Investigating adolescents’ sources of information concerning tobacco and the resulting impact on attitudes toward public policy

Articles

Abstract

Background. In this study, we investigated different sources of information concerning the use of tobacco and the impact that these sources may have on attitudes toward tobacco policies. Methods. We surveyed 4336 high school students gathered from 5 high schools in the Southeastern United States. Results. The results indicate that just over half of these youth are supportive of public policies targeting bans on smoking in public places and having a minimum age to purchase tobacco products. Race is significant in impacting both age restriction and prohibition of smoking in public places, with African American youth being less supportive of both dependent variables. However, holding this variable constant in an ordinal logistic regression, we found that attitudes toward policy are impacted by the environment related to smoking in which the youth lives; the extent to which the youth believes he/she is well informed; and more important, the amount of correct and accurate information on smoking the youth possess. Conclusions. Communicating accurate information is vital in increasing youth support for pending or already existing tobacco policies.

References

  1. 1.
    Hamilton WL, Biener L, Rodger CN. Who supports tobacco excise taxes? Factors associated with towns’ and individuals’ support in Massachusetts. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2005;11:333–340.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Green DP, Gerken AE. Self-interest and public-opinion toward smoking restrictions and cigarette taxes. Public Opinion Q. 1989; 53:1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    White HR, Nagin D, Replogle E, Stouthamer-Loeber M. Racial differences in trajectories of cigarette use. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2004;76:219–227.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Tobacco use among adults—United States, 2005. MMWR Morb Mortal Weekly Rep. 2007;55:1145–1148.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    US Department of Health and Human Services. Tobacco Use Among U.S. Racia/Ethnic Minority Groups-African Americans, American Indians and Alaska Natives, Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders, and Hispanics: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health; 1998.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jarvik ME, Tashkin DP, Caskey NH, Mccarthy WJ, Rosenblatt MR. Mentholated cigarettes decrease puff volume of smoke and increase carbon-monoxide absorption. Physiol Behav. 1994;56: 563–570.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mccarthy WJ, Caskey NH, Jarvik ME, Gross TM, Rosenblatt MR, Carpenter C. Menthod vs nonmenthol cigarettes—effects on smoking behavior. Am J Public Health. 1995;85:67–72.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chang SC, O’Brien KO, Nathanson MS, Mancini J, Witter FR. Characteristics and risk factors for adverse birth outcomes in pregnant black adolescents. J Pediatr. 2003;143:250–257.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ellickson PL, Orlando M, Tucker JS, Klein DJ. From adolescence to young adulthood: racial/ethnic disparities in smoking. Am J Public Health. 2004;94:520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Center for Disease Control and Prevention 2008. National Youth Tobacco Survey. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/data_ statistics/surveys/NYTS/index.htm.Accessed November 12, 2008.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2007. Question Inventory on Tobacco. Available at: http://apps.nccd.cdc.gov/QIT/ QuickSearch.aspx. Accessed November 12, 2008.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Levy DT, Ross H, Powell L, Bauer JE, Lee HR. The role of public policies in reducing smoking prevalence and deaths caused by smoking in Arizona: results from the Arizona tobacco policy simulation model. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2007;13:59–67.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Brener ND, Kann L, McManus T, Kinchen SA, Sundberg EC, Ross JG. Reliability of the 1999 youth risk behavior survey questionnaire. J Adolesc Health 2002;31:336–342.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Muilenburg JL, West SJ, Clayton DL, Johnson WD, Annang L. Home smoking environment: Influence on behaviors and attitudes in an urban adolescent population. Health Educ Behav. 2008.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© American Association for Cancer Education 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Public Health, Department of Health Promotion and BehaviorUniversity of GeorgiaAthens

Personalised recommendations