Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of strains of Agrobacterium vitis from grapevine source areas in Australia

  • Published:
Australasian Plant Pathology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Dormant cuttings from grapevine source areas in three Australian states were indexed for the presence of Agrobactenrium vitis, the causal agent of crown gall disease of grapevine. The bacterium was present at varying levels in both rootstock and scion material from New South Wales, Victoria, and Western Australia. A genomic DNA fingerprinting technique was used to compare these strains of A. vitis with strains previously isolated from South Australian propagation material and with strains from the United States of America, particularly strains from the University of California at Davis where a number of Australian grape cultivars originated. Nine distinct DNA fingerprint types were found, demonstrating that A, vitis is a genetically heterogeneous species. There were no DNA fingerprint types in common between Australian states, suggesting that little or no transfer of A. vitis between states has occurred. Two Californian strains were indistinguishable, when analysed by DNA fingerprinting, from strains isolated over a 14 year period in South Australia. This finding is strong circumstantial evidence that A. vitis was introduced to South Australia on grapevine cuttings imported from California. Given the fact that A. vitis is probably not indigenous to Australia, it is possible that the different strains found in each state were the result of independent introductions. Although grapevines from all Australian states tested did contain A. vitis, the existence of unique strains in each state means that the restrictions on movement of grapevine material between states should be maintained, and that quarantine authorities should avoid introducing further strains of the bacterium.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ayers, S.H., Rupp, P. and Johnson, W.T. (1919) — A study of the alkali-forming bacteria in milk. USDA Bulletin 702.

  • Bazzi, C., Piazza, C. and Burr, T. J. (1987) — Detection of Agrobacterium tumefaciens in grapevine cuttings. EPPO Bulletin 17: 105–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bemaerts, M. J. and DeLey, J. (1963) — A biochemical test for crown gall bacteria. Nature 197: 406–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, A.L., Burr, T.B., Mittak, V.L. and Katz, B.H. (1989) — A monoclonal antibody specific to Agrobacterium tumefaciens biovar 3 and its utilization for indexing grapevine propagating material. Phytopathology 79: 995–998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, A.L., Katz, B.H., Burr, T.J., Kerr, A. and Ophel, K. (1988) — Pectolytic activity in Agrobacterium tumefaciens. (Abstr.) Phytopathology 78: 1551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burr, T.J. and Hunvitz, B. (1981) — Occurrence of Agrobacferium radiobacter pv. tumefaciens (Smith & Townsend) biotype 3 on grapevine in New York State. (Abstr.) Phytopathology 71: 206

    Google Scholar 

  • Burr, T.J. and Katz, B.H. (1983) — Isolation of Agrobacterium tumefaciens biovar 3 from grapevine galls and sap and from vineyard soil. Phytopathology 731:63–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burr, T. J. and Katz, B.H. (1984) — Grapevine cuttings as potential sites of survival and means of dissemination of Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Plant Disease 68: 976–978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, D., Barlow, E. and Sequeira, L. (1989) -Genetic diversity of Pseudomonas solanacearum: Detection of restriction fragment length polymorphisms with DNA probes that specify virulence and the hypersensitive response. Molecular Plant Microbe Interactions 2: 113–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabriel, D.W., Hunter, J.E., Kingsley, M.T., Miller, J.W. and Lazo, G.R. (1988) — Clonal population structure of Xanthomonas campestris and genetic diversity amongst citrus canker strains. Molecular Plant Microbe Interactions 1: 59–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillings, M.R. and Fahy, P.C. (1993) — Genomic fingerprinting: Towards a unified view of the Pseudomonas solanacearum species complex. In Bacterial Wilt: The disease and its causative agent Pseudomonas solanacearum (Eds A.C. Hayward and G.L. Hartman), pp. 95–112. CAB International, Wallingford, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartung, J.S. and Civerolo, E.L. (1987) — Genomic fingerprints of Xanthomonas campestris pv. citri from Asia, South America and Florida. Phytopathologv 77: 282–285.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Igloi, G.L. (1983) — A silver stain for the detection of nanogram amounts of tRNA following two-dimensional electrophoresis. Analytical Biochemistry 134: 184–188.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, A. and Panagopoulos, C.G. (1977) — Biotypes of Agrobacterium radiobacter var. tumefaciens and their biological control. Phytopathologische Zeitschrift 90: 172–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, E.O., Ward, M.K. and Raney, D.E. (1954) — Two simple media for the demonstration of pyocyanin and fluorescein. Journal of laboratoty and Clinical Medicine 44: 301 -307.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Knauf, V.C., Panagopoulos, C.G. and Nester, E.W. (1982) — Genetic factors controlling the host range of Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Phytopathology 72: 1545–1549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazo, G.R., Roffey, R. and Gabriel D.W. (1987) — Pathovars of Xanthomonas campestris are distinguishable by restriction fragment length polymorphism. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology 37: 214–221.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lehoczky, J. (1968) — Spread of Agrobacterium tumefaciens in the vessels of grapevine after natural infection. Phytopathologische Zeitschrift 63: 239–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehoczky, J. (1971) — Further evidence concerning the systemic spreading of Agrobacterium tumefaciens in vascular systems of grapevines. Vitis 10: 215–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma. D., Yanofsky, M.F., Gordon, M.P. and Nester, E.W. (1987) — Characterization of Agrobacterium tumefaciens strains isolated from grapevine tumors in China. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 53: 1338–1343.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maniatis, T., Fritsch, E.F. and Sambrook, J. (1982) — Molecular Cloning. A laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbour Laboratory, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ophel, K., Burr, T.J., Magarey, P.A. and Kerr, A. (1988) — Detection of Agrobacterium tumefaciens biovar 3 in South Australian grapevine propagation material. Australasian Plant Pathology 17: 61 -66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ophel, K., Jones, D.A. and Kerr, A. (1990) — Molecular cloning of cell wall-degrading enzymes from Agrobacterium tumefaciens biovar 3. Phytopathology 80: 892 (Abstr.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ophel, K. and Kerr, A. (1990) — Agrobacterium vitis sp, nov. for strains of Agrobactenum biovar 3 from grapevines. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology 40: 236–241.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Panagopoulos, C. G. and Psallidas, P.G. (1973) -Characteristics of Greek isolates of Agrobacterium tumefaciens (E.F. Smith & Townsend) Conn. Journal of Applied Bacteriologv 36: 233–240,

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Panagopoulos, C.G., Psallidas, P.G. and Alivazatos, AS. (1978)— Studies on biotype 3 Agrobacterium tumefaciens var. tumefaciens. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Plant Pathogenic Bacteria. (Ed M. Ride), pp. 221–228. INRA, Angers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, M.A. and Sasser, M. (1983) — A medium selective for Agrobacterium tumefaciens biotype 3 (Abstr.) Phytopathology 73: 810.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sule, S. (1978) — Biotypes of Agrobacterium tumefaciens in Hungary. Journal Applied Bacteriology 44: 207–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarbah, F.A. and Goodman, R.N. (1986) — Rapid detection of Agrobacterium tumefaciens in grapevine propagating material and the basis of an effective indexing system. Plant Disease 70: 566–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gillings, M., Ophel-Keller, K. Comparison of strains of Agrobacterium vitis from grapevine source areas in Australia. Australasian Plant Pathology 24, 29–37 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1071/APP9950029

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/APP9950029

Keywords

Navigation