Advertisement

Journal of Transatlantic Studies

, Volume 3, Supplement 1, pp 7–30 | Cite as

Three Grand Designs: The U.S.A., Great Britain, and the Gaullist Concept of Atlantic Partnership and European Unity

  • Klaus Schwabe
Article

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Maurice Vaisse, ‘Europe européenne ou Europe atlantique? Les conceptions de Charles de Gaulle’, Michel Dumoulin & Geneviève Duchenne, eds., The European Union and the United States, Bruxelles, Bern, Berlin, 2003, p. 106Google Scholar
  2. 1a.
    Hans-Peter Schwarz, Adenauer. Der Staatsmann 1952–1967, Stuttgart, 1991, pp. 687f., 704.,729f., 743ff., 774.Google Scholar
  3. 2.
    Thomas Zoumaras, ‘Plugging the Dike: The Kennedy Administration Confronts the Balance-of Payments Crisis with Europe’, Douglas Brinkley, Richard T. Griffiths, eds., John F. Kennedy and Europe, Baton Rouge, 1999, pp. 169 ff.Google Scholar
  4. 2a.
    Robert Dallek, An Unfinished Life. John F. Kennedy, 1917–1963, Boston, 2003, pp. 332ff., 510 f.Google Scholar
  5. 2b.
    Frank Costigliola, ‘The Failed Design: Kennedy, de Gaulle, and the Struggle for Europe’, in: Diplomatic History, vol. 8, no. 3, summer 1984, pp. 229, 233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 3.
    George-Henri Soutou, L’alliance incertaine. Les rapport politico-stratégique franco-allemands 1954–1996, Paris, 1996, S. 66 f.Google Scholar
  7. 3.
    Norbert Wiggershaus, ‘Adenauer und die amerikanische Sicherheitspolitik in Europa’, Klaus Schwabe, ed., Adenauer und die USA, Bonn, 1994, pp.29 ff.Google Scholar
  8. 3a.
    K. Schwabe, ‘Adenauer and Nuclear Deterrence’, Wilfried Loth, ed., Europe, Cold War and Coexistence 1953–1965, London, 2004, pp. 38 f.Google Scholar
  9. 3b.
    Marc Trachtenberg, A Constructed Peace. The Making of the European Settlement 1945–1963, Princeton, 1999, pp. 205f.Google Scholar
  10. 4.
    Lawrence Kaplan, ‘The MLF Debate’, Brinkley, Griffiths, Kennedy and Europe, pp. pp52ff.; Costigliola, ‘The Failed Design’, p. 235.Google Scholar
  11. 5.
    Maurice Vaisse, La Grandeur. Politique étrangère du général de Gaulle, 1958–1969, Paris, 1998, pp. 117ffGoogle Scholar
  12. 5a.
    Erin Mahan, Kennedy, de Gaulle, and Western Europe, Houndmills, 2002, p. 48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 6.
    George-Henri Soutou, ‘Le général de Gaulle et le Plan Fouchet d’union politique européenne: Un projet stratégique,’ Anne Deighton, Alan S. Milward, eds., Widening, Deepening, Acceleration: The European Economic Unity 1957–1963, Baden-Baden, 1999, p. 55 ff.Google Scholar
  14. 7.
    Maurice Vaisse, La Grandeur, p. 187.Google Scholar
  15. 8.
    Soutou, ‘Le général de Gaulle et le Plan Fouchet’, p. 68Google Scholar
  16. 9.
    Quoted by G.H. Soutou, L’alliance incertaine, p. 131 ( tranlation by the author).Google Scholar
  17. 10.
    Vaisse, ‘Europe européenne’, p. 108.Google Scholar
  18. 11.
    De Gaulle - Adenauer talks, minutes in: Konrad Adenauer, Erinnerungen, Fragmente 1959–1963, Stuttgart, 1968, pp. 64, 84ff.Google Scholar
  19. 12.
    Charles S. Maier, ‘Alliance and autonomy: European identity and U.S. foreign policy objectives in the Truman years’, Michael L. Lacey, ed., The Truman presidency, Cambridge, 1989, p. 292Google Scholar
  20. 12a.
    K. Schwabe, ‘The United States and European Integration: 1947–1957’, Clemens Wurm ed., Western Europe and Gennany. The Beginnings of European Integration, Oxford 1995, pp. 123 ff.Google Scholar
  21. 13.
    David L. DiLeo, ‘George Ball and the Europeanists in the State Department, 1961–1963’, in: Brinkley, Griffiths, Kennedy and Europe, pp. 264f. 267ff., 272, 275.Google Scholar
  22. 14.
    DiLeo, ‘George Ball’, pp. 276 ff.Google Scholar
  23. 15.
    Quoted in D.C. Watt ed., Documents on International Affairs 1961, London 1971, p. 412.Google Scholar
  24. 16.
    Jeffrey Glen Giauque, Grand Designs & Visions of Unity. The Atlantic Powers and the Reorganization of Western Europe, 1955–1963, Chapell Hill, 2002, p. 113.Google Scholar
  25. 17.
    Walt Rostow, ‘Kennedy’s View of Monnet and Vice Versa’, Brinkley, Griffiths, eds., John F. Kennedy and Europe p. 284Google Scholar
  26. 17a.
    Eckart Conze, Die gaullistische Herausforderung. Die deutsch-französischen Beziehungen in der amerikanischen Europapolitik 1958–1963, München 1995, p. 227f.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 18.
    Conze, Die gaullistische Herausforderung, p. 234 f.Google Scholar
  28. 19.
    Kaplan, ‘The MLF Debate’, in: Brinkley, Griffiths, eds., John F. Kennedy and Europe, p. 59.Google Scholar
  29. 20.
    Mahan, Kennedy, de Gaulle, p. 74., 77; DiLeo, ‘George Ball’, p. 278.Google Scholar
  30. 21.
    Geir Lundetad, “Empire” by Integration. The United States and European Integration, 1945–1997, Oxford, 1998, p. 92.Google Scholar
  31. 22.
    Nigel Fisher, Harold Macmillan. A Biography, London, 1982, p. 306Google Scholar
  32. 23.
    Trachtenberg, A Constructed Peace, p. 216 ff.; Gustav Schmidt, ‘Die politischen und sicherheitspolitischen Dimensionen der britischen Europapolitik 1955–56–1963–64’, idem, ed., Großbritannien und Europa- Großbritannien in Europa, Bochum, 1989, p. 198Google Scholar
  33. 23a.
    Ralph Dietl, ‘Kontinuität und Wandel- Zur Geschichte der europäischen Zusammenarbeit auf dem Gebiet der Sicherheits- und Verteidigungspolitik 1948–2003’, Reinhard C. Meier-Walser, ed., Gemeinsam sicher? Vision und Realität europäischer Sicherheitspolitik, Neuwied, 2004, p. 47.Google Scholar
  34. 24.
    Stuart Ward, ‘Kennedy, Britain, and the European Community’, Brinkley, Griffiths, eds., John F. Kennedy and Europe, p. 318f.Google Scholar
  35. 24a.
    Wolfram Kaiser, ‘The Bomb and Europe. Britain, France and the EEC Entry Negotiations (1961–1963)’, Journal of European Integration History, vol. 1, no. 1 (1995), p. 78.Google Scholar
  36. 25.
    Wolfram Kaiser, Using Europe, abusing the Europeans. Britain and European Integration, 1945–1963, Houndmills, 1996, pp. 189f. (for a different view cf. Ralph Dietl, ‘Kontinuität und Wandel’, p. 59.)Google Scholar
  37. 26.
    Wolfram Kaiser, Using Europe, pp. 111ff.Google Scholar
  38. 27.
    Kaiser, Using Europe, p. 168Google Scholar
  39. 28.
    ‘Ward, Kennedy, Britain, and the European Community’, John F. Kennedy and Europe, p. 320; James A. Bill, George Ball. Behind the Scenes in U.S. Foreign Policy, New Haven, 1997, pp. 125f.Google Scholar
  40. 29.
    Alan P. Dobson, Anglo-American Relations in the Twentieth Century, Of friendship, conflict and the rise and decline of superpowers, London, 1995, p.126.Google Scholar
  41. 30.
    Trachtenberg, A Constructed Peace, p. 216; Giauque, Grand Designs & Visions of Unity, p. 111.Google Scholar
  42. 31.
    Vaisse, La Grandeur, p. 196; Kaiser, Using Europe, p. 166.Google Scholar
  43. 32.
    Wolfram Kaiser, Using Europe, p. 116, 160; for the background see: Constantin Pagedas, Franco-British Nuclear Cooperation, London, 2001, passim.Google Scholar
  44. 33.
    Pierce Ludlow, ‘A mismanaged application: Britain and the EEC’, Deighton, Milward, eds., Widening, p. 283.Google Scholar
  45. 34.
    Ward, ‘Kennedy, Britain, and the European Community’, Brinkley, Griffiths, eds., John F. Kennedy and Europe, p.324.Google Scholar
  46. 35.
    Macmillan, note of 11 June 1961, cited in Kaiser, Using Europe, p. 166.Google Scholar
  47. 36.
    Kaiser, Using Europe, p. 168.Google Scholar
  48. 37.
    Kaiser, Using Europe, p. 126.Google Scholar
  49. 38.
    Gabriele Clemens, ‘“A delicate matter”: Großbritannien und die Fouchet-Verhandlungen 1960‐1962’, Manuscript, Journal of European Integration History, vol. 10, 2004, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  50. 39.
    Trachtenberg, A Constructed Peace, pp. 316f.Google Scholar
  51. 40.
    Soutou, ‘Le général de Gaulle et le Plan Fouchet’, Deighton, Milward, eds., Widening, p. 68; Kaiser, Using Europe, p. 165.Google Scholar
  52. 41.
    Maurice Vaisse, ‘De Gaulle et l’élargissement du Marché commun 1961‐1963’, Deighton, Milward, eds., Widening, p. 209.Google Scholar
  53. 42.
    Vaisse, ‘De Gaulle et l’élargissement’, p. 202 ( 3‐7-1962); Bernd Leupold. “Weder anglophil noch anglophob”. Großbritannien im politischen Denken Konrad Adenauers, Frankfurt, 1997, p. 285.Google Scholar
  54. 43.
    Kaiser, Using Europe, p. 159Google Scholar
  55. 44.
    Vaisse, La Grandeur, p. 201 f.Google Scholar
  56. 45.
    Kaiser, Using Europe, pp. 188f.Google Scholar
  57. 46.
    Kaiser, ‘The Bomb’, Journal ofEuropean Integration History, vol. 1, no. 1 (1995), p.84.Google Scholar
  58. 47.
    Vaisse, La Grandeur, pp. 201, 204, 209.Google Scholar
  59. 48.
    Kaiser, ‘The Bomb’, Journal of European Integration History, vol. 1, no. 1 (1995), p. 77.Google Scholar
  60. 49.
    Vaisse, La Grandeur, pp. 141, 201.Google Scholar
  61. 50.
    Pierce Ludlow, ‘A mismanaged application: Britain and the EEC, in: Deighton, Milward, eds., Widening, pp. 276, 282 ff.Google Scholar
  62. 51.
    I follow the account in Vaisse, La grandeur, pp.205 ff. which is based both on British and French minutes.Google Scholar
  63. 52.
    Ward, ‘Kennedy, Britain, and the European Community’, Brinkley,Griffiths, eds., John F. Kennedy and Europe, p. 329.Google Scholar
  64. 53.
    Trachtenberg, A Constructed Peace, pp. 359 ff.; Pascaline Winand, Eisenhower, Kennedy, and the United States of Europe, Houndmills, 1993, pp. 315 ff.Google Scholar
  65. 54.
    Ward, ‘Kennedy, Britain, and the European Community’, Brinkley, Griffiths, eds., John F. Kennedy and Europe, p. 330.Google Scholar
  66. 55.
    Minutes in: Foreign Relations of the United States (henceforth quoted as FRUS), 1961‐1963, vol. 13, Washington 1994, pp. 1100, 1103, 1109.Google Scholar
  67. 56.
    Kennedy did not explicitly define what he meant by that ( Harald Biermann, Kennedy’s Europapolitik’, Ralph Dietl, Franz Knipping, eds., Begegnung zweier Kontinente. Die Vereinigten Staaten und Europa seit dem Ersten Weltkrieg, Trier, 1999, p. 181; Trachtenberg, A Constructed Peace, p, 367).Google Scholar
  68. 57.
    Winand, Eisenhower Kennedy and the United States of Europe, Houndmills, 1993, p. 316.Google Scholar
  69. 58.
    Winand, Eisenhower Kennedy and the United States of Europe, p. 320; Donette Murray, Kennedy, Macmillan and Nuclear Weapons, New York, 2000, p. 94f., 100.Google Scholar
  70. 59.
    Dietl, ‘Kontinuität und Wandel’, S. 65; Summary Record National Security Council. Executive Committee Meeting, 31 January 1963, FRUS 1961–1963, vol. 13, p. 161.Google Scholar
  71. 60.
    Dobson, Anglo-American Relations, p. 129, Douglas Brinkley, ‘Dean Acheson and John Kennedy’, in: Brinkley Griffiths, eds., John F. Kennedy and Europe, p.305.Google Scholar
  72. 61.
    Memorandum of Conversation. Kennedy-Macmillan, 19 December 1962, FRUS 1961–1963, vol. 13, p. 1096.Google Scholar
  73. 62.
    Trachtenberg, A Constructed Peace, pp. 367 ff.Google Scholar
  74. 63.
    Kennedy to de Gaulle, 20 December 1962, FRUS 1961–1963, vol. 13, p. 1114.Google Scholar
  75. 64.
    Beatrice Heuser, Nuclear Mentalities? Strategies and Beliefs in Britain, France and the FRG, Houndmills, 1998, p. 29.Google Scholar
  76. 65.
    Trachtenberg, A Constructed Peace, p. 369.Google Scholar
  77. 66.
    Vaisse, La Grandeur, pp.155 ff.; Soutou, L’alliance incertaine, pp. 234 ff.Google Scholar
  78. 67.
    Vaisse, La Grandeur, pp. 157.Google Scholar
  79. 68.
    Rolf Steininger, ‘Großbritannien und de Gaulle. Das Scheitern des britischen EWG-Beitritts im Januar 1963’, Vierteljahrshefte für Zeitgeschichte, vol. 44, no. 1, 1996, pp. 87 f., 93 ff.Google Scholar
  80. 69.
    Fisher, Macmillan, p. 320.Google Scholar
  81. 70.
    Kaiser, Using Europe, p. 199.Google Scholar
  82. 71.
    Kennedy to Adenauer, 18 January 1963, FRUS 1961–1963, pp. 482f.Google Scholar
  83. 72.
    Schwarz, Adenauer. Der Staatsmann, pp. 820 f.Google Scholar
  84. 73.
    Rusk to Embassy Bonn, 23 January 1963, FRUS 1961–1963, vol. 13, p. 149.Google Scholar
  85. 74.
    Summary of NSC Executive Committee Meetings, 25 & 31 January 1963, in: FRUS 1961–63, vol. 13, pp. 157, 161ff., 487ff.Google Scholar
  86. 75.
    Memorandum from the Under Secretary of State (Ball), 20 June 1963, FRUS 1961–1963, vol. 13, p. 207.Google Scholar
  87. 76.
    Conze, Die gaullistische Herausforderung, p. 259; Winand, Eisenhower, Kennedy, p. 333.Google Scholar
  88. 77.
    Conze, Die gaullistische Herausforderung, pp. 267ff., 272, 275.Google Scholar
  89. 78.
    Oliver Bange, ‘English-American and German interests behind the Preamble to the Franco-German Treaty, 1963’, Gustav Schmidt, ed., Zwischen Bündnissicherung und priveligierter Partnerschaft. Die deutsch-britischen Beziehungen und die Vereinigten Staaten von Amerika, 1955–1963, Bochum, 1995, pp. 230, 233, 243, 247; Steininger, ‘Großbritannien und de Gaulle’, pp. 112f.Google Scholar
  90. 79.
    François Duchêne, Jean Monnet. The First Statesman of Interdependence, New York, 1994, pp. 330f.Google Scholar
  91. 80.
    Eric Roussel, Jean Monnet, Paris, 1996, pp. 747f.Google Scholar
  92. 80.
    Vaisse, La Grandeur, pp. 261f.Google Scholar
  93. 81.
    Rusk, Circular Telegram, 19 January 1963, in: FRUS 1961–1963, vol. 13, pp. 146ff.Google Scholar
  94. 82.
    Trachtenberg, A Constructed Peace, pp. 371ff.Google Scholar
  95. 83.
    Ward, ‘Kennedy, Britain, and the European Community’, Brinkley,Griffiths, eds., John F. Kennedy and Europe, p. 330.Google Scholar
  96. 84.
    Ward, ‘Kennedy, Britain, and the European Community’, pp. 331f.Google Scholar
  97. 85.
    Alan P. Dobson, ‘The USA, Britain and the Question of Hegemony,’ Geir Lundestad, ed., No End to Alliance. The United States and Western Europe: Past,Present, and Future, Houndmills, 1998, p. 150.Google Scholar
  98. 86.
    Memorandum Conversation Kennedy-Macmillan, 20 December 1962, FRUS 1961–63, vol. 13, p. 1109; Vaisse, La Grandeur, p. 208.Google Scholar
  99. 87.
    Klaus Schwabe, ‘Atlantic Partnership and European Integration’, Lundestad, ed., No End to Alliance, pp. 66f.Google Scholar
  100. 88.
    Dobson, ‘The USA, Britain and the Question of Hegemony’, Lundestad, ed., No End to Alliance, pp. 156f.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Board of the Journal of Transatlantic Studies 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Klaus Schwabe
    • 1
  1. 1.University of AachenGermany

Personalised recommendations