google Scholar
  54. 42.
    US Embassy Paris to USIA, 9 April 1985, MI.Google Scholar
  55. 43.
  56. 44.
    US Embassy Paris to USIA, 2 May 1985, MI. On 18 May 2007 Hortefeux was appointed as the first Minister of Immigration, Integration, National Identity and Cooperative Development in Francois Fillon’s government.Google Scholar
  57. 45.
    US Embassy Paris to USIA, 6 June 1985, MI.Google Scholar
  58. 46.
    USIA, Washington DC to US Embassy, Paris, 12 June 1985, MI.Google Scholar
  59. 47.
    US Embassy Paris to USIA, Washington DC, 21 June 1985, MI.Google Scholar
  60. 48.
    Marcia Grant (Exchanges Officer, US Embassy Paris, June 1985-June 1987), telephone interview, 26 June 2009).Google Scholar
  61. 49.
    Herman J. Cohen, interview with Charles Stuart Kennedy, 15 August 1996, ADST. Cohen states that there was a Political Officer, John Dobrin, assigned with following both the Socialist and Communist parties, the only Embassy officer sanctioned to meet with communist officials. Full interview available at https://doi.org/memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/D? mfdip:1:./temp/~ammem_77Ci:: (accessed 15 January 2010).
  62. 50.
    List of French IVLP grantees 1973–1990, FOIA request.Google Scholar
  63. 51.
  64. 52.
    Scott-Smith, Networks of Empire, pp. 334–35.Google Scholar
  65. 53.
    On Hamilton, who died in 2000, see https://doi.org/www.hamiltoncampaigns.com/people/bhamilton.html (accessed 15 January 2010).
  66. 54.
    Keith McKeown (program officer) to Dan Farhm, 28 June 1985, MI.Google Scholar
  67. 55.
    ‘United States Program, July 7-July 16 1985’, MI.Google Scholar
  68. 56.
    Keith McKeown to Sue Levitin, 9 July 1985, MI.Google Scholar
  69. 57.
    ‘United States Program, July 7-July 16 1985’, MI.Google Scholar
  70. 58.
    ‘Sponsors Report on Visitor’, 6 August 1985, MI.Google Scholar
  71. 59.
    Harrison, ‘The successor generation’, pp. 23–25.Google Scholar
  72. 60.
    Sarkozy, Testimony, p. 8.Google Scholar
  73. 61.
    Harrison, ‘The Successor Generation’, p. 21.Google Scholar
  74. 62.
    Sarkozy, Testimony, pp. 8–9.Google Scholar
  75. 63.
    See Patrice de Beer, ‘May’ 68: France’s Politics of Memory’, 28 April 2008, available online at https://doi.org/www.opendemocracy.net/article/institutions/may_68_remember_or_forget (accessed 19 June 2009).Google Scholar
  76. 64.
    See Andrè and Raphaël Glucksmann, Mai 68 explique á Nicolas Sarkozy (Paris: Brochè, 2008).Google Scholar
  77. 65.
    ‘Trois Questions à Nicolas Sarkozy’, Le Figaro Magazine (international edition), 21 September 1985, 87.Google Scholar
  78. 66.
    See ‘Le Sarko Com Club’, 2 June 2005, on the Stratégies website, https://doi.org/www.strategies.fr/emploi-formation/management/r37463W/18-le-sarko-com-club.html (accessed 15 January 2010).
  79. 67.
    ‘Trois Questions à Nicolas Sarkozy’, Le Figaro Magazine (international edition), 21 September 1985, 87.Google Scholar
  80. 68.
    Riccardo Brizzi, ‘Sarkozy and Europe: The First One Hundred Days of the Hyper-president’, Euro Press Research (July-August 2007).Google Scholar
  81. 69.
    Scott-Smith, Networks of Empire, pp. 327–64.Google Scholar
  82. 70.
    See Giles Scott-Smith, ‘Searching for the Successor Generation: Public Diplomacy, the US Embassy’s International Visitor Program, and the Labour Party in the 1980s’, British Journal of Politics and International Relations 8 (2006): 214–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 71.
    Anthony Seldon, Blair (London: Simon & Schuster, 2004), 120.Google Scholar
  84. 72.
    ‘Italian Parliamentary Health Committee, September 8–16 1986’, MI.Google Scholar
  85. 73.
    Riccardo Brizzi, ‘Sarkozy and Europe: The First One Hundred Days of the Hyperpresident’, Euro Press Research (July-August 2007).Google Scholar
  86. 74.
    Michael Moran, ‘French Military Strategy and NATO Reintegration’, Council on Foreign Relations, 12 March 2009, available online at https://doi.org/www.cfr.org/publication/16619/ (accessed 15 January 2010).Google Scholar
  87. 75.
    Frèdèric Bozo and Guillaume Parmentier, ‘France and the United States: Waiting for Regime Change’, Survival 49 (Spring 2007): 182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 76.
    See Scott-Smith, ‘Searching for the Successor Generation’.Google Scholar
  89. 77.
    Sarkozy, Testimony, p. 182.Google Scholar
  90. 78.
    Boz and Parmentier, ‘France and the United States’, p. 190. Socialist leader Laurent Fabius referred to Sarkozy as the US President’s ‘poodle’ after his visit to Washington in September 2006. On French anti-Americanism see also Sophie Meunier, ‘The distinctiveness of French anti-Americanism’, in Anti-Americanism in World Politics, ed. Peter Katzenstein and Robert Keohane (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2007).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Board of Transatlantic Studies 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Roosevelt Study Center/Roosevelt AcademyMiddelburgThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations