Skip to main content
Log in

Reduced productivity in long term monoculture: where are we placed?

  • ASDS Keynote Address Session 2
  • Published:
Australasian Plant Pathology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Long term monoculture of ten leads to poor root health, a build up in deleterious micro-organisms, and reduced productivity. The study of such problems is difficult due to the numerous interactions occurring in the soil environment and the large population of potential contributing biological agents. There are many similarities between monoculture-based problems in a range of crops from various climatic regions. Much research has centred on major pathogens of ten with neglect of minor pathogens and their interaction with chemical, physical and other biological properties. Studies with apple replant disease (ARD) and sugarcane yield decline (SYD) highlight our current state of knowledge of these systems. The development of techniques for assessing the biological composition of soils using assays which speed the process may facilitate the identification of management practices leading to improved soil and root health and an increase in productivity. There remains a great need to increase our understanding of these systems. In a number of cases, the importance of soil-based biological constraints is still not recognised, but their identification and amelioration will be essential for sustained production and improved profitability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander, W.P. and Spillner, E. (1953) — Seven years experience with sugarcane-pineapple rotations. Proceedings of the International Society of Sugarcane Technologists 8: 267–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, A.F. (1938) — Crop rotation with special reference to the principles of green manuring. 1938 Cane Growers’ Quarterly Bulletin. pp. 138–48.

  • Bell, M.J., Garside, A.L., Cunningham, G., Halpin, N., Berthelsen, J.E. and Richards, C.L. (1998) — Grain legumes in sugarcane farming systems. Proceedings Australian Society of Sugarcane Technologists 20: 97–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birch, R.G. (1986) — Biological suppressiveness against poor root syndrome in Queensland soils. Australasian Plant Pathology 15: 51–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blok, W.J. and Bollen, G.J. (1995) — Fungi on roots and stem bases of asparagus in the Netherlands: species and pathogenicity. European JournaIPlant Pathology 1: 15–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, P.G. (1991) — The combination of Cylindrocarpon lucidum and Pythium irregulare as a possible cause of apple replant disease in Novia Scotia. Canadian JournalPlant Pathology 13: 291–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bull, R.M. (1979) — New chemicals for nematode control in the Bundaberg district. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Sugarcane Technologists 1: 99–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catska, V. (1988) — Biological methods in relation to apple replant problem. Acta Horticulturae 233: 45–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croft, B.J. (1989) — A technique for screening sugarcane cultivars for resistance to Pachymetra root rot. Plant Disease 73: 651–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Croft, B.J. and Magarey, R.C. (1984) — Pathogenic fungi associated with Northern Poor Root Syndrome of sugarcane. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Sugar Cane Technologists 6: 55–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croft, B.J., Reghenzani, J.R. and Hurney, A.P. (1984) — Northern poor root syndrome of sugarcane — studies on soil transmission and the effects of various fungicidal, nutritional and agronomic treatments. Proceedings of the Australian Society of sugar Cane Technologists 6: 69–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daemen, E. (1994) — The use of formalin to control replant problems of fruit trees. Acta Horticulturae 363: 191–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dullahide, S.R., Stirling, G.R., Nikulin, A. and Stirling, A.M. (1994) — The role of nematodes, fungi, bacteria and abiotic factors in the etiology of apple replant problems in the Granite Belt of Queensland. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 34: 1177–1182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, L., Vrain, T. and Utkhede, R.S. (1994) — Effect of antagonistic plants on apple replant disease. Acta Horticulturae 363: 135–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egan, B.T., Hurney, A.P., Ryan, C.C. and Matthews, A.A. (1984) — A review of the Northern Poor Root Syndrome of sugarcane in north Queensland. Proceedings of the Ausb-alian Society of sugar Cane Technologists 6: 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, R.C., Rovira, A.D. and Cock, T.W. (1983) — Ultrastructure of the Root-Soil Znterjbce. The American Phytopathological Society, St. Paul, Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garside, A.L., Berthelsen, J.E. and Richards, C.L. (1997) — Effect of fallow history on cane and sugar yield of a following plant cane crop. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Sugarcane Technologists 19: 80–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geldart, H.G. (1994) — The impact of replant problems on the economics of high density apple plantings. Acta Horticulturae 363: 11–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halbrendt, J.M. and Jing, G. (1994) — Nematode suppressive rotation crops for orchard renovation. Acta Horticulturae 363: 49–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoestra, H. (1965) — Thielaviopsis basicola, a factor in the cherry replant problems in the Netherlands. Netherlands Journal of plant Pathology 71: 180–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoestra, H. (1968) — Replant diseases of apple in the Netherlands. Mededelingen Landbouwhogeschool Wageningen 68: 1–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoestra, H. (1994) — Ecology and pathology of replant problems. Acta Horticulturae 363: 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoy, J.W. (1999) — Yield decline of sugarcane in Louisiana. Proceedings of the First Australasian Soilborne Diseases Symposium, Gold Coast, 10–12 February. pp. 17–18.

  • Jaffee, B.A., Abawai, G.S. and Mai, W.F. (1982) — Fungi associated with roots of apple seedlings grown in soil from an apple replant site. Plant Disease 66: 942–944.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magarey, R.C. (1989) — Quantitative assay of Pachynetra chaunorhiza, a root pathogen of sugarcane in Australia. Phytopathology 79: 1302–1305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magarey, R.C. (1996) — Microbiological aspects of sugarcane yielddecline. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 47: 307–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magarey, R.C. and Bull, J.I. (1994a) — The control of yield decline in sugarcane with fungicides. Plant Protection Quarterly 9: 90–93.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Magarey, R.C. and Bull, J.I. (1994b) — Effect of soil pasteurisation and mancozeb on growth of sugarcane and apple seedlings in sugarcane yield decline and apple replant disease soils. Acta Horticulturae 363: 183–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magarey, R.C. and Croft, B.J. (1995) — A review of root disease research in Australia. Proceedings of the International Society of Sugarcane Technologists 22: 505–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magarey, R.C. and Grace, D. J. (1998) — Further studies on the effect of soil treatments on shoot and root growth. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Sugarcane Technologists 20: 288–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magarey, R.C. and Mewing, C.M. (1994) — Effect of sugarcane cultivars and location on inoculum density of Pachymetra chaunorhiza in Queensland. Plant Disease 78: 1193–1196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magarey, R.C., Yip, H.Y., Bull, J.I. and Johnson, E.J. (1995) — Recent studies into the soil biology of yield decline. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Sugarcane Technologists 17: 128–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mai, W.,F. and Abawi, G.S. (1978) — Determining the cause and extent of apple, cherry and pear replant diseases under controlled conditions. Phytopathologv 68: 1540–1544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mai, W.F. and Abawi, G.W. (1981) — Controlling replant diseases of pome and stone fruits in north eastern United States by preplant fumigation. Plant Disease 65: 859–864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mai, W.F., Menvin, I.A. and Abawi, G.S. (1994) — Diagnosis, etiology and management of replant disorders in New York cherry and apple orchards. Acta Horticulturae 363: 33–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matz, J. (1920) — Investigations of root disease of sugar cane. Journal Department of Agriculture, Puerto Rico 4: 28–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyls, A.L., Hocking, R.P., Neilsen, G.H. and Hague, E.J. (1994) — Apple tree growth response in greenhouse pot tests using heat-treated replant soil versus orchard replanted trees with in situ heated soil. Acta Horticulturae 363: 57–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otto, G., Winkler, H. and Szabo, K. (1994) — Proof of actinomycetes in rootlets of species of rosaceae from a SARD soil: a contribution to the specificity of replant diseases. Acta Horticulturae 363: 43–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pankhurst, C.E., Hawke, B.G. and Magarey, R.C. (1999) — Crop-rotation induced changes in the composition and functional diversity of soil microbial communities and its effect on yield decline in sugarcane. Proceedings of the First Australasian Soilborne Diseases Symposium, Gold Coast, 10–12 February. pp. 5–8.

  • Pankhurst, C.E., Hawke, B.G., McDonald, H.J., Kirkby, C.A., Buckerfield, J.C., Michelsen, P., O’Brien, K.A., Gupta, V.V.S.R. and Doube, B.M. (1995) — Evaluation of soil biological properties as potential bioindicators of soil health. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 35: 1015–1028.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, A.B. and Hinman, H. (1994) — The economics of replanting apple orchards in Washington State. Acta Horticulturae 363: 19–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, I.J., Brett, R.W. and Wiesman, B.W. (1999) — Alternatives to methyl bromide: chemical fumigants or integrated pest management systems? Australasian Plant Pathology 28: 65–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roget, D.K. (1995) — Decline in root rot (Rhizoctonia solani AG-8) in wheat in a tillage and rotation experiment at Avon, South Australia. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 35: 1009–1013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rovira, A.D., Elliott, L.F. and Cook, R.J. (1990) — The impact of cropping systems on rhizosphere organisms affecting plant health. In The Rhizosphere (Ed J.M. Lynch), pp. 389–436. John Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rovira, A.D. and Ridge, E.H. (1978) — The effect of methyl bromide and chloropicrin on some chemical and biological properties of soil and on the growth and nutrition of wheat. In Soil Disinfestation (Ed D. Mulder), pp. 231–250. Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salt, G.A. (1979) — The increasing interest in “minor pathogens”. In Soil-borne Plant Pathogens (Eds B. Schippers and W. Gams), pp. 289–312. Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savory, B.M. (1969) — Evidence that toxins are not the causal factors of the specific apple replant disease. Annals of Applied Biology 63: 225–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sewell, G.W.F. and White, G.C, (1980) — Effects of formalin and other soil treatments on the poor growth of replant disease of apple. East Malling Research Station Annual Report, 1980. pp. 169–170.

  • Sewell, G.W.F. and Wilson, J.F. (1975) — The role of Thielaviopsis basicola in the specific replant disorders of cherry and plum. Annals of Applied Biology 79: 149–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slykhuis, J.T. and Li, T.S.C. (1985) — Responses of apple seedlings to biocides and phosphate fertilisers in orchard soils in British Columbia. Canadian Journal of plant Pathology 7: 294–301.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, T.J. (1994) — Successful management of orchard replant disease in Washington. Acta Horticulturae 363: 161–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spaull, V.W. and Cadet, P. (1990) — Nematode parasites of sugarcane. In Plant Parasitic Nematodes in Subtropical and Tropical Agriculture (Eds M. Luc, R.A. Sikora and J. Bridge), pp. 461–491. CAB International: Wallingford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stirling, G.R., Blair, B.L., Garside, A.L. and Whittle, P.J.L. (1999) — Lesion nematode (Pratylenchus zeae) is a component of the yield decline complex of sugarcane. Proceedings of the First Australasian Soilborne Diseases Symposium, Gold Coast, 10–12 February. pp.15–16.

  • Stirling, G.R., Dullahide, S.R. and Nikulin, A. (1995) — Management of lesion nematode (Pratylenchus jordanensis) on replanted apple trees. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 35: 247–258.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J.B. (1969) — Root-canker disease of apples caused by Peniophora nacrata. New Zealand Journal of Botany 7: 262–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Utkhede, R.S. and Li, T.S.C. (1988) — The role of fungi, bacteria, and their interactions in apple replant disease complex in soils of British Columbia. Acta Horticulturae 233: 75–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Utkhede, R.S. and Li, T.S.C. (1994) — Development of biological control of apple replant disease. Acta Horticulturae 363: 129–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veghelyi, K. (1989) — Root rot fungi on apricot in Hungary. Replant Newsletter 2: 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vos, J. and van Loon, C.D. (1989) — Effects of cropping frequency on potato production. In Effects of Crop Rotation on Potato Production in the Temperate Zones (Eds J. Vos, C.D. van Loon and G.J. Bollen), pp. 1–23. Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westcott, S.W. III, Beer, S.V. and Israel, H.W. (1987) — Interactions between actinomycete-like organisms and young apple roots grown in soil conducive to apple replant disease. Phytopathology 77: 1071–1077.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Magarey, R.C. Reduced productivity in long term monoculture: where are we placed?. Australasian Plant Pathology 28, 11–20 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1071/AP99002

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/AP99002

Keywords

Navigation