Journal of Transatlantic Studies

, Volume 9, Issue 1, pp 63–75 | Cite as

The ‘Hemisphere isolationists’ and Anglo-American economic diplomacy during the Second World War

  • Thomas C. MillsEmail author


Throughout the Second World War a central component of the Franklin D. Roosevelt administration’s post-war planning was an attempt to win the support of Great Britain for a multilateral economic system, based on the internationalist principles of free and equal access to the world’s markets and resources. This paper explores the impact on Anglo-American economic diplomacy of a faction within the Roosevelt administration, defined as ‘Hemisphere isolationists’. United by a preoccupation with Latin American affairs, alongside an instinctive disdain for the European powers, this group pursued policies which had the effect of excluding British interests from Latin America for the post-war era. As such, they represented a regionalist challenge to broader internationalist conceptions of the post-war world.


Anglo-American economic diplomacy Latin America multilateralism isolationists 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    The most prominent example of this thesis is Robert A. Divine, Second Chance: The Triumph of Internationalism in America during World War II (New York: Atheneum, 1967).Google Scholar
  2. 1a.
    For more recent examples, see Tony Smith, America’s Mission: The United States and the Worldwide Struggle for Democracy in the Twentieth Century (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1994), 113–45Google Scholar
  3. 1b.
    Frank Ninkovich, The Wilsonian Century: US Foreign Policy since 1900 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999), 137–44.Google Scholar
  4. 2.
    For more on economic internationalists in the State Department, see Richard Gardner, Sterling-Dollar Diplomacy: Anglo-American Collaboration in the Reconstruction of Multilateral Trade (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1956), 16Google Scholar
  5. 2a.
    Randall B. Woods, A Changing of the Guard (Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 1990), 13Google Scholar
  6. 2b.
    Donald Cameron Watt, Succeeding John Bull: America in Britain’s Place, 1900–1975: A Study of the Anglo-American Relationship and World Politics in the Context of British and American Foreign-Policy-making in the Twentieth Century (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984), 95.Google Scholar
  7. 3.
    Cordell Hull, The Memoirs of Cordell Hull, 2 vols. (New York: Macmillan, 1948), vol. 1, 81–6, 363-5.Google Scholar
  8. 3a.
    For further examples of this thesis by officials who participated in wartime diplomacy, see Herbert Feis, The Sinews of Peace (New York: Harper & Bothers, 1944), ch.3Google Scholar
  9. 3b.
    E.F Penrose, Economic Planning for Peace (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1953), ch.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 4.
    Frederick Benham, Great Britain Under Protection (New York: Macmillan, 1941), 90–102.Google Scholar
  11. 5.
    Foreign Relations of the United States [FRUS], 1941, vol. 1 (Washington DC: USGPO, 1958), 367–9. For Anglo-American negotiations concerning point four of the charter, see FRUS, 1941, vol. 1, 360–73.Google Scholar
  12. 6.
    Department of State Bulletin, 28 February 1942 (Washington DC, USGPO, 1942). for the negotiations leading to the Master Lend-Lease Agreement, see FRUS, 1942, vol. 1, 525–37.Google Scholar
  13. 7.
    Harley A. Notter, Post-War Foreign Policy Preparation (Washington DC: USGPO, 1949), 190–4.Google Scholar
  14. 8.
    Lloyd C. Gardner, Economic Aspects of New Deal Diplomacy, 2nd ed. (Boston, MA: Beacon Press, 1971), 217–36Google Scholar
  15. 8a.
    Gabriel Kolko, The Politics of War: Allied Diplomacy and the Crisis of 1943–1945 (London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1968), 294–13.Google Scholar
  16. 9.
    ‘Proceedings and Documents of the United Nations Monetary and Financial Conference, Bretton Woods, New Hampshire, July 1–22, 1944’, Department of State Publication 2866 (Washington DC: USGPO, 1948).Google Scholar
  17. 10.
    ‘Financial Agreement Between the Governments of the United States and the United Kingdom’, Department of State Publication 2439 (Washington DC: USGPO, 1946), 7. for the negotiations leading to the financial agreement, see FRUS, 1945, vol. 6, 1–204.Google Scholar
  18. 11.
    References to this term, or variations of it, can be found in the following primary and secondary sources: Report by Humphreys for Bonham-Carter, undated [February 1942], Foreign Office General Correspondence, FO371/33908/A3996 [hereafter cited as FO371 with file numbers], The National Archives of the United Kingdom, Kew, London [hereafter TNA]; Washington to Foreign Office, 29 April 1943, FO371/33908/A3996, TNA; Watt, Succeeding John Bull, 91.Google Scholar
  19. 12.
    For more on Latin Americanists in the State Department, see Randall B. Woods, The Roosevelt Foreign Policy Establishment and the ‘Good Neighbor’: The United States and Argentina, 1941–1945 (Lawrence Kansas: Regents Press, 1979), 23–4.Google Scholar
  20. 13.
    John Harper has characterised this attitude within the Roosevelt administration as ‘Europhobic-hemispherism’. See John Harper, American Visions of Europe: Franklin D. Roosevelt, George F Kennan, and Dean G Acheson (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994), 60.Google Scholar
  21. 14.
    For example, Welles confirmed his support for an international organisation in a Memorial Day speech in 1942. See Divine, Second Chance, 66.Google Scholar
  22. 15.
    Raul C. Migone, ed., Inter-American Statistical Yearbook, 1940 (New York: Macmillan, 1940), 158–61.Google Scholar
  23. 16.
    Rory Miller, Britain and Latin America in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries (London: Longman, 1993), 151–2Google Scholar
  24. 16a.
    Rory Miller, ‘British Investments in Latin America’, South American Journal (14 January 1939), 26; Migone, Inter-American Statistical Yearbook, 158–61.Google Scholar
  25. 17.
    Washington to FO, 27 December 1941, FO371/26036/A10669, TNA.Google Scholar
  26. 18.
    Draft memo by Gallop, FO371/30503/A1817, TNA; ‘Memorandum respecting the Anglo-United States-Brazilian Triangle’ by Gallop, 15 July 1942, FO371/30369/A6565, TNA.Google Scholar
  27. 19.
    Sumner Welles, The Time for Decision (London: Hamish Hamilton, 1944), 140.Google Scholar
  28. 20.
    Benjamin Welles, Sumner Welles: FDR’s Global Strategist (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1997), 52–79; Harper, American Visions of Europe, 56.Google Scholar
  29. 21.
    Welles, Sumner Welles, 134–55; Harper, American Visions of Europe, 56.Google Scholar
  30. 22.
    Welles, Sumner Welles, 156–208; Welles, The Time for Decision, 145–88; Laurence Duggan, The Americas: The Search for Hemisphere Security (New York: Henry Holt & Company, 1949), 102–103.Google Scholar
  31. 23.
    ‘Welles to Roosevelt: A Memorandum on Inter-American Relations, 1933’, OF470, Franklin D. Roosevelt Papers, Hyde Park New York [hereafter FDR Papers]; Woods, Roosevelt Foreign Policy Establishment, 23; Welles, Time for Decision, 145, 150, 186.Google Scholar
  32. 24.
    Ibid., 160; Duggan, The Americas, 70–2.Google Scholar
  33. 25.
    Welles, Time for Decision, 161–3.Google Scholar
  34. 26.
    Welles, Time for Decision, 160. See also Michael J. Francis, ‘The United States at Rio, 1941: The Strains of Pan-Americanism’, Journal of Latin American Studies 6, no. 1 (1974): 77–95; Woods, Roosevelt Foreign Policy Establishment, 27–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 27.
    For reference to this widely held belief, see ‘The Pan American Union in the Post-War World’ memo by Halle, 1 February 1943, Memorandums Relating to General Latin America Affairs, Office of American Republic Affairs, Box 8, Record Group 59 [hereafter RG59], United States National Archives and Records Administration, College Park Maryland [hereafter NARA]; ‘Speech of Mr. Henry A. Wallace at a Rally Celebrating “I am an American Day”’, 16 May 1943, FO371/33901/A4771, TNA; Hull, The Memoirs of Cordell Hull, vol. 1, 309, 320–1, 344, 349–50; Warren F Kimball, The Juggler: Franklin Roosevelt as Wartime Statesman (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1991), 107–25.Google Scholar
  36. 28.
    Harper, American Visions of Europe, 56–7.Google Scholar
  37. 29.
    Welles, Time for Decision, 187.Google Scholar
  38. 30.
    Grubb to Perowne, 21 January 1943, FO371/33903/A959, TNA.Google Scholar
  39. 31.
    For more on Grubb, see Kenneth Grubb, Crypts of Power (London: Hodder & Stoughton, 1971).Google Scholar
  40. 32.
    Grubb to Perowne, 21 January 1943, FO371/33903/A959, TNA.Google Scholar
  41. 33.
    See, for example, Campbell to Perowne, 29 May 1943, FO371/33903/A5359, TNA.Google Scholar
  42. 34.
    Acheson to American Diplomatic and Consular Offices in the other American Republics, 10 July 1942, State Department Decimal File, 610.4117/30A [hereafter cited by decimal reference], RG59, NARA.Google Scholar
  43. 35.
    ‘bl]Notes on a Visit to Washington and Ottawa’ by Gallop, 14 March 1944, FO371/35185/AS1621, TNA.Google Scholar
  44. 36.
    Campbell to Eden, 3 November 1943, FO371/33902/A10016, TNA. See also Gainer to Eden, 30 November 1943, FO371/33902/A10863, TNA.Google Scholar
  45. 37.
    James Desmond, Nelson Rockefeller: A Political Biography (New York: Macmillan, 1964), 79–80, 102.Google Scholar
  46. 38.
    ‘Order Establishing the Office, August 16, 1940’, Leland M. Goodrich, ed., Documents on American Foreign Relations, vol. 3, July 1940–June 1941 (Boston, MA: World Peace Foundation, 1942), 109–110. For more on Rockefeller’s background in Latin American affairs, see Desmond, Nelson Rockefeller, 52–64. For Rockefeller’s relationship with Roosevelt, see Desmond, Nelson Rockefeller, 73, 89.Google Scholar
  47. 39.
    ‘Executive Order No.8840 Establishing the Office of the Coordinator of Inter-American Affairs in the Executive office of the President and Defining its Functions and Duties, July 30, 1941’, Goodrich, Documents on American Foreign Relations, vol. 4, July 1941–June 1942, 329–32; Halifax to Eden, 29 December 1942, FO371/30508/A12038, TNA; Paul Kramer, ‘Nelson Rockefeller and British Security Coordination’, Journal of Contemporary History 16, no. 1 (1981): 76–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 40.
    Rockefeller to Roosevelt, 27 August 1941, OF412, Box 1, FDR Papers.Google Scholar
  49. 41.
    Halifax to Eden, 29 December 1942, FO371/30508/A12038, TNA. Indicative of the increasing status of the agency is the increase in its budget. Initially allocated funding of $3.5 million, by 1942 CIAA was in receipt of $38 million. See Gerald K. Haines, ‘Under the Eagle’s Wing: The Franklin Roosevelt Administration Forges an American Hemisphere’, Diplomatic History 4, no. 1 (1977): 380.Google Scholar
  50. 42.
    Desmond, Nelson Rockefeller, 92; Gordon Connell-Smith, The Inter-American System (London: Oxford University Press, 1966), 119Google Scholar
  51. 43.
    David Green, The Containment of Latin America: A History of the Myths and Realities of the Good Neighbor Policy (Chicago, IL: Quadrangle Books, 1971), 48–9.Google Scholar
  52. 43.
    Halifax to Eden, 29 December 1942, FO371/30508/A12038, TNA. Similar concerns were heard from British officials throughout Latin America. See, for example, Blair to Sands, 18 November 1942, FO371/30516/A10802, TNA; Bonham-Carter to Perowne, 25 January 1942, FO371/33901/A281, TNA.Google Scholar
  53. 44.
    Davidson to Dalton, 11 November 1942, Sullivan to Rockefeller, 17 July 1942, FO371/30516/A11310, TNA; ‘Extract from letter of July, 1942, from the Treasury Department to Nelson Rockefeller’, FO371/33901/A3135, TNA; ‘Internal Revenue Code’, 1942, Trade Promotion, Box 31, Subject File, Records of the Office of the Administrator, Records of the Foreign Economic Administration, RG169, NARA.Google Scholar
  54. 45.
    Davidson to Dalton, 11 November 1942, FO371/30516/A11310, TNA.Google Scholar
  55. 46.
    Halifax to Ministry of Information, 3 March 1943, FO371/33907/A2308, TNA; Campbell to Kelly, 22 April 1943, FO371/33908/A3958, TNA.Google Scholar
  56. 47.
    Desmond, Nelson Rockefeller, 97.Google Scholar
  57. 48.
    ‘The Coordinator Writes to 500 Exporters’, Export Trade and Shipper, July 1942, 6. See also Rockefeller’s remarks to the Economic Club of New York in April 1943. ‘Opportunity Seen in South America’, New York Times, April 2, 1943, 10.Google Scholar
  58. 49.
    ‘How the Rockefeller Plan is Being Implemented’, August 17, 1942, Export Trade and Shipper, 5–8. For more on US advertising during the war, see Advertising in the War’, Time, March 22, 1943,,9171,796133,00.html (accessed May 17, 2009).
  59. 50.
    The Inter-American Development Commission was established by the Inter-American Financial and Economic Advisory Committee following the meeting of the Ministers of Foreign Affairs of the American Republics in Panama in September 1939.Google Scholar
  60. 51.
    For more on Johnston, see ‘Surprise for Mr. Roosevelt’, Time, June 19, 1942,,9171,795956,00.html (accessed February 2, 2009).
  61. 52.
    ‘Johnston in Panama, Optimistic on Tour’, New York Times, March 26, 1943, 8; ‘New Ambassador’, Time, March 15, 1943,,9171,884816,00.html (accessed February 2, 2009).
  62. 53.
    ‘Johnston in Panama, Optimistic on Tour’, New York Times, March 26, 1943, 8; Rio to Foreign Office, 23 March 1943, FO371/33666/A3348, TNA.Google Scholar
  63. 54.
    ‘President of US Chamber of Commerce on “American Century”’, South American Journal (June 26, 1943): 338; ‘The Future of Investment in Latin America’, South American Journal (March 11, 1944): 150.Google Scholar
  64. 55.
    ‘See the President on Americas Plan’, New York Times, March 22, 1943, 14; ‘Business Opportunities in South America’, Buenos Aries Herald, March 22, 1943, Hadow to Perowne, 22 March 1943, FO371/33907/A3491, TNA.Google Scholar
  65. 56.
    Rio to Foreign Office, 23 March 1943, FO371/33666/A3348, TNA.Google Scholar
  66. 57.
    Gallop minute, 27 April 1943, FO371/33908/A3834, TNA. For further concern among British officials following Johnston’s remarks, see Buenos Aires to FO, 2 April 1943, FO371/33907/A3215, TNA; Snow to Eden, 24 March 1943, Perowne minute, 15 April 1943, FO371/33812/A3341, TNA.Google Scholar
  67. 58.
    Wendell C. Gordon, The Economy of Latin America (New York: Colombia University Press, 1950), 389.Google Scholar
  68. 59.
    For the more general process whereby the US supplanted Britain as the leading commercial power in the world during the course of the twentieth century, see Paul Kennedy, The Rise and Fall of Great Powers: Economic Change and Military Conflict from 1500 to 2000 (London: Fontana Press, 1988), 459–73.Google Scholar
  69. 60.
    A.C. Bunce, ‘The Hemisphere and the Postwar World’ (Washington DC: The National Policy Committee, 1943), Folder 8, Box 102, Jacob Viner Papers, Seeley G. Mudd Manuscript Library, Princeton University, Princeton New Jersey.Google Scholar
  70. 61.
    For more on this topic, see Walter LaFeber, America, Russia and the Cold War, 1945–1992 (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1993), 22–3Google Scholar
  71. 61a.
    Barton J. Bernstein, ‘American Foreign Policy and the Origins of the Cold War’ in The Politics and Policies of the Truman Administration, ed. Barton J. Bernstein (Chicago Illinois: Quadrangle Books, 1970), 40–1; Green, Containment of Latin America, 217–30; Kolko, Politics of War, 458–65, 469–75.Google Scholar
  72. 62.
    Quoted in Bernstein, American Foreign Policy and the Origins of the Cold War’, 40.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Board of Transatlantic Studies 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Politics and History Department, School of Social SciencesBrunel UniversityUxbridge, MiddlesexUK

Personalised recommendations