Journal of Transatlantic Studies

, Volume 1, Issue 1, pp 59–86 | Cite as

The Emerging Knowledge-Based Economies of the Atlantic Regions: Vision and Policy Design

  • Dimitrios Konstadakopulos


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 2.
    Yet another term in use is ‘information society’. Castells, M. The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture, 3 vols., Cambridge, Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishers, 1996, Vol. I, Chapters 2 and 3). All three terms are used within this paper.Google Scholar
  2. 3.
    The New Economy: Beyond the Hype, Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2001.Google Scholar
  3. 4.
    Van Reenen, J. ‘The New Economy: Reality and Policy’, Fiscal Studies, 22(3), (2001), pp. 307–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 5.
    Williams, K. ‘Business as Usual’, Economy and Society, 30(4), (2001), pp. 399–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 6.
    Breslin, S. and Higgott, R. ‘Studying Regions: Learning from the Old, Constructing the New’, New Political Economy, 5(3), (2000), pp. 333–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6a.
    Clarkson, S. ‘The Multi-level State: Canada in the Semi-periphery of both Continentalism and Globalization’, Review oflnternational Political Economy, 8(3), (2001), pp. 501–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nelson, R. R. and Winter, S. G. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, London: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
  8. 7a.
    Dosi, J., Freeman, C., Nelson, R. R., Silverberg, G. and Soete, L. Technical Change and Economic Theory, London: Pinter, 1987.Google Scholar
  9. 8.
    Mankiw, G. N., Romer D. and Weil, D. N. ‘A Contribution to the Empirics of Economic Growth’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 100(1), (1992), pp. 225–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 8a.
    Aghion, P. and Howitt, P. Endogenous Growth Theory, Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 1998.Google Scholar
  11. 8b.
    Bassanini, A., Scarpetta, S. and Visco, I. ‘Knowledge, Technology and Economic Growth: Recent Evidence from OECD Countries’, OECD, Economics Department Working Paper No. 259, Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2000.Google Scholar
  12. 9.
    Leadbeater, C. Living on Thin Air: The New Economy, London: Penguin, 1999.Google Scholar
  13. 9a.
    Thurow, L. C. Building Wealth: The New Rules for Individuals, Companies, and Nations in a Knowledge-based Economy, New York: Harper Collins, 1999.Google Scholar
  14. 10.
    A New Economy? The Changing Role of Innovation and lnformation Technology in Growth, Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2000. Managing National Innovation Systems, Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 1999. The Knowledge-based Economy, Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 1996. The Implementation of an Entrepreneurship Development Strategy in Canada: The Case of Atlantic Region, Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 1996. Kuklifiski, A. and. Orlowski, W. M. (eds), The Knowledge-Based Economy — The Global Challenges of the 21st Century, Warsaw: State Committee for Scientific Research, 2000.Google Scholar
  15. 10a.
    Kukliński, A. (ed), The Knowledge-Based Economy — The European Challenges of the 21st Century, Warsaw: State Committee for Scientific Research, 2000. RSA, Regionalising the Knowledge Economy, Conference Proceedings of the Regional Studies Association Annual Conference, London: Regional Studies Association, November, 2001.Google Scholar
  16. 11.
    OECD, 1999, pp. 10–11.Google Scholar
  17. 12.
    Capello, R. ‘Spatial Transfer of Knowledge in High Technology Milieux: Learning Versus Collective Learning Process’, Regional Studies, 33(4), (1999), pp. 353–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 12a.
    Cooke, P., Boekholt, P. and Tödtling, Y. The Governance of Innovation in Europe: Regional Perspectives on Global Competitiveness, London: Pinter, 2000.Google Scholar
  19. 12b.
    Matthiessen, C. W. and Schwarz, A. W. ‘Knowledge Centres of Europe: An Analysis of Research Strength and Patterns of Specialization Based on Bibliometric Indicators’, in A. Kuklifiski (ed.) The Knowledge-Based Economy — The European Challenges of the XXI Century, Warsaw: State Committee for Scientific Research, (2000), pp. 47–67.Google Scholar
  20. 12c.
    Gertler, M. S., Wolfe, D. A. and Garkut, D. ‘No Place Like Home? The Embeddedness of Innovation in a Regional Economy’, Review of International Political Economy, 7(4), (2000), pp. 688–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 12d.
    Diez, M. A. ‘The Evaluation of Regional Innovation and Cluster Policies: Towards a Participatory Approach’ European Planning Studies, 9(7), (2001), pp. 902–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 12e.
    Nauwelaers, C. and Wintjes, R. ‘Innovating SMEs and Regions: The Need for Policy Intelligence and Interactive Policies’, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 14(2), (2002), pp. 201–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 13.
    Howells, J. ‘Tacit Knowledge, Innovation and Economic Geography’, Urban Studies, 39(5–6), (2002), pp. 871–884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 14.
    Cooke et al., 2000, pp. 95–96.Google Scholar
  25. 15.
    See, for instance Steiner, M. (ed) Clusters and Regional Specialisation, London: Pion Ltd, pp. 1–17. For a critique of Michael Porter’s influential work on clusters, Martin, R. and Sunley, P. ‘Deconstructing Clusters: Chaotic Concept or Policy Panacea?, Regionalising the Knowledge Economy, Conference Proceedings of the Regional Studies Association Annual Conference, London: Regional Studies Association, November, 2001, pp. 8–13.Google Scholar
  26. 16.
    OECD, 1999. Banerjee, P. and Richter, F-J. ‘Social Management: Situating Imagination, Concept, Cooperation and Intangible Assets in the Knowledge Business’, in E Banerjee and F. J. Richter (eds) Intangibles in Competition and Cooperation, Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2001, pp. 289–338.Google Scholar
  27. 17.
    White Paper on Our Competitive Future: Building the Knowledge-Driven Economy, London: Department of Trade and Industry, December 1998. Canada’s Innovation Strategy 2002 views knowledge as an important national asset (
  28. 18.
    Konstadakopulos, D., Christopoulos, D. and Cannon, J. ‘Regional Strategies for the Future: Growing a Knowledge-BasedEconomy in the West of England and Singapore- Johor Agglomerations’, in A. Kuklifiski and W. M. Orlowski (eds.) The Knowledge- Based Economy — The Global Challenge of the XXI Century, Warsaw: State Committee for Scientific Research, 2000, pp. 274–87, p. 274.Google Scholar
  29. 19.
    The Trudeau government, after its election in 1968, established the Department of Regional Economic Expansion (DREE) with specific responsibilities and ambitious initiatives for regional development. In 1983, the new Department of Regional Industrial Expansion (DRIE) was formed, taking over the industry, small business and tourist components of the Department of Industry, Trade and Commerce. In 1987, the Mulroney government established the Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency (ACOA) with the aim of assisting entrepreneurs, or would-be entrepreneurs, to establish new businesses in the region. Shortly after, the federal government created the Western Diversification Office and replaced DRIE with the new Department of Industry, Science and Technology (DIST) in charge of promoting high technology sectors in all regions, Hansen, N. M., Higgins, B. H. and Savoie, D. J. Regional Policy in a Changing World, New York and London: Plenum Press, 1990, pp. 21–43.Google Scholar
  30. 20.
    The federal government has devised transfer-payment programmes for less developed regions. The most important and best known is the equalisation programme that contributes about a quarter of the provincial revenue of Atlantic regions. Transfers to individuals such as unemployment benefits or family allowances are also significant, amounting to a fifth of earned incomes for individuals living in the less developed regions (Savoie, 1992, pp. 167–168; Bradfield, 2001, pp. 13–14). For an extensive and detailed discussion of Canada’s fiscal federalism, see Lazar, H (ed.) Towards a New Mission Statement for Canadian Fiscal Federalism, Kingston Ontario: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
  31. 21.
    Afxentiou, C. R and Serletis, A. ‘Convergence across Canadian Provinces’ in Canadian Journal of Regional Science, XXI: 1 (1998), pp. 111–126.Google Scholar
  32. 21a.
    MacDonald, M. ‘The Impact of a Restructured Canadian Welfare State on Atlantic Canada’, Social Policy & Administration, 32(4), (1998), pp. 389–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 21b.
    Coulombe, S. (2000) ‘New Evidence of Convergence Across Canadian Provinces: The Role of Urbanization’, Regional Studies, 34(8), pp. 713–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 21c.
    Bradfield, M. Regional Economics: Analysis and Policies in Canada, Halifax NS: Dalhousie University, 2001.Google Scholar
  35. 22.
    Fanjoy, E. ‘Maritime Cooperation and the Maritime Premiers’ in I. McAllister Working with the Region: University Partnerships: Regional Cooperation; Sustainable Development, Halifax, NS: Dalhousie University, 1997, pp. 71–108, p. 74.Google Scholar
  36. 23.
    At the supranational level, the European Commission has taken a number of initiatives to expedite the shift towards a knowledge-based economy and society (as the Commission now refers to the concept, reflecting its desire to include the social dimension). In 1997, the European Union adopted a communication document entitled Towards a Europe of Knowledge, proposed by the Commission for the creation of a European common response to the challenges of the emerging knowledge-based economy. At the Lisbon extraordinary summit in 2000, the discussion document Employment, Economic Reforms and Social Cohesion — Towards a Europe Based on Innovation and Knowledge highlighted the need for Europe to hasten her transition to a knowledge-based economy by investing in people. Many activities for the promotion of the knowledge-based economy and society have been incorporated in the Commission’s draft 6th Framework Programme (2002–06) on the creation of a ‘European Research Area’. McAllister, I. ‘Regional development: How the EC and Canada tackle the issues — with lessons for each’, in Europe, 6(4), (1986), pp. 44–6.Google Scholar
  37. 24.
    Savoie, D. J. Regional Economic Development: Canada’s Search for Solutions, Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1992, pp. 14–15..Google Scholar
  38. 25.
    Personal comment from an economist who specialises in the province’s economic development, Halifax NS, May 2001.Google Scholar
  39. 26.
    Simeon, R. ‘Recent Trends in Federalism and Intergovernmental Relations in Canada: Lessons for the UK?’, in T. C. Salmon, and M. Keating (eds.) The Dynamics of Decentralisation: Canadian Federalism and British Devolution, Montreal & Kingston: McGill- Queen’s University Press, 2001, pp. 47–62, p. 53.Google Scholar
  40. 27.
    Savoie, pp. 15–17.Google Scholar
  41. 28.
    Ibid., p. 55.Google Scholar
  42. 29.
    Simpson, J., The truth about Atlantic Canada’s economy, The Globe and Mail, 2 June 2001.Google Scholar
  43. 30.
    The United Kingdom is best described as a unitary state, which since 1998 has gradually devolved power to its constituent nations (Scotland and Wales), provinces (Northern Ireland), and one of its regions (Greater London).Google Scholar
  44. 31.
    Regional Strategy for the South West of England, 2000–2010, (Brochure), Exeter: South West of England Regional Development Agency (SWERDA) 2000.Google Scholar
  45. 32.
    MacDonald, 1998, p. 396.Google Scholar
  46. 33.
    Department of Finance of Nova Scotia Nova Scotia Budget for the Fiscal Year 2002–03 by N. J. Leblanc, Minister of Finance, Halifax NS: Department of Finance, 2002.Google Scholar
  47. 34.
    Presentation by Ron L’Esperance, Deputy Minister, Nova Scotia Department of Economic Development, at the debate Competing Globally at St Mary’s University, Halifax NS, 29 May 2001.Google Scholar
  48. 35.
    The United States announced that it will impose an average 29% tariff on imported softwood lumber from Canada in an attempt to protect its own troubled forestry industry. BBC News, 22 March 2002,
  49. 36.
    OECD, Entrepreneurship Development Strategy, 1996, p. 16.Google Scholar
  50. 37.
    For a description of two well-known initiatives in community economic development in eastern Nova Scotia, the Antigonish Movement of co-operatives and the Cape Breton Family community corporations, see MacAulay, S. ‘The Community Economic Development Tradition in Eastern Nova Scotia, Canada: Ideological Continuities and Discontinuities between the Antigonish Movement and the Family of Community Development Corporation’, Community Development Journal, 36(2), (2001), pp. 111–21.Google Scholar
  51. 38.
    The South West of England consists of the counties and unitary authorities of Gloucestershire, South Gloucestershire, Swindon and Wiltshire, Bristol, Bath & North East Somerset, North Somerset, Somerset, Bournemouth, Dorset and Poole, Devon, Torbay and Plymouth, and Cornwall and the Isles of Scilly.Google Scholar
  52. 39.
    DTI and DfEE ‘South West: Opportunity for All in a World of Change’, A White Paper on Enterprise, Skills and Innovation, London: Department of Trade and Industry, and Department for Education and Employment, 2001.Google Scholar
  53. 40.
    SWERDA, 2000.Google Scholar
  54. 41.
    Regions in Figures: South West, Summer 2002, Table 4.1, London: Office for National Statistics.Google Scholar
  55. 42.
    Sunday Times, Southwest is the top spot for entrepreneurs, 7 April 2002. This article, drawing from a study compiled by Barclays Bank, reports that outside London the cities and towns of the South West of England have the highest business start-ups as a percentage of population.Google Scholar
  56. 43.
    DTI and DfEE, 2001.Google Scholar
  57. 44.
    Matthiessen and Schwarz, 2000, pp. 53–55Google Scholar
  58. 45.
    The West of England sub-region is the northeastern part of the region and constitutes approximately one third of the total area. sGoogle Scholar
  59. 46.
    UWE, Facilitating the Learning Behaviour of Small Innovative Firms, Survey Report, Bristol: University of the West of England, Bristol, 1999.Google Scholar
  60. 47.
    Konstadakopulos, D. ‘The Regions and Their Firms in the Perspective of Global Change’, in H. Btinz, and A. Kuklifiski (eds) Globalisation: Experiences and Prospects, Warsaw: F. E. Stiftung, 2001, pp. 306–24.Google Scholar
  61. 48.
    Savoie, 1992, pp. 265; MacDonald, 1998.Google Scholar
  62. 49.
    Statistics Canada ‘Estimation of Research and Development Expenditures in the Higher Education Sector, 1998–9’, Working Paper, Ottawa: Statistics Canada, May, 2001.Google Scholar
  63. 50.
    Department of Finance of Nova Scotia, 2002.Google Scholar
  64. 51.
    Nova Scotia has nine universities, although only one — Dalhousie University — is large by Canadian standards.Google Scholar
  65. 52.
    The remaining Canadian provinces featured in the statistical diagrams are: Saskatchewan (Sask) and Manitoba (Man).Google Scholar
  66. 53.
    Statistics Canada, 2001.Google Scholar
  67. 54.
    Nova Scotia Economic Development, 2000.Google Scholar
  68. 55.
    Department of Finance of Nova Scotia Budget Address for the Fiscal Year 2001–02 by N. J. Leblanc, Halifax NS: Department of Finance, 2001.Google Scholar
  69. 56.
    As, for instance, with two indigenous companies: the provincial telecommunications company MT&T and the Halifax-based distance learning provider Knowledge House Inc.Google Scholar
  70. 57.
    In the discussion paper Toward Prosperity it is shown that 57 per cent of the people who left the province between 1991 and 1996 had a university degree, and most belonged to the 25–34 age group, Nova Scotia Economic Development ‘Toward Prosperity: Developing an Economic Growth Strategy for Nova Scotia’, A Discussion Paper, Halifax NS: Nova Scotia Economic Development, 2000, p. 17.Google Scholar
  71. 57a.
    The determinants of inter-provincial mobility in Canada are discussed by Vachon, M. and Vaillancourt, F., T. McIntosh (eds) How Canadians Connect, Kingston Ontario: McGilI-Queen’s University Press, 1999, pp. 101–22. However, out-migration is not the same as labour mobility. For instance, intra-regional labour mobility among firms, and between firms and research institutions, is an important mechanism for the diffusion of knowGoogle Scholar
  72. 57b.
    The recent changes in the Canadian labour market policies, including efforts by the federal government to remove barriers to labour mobility, are discussed Lazar, H. and Stokyo, P. ‘Canadian Labour Market Policies: The Changing Role of Government and the Extent of Decentralization’, in T.C. Salmon and M. Keating (eds) The Dynamics of Decentralisation: Canadian Federalism and British Devolution, Montreal & Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2001, pp. 137–62.Google Scholar
  73. 58.
    Ministry of Finance Crown Corporation Business Plans for the fiscal year 2002–3, Halifax NS: Province of Nova Scotia, 2002.Google Scholar
  74. 59.
    Taylor, J. and Wren, C. ‘UK Regional Policy: An Evaluation’, Regional Studies, 39(9), (1997), 835–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 60.
    RSA, 2001: 13–14.Google Scholar
  76. 61.
    White Paper on Our Competitive Future: Building the Knowledge-Driven Economy op. cit, footnote 5.Google Scholar
  77. 62.
    Opportunity for All in a World of Change, White Paper on enterprise, skills and innovations, February 2001, London: DTI and DfEE.Google Scholar
  78. 63.
    RSA, 2001: 26; Martin, and Sunley, 2001, pp. 12–13.Google Scholar
  79. 64.
    The Internationalisation of Industrial R&D, Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, 1998, p. 54.Google Scholar
  80. 65.
    Bishop, P. and Wiseman, N. ‘The North-South Divide in the UK Defence Sector’, Regional Studies, 33(9), (1999), pp. 829–841, 831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 66.
    Boddy, M., Lovering, J. and Bassett, K. Sunbelt City? A Study of Economic Change in Britain’s M4 Growth Corridor, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986.Google Scholar
  82. 66a.
    Konstadakopulos D. ‘A Report on Learning for Innovation in the South West of England and South Wales: Supporting and Helping Small- and Medium-sized Enterprises to Improve Performance and Competitiveness’, Bristol: University of the West of England, Bristol. UWE, 1999. Konstadakopulos et al, 2001.Google Scholar
  83. 67.
    Bradfield, 2001, p. 30.Google Scholar
  84. 68.
    Bradfield, 2001, p. 30.Google Scholar
  85. 69.
  86. 70.
    Wernerheim, M. C. and Sharpe, C. A. ‘The Potential Bias in Producer Services Employment Estimates: The Case of the Canadian Space Economy’, Urban Studies, 38(3), (2001), pp. 563–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 71.
    APEC, IT and the Knowledge Economy in Atlantic Canada, Halifax, NS: Atlantic Provinces Economic Council, 1999, p. 42.Google Scholar
  88. 72.
    Konstadakopulos, D. ‘Milieux innovateurs et apprentissage dans le Sud-Ouest de l’Angleterre’, Innovations, Cahiers d’Economie de l’lnnovation, 11(1), (2000), pp. 139–154.Google Scholar
  89. 73.
    The provincial government of Nova Scotia refers to knowledge-based industries according to the Standard Industrial Classification codes, and these industries include lifesciences, e-learning and information technology (Ministry of Finance, 2002). Lee and Hass, c.f. APEC, 1999, pp. 5–6.Google Scholar
  90. 74.
    APEC, 1999, pp. 7–12.Google Scholar
  91. 75.
    Novaknowledge ‘Nova Scotia — Knowledge Economy Report Card 2000’, Halifax NS: Nova Knowledge, pamphlet 16 pages, 2000.Google Scholar
  92. 76.
    APEC, 1999, pp. 13–14.Google Scholar
  93. 77.
    MacDonald, 1998, pp. 398.Google Scholar
  94. 78.
    A sector survey in 1999 revealed that there were 84 life sciences companies in Nova Scotia, of which 87 per cent had their head offices in Nova Scotia, while 63 per cent were located in the Halifax Regional Municipality (The Nova Scotia Life Sciences Industry Report, 2000).Google Scholar
  95. 79.
    Mandale, M., Foster, M. E. and Plumstead, J. ‘Estimating the Economic Value of Coastal and Ocean Resources: The Case of Nova Scotia’ a report prepared for the Oceans Institute of Canada and the Atlantic Coastal Zone Information Steering Committee, Chester NS, February, 1998, p. 23.Google Scholar
  96. 80.
    Konstadakopulos, D., Diez, J. R., Kockel,1 U. and Mildahn, B. ‘Knowledge Companies in Britain and Germany: A Common Response to the Challenges of the Emerging Knowledge-based Economy?’ a report, London: Anglo-German Foundation for the Study of Industrial Society, 2001 (on-line Scholar
  97. 81.
    Salmon, T. C. ‘The Dynamics of Decentralisation: Canadian Federalism and British Devolution’, in T. C. Salmon, and M. Keating (eds) The Dynamics of Decentralisation: Canadian Federalism and British Devolution, Montreal & Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2001, pp. 187–92.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Board of the Journal of Transatlantic Studies 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dimitrios Konstadakopulos
    • 1
  1. 1.European Regional Studies Unit at the Centre for European StudiesUniversity of the West of EnglandUK

Personalised recommendations