The importance and degree of implementation of the European standards and guidelines for internal quality assurance in universities: the views of Portuguese academics
This research seeks to explore academics’ perceptions of the importance and degree of implementation of the Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area (ESG) for internal quality assurance. It uses empirical evidence from Portugal, gathered via a questionnaire given to all university academics. Results show academics’ perceptions of the importance and implementation of the ESG in their institutions to be quite positive. Nevertheless, academics tend to find the standards more important than effectively implemented. Furthermore, significant differences in perceptions emerge between groups of academics. This study intends to contribute to a better understanding of the implementation of quality management practices in universities, and the influence of the ESG in this process.
Keywordsquality management European standards and guidelines (ESG) Portugal importance implementation
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Becher, T., & Trowler, P. (2001). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the cultures of disciplines. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
- Clark, B. (1986). The higher education system: Academic organization in cross-national perspective. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- ENQA. (2009). Standards and guidelines for quality assurance in the European Higher Education Area (3rd ed.). Helsinki: European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education.Google Scholar
- Loukkola, T., & Zhang, T. (2010). Examining quality culture: Part 1 — Quality assurance processes in higher education institutions. Brussels: European University Association.Google Scholar
- Prikulis, A., Rusakova, A., & Rauhvargers, A. (2013). Internal quality assurance policies and systems in European higher education institutions. Journal of the Higher Education Area, 4, 1–16.Google Scholar
- Rosa, M., & Sarrico, C. S. (2012). Quality, evaluation and accreditation: From steering, through compliance, on to enhancement and innovation? In A. Amaral & G. Neave (Eds.), Higher education in Portugal 1974–2009. A nation, a generation (pp. 249–264). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
- Sarrico, C. S., Veiga, A., & Amaral, A. (2013a). Quality, management and governance in European higher education institutions. Journal of the Higher Education Area, 4, 47–70.Google Scholar
- Stensaker, B., Välimaa, J., & Sarrico, C. S. (2012). Introduction: How is change in higher education managed? In B. Stensaker, J. Välimaa, & C. S. Sarrico (Eds.), Managing reform in universities: The dynamics of culture, identity and organisational change (pp. 81–97). Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Trowler, P. (2002). Higher education policy and institutional change: Intentions and outcomes in turbulent environments. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
- Trowler, P., Saunders, M., & Knight, P. (2003). Change thinking, change practices. A guide to change for heads of department, programme leaders and other change agents in higher education. York: LTSN Generic Centre.Google Scholar
- Veiga, A., & Sarrico, C. S. (2014). Changes in governance: Do they help overcome barriers to the implementation of the European standards and guidelines for quality assurance in higher education? In H. Eggins (Ed.), Drivers and barriers to achieving quality in higher education (pp. 67–81). Rotterdam: Sense.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Westerheijden, D., & Kohoutek, J. (2014). Implementation and translation: From European standards and guidelines for quality assurance to education quality work in higher education institutions. In H. Eggins (Ed.), Drivers and barriers to achieving quality in higher education (pp. 1–12). Rotterdam: Sense.Google Scholar