The Changing Structure of British Higher Education: How diverse is it?
With the passage of the 1992 Further and Higher Education Act the British system of higher education formally moved from a binary to a unitary structure. However, ever since successive governments have argued for a diversified model of higher education within which institutions should pursue contrasting goals. This article offers an interpretation of the key ingredients of institutional diversification and constructs alternative structural models of higher education. It proceeds by exploring the changing structure of British higher education since the creation of the unitary model. The argument is that there has been a steady emergence of flexible sectors, which both converge and diversify. However, there is a danger that the 2011 White Paper, rather than sustaining flexible sectors, could intensify the nascent shift in the direction of stratification marked by increasing differentiation between sectors as they converge internally.
Keywordsdiversity governance higher education policy/development national systems of higher education organization structures strategic planning
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Baker, S. (2011, April 7). Underlying disorders. Times Higher Education, pp. 35–42.Google Scholar
- BPP University College. (2011, September 30). Retrieved from http://www.bpp.org.uk/Google Scholar
- Bruce, T. (2012, April). Universities and constitutional change in the UK: The impact of devolution on the higher education sector. Oxford: Higher Education Policy Institute.Google Scholar
- Catto, J.I. (Ed.). (1984). The history of the university of Oxford: Volume 1: The early Oxford schools. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
- Committee of University Chairmen. (2004). Governance code of practice and general principles. Bristol: HEFCE.Google Scholar
- Committee on Higher Education. (1963). Report. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
- Davie, G.E. (1961). The democratic intellect. Edinburgh: The University Press.Google Scholar
- Department for Business, Innovation and Skills. (2011, June). Higher education: Students at the heart of the system (CM 8122). London: BIS.Google Scholar
- Department for Business, Innovation and Skills. (2011, August). Technical consultation. London: BIS.Google Scholar
- Department for Education and Skills. (2003). The future of higher education. Norwich: HMSO.Google Scholar
- Halsey, A.H. (1961). Pyramid of prestige. Universities Quarterly, 15(4), 341–344.Google Scholar
- Halsey, A.H. (1995). Decline of donnish dominion. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
- Higher Education Funding Council for England. (2000). Diversity in higher education: HEFCE policy statement. Bristol: HEFCE.Google Scholar
- Pratt, J. (1997). The polytechnic experiment, 1966–1992. Buckingham: SRHE/Open University Press.Google Scholar
- Pratt, J., & Burgess, T. (1974). The polytechnics: A report. London: Pitman.Google Scholar
- Times Higher Education. (2011, March 10). The cost of concentration. Times Higher Education, p. 20.Google Scholar
- Times Higher Education. (2011, March 17). Losses of concentration: Post-92s hit hardest by quality related shake-up. Times Higher Education, pp. 6–7.Google Scholar
- Treasury. (2003). Lambert review of university-business collaboration: Final report. London: HM Treasury.Google Scholar
- Wojtas, O. (2002, October 18). Scots set up forum for policy. Times Higher Education Supplement, p. 52.Google Scholar