Advertisement

Journal of Transatlantic Studies

, Volume 7, Issue 4, pp 389–398 | Cite as

Transatlantic dialogues and identity politics: theorising bilateral silences in the genesis and future of queer studies

  • Maite Escudero-AlíasEmail author
Article

Abstract

Since its appearance in the early 1990s, queer theory has been first and foremost characterised by the problematisation of stable normative identity categories, stressing that the concepts of gender, sex and sexuality do not have to be necessarily related. While most scholars working on queer theory often focus on its potential to redefine both heteronormative and homonormative paradigms of gender identity as well as on a pervading fascination with ‘gender performativity’ (Butler 1990, 1993), only a few have explicitly noticed the transatlantic component in the genesis of queer theory. Besides acknowledging such interdisciplinary coalition, the present contribution explores other discourses, such as (non-white) lesbian feminism, that have been queerly silenced in an attempt to de-center the rapid globalisation and Westernisation of queer studies.

Keywords

queer identity politics representation feminism globalisation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick, Tendencies (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1993), xii.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    The work by sexologist Richard von Krafft-Ebing, Psychopathia Sexualis, written for scientific and medical experts, discussed the process through which sexuality became medicalised. Richard von Krafft-Ebing Psychopathia Sexualis, trans. F.J Rebman (Chicago: Login Brothers, 1929 [1886]). It also put forward the relevance of sexuality in the formation of identity and demonstrated ‘both the ways in which sexology imposed identity on individuals and the ways in which those individuals made use of sexology for their own purposes’Google Scholar
  3. 2a.
    R. Tobin, ‘Masochism and Identity’, in One Hundred Years of Masochism. Literary Texts, Social and Cultural Contexts, ed. Michael C. Finke and Carl Niekerk (Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2000), 33–52 (33).Google Scholar
  4. 3.
    John A. Simpson, ed. The Compact Oxford English Dictionary, 2nd ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993 [1971]), 1489.Google Scholar
  5. 4.
    Richard Dyer, The Culture of Queers (London and New York: Routledge, 2002), 1.Google Scholar
  6. 5.
    Richard Dyer, The Culture of Queers (London and New York: Routledge, 2002), 2.Google Scholar
  7. 6.
    Michel Foucault, The History of Sexuality (New York: Vintage, 1990 [1978]), 43.Google Scholar
  8. 7.
    Dyer, The Culture of Queers, 3.Google Scholar
  9. 8.
    Foucault, The History of Sexuality, 101.Google Scholar
  10. 9.
    It is interesting to note here that the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transsexual and Transgender community (hereafter LGBT) started its own campaign of positive visibility out of the Stonewall events.Google Scholar
  11. 10.
    According to Sedgwick, ‘there is no satisfactory rule for choosing between the usages of “homosexual” and “gay”, outside of a post-Stonewall context where “gay” must be preferable since it is the explicit choice of a larger number of people to whom it refers. Until recently it seemed that “homosexual”, though it severely risked anachronism in any application before the late nineteenth century, was still somehow less temporally circumscribed than “gay”, perhaps because it sounded more official, not to say diagnostic’, Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick, Epistemology of the Closet (London: Penguin, 1990), 16.Google Scholar
  12. 11.
    VV.AA. ‘Queers Read This’, https://doi.org/blue.butler.edu/bwoodruf/alliance/misc/qrrdthis/html, 1990.Google Scholar
  13. 12.
    Judith Butler, Undoing Gender (London and New York: Routledge, 2004), 18.Google Scholar
  14. 13.
    One of the predecessors of queer theory was AIDS activist group ACT-UP (AIDS Coalition to Unleash Power) — which was organised in 1987 by the gay community to demand, among other issues, greater visibility of HIV-infected gay men. What is interesting in the creation of ACT-UP was their adoption of subversive visual practices in an attempt to effect social and political change; that is to say, rather than portray HIV-infected homosexuals as victims, their activism was targeted at the gay community in particular with the aim of promoting a counter-visibility which directly subverted the politically-correct and homogeneous representations of the white and middle-class gay community. For further information, see the work by Bad Object-Choices, How Do I Look? Queer Film and Video (Seattle, WA: Bay Press, 1991), a reading group formed in New York in the spring of 1987 to address questions of gay and lesbian theory. Among the group members who edited the proceedings of a conference entitled How Do I Look? were Martha Gever, Bill Horrigan, Amber Hollibaugh, and Douglas Crimp.Google Scholar
  15. 14.
    Although De LeGrace Volcano was born in the States, he has been living and working in England for the past twenty years. His photographs, which have been censored several times, address the importance of gathering and representing stigmatised bodies, such as FTM transgender and intersex on the one hand, and the necessity of building a transatlantic bridge that raises questions about belonging and location on the other. For further information, see his work Sublime Mutations (Tubingen: Konkursbuchverlag, 2000).Google Scholar
  16. 15.
    The most influential works on the intersections of gender, race and sexuality are Barbara Smith’s ‘Towards a Black Feminist Criticism’, in The Feminist Criticism: Essays on Women, Literature and Theory, ed. Elaine Showalter (London: Virago, 1985), 168–185Google Scholar
  17. 15a.
    bell hook’s Feminist Theory: From Margin to Center (Bostone: South End Press, 1984)Google Scholar
  18. 15b.
    Audre Lorde’s Sister Outsider: Essays and Speeches by Audre Lorde (Berkeley, CA, and Toronto: Crossing Press, 1984 [1984])Google Scholar
  19. 15c.
    and Cherríe Moraga and Gloria Anzaldúa’s (eds) This Bridge Called My Back: Writings by Radical Women of Color (New York: Women of Color Press, 1984).Google Scholar
  20. 16.
    Andy Medhurst and Sally R. Munt, Lesbian and Gay Studies. A Critical Introduction (London: Cassell, 1997), xvi.Google Scholar
  21. 17.
    Krafft-Ebing, Psychopathia Sexualis; Haverlock Ellis, ‘Sexual Inversion’, in Studies of the Psychology of Sex, 2 vols (New York: Random House, 1905 [1896]Google Scholar
  22. 17a.
    Sigmund Freud, Three Essays on the Theory of Sexuality (London: Hogarth, 1953 [1905]; Foucault, The History of SexualityGoogle Scholar
  23. 17b.
    Guilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari, Anti-Oedipus. Capitalism and Schizophrenia (London and New York: Continuum, 2003 [1972])Google Scholar
  24. 17c.
    Jacques Derrida, Writing and Difference (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1978)Google Scholar
  25. 17d.
    Monique, Wittig, ‘One is Not Born a Woman’, Feminist Issues 1, no. 2 (1981): 47–54; Cixous.Google Scholar
  26. 18.
    James Procter, Stuart Hall (London and New York: Routledge, 2004), 118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 19.
    Roland Barthes, ‘The Death of the Author’, in Image-Music-Text, trans. Stephen Heath (New York: Hill and Wang, 1977), 142–148.Google Scholar
  28. 20.
    Michel Foucault, ‘What is an Author?’, in Language, Counter-Memory, Practice, ed. Donald F. Bouchard (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1977), 113–138; Derrida, Writing and Difference.Google Scholar
  29. 21.
    Mikhail Bakhtin, The Dialogic Imagination (Austin: University of Texas Press, 1981).Google Scholar
  30. 22.
    Judith Butler, Gender Trouble. Feminism and the Subversion of Identity (London and New York: Routledge, 1990)Google Scholar
  31. 22a.
    Judith Butler, Bodies that Matter: On the Discursive Limits of ‘Sex’ (London and New York: Routledge, 1993); Butler, Undoing Gender; Kosofsky Sedgwick, Epistemology of the ClosetGoogle Scholar
  32. 22b.
    Teresa De Lauretis, ‘Queer Theory: Lesbian and Gay Sexualities’, Differences 3 (1991): iii–xviii.Google Scholar
  33. 23.
    Butler, Gender Trouble, 5.Google Scholar
  34. 24.
    Wittig, ‘One is Not Born a Woman’, 47–54.Google Scholar
  35. 25.
    Butler, Bodies that Matter.Google Scholar
  36. 26.
    Catharine MacKinnon, Feminism Unmodified: Discourses on Life and Law (New York: Routledge, 1987)Google Scholar
  37. 26a.
    Andrea Dworkin, Pornography: Men Possessing Women (New York: Seal, 1981).Google Scholar
  38. 27.
    Medhurst and Munt, Lesbian and Gay Studies, xiii.Google Scholar
  39. 28.
    The emphasis on the glorification of working-class culture and the concern with social class have typically been recurrent themes not only in British Cultural Studies but also in British literature and film.Google Scholar
  40. 29.
    Paul Gilroy, ‘Nothing But Sweat Inside My Hand: Diaspora Aesthetics and Black Arts in Britain’, in I.C.A. Documents 7. Black Film, British Cinema (London: Institute of Contemporary Arts, 1986), 44–47Google Scholar
  41. 29a.
    Kobena Mercer, ‘Dark and Lovely Too: Black Gay Men in Independent Film’, in Queer Looks. Perspectives on Lesbian and Gay Film and Video, ed. Martha Gever, John Greyson and Pratibha Parmar (London and New York: Routledge, 1993), 238–256Google Scholar
  42. 29b.
    Stuart Hall, ‘Cultural Identity and Diaspora’, in Identity and Difference, ed. Kathryn Woodward (London: SAGE, 1997a [1990]), 51–58Google Scholar
  43. 29c.
    Stuart Hall, Representation. Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices. London: The Open University, 1997bGoogle Scholar
  44. 29d.
    Dyer, Richard. White. London and New York: Routledge, 1997Google Scholar
  45. 29e.
    Richard Dyer, The Culture of Queers. London and New York: Routledge, 2002.Google Scholar
  46. 30.
    Medhurst, and Munt, Lesbian and Gay Studies, xiv.Google Scholar
  47. 31.
    Gever et al., Queer Looks.Google Scholar
  48. 32.
    Pratibha Parmar’s documentary film Khush (1991) explicitly challenges dominant Anglo-Saxon representations of lesbians. Accentuated by dream sequences, dance segments and a sensuous soundtrack, Khush, which means ‘ecstatic pleasure’ in Urdu, captures the complex and inspiring testimonies of being queer and of color for Asian lesbians and gay men in Britain, the USA, and also in India, where homosexuality is still illegal.Google Scholar
  49. 33.
    Gever et al., Queer Looks, 9.Google Scholar
  50. 34.
    Judy Grahn, Edward the Dyke and Other Poems (Oakland, CA: Women’s Press Collective, 1971)Google Scholar
  51. 34a.
    Pat Parker, Womanslaughter (Oakland, CA: Diana, 1978)Google Scholar
  52. 34b.
    Pat Parker, Movement in Black: The Collected Poetry of Pat Parker, 1961–1978 (Trumansburg, NY: Crossing, 1983)Google Scholar
  53. 34c.
    Gloria Anzaldu’a, Making Face, Making Soul, Haciendo caras: Creative and Critical Perspectives by Women of Color (San Francisco, CA: Auntlute, 1990).Google Scholar
  54. 35.
    Linda Garber, Identity Poetics. Race, Class, and the Lesbian-Feminist Roots of Queer Theory (New York: Columbia University Press, 2001), 189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 36.
    In fact, one cannot escape this global trend within queer studies of citing the list of hegemonic authors to the detriment of other marginalised voices. This is mostly so when, as in the case of this paper, a brief ‘official’ account of the genesis of queer theory has been offered.Google Scholar
  56. 37.
    Garber, Identity Poetics, 17.Google Scholar
  57. 38.
    Garber, Identity Poetics, 177.Google Scholar
  58. 39.
    Grahn, Edward the Dyke and Other Poems; Parker, Womanslaughter; Parker, Movement in Black.Google Scholar
  59. 40.
    Garber, Identity Poetics, 200.Google Scholar
  60. 41.
    Jose Esteban Munoz, Disindentifications: Queers of Color and the Performance of Politics (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1999)Google Scholar
  61. 41a.
    Siobhan Somerville, Queering the Color Line. Race and the Invention of Homosexuality in American Culture (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2000)Google Scholar
  62. 41b.
    ed. John Hawley, Post-colonial, Queer. Theoretical Intersections (Albany: State University of New York Press, 2001)Google Scholar
  63. 41c.
    Mason Stokes, The Color of Sex. Whiteness, Heterosexuality and the Fictions of White Supremacy (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 42.
    Jose Esteban Munoz, Disindentifications, 203.Google Scholar
  65. 43.
    William Spurlin, ‘Broadening Postcolonial Studies/Decolonizing Queer Studies’, in Postcolonial, Queer. Theoretical Intersections, ed. John Hawley (Albany: State University of New York Press, 2001), 185–205 (20).Google Scholar
  66. 44.
    Some of these terms, attempting to resist the global presence and naming of ‘queer’, can be the Thai yingrakying, tom or dii, the West-Sumatra mahu, the Japanese onabees, all of which mean ‘women who love women following nonconformist ways’, Jillana Enteen, ‘Tom, Dii and Anjaree: Women Who Follow Nonconformist Ways’, in Postcolonial, Queer, ed. Hawley, 99–122 (99). The Spanish bollera or tortillera can also be illustrative in this sense.Google Scholar
  67. 45.
    Quoted in Procter, Stuart Hall, 107.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Board of Transatlantic Studies 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of ZaragozaSpain

Personalised recommendations