Advertisement

Journal of Transatlantic Studies

, Volume 9, Issue 1, pp 35–45 | Cite as

Isolationism, internationalism and the Monroe Doctrine

  • Marco Mariano
Article

Abstract

The Monroe Doctrine had been a pillar of US foreign policy in the nineteenth century, but its importance in the twentieth century is disputed. On the one hand, it laid the grounds for American expansion in the Western Hemisphere and, on the other, it provided a framework of reciprocal non-interference in transatlantic relations. Therefore, a reconsideration of its impact is relevant to the discussion of the tension between internationalism and isolationism. An assessment of the relevance of the Monroe Doctrine in twentieth-century US diplomacy must take into account that (i) it outlined a space-based, regionalist view of world affairs and (ii) it expressed widespread notions of American culture, history, and national identity.

Keywords

Monroe Doctrine Western Hemisphere US diplomacy isolationism internationalism 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Dexter Perkins’ classic three volumes on the subject were published respectively in 1927, 1933 and 1937; Ernest May, The Making of the Monroe Doctrine (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 1a.
    Frederick Merk, The Monroe Doctrine and American Expansionism, 1843–1849 (New York: Knopf, 1966).Google Scholar
  3. 1b.
    I am referring to the second edition of Michael Hogan and Thomas Patterson, eds., Explaining the History of American Foreign Relations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004), 105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 2.
    Bradford Perkins, The Cambridge History of American Foreign Relations, vol. II, The Creation of a Republican Empire, 1776–1885 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993), 159.Google Scholar
  5. 3.
    Gaddis Smith, The Last Years of the Monroe Doctrine, 1945–1993 (New York: Hill and Wang, 1994).Google Scholar
  6. 4.
    David Ryan, US Foreign Policy in World History (London and New York: Routledge, 2000), 51.Google Scholar
  7. 5.
    Lawrence S. Kaplan, ‘The Monroe Doctrine and the Truman Doctrine: the Case of Greece’, Journal of the Early Republic 13 (1993), 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 6.
    Samuel Flegg Bemis, John Quincy Adams and the Foundations of American Foreign Policy (New York: Norton, 1949).Google Scholar
  9. 6a.
    For his discussion on the natural dimension of inter-American relations see Samuel Flegg Bemis, ‘Latitude and Altitude’, in The Latin American Policy of the United States: an Historical Interpretation (New York: Harcourt, Brace & Co., 1943).Google Scholar
  10. 6b.
    On Bemis, see Mark T. Gilderhus, ‘Founding Father: Samuel Flagg Bemis and the Study of U.S.-Latin American Relations’, Diplomatic History 21 (Winter 1997): 1–13 andCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 6c.
    Gaddis Smith, ‘The Two Worlds of Samuel Flagg Bemis’, Diplomatic History 9 (October 1985): 295–302.Google Scholar
  12. 7.
    Murphy, Hemispheric Imaginings, 31–2.Google Scholar
  13. 8.
    William Applemans Williams, The Contours of American History (Cleveland: World Pub. Co., 1961), 215–16.Google Scholar
  14. 9.
    Thomas Knock, To End All Wars: Woodrow Wilson and the Quest for a New World Order (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1992)Google Scholar
  15. 9a.
    Frank Ninkovich, Modernity and Power: a History of the Domino Theory in the Twentieth Century (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994) andGoogle Scholar
  16. 9b.
    Frank Ninkovich, The Wilsonian Century: US Foreign Policy since 1900 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999).Google Scholar
  17. 10.
    Ninkovich, Wilsonian Century, 29–32.Google Scholar
  18. 11.
    A recent account of the impact of the cultural turn on the field is Thomas W Zeiler, ‘The Diplomatic History Bandwagon: A State of the Field’, Journal of American History 95 (March 2009): 1053–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 12.
    Ninkovich, Wilsonian Century, 126.Google Scholar
  20. 13.
    Tony Smith, America’s Mission: the United States and the Worldwide Struggle for Democracy in the Twentieth Century (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994), 113–14.Google Scholar
  21. 14.
    Quoted in Mark Gilderhus, The Second Century. US-Latin American Relations since 1889 (Wilmington: Scholarly Resources, 2000), 121.Google Scholar
  22. 15.
    Quoted in Smith, Last Years, 29.Google Scholar
  23. 16.
    Murphy, Hemispheric Imaginings, 130.Google Scholar
  24. 17.
    Walter LaFeber, ‘The Evolution of the Monroe Doctrine from Monroe to Reagan’, in Redefining the Past. Essays in Diplomatic History in Honor of William Appleman Williams, ed. Lloyd C. Gardner (Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University Press, 1986), 125. Emphasis added.Google Scholar
  25. 18.
    LaFeber, ‘The Evolution of the Monroe Doctrine’, 134. This argument is penetratingly developed in Neil Smith, American Empire: Roosevelt’s Geographer and the Prelude to Globalization (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2003).Google Scholar
  26. 19.
    Gaddis Smith, The Last Years of the Monroe Doctrine, 1945–1993 (New York: Hill and Wang, 1994), 29–31.Google Scholar
  27. 20.
    Smith, American Empire. See also Thomas Campbell, Masquerade Peace. America’s UN Policy, 1944–1945 (Tallahassee: Florida State University Press, 1973).Google Scholar
  28. 21.
    Ryan, US Foreign Policy, 40–54.Google Scholar
  29. 22.
    Murphy, Hemispheric Imaginings, 153.Google Scholar
  30. 23.
    Hans Kohn, American Nationalism. An Interpretative Essay quoted in John Fousek, To Lead the Free World. American Nationalism and the Cultural Roots of the Cold War (Chapel Hill: University of Carolina Press, 2000), 5.Google Scholar
  31. 24.
    Michael Hunt, Ideology and US Foreign Policy (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1987), xi.Google Scholar
  32. 25.
    Andrew M. Johnston, Hegemony and Culture in the Origins of NATO Nuclear First-Use, 1945–1955 (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 26.
    David Campbell, Writing Security. United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1992).Google Scholar
  34. 26a.
    A useful survey on the literature about US foreign policy and identity is Steven Hurst, Cold War US Foreign Policy. Key Perspectives (Edinburg: Edinburgh University Press, 2005), Chapter 9.Google Scholar
  35. 27.
    Johnston, Hegemony and Culture, 10.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Board of Transatlantic Studies 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marco Mariano
    • 1
  1. 1.Università del Piemonte OrientaleVercelliItaly

Personalised recommendations