Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of screening methods for fungicides to control take-all of wheat

  • Published:
Australasian Plant Pathology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Three screening methods were used to evaluate the activity of eight fungicides against the saprophytic growth of Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici (Ggt) and its damage to wheat seedlings. Linear regression analyses were used to determine the relationships between the results of the different screening procedures. Control of saprophytic growth of Ggt either on agar or in soil, was not related to control of take-all on seedlings, sothat inhibition of saprophytic growth by a fungicide does not always indicate an ability to suppress take-all. Flutolanil, cyproconazole and SN-539865 were equal to, or better than, flutriafol (which is registered for control of the disease) in reducing take-all in wheat seedlings. This study has highligted discrepancies in different screening techniques and identified some new chemicals which show potential for controlling take-all.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anon. (1976) — Manual of Plant Growth Stages and Disease Assessment Keys, Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Agricultural Development and Advisory Service, Harpenden, Hertfordshire.

  • Araki, F. (1985) — Moncut (flutolanil), a new systemic fungicide. Japan Pesticide Information 47: 23–25.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ballinger, D.J. and Kollmorgen, J.F. (1988) — Effect of triazole coated superphosphate, applied at sowing, on take-all and yield of wheat. Australian Joumal of Experimental Agriculture 28: 635–638.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bateman, G.L. (1980) — Prospects for fungicidal control of take-all of wheat. Annals of Applied Biology 96: 275–282.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bateman, G.L. (1989) — Progress in research on the control of take-all in cereals with fungicides: a review. Crop Protection 8: 75–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, S.C. (1970) — Pathogenic variation in Ophiobdus graminis. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences 23: 1099–1103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotterill, P.J. (1991) — Biological mode of action of soil-applied flutriafol in controlling take-all of wheat. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 23: 323–329.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cotterill, P.J., Ballinger, D.J. and Kollmorgen, J.F. (1989) — Use of three screening techniques for the evaluation of fungicides to control rhizoctonia root rot of wheat. Annals of Applied Biology 115: 229–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhingra, O.D. and Sinclair, J.B. (1985) — Basic Plant Pathology Methods. CRC Press: Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gisi, U., Schaub, F., Wiedmer, H. and Ummel, E. (1986) — SAN 619F, a new triazole fungicide. Proceedings of the 1986 British Crop Protection Conference (Pests and Diseases) 2: 33–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grose, M. J., Parker, C. A. and Sivasithamparam, K. (1988) — Growth of Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici in soil: effects of temperature and water potential. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 16: 211–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kollmorgen, J. F. (1982) — Take-all of cereals. Victorian Department of Agriculture, Agnote No. 1774/82.

  • Simon, A., Sivasithamparam, K. and MacNish, G. C. (1987) — Biological suppression of the saprophytic growth of Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici in soil. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 19: 515–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cotterill, P.J., Ballinger, D.J. & McLean, L.K. Evaluation of screening methods for fungicides to control take-all of wheat. Australasian Plant Pathology 21, 83–87 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1071/APP9920083

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/APP9920083

Keywords

Navigation