Advertisement

Tertiary Education and Management

, Volume 21, Issue 3, pp 186–199 | Cite as

Leading learning and teaching: an exploration of ‘local’ leadership in academic departments in the UK

  • Kate IrvingEmail author
Article

Abstarct

This paper reports on a small-scale longitudinal study of ‘local’ leadership roles at two UK universities. The research explored perceptions of the leadership provided by a specific group of staff who held roles for enhancing learning and teaching. Based on ethnographic design principles, the study was based at one UK higher education institution with another as a comparator. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and focus groups with ‘local’ leadership role-holders and their colleagues. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with academic managers. Analysis of the data was based on grounded theory and thematic analysis. The discussion and conclusion suggests that, to maximize the impact of these roles, the leadership aspects of them should be made explicit, recognized by colleagues at all levels and supported by leadership development. Further investigation into local leaders’ career progression may provide valuable insights for the relatively limited body of knowledge and practice of leadership within professional teams.

Keywords

leadership enhancement learning and teaching grounded theory thematic analysis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aasen, P., & Stensaker, B. (2007). Balancing trust and technocracy? Leadership training in higher education. International Journal of Educational Management, 21, 371–383. doi:10.1108/0953540710760615Google Scholar
  2. Almio-Metcalfe, B., & Alban-Metcalfe, J. (2008). Engaging leadership: Creating organisations that maximise the potential of their people. London: Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development.Google Scholar
  3. Alvesson, M. (2003). Methodology for close up studies — Struggling with closeness and closure. Higher Education, 46, 167–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beare, H., Caldwell, B., & Millikan, R. (1993). Leadership. In M. Preedy (Ed.), Managing the effective school (pp. 141–162). London: Paul Chapman.Google Scholar
  5. Becher, T., & Trowler, P. (2001). Academic tribes and territories (2nd ed.). Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Blackmore, P., Dales, R., Law, S., & Yates, P. (2007). Investigating the capabilities of course and module leaders in departments. York: Higher Education Academy.Google Scholar
  7. Blackmore, P., & Kandiko, C. (2009). Leading across boundaries. In L. Huxley (Ed.), Engage (Autumn ed., pp. 10–12). London: Leadership Foundation for Higher Education.Google Scholar
  8. Bolden, R., Gosling, J., O’Brien, A., Peters, K., Ryan, M., & Haslam, A. (2012). Academic leadership: Changing conceptions, identities and experiences in UK HE. London: Leadership Foundation for Higher Education.Google Scholar
  9. Bolden, R., Petrov, G., Gosling, J., & Bryman, A. (2009). Leadership in higher education: Facts, fictions and futures — Introduction to the special issue. Leadership, 5, 291–298. doi:10.1177/1742715009337761CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  11. Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  12. Cousin, G. (2009). Researching learning in higher education. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Dearlove, J. (1995). Collegiality, managerialism and leadership in English universities. Tertiary Education and Management, 1, 161–169. doi:10.1080/13583883.1995.9966874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Deem, R. (1998). ‘New managerialism’ and higher education: The management of performances and cultures in universities in the United Kingdom. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 8, 47–70. doi: 10.1080/0962021980020014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ford, J., & Harding, N. (2007). Move over management: We are all leaders now. Management Learning, 38, 475–493. doi:10.1177/1350507607083203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fullan, M. (2003). Change forces with a vengeance. New York, NY: RoutledgeFalmer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gibbs, G., Knapper, C., & Piccinin, S. (2008). Disciplinary and contextually appropriate approaches to leadership of teaching in research-intensive academic departments in higher education. Higher Education Quarterly, 62, 416–436. doi:10.1111/j.l468-2273.2008.00402.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gomm, R. (2004). Social science methodology. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
  19. Gunn, V., & Fisk, A. (2013). Considering teaching excellence in higher education: 2007–2013. York: Higher Education Academy. Retrieved from https://doi.org/www.heacademy.ac.uk/sites/default/files/resources/TELR_final_acknowledgements.pdfGoogle Scholar
  20. Handy, C. (1993). Understanding organisations (4th ed.). London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  21. Hannan, A., & Silver, H. (2000). Innovating in higher education. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE). (1999). Circular 99/48, teaching quality enhancement fund: Funding arrangements. Bristol: HEFCE.Google Scholar
  23. Irving, C. (2003, August). Quality development in learning and teaching: The impact of organisational and cultural factors on an enhancement initiative. Paper presented at the EAIR Forum, Limerick, Eire.Google Scholar
  24. Irving, C. (2005, August). Challenges, barriers and opportunities for implementing enhancement in learning and teaching. Paper presented at the EAIR Forum, Riga, Latvia.Google Scholar
  25. Irving, C. (2012). Leadership in higher education: A longitudinal study of local leadership for enhancing learning and teaching (Unpublished PhD thesis). University of Liverpool, Liverpool.Google Scholar
  26. Kolsaker, A. (2008). Academic professionalism in the managerialist era: A study of English universities. Studies in Higher Education, 33, 513–525. doi: 10.1080/03075070802372885CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lawler, P., & Ziegenfuss, D. (2010, November). Leadership from the ranks: The missing piece for academic development. Paper presented at the International Society for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning conference, Liverpool.Google Scholar
  28. McKenna, P. J., & Maister, D. (2005). First among equals: How to manage a group of professionals. London: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  29. McNay, I. (1995). From collegial academy to corporate enterprise: The changing cultures of universities. In T. Schuller (Ed.), The changing university? (pp. 105–115). Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  30. McRoy, I., & Gibbs, P. (2009). Leading change in higher education. Educational Management, Administration and Leadership, 37, 687–704. doi:10.1177/1741143209339655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mercer, J. (2007). The challenges of insider research in educational institutions: Wielding a double-edged sword and resolving delicate dilemmas. Oxford Review of Education, 33, 1–17. doi:10.1080/03054980601094651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Middlehurst, R. (1993). Leading academics. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Middlehurst, R. (1997). Reinventing higher education: The leadership challenge. Quality in Higher Education, 3, 183–198. doi:10.1080/1353832790300208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Middlehurst, R., Goreham, H., & Woodfield, S. (2009). Why research leadership in higher education? Exploring contributions from the UK’s Leadership Foundation for Higher Education. Leadership, 5, 311–329. doi:10.1177/1742715009337763CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Milburn, P. C. (2010). The role of programme directors as academic leaders. Active Learning in Higher Education, 11, 87–95. doi:10.1177/1469787410365660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Newton, J. (2013). Institutional change through quality assurance: Identifying conditions to support effective policy implementation and management intervention. In Leadership and governance in higher education: A handbook for decision-makers and administrators (Section C, 5-3). Berlin: Raabe.Google Scholar
  37. Northouse, P. (2007). Leadership: Theory and practice (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  38. Platt, J. (1981). On interviewing one’s peers. The British Journal of Sociology, 32, 75–92. doi: 10.2307/589763CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Quality Assurance Agency (QAA). (2014). Educational Oversight conference 2014: Embedding quality enhancement. Retrieved from https://doi.org/www.qaa.ac.uk/en/Newsroom/Documents/EO-Autumn-Conference-Student-Learning-Opportunities.pdfGoogle Scholar
  40. Roxå, T., & Mârtensson, J. (2013). Significant conversations and significant networks: Exploring the backstage of the teaching arena. Studies in Higher Education, 34, 547–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Saldana, J. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  42. Spendlove, M. (2007). Competencies for effective leadership in education. International Journal of Educational Management, 21, 407–417. doi:10.1108/09513540710760183Google Scholar
  43. Thomas, G., & James, D. (2006). Reinventing grounded theory: Some questions about theory, ground and discovery. British Educational Research Journal, 32, 767–795. doi:10.1080/01411920600989412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Trowler, P. (1998). Academics responding to change. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Vilkinas, T. (2014). Leadership provided by non-academic middle-level managers in the Australian higher education sector. Tertiary Education and Management, 20, 280–293. doi:10.1080/13583883.2014.948907CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Vilkinas, T., Leask, B., & Ladyshewsky, R. (2009). Academic leadership: Fundamental building blocks. Strawberry Hills, NSW: Australian Learning and Teaching Council.Google Scholar
  47. Wengraf, T. (2001). Qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The European Higher Education Society 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ChesterUK

Personalised recommendations