Advertisement

Journal of Transatlantic Studies

, Volume 8, Issue 4, pp 315–336 | Cite as

Misplaced ‘other’ and normative pretence in transatlantic relations

  • Simon DukeEmail author
Article

Abstract

Normative pretence in EU-US relations argues that the role of ‘Europe’ as a normative power has often been promoted by reference to the United States as the ‘other’, often using evidence of American exceptionalism to bolster this view. This introduces two unhelpful elements into the debate over whether either is a normative power. First the confusion over who or what ‘Europe’ is, alongside the tendency to identify the US rather narrowly with the last administration, thereby introducing not only terminological confusion but a potentially distorting element of ahistoricism. Second, it artificially promotes differences in transatlantic relations that are generally exaggerated or false. Seven brief case studies suggest that the EU and the US are in fact remarkably similar as normative powers.

Keywords

normative power European Union United States exceptionalism George W. Bush 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Ian Manners, ‘Normative Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms?’, Journal of Common Market Studies 40, no. 2 (2002): 235–58, 252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ibid., 239.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Thomas Diez and Ian Manners, ‘Reflecting on Normative Power Europe’, in Power in World Politics, eds. Felix Berenskoetter and M.J. Williams (London: Routledge, 2007), 175.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Daniel S. Hamilton, ‘The United States: A Normative Power?’, in Who is a Normative Foreign Policy Actor? The European Union and its Global Partners, ed. Nathalie Tocci (Brussels: Centre for European Policy Studies, 2008), 76–156.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Manners, ‘Normative Power Europe’, 248.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Robert Cooper, The Breaking of Nations: Order and Chaos in the Twenty-First Century (New York: Atlantic Monthly Press, 2003), 53.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ibid., 156.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Karen Smith, European Union Foreign Policy in a Changing World (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2003), 111.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Robert Kagan, Of Paradise and Power (New York: Alfred Knopfy, 2003), 99.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ibid., 57.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    This theme and possible solutions to this dilemma are discussed in Andrew F. Krepinevich Jr., ‘The Pentagon’s Wasting Assets: The Eroding Foundations of American Power’ Foreign Affairs 88, no. 4 (July/August 2009): 18–33.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Francoise Duchêne, ‘Europe’s Role in World Peace’, in Europe Tomorrow: Sixteen Europeans Look Ahead, ed. R. Mayne (London: Fontana, 1972), 32–47.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jonathan Lyons, ‘Bush Enters Mideast’s Rhetorical Minefield’ (Reuters: 21 September 2001), https://doi.org/hv.greenspun.com/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg.tcl?msg_id=006SM3 (accessed November 18, 2009).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy in America, Henry Reeve Text, revised by Francis Bowen, further corrected and edited by Phillips Bradley (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1954).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hamilton, ‘The United States: A Normative Power?’, 4.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Diez and Manners, ‘Reflecting on Normative Power Europe’, 173-88.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Olli Rehn, ‘Values define Europe, Not Borders’, 6 January 2005, https://doi.org/www.otw.co.at/otw/index.php/e/a/194.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dimitris Papadimitriou and David Phinnemore, Romania and the EU: From Marginalisation to Membership, (Abingdon, Oxfordshire: Routledge, 2008), 14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    For an overview, see Steve Wood, ‘The European Union: A Normative or a Normal Power?’, European Foreign Affairs Review 14, no. 1 (January 2009): 113–28.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Haizam Amirah Fernandez and Richard Youngs, eds, The Euro-Mediterranean Partnership: Assessing the First Decade, (Barcelona: Real Instituto Elcano de Estudios Internacionales y Estratégicos, 2005), p. 158.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    This point is made in M. Gülce Kumrulu, ‘Can the EU become a Normative Power in the South? The Egyptian Case’, https://doi.org/www.sam.gov.tr/perceptions/volume13/autumn/MGulceKUMRULU.pdf.
  22. 22.
    Bernard Kouchner, quoted in Natalie Nougayrède, ‘France without Illusions’, Foreign Policy 174 (Sept/Oct 2009): 31.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Manners, ‘Normative Power Europe’, 239.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Colin Dueck, Reluctant Crusaders: Power, Culture and Change in American Grand Strategy, (Princeton, Princeton University Press, 2006), 21–2.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    The National Security Strategy of the United States, September 2002, p. 31.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ibid., 15.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    See Karen J. Greenberg, ‘What the Torture Memos Tell Us’, Survival 51, no. 3 (June/July 2009): 7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    David P. Calleo, ‘The Tyranny of False Vision: America’s Unipolar Fantasy’, Survival 50, no. 5 (Oct-Nov 2008): 71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Godfrey Hodgson, ‘The Myth of American Exceptionalism’ (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2009), 177.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ibid., 175.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Manners, ‘Normative Power Europe’, 253.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Steven J. Silvia and Aaron Beers Sampson, Acquis Communautaire and European Exceptionalism: A Geneaology, ACES Working Paper 2003. 1, July 2003, 2–3, https://doi.org/www1.american.edu/aces/Working%20Papers/2003.1.pdf.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ibid., 10.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hamilton, ‘The United States: A Normative Power?’, 146.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Manners, ‘Normative Power Europe’, 252.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    It should though be noted that 37 states, the US military and the Federal Government have authorised the death penalty and it remains a highly contentious issue.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    See Sibylle Scheipers and Daniela Sicurelli, ‘Normative Power Europe: A Credible Utopia?’, Journal of Common Market Studies 45, no. 2 (2007): 435–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    European Commission, Indonesia-European Community Strategy Paper, 2007–2013, (Brussels: European Commission, 2007).Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Hillary Rodham Clinton, Secretary of State, ‘The Role of Civil Society in Building a Stronger, More Peaceful World’, Address at Indonesian Civil Society Dinner, Washington, DC, 18 February 2009, https://doi.org/www.state.gov/secretary/rm/2009a/02/119425.htm; andGoogle Scholar
  40. 39a.
    Barack H. Obama, Statement on World Day Against Child Labor, 12 June 2009 https://doi.org/www.gpoaccess.gov/presdocs/2009/DCPD-200900464.pdf.Google Scholar
  41. 40.
    See Council of the European Union, Ensuring Protection - European Union Guidelines on Human Rights Defenders (Brussels: Council of the European Union, 2008.)Google Scholar
  42. 41.
    Declaration of the European Parliament, Murder of the Human Rights Activist Munir Said Thalib, Thursday, 10 April 2008, Brussels P6 TA(2008)0126.Google Scholar
  43. 42.
    US Department of State, Supporting Human Rights and Democracy: The US Record 2006, Department of State Publication 11411, Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor Bureau of Public Affairs.Google Scholar
  44. 43.
    A copy of the letter may be found at https://doi.org/www.humanrightsfirst.info/pdf/05118-hrd-indonesia-sby-ltr.pdf.
  45. 44.
    Sen. Russell Feigngold (D-WI), Senate, S.8524, 15 September 2008.Google Scholar
  46. 45.
    See https://doi.org/ec.europa.eu/development/geographical/regionscountries/countries/country_ profile.cfm?cid = ng&type = long&lng = en.
  47. 46.
    US Department of State, 23 March 2009, https://doi.org/nigeria.usembassy.gov/prog_ 12132007.html.
  48. 47.
    Murder of Russian journalist Anna Politkovskaya, European Parliament Resolution on EU-Russian relations following her murder, P6_TA-PROV(2006)0448.Google Scholar
  49. 48.
    Statement on the Murder of Russian Journalist Anna Politkovskaya, Office of the Press Secretary, The White House, 8 October 2006, https://doi.org/georgewbushwhitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2006/10/20061008.html.Google Scholar
  50. 49.
    The agreement was signed ‘pour l’Union europeénne, la Présidence franc¸aise’, but on notepaper headed with the latter.Google Scholar
  51. 50.
    Presidency Conclusions, Extraordinary European Council, Brussels, 1 September 2008, 12594/2/08 (Rev.2), Brussels, 6 October 2008, para.10.Google Scholar
  52. 51.
    Press conference, see https://doi.org/georgia.usembassy.gov/pr-08122008-bryza.html.
  53. 52.
    Antonella Rampino, ‘Interview with Minister Frattini: An Immediate Truce, But we Mustn’t Isolate Moscow’, La Stampa, Rome, 11 August 2008.Google Scholar
  54. 53.
    Source European Commission at https://doi.org/ec.europa.eu/trade/issues/bilateral/countries/usa/ index_en.htm.
  55. 54.
    William H. Cooper, ‘EU-US. Economic Ties: Framework, Scope and Magnitude’, CRS Report for Congress, Updated 17 Feb. 2006. CRS Report for Congress, 8.Google Scholar
  56. 55.
    Lars Nilsson, ‘Comparative Effects of EU and US Trade Policies on Developing Country Exports’, in The EU and Developing Countries: Trade, Aid and Growth in an Integrating World, eds. Yves Bourdet, Joakim Gullstrand and Karin Olofsdotter (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2007), 62.Google Scholar
  57. 56.
    UN General Assembly, International Development Strategy for the Second United Nations Development Decade, UN General Assembly Resolution 2626 (XXV), 24 October 1970, para. 43.Google Scholar
  58. 57.
    United Nations, The Millennium Development Goals Report (New York: United Nations, 2008).Google Scholar
  59. 58.
    Michael A. Fletcher, ‘Bush has Quietly Tripled Aid to Africa’, The Washington Post, 31 December 2006.Google Scholar
  60. 59.
    Knud Erik Jørgensen and Katie V. Laatikainen, ‘The EU at the UN: Multilateralism in a New Key?’ (paper presented at the Second Pan-European Conference on EU Politics, Bologna, 2004).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Board of Transatlantic Studies 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.European Institute of Public AdministrationMaastrichtThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations