Abstract
Laboratory studies were carried out to investigate the role of larval habitat-derived microorganisms in the production of semiochemicals for oviposition site selection by Anopheles gambiae Giles sensu stricto mosquitoes. Dual-choice bioassays with gravid females were conducted in standard mosquito cages. Field-collected or laboratory-reared mosquitoes, individually or in groups, were offered a choice between unmodified (water or soil from a natural breeding site) or modified substrates (filtered water, autoclaved soil or sterile media to which bacterial suspensions had been added). Egg counts were used to assess oviposition preferences. Mosquitoes preferred to oviposit on unmodified substrates from natural larval habitats containing live microorganisms rather than on sterilized ones. Variable responses were observed when sterile substrates were inoculated with bacteria isolated from water and soil from natural habitats. We conclude that microbial populations in breeding sites produce volatiles that serve as semiochemicals for gravid An. gambiae. These signals, in conjunction with other (non-olfactory) chemical and physical cues, may be used by the female to assess the suitability of potential larval habitats in order to maximize the fitness of her offspring.
Résumé
Des études de laboratoire ont été conduites afin de déterminer le rôle de substances chimiques attractives de microorganismes présents dans les sites larvaires dans la préférence de ponte des femelles gravides d’Anopheles gambiae s.s. pour ces sites. Un test biologique à double choix a été mis en place dans des cages à moustiques standards contenant des femelles gravides. Un choix entre substrat naturel (eau et sol non modifiés provenant des sites larvaires naturels) et substrat modifié (eau filtrée, sol stérilisé, ajout de suspensions bactériennes) est offert individuellement ou en groupe aux femelles collectées sur le terrain ou élevées en laboratoire. Le nombre d’oeufs pondus dans chaque substrat a été utilisé comme critère pour évaluer la préférence des femelles gravides pour un substrat particulier. Les femelles ont préféré pondre dans le substrat naturel contenant des microorganismes vivants plutôt que dans le substrat stérile. Des réponses variables ont été observées lorsque des bactéries provenant des sites larvaires naturels ont été inoculées dans le substrat stérile. Nous concluons que la population microbienne, présente dans les site larvaires, produit des substances chimiques odorantes attirant les femelles gravides d’Anopheles gambiae s.s. Ces signaux, associés à d’autres substances non odorantes et à des facteurs physiques, peuvent être utilisés par les femelles pour évaluer le potentiel d’un site larvaire, en vue du développement optimal de leur progéniture.
References
Beehler J. W., Millar J. G. and Mulla M. S. (1993) Synergism between chemical factors and visual cues influencing oviposition of the mosquito Culex quinquefasciatus (Diptera: Culcidae). J. Chem. Ecol. 19, 635–643.
Benzon G. L. and Apperson C. S. (1988) Reexamination of chemically mediated oviposition behavior in Aedes aegypti (L.) (Diptera: Culicidae). J. Med. Entomol. 25, 158–164.
Blackwell A. and Johnson S. N. (2000) Electrophysiological investigation of larval water and potential oviposition chemo-attractants for Anopheles gambiae s.s.. Ann. Trop. Med. Parasitol. 94, 389–398.
Briegel H. and Hö rler E. (1993) Multiple blood meals as a reproductive strategy in Anopheles (Diptera: Culicidae). J. Med. Entomol. 30, 975–985.
Everall N. C. and Lees D. R. (1997) The identification and significance of chemicals released from decomposing barley straw during reservoir algal control. Water Res. J. 31, 614–620.
Gimnig J. E., Ombok M., Kamau L. and Hawley W. A. (2001) Characteristics of larval anopheline (Diptera: Culicidae) habitats in Western Kenya. J. Med. Entomol. 38, 282–288.
Gjullin G. M., Johnsen J. O. and Plapp F. W. J. (1965) The effect of odors released by various waters on the oviposition sites selected by two species of Culex. Mosq. News 25, 268–269.
Hazard E. I., Mayer M. S. and Savage K. E. (1967) Attraction and oviposition stimulation of gravid female mosquitoes by bacteria isolated from hay infusions. Mosq. News 27, 133–136.
Ikeshoji T., Saito K. and Yano A. (1975) Bacterial production of the ovipositional attractants for mosquitoes on fatty acid substrates. J. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 10, 239–242.
Knight J. C. and Corbet S. A. (1991) Compounds affecting mosquito oviposition: structure-activity relationships and concentration effects. J. Am. Mosq. Cont. Assoc. 7, 37–41.
Kramer W. L. and Mulla M. S. (1979) Oviposition attractants and repellents of mosquitoes: oviposition responses of Culex mosquitoes to organic infusions. Environ. Entomol. 8, 1111–1117.
McCrae A. W. (1984) Oviposition by African malaria vector mosquitoes. II. Effects of site tone, water type and conspecific immatures on target selection by freshwater Anopheles gambiae Giles, sensu lato. Ann. Trop. Med. Parasitol. 78, 307–318.
Merritt R. W., Dadd R. H. and Walker E. D. (1992) Feeding behavior, natural food, and nutritional relationships of larval mosquitoes. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 37, 349–376.
Millar J. G., Chaney J. D. and Mulla M. S. (1992) Identification of oviposition attractants for Culex quinquefasciatus from fermented Bermuda grass infusions. J. Am. Mosq. Cont. Assoc. 8, 11–17.
Minakawa N., Mutero C. M., Githure J. I., Beier J. C. and Yan G. (1999) Spatial distribution and habitat characterization of anopheline mosquito larvae in Western Kenya. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 61, 1010–1016.
Minakawa N., Githure J. I., Beier J. C. and Yan G. (2001) Survival strategies of anopheline mosquitoes during dry period in Western Kenya. J. Med. Entomol. 38, 388–392.
Navarro D. M. A. F., De Oliveria P. E. S., Potting R. P. J., Brito A. C. and Fital S. J. F. (2003) The potential attractant or repellent effects of different water types on oviposition in Aedes aegypti L. (Diptera: Culicidae). J. Appl. Entomol. 127, 46–50.
Poonam S., Paily K. P. and Balaraman K. (2002) Oviposition attractancy of bacterial culture filtrates-response of Culex quinquefasciatus. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 97, 359–362.
Reiter P. (1983) A portable battery-powered trap for collecting gravid Culex mosquitoes. Mosq. News 43, 496–498.
Reiter P., Amador M. A. and Colon N. (1991) Enhancement of the CDC ovitrap with hay infusions for daily monitoring of Aedes aegypti populations. J. Am. Mosq. Cont. Assoc. 7, 52–55.
Rejmankova E., Harbin-Ireland and Lege M. (2000) Bacterial abundance in larval habitats of four species of Anopheles (Diptera: Culicidae) in Belize, Central America. J. Vect. Ecol. 25, 229–239.
Service M. (1993) Mosquito Ecology: Field Sampling Methods. Chapman and Hall, London. 988 pp.
Smith T. W., Walker E. D. and Kaufman M. G. (1998) Bacterial density and survey of cultivable heterotrophs in the surface water of a freshwater marsh habitat of Anopheles quadrimaculatus larvae (Diptera: Culicidae). J. Am. Mosq. Cont. Assoc. 14, 72–77.
Straif S. C., Mbogo C. N., Toure A. M., Walker E. D., Kaufman M., Touré Y. T. and Beier J. C. (1998) Midgut bacteria in Anopheles gambiae and An. funestus (Diptera: Culicidae) from Kenya and Mali. J. Med. Entomol. 35, 222–226.
Takken W. and Knols B. G. J. (1999) Odor-mediated behavior of Afrotropical malaria mosquitoes. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 44, 131–157.
Trexler J. D., Apperson C. S., Zurek L., Gemeno C., Schal C., Kaufman M., Walker E., Watson D. W. and Wallace L. (2003) Role of bacteria in mediating the oviposition responses of Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae). J. Med. Entomol. 40, 841–846.
Walker E. D. and Merritt R. W. (1993) Bacterial enrichment in the surface microlayer of an Anopheles quadriannulatus (Diptera: Culicidae) larval habitat. J. Med. Entomol. 30, 1050–1052.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sumba, L.A., Guda, T.O., Deng, A.L. et al. Mediation of oviposition site selection in the African malaria mosquito Anopheles gambiae (Diptera: Culicidae) by semiochemicals of microbial origin. Int J Trop Insect Sci 24, 260–265 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1079/IJT200433
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1079/IJT200433