Advertisement

Tertiary Education and Management

, Volume 18, Issue 4, pp 353–374 | Cite as

Evidence-informed Leadership in the Japanese Context: Middle managers at a university self-access center

  • John AdamsonEmail author
  • Howard Brown
Article

Abstract

This study reports on the steering of a self-access learning center in a Japanese university by its “middle management” committee over the first years of its operation. Middle management practice was informed by an ethnographic archive of various facets of center use, particularly concerning language policy and curriculum integration, issues about which the archive reveals considerable shifts in stakeholder views over time. It is argued that this evidence-based middle management style has been an effective, but sometimes limited, means in decision-making as it succeeds in placing research at the center of middle management activity, not at its periphery.

Keywords

evidence-based middle management self-access ethnographic archive Japan 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adamson, J. (2010). I wonder why they don’t talk to us more: Exploring interdisciplinarity in Japanese higher education. Reflections on English Language Teaching, 9(1), 43–58.Google Scholar
  2. Adamson, J. L., & Athanasiou, A. (2011). Middle management and diversity of evaluation of self-access. Independence, 51 (Spring), 18–21. Learner Autonomy SIG Newsletter, IATEFL.Google Scholar
  3. Adamson, J. L., Brown, H., & Fujimoto-Adamson, N. (2011). Archiving self access: Methodological considerations. Asian EFL Journal, 13(2), 11–33.Google Scholar
  4. Adamson, J., Fujimoto-Adamson, N., & Watanabe, Y. (2011, February 11). Student voices from self access: Informing language policy. Paper presented at MASH JALT Inviting Student Voices, Seisen Jogakuin College, Nagano.Google Scholar
  5. Benor, S. B. (2010). Ethnolinguistic repertoire: Shifting the analytic focus in language and ethnicity. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 14(2), 159–183.Google Scholar
  6. Blackledge, A., & Creese, A. (2010). Translanguaging in the bilingual classroom: A pedagogy for learning and teaching? The Modern Language Journal, 94(2), 103–115.Google Scholar
  7. Blommaert, J., & Jie, D. (2010). Ethnographic field-work. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  8. Boles, K. C. (1992, April 20–24). School restructuring by teachers: A study of the teaching project at the Edward Devotion School. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
  9. Bourdieu, P. (1988). Homo academicus. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  10. Briggs, A. (2006). Middle management in FE. London: Continuum Books.Google Scholar
  11. Busher, H. (2005). The project of the other: Developing inclusive learning communities in schools. Oxford Review of Education, 31(3), 459–477.Google Scholar
  12. Busher, H., Hammersley-Fletcher, L., & Turner, C. (2007). Making sense of middle leadership: Community, power and practice. School Leadership & Management, 27(5), 405–422.Google Scholar
  13. Busher, H., & Harris, A. (1999). Leadership of school subject areas: Tensions and dimensions of managing in the middle. School Leadership & Management, 19(3), 305–317.Google Scholar
  14. Clegg, S. (2008). Academic identities under threat? British Educational Research Journal, 34(3), 329–345.Google Scholar
  15. Creese, A. (2002). The discursive construction of power in teacher partnerships: Language and subject specialists in mainstream schools. TESOL Quarterly, 36(4), 597–616.Google Scholar
  16. Cummins, J. (2005). A proposal for action: Strategies for recognizing heritage language competence as a learning resource within the mainstream classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 89(4), 585–592.Google Scholar
  17. Czander, W. M. (1993). The psychodynamics of work and organizations: Theory and application. London: The Guildford Press.Google Scholar
  18. Doi, T. (1987). The anatomy of dependence. Tokyo: Kondansha.Google Scholar
  19. Drever, E. (1995). Using semi-structured interviews in small-scale research. Edinburgh: The Scottish Council for Research in Education.Google Scholar
  20. Floyd, A. (2012). “Turning points”: The personal and professional circumstances that lead academics to become middle managers. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 40(2), 272–284.Google Scholar
  21. Harris, A. (2003). Teacher leadership as distributed leadership: Heresy, fantasy or possibility? School Leadership & Management, 23(3), 313–324.Google Scholar
  22. Harvie, D. (2000). Alienation, class and enclosure in UK universities. Capital and Class, 71, 103–132.Google Scholar
  23. Harvie, D. (2004). Commons and communities in the university: Some notes and some examples. The Commoner, 8, 1–10.Google Scholar
  24. Heintz, C., & Origgi, G. (2008). Rethinking interdisciplinarity. Emergent issues. Interdisciplines. Retrieved October 15, 2008, from https://doi.org/www.interdisciplines.org/interdisciplinarity/papers/11Google Scholar
  25. Hofstede, G. (1990). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. London: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  26. Howe, J. (2006). The rise of crowdsourcing. Wired, 14(6). Retrieved September 5, 2011, from http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/14.06/crowds.htmlGoogle Scholar
  27. Jacoby, J., & Ochs, E. (1995). Co-construction: An introduction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 28(3), 171–183.Google Scholar
  28. James, N. (2007). The learning trajectories of “old-timers”: Academic identities and communities of practice in higher education. In J. Hughes, N. Jewson, & L. Unwin (Eds.), Communities of practice: Critical perspectives (pp. 131–143). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  29. Johnson, B. (2003). Values in English language teaching. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  30. Klein, J. T. (1996). Crossing boundaries: Knowledge, disciplinarities, and interdisciplinarities. Charlottesville, VA: University Press of Virginia.Google Scholar
  31. Lambert, L. (1988). Building leadership capacity in schools. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar
  32. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Lele, S., & Norgaard, R. (2005). Practising interdisciplinarity. BioScience, 55(11), 967–975.Google Scholar
  34. Levin, B. (2010). Leadership for evidence-informed education. School Leadership & Management, 30(4), 303–315.Google Scholar
  35. Levine, G. S. (2011). Code choice in the language classroom. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  36. Lin, A. M. Y. (2005). Critical, transdisciplinary perspectives on language-in-education policy and practice in postcolonial contexts: The case of Hong Kong. In A. M. Y. Lin & P. W. Martin (Eds.), Decolonization, globalization: Language-in-education policy and practice (pp. 38–54). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  37. Lucas, L. (2006). The research game in academic life. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Lumby, J., & Tomlinson, H. (2000). Principals speaking: Managerialism and leadership in further education. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 5(2), 139–151.Google Scholar
  39. Martin, P. W. (2005). Bilingual encounters in the classroom. In J.-M. Dewale, A. Housen, & L. Wei (Eds.), Bilingualism: Beyond the basic principles (pp. 67–87). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  40. Nakane, C. (1970). Japanese society. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  41. Ochs, E., & Capps, L. (2001). Living narrative. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Reid, W. A. (1992). The pursuit of curriculum: Schooling and the public interest. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
  43. Simkins, T., & Lumby, J. (2002). Cultural transformation in further education? Mapping the debate. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 7(1), 9–26.Google Scholar
  44. Spillane, J. P. (2005). Distributed leadership. Educational Forum, 69(2), 143–150. Retrieved September 6, 2012, from https://doi.org/www.sdexter.net/courses/589/downloads/SpillaneLeadership05.pdfGoogle Scholar
  45. Taysum, A. (2010). Evidence informed leadership in education. London: Continuum International.Google Scholar
  46. Timperley, H., & Robinson, V. (2000). Workload and the professional culture of teachers. Educational Management & Administration, 28(1), 47–62.Google Scholar
  47. Trowler, P. (2010, July 15–16). Large scale university curriculum change: From practice to theory (and back again). Talk delivered at the Tomorrow’s Sustainable Universities Conference, University of Bradford, UK, pp. 1–7. Retrieved May 28, 2012, from https://doi.org/www.brad.ac.uk/sustainable-universities/media/SustainableUniversities/Keynote-Prof-Paul-Trowler.pdfGoogle Scholar
  48. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© European Higher Education Society 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of International Studies and Regional DevelopmentUniversity of Niigata PrefectureNiigataJapan

Personalised recommendations