Journal of Transatlantic Studies

, Volume 6, Issue 3, pp 279–289 | Cite as

John Foster Dulles: moralism and anti-communism

  • Dianne Kirby


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Walter Russell Mead, Special Providence: American Foreign Policy and How It Changed the World (New York: Routledge, 2002).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    This is a well-explored theme in American history books. See Conrad Cherry, ed., God’s New Israel: Religious Interpretations of American Destiny (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1998).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    R.W. Pruessen, John Foster Dulles: The Road to Power (New York: The Free Press, 1982), 186.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    A.J. Mayer, Politics and Diplomacy of Peacemaking, Containment and Counter-revolution at Versailles, 1918–1919 (New York: Alfred Knopf, 1967), 9.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    US Congress, Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Executive Sessions of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, vol. 5, 83rd Congress., 1st session, 1977, 315.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Reinhold Niebuhr, ‘The Moral World of John Foster Dulles’, New Republic (1 December 1958), 8.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Richard Immerman, ed., ‘Introduction’, in John Foster Dulles and the Diplomacy of the Cold War (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1990), 3.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Seth Jacobs, America’s Miracle Man in Vietnam (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2004), 275.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    See, for example, the work of James Burnham, philosophy professor and CIA consultant, The Struggle for the World (1947), The Coming Defeat of Communism (1950) and Containment or Liberation (1953).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    J.F. Dulles, ‘Thoughts on Soviet Foreign Policy and What to Do About It’, Life (3 June 1946), 20.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    James Baughman, Henry R. Luce and the Rise of the American News Media (Boston, MA: Twayne Publishers, 1987).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    D.T. Miller and M. Nowak, The Fifties: The Way We Really Were (New York: Doubleday, 1977), 38, 91.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kenneth O’Reilly, Hoover and the Un-Americans: The FBI, HUAC and the Red Menace (Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press, 1983).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    M. Silk, Spiritual Politics: Religion and America since World War II (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1988), 96–7.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    The proposal had originated some years previously in Roman Catholic circles. Silk, Spiritual Politics, 99.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Alessandro Brogi, ‘“Competing Missions”: France, Italy, and the Rise of American Hegemony in the Mediterranean’, Diplomatic History 30, no. 4 (September 2006): 741–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dianne Kirby, ‘The Church of England and Religions Division during the Second World War: Church-State relations and the Anglo-Soviet Alliance’, Journal of International Relations 1, no. 1 (electronic) (May 2000).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Diane Kirby, ‘Divinely Sanctioned: The Anglo-American Cold War Alliance and the Defence of Western Civilisation and Christianity, 1945–48’, The Journal of Contemporary History 35, no. 3 (July 2000), 385–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hitler’s mobilisation of religion, as part of his ‘crusade’ against the Soviet Union, was disregarded. See S.M. Miner, Stalin’s Holy War: Religion, Nationalism, and Alliance Politics, 1941–1945 (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2003).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    At the Potsdam conference, Secretary of State James Byrnes initially refused reparations, before concessions that historian Marc Trachtenberg has interpreted as a policy of ‘amicable divorce’ by which the Americans demonstrated their willingness to tolerate a Soviet ‘security zone’. W.A. McDougall, Promised Land, Crusader State (Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin, 1997), 158.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Foreign Relations of the United States (henceforth FRUS), 1952–1954, V, 461–468.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ibid., 362.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Stanley High, ‘What the President Wants’, Reader’s Digest 65 (April 1953), 2–4.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ira Chernus, ‘Operation Candor: Fear, Faith, and Flexibility’, Diplomatic History 29, no. 5 (November 2005), 785–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    New York Times, 5 October 1952.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Dulles’s statement to the North Atlantic Cuncil, 23 April 1954, FRUS 1952–54, 5: 509–14.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Scott Lucas, Freedom’s War: The US Crusade against the Soviet Union, 1945–1956 (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1998). For a contemporary comment on the distance between Dulles’s rhetoric and policyGoogle Scholar
  28. 27a.
    see Joseph C. Harsch, ‘John Foster Dulles: A Very Complicated Man’, Harper’s Magazine 213 (September 1956), 27–34: ‘He has appeared to be a crusading knight bearing the cross of righteousness on his shield, his sword upraised against the foe and his voice calling for the charge. But if your glance descends from this stirring picture, you notice that the charger he bestrides is ambling placidly in the opposite direction.’Google Scholar
  29. 28.
    E.M. O’Connor to G.A Morgan, 27 May 1953; ‘US Prestige Abroad’, Box 17, PSB 092, Eisenhower Library.Google Scholar
  30. 29.
    Ronald Radosh, The Rosenberg File (Austin, TX: Rinehart & Winston, 1983).Google Scholar
  31. 30.
    Dulles was the first secretary of state to have an official audience with the pope. Frederick W. Marks III, Power and Peace: The Diplomacy of John Foster Dulles (London: Praeger, 1995), 77.Google Scholar
  32. 31.
    D. Kirby, ‘Ecclesiastical McCarthyism: Christianity and Cold War Culture’, Journal of Contemporary British History 19, no. 2 (June 2005), 185–201.Google Scholar
  33. 32.
    Memorandum of Dulles-Strauss telephone conversation, 29 March 1954, FRUS 1952–54, 2: 1379–80.Google Scholar
  34. 33.
    Foreign Relations of the United States, 1952–54, vol. XV, 1485, cited in J.L. Gaddis, Strategies of Containment: A Critical Appraisal of American National Security Policy During the Cold War (New York: Oxford University Press, 2005), 172.Google Scholar
  35. 34.
    Memorandum of NSC meeting, 5 August 1954, FRUS 1952–54, 2: 706–7.Google Scholar
  36. 35.
    The influence of Christian thinking about nuclear war, including the abolition of nuclear weapons, can be discerned in Dulles’s recorded conversations with the president, ‘Meetings with the President, August-December, 1956 (2),’ Eisenhower Library, and in ‘Papers on Nuclear Weapons 1/56 (1),’ Eisenhower Library.Google Scholar
  37. 36.
    Memorandum of NSC meeting, 21 December 1954, FRUS 1952–54, 2: 833–836.Google Scholar
  38. 37.
    ‘Basic National Security Policy (Suggestions of the Secretary of State)’, 15 November 1954, FRUS 1952–54, 2: 789–95.Google Scholar
  39. 38.
    Memorandum of US-UK conversation, 11 December 1956, FRUS 1955–57, 4: 125.Google Scholar
  40. 39.
    For a full historiographical discussion, see Klaus Larres, Churchill’s Cold War: The Politics of Personal Diplomacy (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
  41. 40.
    Ibid., xx.Google Scholar
  42. 41.
    Brian R. Duchin, ‘The “Agonising Reappraisal”: Eisenhower, Dulles, and the European Defence Community’, Diplomatic History 16, no. 2 (Spring 1992), 201–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 42.
    Alessandro Brogi, ‘“Competing Missions”: France, Italy, and the Rise of American Hegemony in the Mediterranean’, Diplomatic History 30, no. 4 (September 2006), 741–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 43.
    Rolf Steininger, ‘John Foster Dulles, the European Defence Community, and the German Question’, in John Foster Dulles and the Diplomacy of the Cold War, ed. Richard H. Immerman (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1990), 80.Google Scholar
  45. 44.
    Hans-Jurgen Grabbe, ‘Konrad Adenauer, John Foster Dulles, and West German-American Relations’, in John Foster Dulles and the Diplomacy of the Cold War, ed. Richard H. Immerman (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1990), 120. Grabbe argues that the skillful management of what was still a fragile, difficult relationship was one of Dulles’s lasting achievements, p. 132.Google Scholar
  46. 45.
    Frederick W. Marks III, Power and Peace, 62–9.Google Scholar
  47. 46.
    Frederick W. Marks III, Power and Peace, 62; Robert A. Divine, ‘John Foster Dulles: What You See is What You Get’, Diplomatic History 15, no. 2 (Spring 1991), 277–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 47.
    R.W Pruessen, John Foster Dulles, 211.Google Scholar
  49. 48.
    Wm. Roger Louis, ‘Dulles, Suez, and the British’, in John Foster Dulles and the Diplomacy of the Cold War, ed. R. Immerman (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1990), 135.Google Scholar
  50. 49.
    Evelyn Shuckburgh, Descent to Suez: Diaries 1951–1956 (London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1986), 187.Google Scholar
  51. 50.
    It was, of course, Dulles’s withdrawal of the Anglo-American offer to fund building the Aswan Dam, following Nasser’s recognition of China in May 1956 that prompted the crisis.Google Scholar
  52. 51.
    Lloyd to Eden, 18 November 1956; FO 371/118873, National Archives.Google Scholar
  53. 52.
    Fred I. Greenstein, The Hidden-Hand Presidency: Eisenhower as Leader (New York: Basic Books, 1982).Google Scholar
  54. 53.
    Townsend Hoopes, The Devil and John Foster Dulles (Boston, MA: Little Brown, 1973).Google Scholar
  55. 54.
    Stephen E. Ambrose, Eisenhower, the President, 2 (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1984).Google Scholar
  56. 55.
    Chris Tudda, The Truth is Our Weapon: The Rhetorical Diplomacy of Dwight D. Eisenhower and John Foster Dulles (Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
  57. 56.
    Peter G. Boyle, Eisenhower (New Jersey: Pearson Education, 2005), 18 & 37.Google Scholar
  58. 57.
    Strobe Talbott, ed., Khrushchev Remembers (London: Andre Deutsch, 1971), 361.Google Scholar
  59. 58.
    Klaus Larres, Churchill’s Cold War: The Politics of Personal Diplomacy (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2002), 285.Google Scholar
  60. 59.
    James Srodes, Allen Dulles: Master of Spies (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, 1999), 432.Google Scholar
  61. 60.
    Blanche Weisen Cook, The Declassified Eisenhower: A Divided Legacy (New York: Doubleday, 1981).Google Scholar
  62. 61.
    Leo Ribuffo, ‘Religion and American Foreign Policy’, National Interest 52 (Spring 1998): 36–51.Google Scholar
  63. 62.
    Lloyd Gardner, ‘Poisoned Apples: John Foster Dulles and the “Peace Offensive”’, in The Cold War after Stalin’s Death, ed. Klaus Larres and Kenneth Osgood (New York: Rowman & Littlefield, 2006).Google Scholar
  64. 63.
    Van Dusen, ed., The Spiritual Legacy of John Foster Dulles (Philadelphia, PA: Westminster Press), 118.Google Scholar
  65. 64.
    Robert A. Divine, ‘John Foster Dulles: What You See is What You Get’, 277.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Taylor & Francis 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dianne Kirby
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of HistoryUniversity of UlsterBelfastNorthern Ireland, UK

Personalised recommendations