Production of St. John's wort plants under controlled environment for maximizing biomass and secondary metabolites

Article

Summary

St. John's wort (Hypericum perforatum L.) is a medicinal plant used in the treatment of neurological disorders and has been recently shown to have anticancer potential. The principle medicinal components of St. John's wort are hypericin. pseudohypericin, and hyperforin. One of the problems associated with medicinal plant preparations including St. John's wort is the extreme variability in the phytochemical content, mostly due to environmental variability, and biotic and abiotic contamination during cropping. The current study was undertaken to transplant St. John's wort plants from in vitro bioreactors in a closed controlled environment system (CCES) with CO2 enrichment for the optimized production of biomas and phytochemicals. The growth and levels of hypericin, pseudohypericin, and hyperforin in plants grown in CCES were compared with those of the greenhouse and in vitro-grown plants. The environmental parameters in the greenhouse were found to be variable whereas in the CCES these parameters were controlled. Generally, all the growth parameters and hypericin and psendohypericin levels were significantly higher in the plants grown in the CCES. These results provide the first indication that growing St. John's wort plants, under CO2 enrichment in a closed environment system can enhance the biomass and medicinal contents. The adaptation of this growing system may be useful for the production of optimized products of St. John's wort and other medicinal species.

Key words

closed controlled environment CO2 greenhouse berbal medicine hyperforin hypericin St. John's wort 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arnon, D. L.; Hoagland, D. R. Crop production in artificial culture solutions and in soils with special reference to factors influencing yields and absorption of inorganic nutrients. Soil Sci. 50:463–485; 1940.Google Scholar
  2. Briskin, D. P.; Gawienowski, M. C. Differential effects of light and nitrogen on production of hypericins and leaf glands in Hypericum perforatum. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 39:1075–1081; 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Buter, B.; Orlacchio, C.; Soldati, A; Berger, K. Significance of genetic and environmental aspects in the field cultivation of Hypericum perforatum. Planta Med. 64:431–437; 1998.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Coley, P. D. Effects of plant growth rate and leaf lifetine on the amount and type of antiherbivore defence. Oecologia 74:531–536;1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Consumers Safety Symposium on Dietary Supplements and Herbs. New Good Housekeeping Institute study finds drastic discrepancy in potencies of popular herbal supplement. New York: Good House-keeping Institute: March 2, 1998.Google Scholar
  6. Cott, J. M. In vitro receptor binding and cnzyme inhibition by Hypericum perforatum extract. Pharmak. NeuroPsyc. 30:103–112; 2001.Google Scholar
  7. Curtis, J. D.; Lersten, N. R. Internal secretory structures in Hypericum (Clusiaceae): H. perforatum L. and H. balcaricum L. New Phytol. 114:571–580, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Devlin, R. M.; Barker, A. V. Photosynthesis. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company; 1971.Google Scholar
  9. Fields, P. G.; Arnason, J. T.; Fulcher, R. G. The spectral properties of Hypericum perforatum leaves: the implications for photoactivated defenses. Can. J. Bot. 68:1166–1170; 1990.Google Scholar
  10. Gamborg, O. L.; Miller, R. A.; Ojima, K. Natrient requirement of suspension cultures of soybean root cells. Exp. Cell Res. 50:150–158; 1968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gibson, D. M. Boosting the quality and potency of St. John's-wort. In: Agricultural Research, July, 2000, Ithaca, NY. Camilo Canel, Oxford: 2000:12–13.Google Scholar
  12. Greger, M. Metal availability and bioconcentration in plants. In: Prasad, M. N. V.; Hagemeyer, J., eds. Heavy metal stress in plants. New York: Springer-Verlag: 1999:1–20.Google Scholar
  13. Herms, D. A.; Mattson, W. J. The dilemma of plants: to grow or defend. Quart. Rev. Biol. 67:283–335; 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Heyworth, C. J.; Iason, G. R.; Temperton, V.; Jarvis, P. G.; Duncan, A. J. The effect of elevated CO2 concentration and nutrient supply on carbon-based plant secondary metabolites in Pinus sylvestris L. Oecologia 115:334–350; 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kozai, T.; Ohyama, K.; Afreen, F.; Zobayed, S.; Kubota, C.; Hoshi, T.; Chun, C. Transplant production in closed systems with artificial lighting for solving global issues on environment conservation, food, resource and energy. Proc. ACESYS III Conf., 23 July, New Brunswick, NJ: CCEA, Rutgers University; 1999:31–45.Google Scholar
  16. Kubota, C.; Sciyama, S.; Kozai, T. Manipulation of photoperiod and light intensity in low-temperature storage of eggplant plug seedlings. Sci. Hort. 94:13–20; 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Matsuki, M. Regulation of plant phenolic synthesis: from biochemistry to ecology and evolution. Aust. J. Bot. 44:613–634; 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Murashige, T.; Skoog, F. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant. 15:473–497; 1962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Murch, S. J.; Haq, K.; Rupasinghe, H. P. V.; Saxena, P. K. Nickel contamination affects growth and secondary metabolite composition of St. John's wort (Hypericum perforatum L.). Environ. Exp. Bot. 49:251–257; 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Murch, S. J.; KrishnaRaj, S.; Saxena, P. K. Phytopharmaceuticals: problems, limitations and solutions. Sci. Rev. Altern. Med. 4:33–38; 2000.Google Scholar
  21. National Centre for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NCCAM). St. John's wort (fact sheet). Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health; 2001.Google Scholar
  22. Poutaraud, A.: Di Gregorio, F.; Tin, V. C. F.; Girardin, P. Effect of light on hypericin contents in fresh flowering top parts and in an extract of St. John's wort (Hypericum perforatum). Planta Med. 67:254–259; 2001.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Saxena, P. K. Preface. Plant Cell Tiss. Organ Cult. 62:167: 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Schempp, C. M.; Krikin, V.; Simon-Haarhaus, G.; Kersten, A.; Kiss, J.; Termeer, C. C.; Cilb, B.; Kaufmann, T.; Borner, C.; Sleeman, J. P.; Simon, J. C. Inhibition of tumour cell growth by hyperforin, a novel anticancer drug from St. John's wort that acts by induction of apoptosis. Oncogene 21:1242–1250; 2002.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Southwell, I. A.; Bourke, C. A. Seasonal variation in hypericin content of Hypericum perforatum L. (St. John's wort). Phytochemistry 56:437–441; 2001.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tezara, W.; Mitchell, V.; Driscoll, S. P.; Lawlor, D. W. Effects of water deficit and its interaction with CO2 supply on the biochemistry and physiology of photosynthesis in sunflowert. J. Exp. Bot. 53:1781–1791; 2002.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Vlahos, J. C.; Heuvelink, E.; Martakis, G. F. P. A growth analysis study of three Achimenes cultivars grown under three light regimes. Sci. Hort. 46:275–282; 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Zobayed, S. M. A.: Armstrong, J.; Armstrong, W. Cauliflower shoot-culture: effects of different types of ventilation on growth and physiology. Plant Sci. 141:221–231; 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Zobayed, S. M. A.; Murch, S. J.; Rupasinghe, H. P. V.; Saxena, P. K. In vitro production and chemical characterization of St. John's wort (Hypericum perforatum L. ev ‘New Stem’). Plant Sci. (in press); 2003a.Google Scholar
  30. Zobayed, S. M. A.; Murch, S. J.; Rupasinghe, H. P. V.; Saxena, P. K. Increasing carbon decreased phytochemical contents of Hypericum perforatum L. ev ‘New Stem’ cultured in sterile bioreactor. Plant Cell Tiss. Organ Cult. 75:143–149; 2003b.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Zobayed, S. M. A.; Saxena, P. K. In vitro-grown roots: a superior explant for prolific shoot regeneration of St. John's wort (Hypericum perforatum L. ev ‘New Stem’) in a temporary immersion bioreactor. Plant Sci. 165:463–470; 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for In Vitro Biology 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Plant AgricultureUniversity of GuelphGuelphCanada

Personalised recommendations