Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of methyl bromide, metham sodium and the biofumigants Indian mustard and canola on the incidence of soilborne fungal pathogens and growth of grapevine nursery stock

  • Published:
Australasian Plant Pathology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The potential of the biofumigant crops Indian mustard and canola (cv. Dunkeld) to replace methyl bromide (MeBr) and metham sodium for the control of root pathogens on Shiraz on Ramsey rootstocks was evaluated in a commercial grapevine nursery in the Riverland district of South Australia. The application of MeBr and metham sodium resulted in a significant 78% and 40% increase, respectively, in the percentage of first grade vines at harvest. In contrast, Indian mustard and canola incorporated into the soil at equivalent rates of 12.2 and 9.8 t dry matter per ha, respectively, had no significant effect upon the percentage of first grade vines. There was a significant reduction in vine establishment in the plots treated with Indian mustard (87.5%), compared to the control (93.5%). This reduction was related to a significant increase in the number of Pythium propagules in soil in the plots treated with Indian mustard and canola. Pythium spp. were isolated from >86% of stunted vines in the brassica amended plots. MeBr and metham sodium caused significant reductions in the number of Pythium propagules in the soil and caused significant reductions in the incidence of Cylindrocarpon spp. and Rhizoctonia spp, in the first grade vine roots at harvest. These results demonstrate that, at the rates of incorporation, Indian mustard and canola were unable to replace the beneficial effects and economic returns of MeBr or metham sodium on nursery grapevine growth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Angus, J.F., van Herwaaden, A.F. and Howe, G.N. (1991) — Productivity and break crop effect of winter growing oilseeds. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 31: 669–677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balogh, I., Kallay, E. and Kallay, T. (1998) — Replant problems in connection with the reconstruction of vine and fruit growing in Hungary. Acta Horticulturae 477: 19–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bumbieris, M. (1972) — Observations on some Pythiaceous fungi associated with grapevine decline in South Australia. Australian Journal ofAgricultura1 Research 23: 651–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cresswell, H.P and Kirkegaard, J.A. (1995) — Subsoil amelioration by plant roots: the process and the evidence. Australian Journal of Soil Research 32: 221–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhingra, O.D and Sinclair, J.B (1995) — Basic Plant Pathology Methods. 2nd Edition. Lewis Publishers. Boca Raton, London, Tokyo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flaherty D.L. (1992) — Grape Phylloxera. In Grape Pest Management Guide. 2nd Edition. pp. 153–158. University of California, Davis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrett S.D. (1970) — Pathogenic Root Infecting Fungi. Cambridge University Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grasso, S. and Magnano di san Lio, G. (1975) — Infections of Cylindrocarpon obtusisporium on grapevines in Sicily. Vitis 14: 36–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, J. (1993) — Brassica alternatives to herbicides and soil fumigants. The IPM Practitioner 15: 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffers, S.N. and Martin, S.B. (1986) — Comparison of two selective media selective for Phytophthora and Pythium species. Plant Disease 70: 1038–1043.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keyser, H.A. and Ferreira, J.H.S. (1988)- Chemical and biological control of Sclerotium rolfsii in grapevine nurseries. South African Journal of Viticulture 9: 43–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkegaard, J.A., Gardner, P.A., Angus, J.F. and Koetz, E. (1994) — Effect of brassica break crops on the growth and yield of wheat. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 45: 529–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkegaard, J.A., Wong, P.T.W. and Desmarchelier, J.M. (1996) — In vitro suppression of fungal root pathogens of cereals by Brassica tissues. Plant Pathology 45: 593–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lear, B, and Lider. L.A. (1959) — Eradication of root knot nematodes from grapevine rootlings by hot water. Plant Disease Reporter 43: 314–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, J.A. and Papavizas, G.C. (1971) — Effect of sulphur containing volatile compounds and vapours from cabbage decomposition on Aphanomyces euteiches. Phytopathology 61: 208–214.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marais, P.G. (1980) — Fungi associated with decline and death of nursery grapevines in the western Cape. Phytophylactica 12: 9–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, F.N. and Hancock, J.G. (1986) — Association of chemical and biological factors in soils suppressive to Pythium ultimum. Phytopathology 76: 1221–1231.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Molnar, P., Veghelyi, K. and Balogh, I. (1998) — Examination of grapevine replant problems in Hungary. Acta Horticulturae 477: 89–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mojtahedi, H., Santo, G.S., Wilson, J.H. and and Hang, A.N. (1993) — Managing Meloidogyne chitwoodi on potato with rapeseed as green manure Plant Disease 77: 42–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muehlchen, A.M., Rand, R.E. and Parke, J.L. (1990) — Evaluation of crucifer green manures for controlling Aphanomyces root rot of peas Plant Disease 74: 651–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neate, S.M. (1994) — Soil and crop management practices that affect root diseases of crop plants. In Soil Biota — Management in Sustainable Farming Systems (Eds C.E. Pankhurst, B.M. Doube, V.V.S.R. Guptaand P.R. Grace), pp. 96–106. CSIRO Australia.

  • Ophel, K., Nicholas, P.R., Magarey, P.A. and Bass, A.W. (1990) — Hot water treatment of dormant grape cuttings reduces crown gall incidence in a field nursery. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture 41: 325–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramirez-Villapudua, J. and Munnecke, D.E. (1988) — Effect of solar heating and soil amendments of cruciferous residues on Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. conglutinans and other organisms. Phytopathology 78: 289–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sang, J.P., Minchinton, P.K., Johnstone, P.K., Truscott, R.J. W. (1984) — Glucosinolate profiles in the seed, root and leaf tissues of cabbage, mustard, rapeseed, radish and swede. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 64: 77–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stanghellini, M.E. (1974) — Spore germination, growth and survival of Pythium in soil. Proceedings of the American Phytopathological Society 1: 200–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Subbarao, K.V., Hubbard, J.C. and Koike, S.T. (1994) — Effects of broccoli residue on Verticillium dahliae and microsclerotia and wilt incidence in cauliflower. (Abstr.) Phytopathology 84: 1092.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Broembsen, S. and Marais, P.G. (1978) — Eradication of Phytophthora cinnamomi from grapevine by hot water treatment. Phytophylactica 10: 25–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, G.E. (1992) — Root rot of grapevine rootlings in South Australia caused by Rhizoctonia solani. Australasian Plant Pathology 21: 58–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zarcinas, B.A. and Cartwright, B (1983) — Analysis of soil and plant materials by inductively coupled plasma optical spectrometry. Division of Soils Technical Paper 45. CSIRO, Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. M. Stephens.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stephens, P.M., Davoren, C.W. & Wicks, T. Effect of methyl bromide, metham sodium and the biofumigants Indian mustard and canola on the incidence of soilborne fungal pathogens and growth of grapevine nursery stock. Australasian Plant Pathology 28, 187–196 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1071/AP99032

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/AP99032

Keywords

Navigation