Misplaced ‘other’ and normative pretence in transatlantic relations
Normative pretence in EU-US relations argues that the role of ‘Europe’ as a normative power has often been promoted by reference to the United States as the ‘other’, often using evidence of American exceptionalism to bolster this view. This introduces two unhelpful elements into the debate over whether either is a normative power. First the confusion over who or what ‘Europe’ is, alongside the tendency to identify the US rather narrowly with the last administration, thereby introducing not only terminological confusion but a potentially distorting element of ahistoricism. Second, it artificially promotes differences in transatlantic relations that are generally exaggerated or false. Seven brief case studies suggest that the EU and the US are in fact remarkably similar as normative powers.
Keywordsnormative power European Union United States exceptionalism George W. Bush
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 2.Ibid., 239.Google Scholar
- 3.Thomas Diez and Ian Manners, ‘Reflecting on Normative Power Europe’, in Power in World Politics, eds. Felix Berenskoetter and M.J. Williams (London: Routledge, 2007), 175.Google Scholar
- 4.Daniel S. Hamilton, ‘The United States: A Normative Power?’, in Who is a Normative Foreign Policy Actor? The European Union and its Global Partners, ed. Nathalie Tocci (Brussels: Centre for European Policy Studies, 2008), 76–156.Google Scholar
- 5.Manners, ‘Normative Power Europe’, 248.Google Scholar
- 6.Robert Cooper, The Breaking of Nations: Order and Chaos in the Twenty-First Century (New York: Atlantic Monthly Press, 2003), 53.Google Scholar
- 7.Ibid., 156.Google Scholar
- 8.Karen Smith, European Union Foreign Policy in a Changing World (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2003), 111.Google Scholar
- 9.Robert Kagan, Of Paradise and Power (New York: Alfred Knopfy, 2003), 99.Google Scholar
- 10.Ibid., 57.Google Scholar
- 11.This theme and possible solutions to this dilemma are discussed in Andrew F. Krepinevich Jr., ‘The Pentagon’s Wasting Assets: The Eroding Foundations of American Power’ Foreign Affairs 88, no. 4 (July/August 2009): 18–33.Google Scholar
- 12.Francoise Duchêne, ‘Europe’s Role in World Peace’, in Europe Tomorrow: Sixteen Europeans Look Ahead, ed. R. Mayne (London: Fontana, 1972), 32–47.Google Scholar
- 14.Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy in America, Henry Reeve Text, revised by Francis Bowen, further corrected and edited by Phillips Bradley (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1954).Google Scholar
- 15.Hamilton, ‘The United States: A Normative Power?’, 4.Google Scholar
- 16.Diez and Manners, ‘Reflecting on Normative Power Europe’, 173-88.Google Scholar
- 19.For an overview, see Steve Wood, ‘The European Union: A Normative or a Normal Power?’, European Foreign Affairs Review 14, no. 1 (January 2009): 113–28.Google Scholar
- 20.Haizam Amirah Fernandez and Richard Youngs, eds, The Euro-Mediterranean Partnership: Assessing the First Decade, (Barcelona: Real Instituto Elcano de Estudios Internacionales y Estratégicos, 2005), p. 158.Google Scholar
- 21.This point is made in M. Gülce Kumrulu, ‘Can the EU become a Normative Power in the South? The Egyptian Case’, https://doi.org/www.sam.gov.tr/perceptions/volume13/autumn/MGulceKUMRULU.pdf.
- 22.Bernard Kouchner, quoted in Natalie Nougayrède, ‘France without Illusions’, Foreign Policy 174 (Sept/Oct 2009): 31.Google Scholar
- 23.Manners, ‘Normative Power Europe’, 239.Google Scholar
- 24.Colin Dueck, Reluctant Crusaders: Power, Culture and Change in American Grand Strategy, (Princeton, Princeton University Press, 2006), 21–2.Google Scholar
- 25.The National Security Strategy of the United States, September 2002, p. 31.Google Scholar
- 26.Ibid., 15.Google Scholar
- 29.Godfrey Hodgson, ‘The Myth of American Exceptionalism’ (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2009), 177.Google Scholar
- 30.Ibid., 175.Google Scholar
- 31.Manners, ‘Normative Power Europe’, 253.Google Scholar
- 33.Ibid., 10.Google Scholar
- 34.Hamilton, ‘The United States: A Normative Power?’, 146.Google Scholar
- 35.Manners, ‘Normative Power Europe’, 252.Google Scholar
- 36.It should though be noted that 37 states, the US military and the Federal Government have authorised the death penalty and it remains a highly contentious issue.Google Scholar
- 38.European Commission, Indonesia-European Community Strategy Paper, 2007–2013, (Brussels: European Commission, 2007).Google Scholar
- 40.See Council of the European Union, Ensuring Protection - European Union Guidelines on Human Rights Defenders (Brussels: Council of the European Union, 2008.)Google Scholar
- 41.Declaration of the European Parliament, Murder of the Human Rights Activist Munir Said Thalib, Thursday, 10 April 2008, Brussels P6 TA(2008)0126.Google Scholar
- 42.US Department of State, Supporting Human Rights and Democracy: The US Record 2006, Department of State Publication 11411, Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor Bureau of Public Affairs.Google Scholar
- 43.A copy of the letter may be found at https://doi.org/www.humanrightsfirst.info/pdf/05118-hrd-indonesia-sby-ltr.pdf.
- 44.Sen. Russell Feigngold (D-WI), Senate, S.8524, 15 September 2008.Google Scholar
- 45.See https://doi.org/ec.europa.eu/development/geographical/regionscountries/countries/country_ profile.cfm?cid = ng&type = long&lng = en.
- 46.US Department of State, 23 March 2009, https://doi.org/nigeria.usembassy.gov/prog_ 12132007.html.
- 47.Murder of Russian journalist Anna Politkovskaya, European Parliament Resolution on EU-Russian relations following her murder, P6_TA-PROV(2006)0448.Google Scholar
- 48.Statement on the Murder of Russian Journalist Anna Politkovskaya, Office of the Press Secretary, The White House, 8 October 2006, https://doi.org/georgewbushwhitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2006/10/20061008.html.Google Scholar
- 49.The agreement was signed ‘pour l’Union europeénne, la Présidence franc¸aise’, but on notepaper headed with the latter.Google Scholar
- 50.Presidency Conclusions, Extraordinary European Council, Brussels, 1 September 2008, 12594/2/08 (Rev.2), Brussels, 6 October 2008, para.10.Google Scholar
- 51.Press conference, see https://doi.org/georgia.usembassy.gov/pr-08122008-bryza.html.
- 52.Antonella Rampino, ‘Interview with Minister Frattini: An Immediate Truce, But we Mustn’t Isolate Moscow’, La Stampa, Rome, 11 August 2008.Google Scholar
- 53.Source European Commission at https://doi.org/ec.europa.eu/trade/issues/bilateral/countries/usa/ index_en.htm.
- 54.William H. Cooper, ‘EU-US. Economic Ties: Framework, Scope and Magnitude’, CRS Report for Congress, Updated 17 Feb. 2006. CRS Report for Congress, 8.Google Scholar
- 55.Lars Nilsson, ‘Comparative Effects of EU and US Trade Policies on Developing Country Exports’, in The EU and Developing Countries: Trade, Aid and Growth in an Integrating World, eds. Yves Bourdet, Joakim Gullstrand and Karin Olofsdotter (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2007), 62.Google Scholar
- 56.UN General Assembly, International Development Strategy for the Second United Nations Development Decade, UN General Assembly Resolution 2626 (XXV), 24 October 1970, para. 43.Google Scholar
- 57.United Nations, The Millennium Development Goals Report (New York: United Nations, 2008).Google Scholar
- 58.Michael A. Fletcher, ‘Bush has Quietly Tripled Aid to Africa’, The Washington Post, 31 December 2006.Google Scholar
- 59.Knud Erik Jørgensen and Katie V. Laatikainen, ‘The EU at the UN: Multilateralism in a New Key?’ (paper presented at the Second Pan-European Conference on EU Politics, Bologna, 2004).Google Scholar