Advertisement

Tertiary Education and Management

, Volume 18, Issue 4, pp 321–333 | Cite as

The Changing Structure of British Higher Education: How diverse is it?

  • Ourania Filippakou
  • Brian Salter
  • Ted TapperEmail author
Article

Abstract

With the passage of the 1992 Further and Higher Education Act the British system of higher education formally moved from a binary to a unitary structure. However, ever since successive governments have argued for a diversified model of higher education within which institutions should pursue contrasting goals. This article offers an interpretation of the key ingredients of institutional diversification and constructs alternative structural models of higher education. It proceeds by exploring the changing structure of British higher education since the creation of the unitary model. The argument is that there has been a steady emergence of flexible sectors, which both converge and diversify. However, there is a danger that the 2011 White Paper, rather than sustaining flexible sectors, could intensify the nascent shift in the direction of stratification marked by increasing differentiation between sectors as they converge internally.

Keywords

diversity governance higher education policy/development national systems of higher education organization structures strategic planning 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baker, S. (2011, April 7). Underlying disorders. Times Higher Education, pp. 35–42.Google Scholar
  2. BPP University College. (2011, September 30). Retrieved from http://www.bpp.org.uk/Google Scholar
  3. Browne, J. (2010, October). An independent review of higher education funding and student finance. Retrieved from https://doi.org/www.independent.gov.uk/browne-reportGoogle Scholar
  4. Bruce, T. (2012, April). Universities and constitutional change in the UK: The impact of devolution on the higher education sector. Oxford: Higher Education Policy Institute.Google Scholar
  5. Catto, J.I. (Ed.). (1984). The history of the university of Oxford: Volume 1: The early Oxford schools. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  6. Committee of University Chairmen. (2004). Governance code of practice and general principles. Bristol: HEFCE.Google Scholar
  7. Committee on Higher Education. (1963). Report. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  8. Court, S. (2004). Government getting closer: Higher education and devolution in the UK. Higher Education Quarterly, 58(3), 151–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Davie, G.E. (1961). The democratic intellect. Edinburgh: The University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Department for Business, Innovation and Skills. (2011, June). Higher education: Students at the heart of the system (CM 8122). London: BIS.Google Scholar
  11. Department for Business, Innovation and Skills. (2011, August). Technical consultation. London: BIS.Google Scholar
  12. Department for Education and Skills. (2003). The future of higher education. Norwich: HMSO.Google Scholar
  13. Halsey, A.H. (1961). Pyramid of prestige. Universities Quarterly, 15(4), 341–344.Google Scholar
  14. Halsey, A.H. (1995). Decline of donnish dominion. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  15. Higher Education Funding Council for England. (2000). Diversity in higher education: HEFCE policy statement. Bristol: HEFCE.Google Scholar
  16. Pratt, J. (1997). The polytechnic experiment, 1966–1992. Buckingham: SRHE/Open University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Pratt, J., & Burgess, T. (1974). The polytechnics: A report. London: Pitman.Google Scholar
  18. Tapper, T. (2007). The governance of British higher education: The struggle for policy control. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Times Higher Education. (2011, March 10). The cost of concentration. Times Higher Education, p. 20.Google Scholar
  20. Times Higher Education. (2011, March 17). Losses of concentration: Post-92s hit hardest by quality related shake-up. Times Higher Education, pp. 6–7.Google Scholar
  21. Treasury. (2003). Lambert review of university-business collaboration: Final report. London: HM Treasury.Google Scholar
  22. Wojtas, O. (2002, October 18). Scots set up forum for policy. Times Higher Education Supplement, p. 52.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© European Higher Education Society 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of HullHullUK
  2. 2.Kings CollegeLondonUK
  3. 3.OxCheps, New CollegeUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations