Advertisement

Efficient plant regeneration through direct somatic embryogenesis from leaf explants of Phalaenopsis ‘Little Steve’

  • Huei-Lan Kuo
  • Jen-Tsung Chen
  • Wei-Chin ChangEmail author
Article

Summary

Leaf segments of the orchid sp. Phalaenopsis ‘Little Steve’ were used as explants testing the effects of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D; 0.45, 2.26, 4.52 μM), 6-furfurylaminopurine (kinetin; 2.32, 4.65, 13.95 μM), N6-benzyladenine (BA; 2.22, 4.44, 13.32 μM), and 1-phenyl-3-(1,2,3-thiadiazol-5-yl)-urea (TDZ; 2.27, 4.54, 13.62μM) on the induction of direct somatic embryogenesis. After 20–30 d of culture in darkness, clusters of somatic embryos formed from leaf surfaces and wounded regions of explants on half-strength Murashige and Skoog medium supplemented with BA and TDZ. However, kinetin had no response on direct embryo induction. In addition, 2,4-D highly retarded the frequency of embryogenesis that was induced by TDZ. Generally, adaxial surfaces near wounded regions had the highest embryogenic competency compared to other regions of explants. Histological sections revealed that somatic embryos mostly arose from epidermal cell layers of the explants. Secondary embryogenesis occurred at basal parts of embryos, and originated from outer cell layers. Following transfer of regenerated embryos onto growth regulator-free medium for 3.5–4 mo., plantlets with three to four leaves and several roots were obtained. This protocol provides a simple way to regenerate plants through direct somatic embryogenesis, and is suitable for further studies on embryo development and genetic transformation of Phalaenopsis.

Key words

direct somatic embryogenesis leaf explant moth orchid 

References

  1. Arditti, J.; Ernst, R. Micropropagation of orchids, New York: John Wiley & Son; 1993:467–520.Google Scholar
  2. Chen, J. T.; Chang, C.; Chang, W. C. Direct somatic embryogenesis from leaf explants of Oncidium ‘Gower Ramsey’ and subsequent plant regeneration. Plant Cell Rep. 19:143–149; 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chen, J. T.; Chang, W. C. Efficient plant regeneration through somatic embryogenesis from callus cultures of Oncidium (Orchidaceae). Plant Sci. 160:87–93; 2000.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen, J. T.; Chang, W. C. Effects of auxins and cytokinins on direct somatic embryogenesis from leaf explants of Oncidium ‘Gower Ramsey’. Plant Growth Regul. 34:229–232; 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen, J. T.; Chang, W. C. Induction of repetitive embryogenesis from seed-derived protocorms of Phalaenopsis amabilis var. formosa Shimadzu. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 40:290–293; 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen, Y.; Piluek, C. Effects of thidiazuron and N6-benzylaminopurin on shoot regeneration of Phalaenopsis. Plant Growth Regul. 16:99–101; 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen, Y. C.; Chang, C.; Chang, W. C. A reliable protocol for plant regeneration from callus culture of Phalaenopsis. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 36:420–423; 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Duan, J. X.; Chen, H.; Yazawa, S. In vitro propagation of Phalaenopsis via culture of cytokinins-induced nodes. J. Plant Growth Regul. 15:133–137; 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Duncan, D. B. Multiple range and multiple F test. Biometrics 11:1–42; 1955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ernst, R. Effects of thidiazuron on in vitro propagation of Phalaenopsis and Doritaenopsis (Orchidaceae). Plant Cell Tiss. Organ Cult. 39:273–275; 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ishii, Y.; Takamura, T.; Goi, M.; Tanaka, M. Callus induction and somatic embryogenesis of Phalaenopsis. Plant Cell Rep. 17:446–450; 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Islam, M. O.; Ichihashi, S. Effects of sucrose, maltose and sorbitol on callus growth of Phalaenopsis, Doritaenopsis and Neofinetia. J. Jap. Soc. Hort. Sci. 68:1124–1131; 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jensen, W. A. Botanical histochemistry. San Francisco: Freeman; 1962.Google Scholar
  14. Murashige, T.; Skoog, F. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant. 15:473–497; 1962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Park, S. Y.; Murthy, H. N.; Pack, K. Y. Rapid propagation of Phalaenopsis from floral stalk-derived leaves. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 38:168–172; 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Tanaka, M.; Hasegawa, A.; Goi, M. Studies on the clonal propagation of monopodial orchids by tissue culture. I. Formation of protocorm-like bodies from leaf tissues in Phalaenopsis and Vanda. J. Jap. Soc. Hort. Sci. 44:47–58; 1975.Google Scholar
  17. Teob, E. S. Orchids of Asia. Singapore: Times Books International; 1989:125–134.Google Scholar
  18. Tokuhara, K.; Mii, M. Micropropagation of Phalaenopsis and Doritaenopsis by culturing shoot tips of flower stalk buds. Plant Cell Rep. 13:7–11; 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Tokuhara, K.; Mii, M. Induction of embryogenic callus and cell suspension culture from shoot tips excised from flower stalk buds of Phalaenopsis (Orchidaceae). In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 37:457–461; 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Young, P. S.; Murthy, H. N.; Yoeup, P. K. Mass multiplication of protocorm-like bodies using bioreactor system and subsequent plant regeneration in Phalaenopsis. Plant Cell Tiss. Organ Cult. 63:67–72; 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for In Vitro Biology 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of BotanyAcademia SinicaTaipeiTaiwan, Republic of China

Personalised recommendations