International Journal of Behavioral Medicine

, Volume 15, Issue 4, pp 311–318

Correlates of functional fitness in older adults

  • James F. Konopack
  • David X. Marquez
  • Liang Hu
  • Steriani Elavsky
  • Edward McAuley
  • Arthur F. Kramer
Article

Abstract

Background: Self-efficacy has been shown to be both an antecedent and determinant of behaviors such as physical activity and may explain variance in the performance of functional tasks among older adults.Purpose: The objectives of the current study were: first, to identify potential latent factors of functional fitness (i.e., the ability to perform activities of daily living) among older adults; and second, to determine the extent to which self-efficacy contributed to the variance in functional fitness over and above other known correlates.Methods: Older adults (n = 190, M age = 69.4 years) completed a functional fitness test battery, maximal graded exercise test, and demographics and self-efficacy questionnaires.Results: Structural equation modeling supported two latent factors of functional fitness representing “Flexibility” and “Physical Power.” Further analyses indicated sex as the sole significant correlate of Flexibility. Greater Physical Power was associated with being male, younger, and having higher self-efficacy.Conclusions: These results support the role of self-efficacy as a correlate of performance on functional tasks. Targeting flexibility and physical power to improve functional fitness among older men and women, respectively, warrants examination.

Key words

latent factors self-efficacy aging health function 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arbuckle, J. L. (1996). Full information estimation in the presence of incomplete data. In G. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schumacker (Eds.),Advanced structural equation modeling: Issues and techniques (pp. 243–278). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  2. Bandura, A. (1997).Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
  3. Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fix indexes in structural models.Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and good- ness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures.Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bollen, K. A. (1989).Structural equations with latent variables. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2006).National vital statistics reports. Retrieved June 2, 2006, from http://www. cdc.gov/nchs/nvss.htmGoogle Scholar
  7. Daley, M. J., & Spinks, W. L. (2000). Exercise, mobility, and aging.Sports Medicine, 29(1), 1–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Enders, C. K. (2001). The impact of nonnormality on full information maximum-likelihood estimation for structural equation models with missing data.Psychological Methods, 6, 352–370.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Enders, C. K., & Bandalos, D. L. (2001). The relative performance of full information maximum likelihood estimation for missing data in structural equation models.Structural Equation Modeling, 8, 430–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Evans, W. J. (1995). What is sarcopenia?Journal of gerontology: Biological and medical sciences, 50(Spec), 5–8.Google Scholar
  11. Gill, T. M., Williams, C. S., Richardson, E. D., & Tinetti, M. E. (1996). Impairments in physical performance and cognitive status as predisposing factors for functional dependence among nondisabled older persons.Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences & Medical Sciences, 51(6), 283–288.Google Scholar
  12. Guralnik, J. M., Ferrucci, L., Simonsick, E. M., Salive, M. E., & Wallace, R. B. (1995). Lower extremity function in persons over the age of 70 years as a predictor of subsequent disability.New England Journal of Medicine, 332(2), 556–561.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hruda, K. V., Hicks, A. L., & McCartney, N. (2003). Training for muscle power in older adults: Effects on functional abilities.Canadian Journal of Applied Physiology, 28(2), 178–189.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional versus new alternatives.Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hui, S. S., & Yuen, P. Y. (2000). Validity of the modified back-saver sit-and-reach test: A comparison with other protocols.Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 32, 1655–1659.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Janssen, I., Heymsfield, S. B., Wang, Z. M., & Ross, R. (2000). Skeletal muscle and distribution in 468 men and women aged 18-88 years.Journal of Applied Physiology, 89, 81–88.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K., McGuire, L., Robles, T. F., & Glaser, R. (2002). Emotions, morbidity, and mortality: New perspectives from psychoneuroimmunology.Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 83–107.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lawrence, R. H., & Jette, A. M. (1996). Disentangling the disablement process.Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences & Social Sciences, 51B(4), S 173–182.Google Scholar
  19. Lexell, J., Taylor, C. C., & Sjostrom, M. (1988). What is the cause of muscle atrophy?Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 84(2-3), 275–294.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. McArdle, W., Katch, F., & Katch, V. (2001).Exercise physiology: Energy, nutrition, and human performance (5th ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams, and Wilkins.Google Scholar
  21. McAuley, E. (1993). Self-efficacy and the maintenance of exercise participation in older adults.Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 16, 103–113.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McAuley, E., & Blissmer, B. (2000). Self-efficacy determinants and consequences of physical activity.Exercise and Sport Science Reviews, 28(2), 85–88.Google Scholar
  23. McCartney, N., Hicks, A. L., Martin, J., & Webber, C. E. (1996). A longitudinal trial of weight training in the elderly: Continued improvements in year 2.Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences & Medical Sciences, 51 A, B425-B433.Google Scholar
  24. Muthen, L. K., & Muthen, B. O. (1998-2004). Mplus (Version 3.0). Los Angeles: Muthen & Muthen.Google Scholar
  25. Nagi, S. Z. (1965). Some conceptual issues in disability and rehabilitation. In M. B. Sussman (Ed.),Sociology and rehabilitation (pp. 100–113). Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.Google Scholar
  26. Nagi, S. Z. (1991). Disability concepts revisited: Implications for prevention. In A. M. Pope & A. R. Tarlov (Eds.),Disability in America: Toward a national agenda for prevention (pp. 309–327). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  27. Pfeiffer, E. (1975). A short portable mental status questionnaire for the assessment of organic brain deficit in elderly patients.Journal of American Geriatrics Society, 23(10), 433–441.Google Scholar
  28. Rejeski, W. J., Brawley, L. R., & Haskell, W L. (2003). The prevention challenge: An overview of this supplement.American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 25, 107–109.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rejeski, W J., Craven, T., Ettinger, W H., McFarlane, M., & Shumaker, S. (1996). Self-efficacy and pain in disability with osteoarthritis of the knee.Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 51B, P24-P29.Google Scholar
  30. Rikli, R. E., & Jones, C. J. (1997). Assessing physical performance in independent older adults: Issues and guidelines.Journal of Aging and Physical Activity, 5, 244–261.Google Scholar
  31. Rikli, R. E., & Jones, C. J. (1999). Development and validation of a functional fitness test for community-residing older adults.Journal of Aging and Physical Activity, 7, 129–161.Google Scholar
  32. Rikli, R. E., & Jones, C. J. (2001).Senior fitness test manual. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.Google Scholar
  33. Roach, K. E., & Miles, T. P. (1991). Normal hip and knee active range of motion: The relationship to age.Physical Therapy, 71, 656–665.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Rodin, J. (1986). Aging and health: Effects of the sense of control.Science, 233, 1271–1276.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rudy, T. E., Lieber, S. J., Boston, J. R., Gourley, L. M., & Baysal, E. (2003). Psychosocial predictors of physical performance in disabled individuals with chronic pain.Clinical Journal of Pain, 19(1), 18–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Siela, D. (2003). Use of self-efficacy and dyspnea perceptions to predict functional performance in people with COPD.Rehabilitation Nursing, 28(6), 197–204.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Steffen, T. M., Hacker, T. A., & Mollinger, L. (2002). Age- and gender-related test performance in community-dwelling elderly people: Six-Minute Walk Test, Berg Balance Scale, Timed Up- & -Go Test, and gait speeds.Physical Therapy, 82(2), 128–137.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Svenningsen, S., Terjesen, T., Auflem, M., & Berg, V. (1989). Hip motion related to age and sex.Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica, 60, 97–100.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Walker, J. M., Sue, D., Miles-Elkousy, N., Ford, G., & Trevelyan, H. (1984). Active mobility of the extremities in older subjects.Physical Therapy, 64, 919–923.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Society of Behavioral Medicine 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • James F. Konopack
    • 1
  • David X. Marquez
    • 1
  • Liang Hu
    • 1
  • Steriani Elavsky
    • 1
  • Edward McAuley
    • 2
  • Arthur F. Kramer
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Kinesiology and Community HealthUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignUrbana
  2. 2.Department of Kinesiology and Community Health and The Beckman InstituteUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignUrbana
  3. 3.The Beckman InstituteUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignUrbana

Personalised recommendations