Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The effect of Trichoderma bio-inoculants on specific apple replant disease (SARD) symptoms in apple rootstocks in New Zealand

  • Published:
Australasian Plant Pathology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Specific apple replant disease (SARD) is a problem in replanted apple orchards worldwide. The causative agents in New Zealand are thought to be biotic in nature. The effect of commercial Trichoderma bio-inoculants on SARD symptoms was investigated in two independent experiments in two SARD soils and one non-SARD soil treated with chloropicrin, commercial Trichoderma pellet and powder formulations, and a nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium (NPK) supplement. Rooted stool-bed cuttings of ungrafted ‘M.26’ apple rootstocks grown in the SARD soils treated with chloropicrin fumigation produced significantly more biomass over the growing season with reduced root disease symptoms compared with untreated controls. The plants grown in the SARD soils treated with the Trichoderma pellet formulations or the NPK supplement also exhibited a significant improvement in growth, with no reduction in root disease symptoms. Similar responses were noted when dead (autoclaved) Trichoderma pellet formulations or unformulated pellets were applied. No disease reduction or growth improvement was observed in the plants grown in soil treated with a Trichoderma spore powder (without the standard carrier included in the pellet formulations). Thus, the improved growth response associated with the Trichoderma treatments correlated with an additive associated with the pellet formulation, and not to the presence of ‘live’ Trichoderma inoculum.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Braun PG (1995) Effects of Cylindrocarpon and Pythium species on apple seedlings and potential role in apple replant disease. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology 17, 336–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunt JA, Mulder D (1973) The possible role of bacteria in relation to the apple replant disease. Mededelingen van de Faculteit Landbouwwetenschappen. Rijksuniversiteit Gent. 38, 1381–1385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catska V, Hudska G (1993) Use of Agrobacterium radiobacter for biological control of apple replant disease. Acta Horticulturae 324, 67–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catska V, Taube-Baab H (1994) Biological control of replant problems. Acta Horticulturae 363, 115–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granatstein D, Mazzola M (2001) Alternatives to fumigation for control of apple replant disease in Washington State orchards. Integrated Fruit Production IOBC/wprs Bulletin 24, 265–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gu Y-H, Mazzola M (2003) Modification of fluorescent pseudomonad community and control of apple replant disease induced in a wheat cultivar-specific manner. Applied Soil Ecology 24, 57–72. doi:10.1016/ S0929-1393(03)00066-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horner IJ (2008) ‘Beyond methyl bromide soil fumigation: a guide for New Zealand strawberry growers.’ Manual produced for Strawberry Growers NZ Inc. (The Horticulture and Food Research Institute of New Zealand Ltd: Auckland)

    Google Scholar 

  • Horner IJ, Tustin DS, Bigwood EH (2006) Timing of apple root disease and plant growth responses in replant soil. In ‘Proceedings of the fourth Australasian soilborne disease symposium, Queenstown, New Zealand, 3-6 September 2006’. (Eds RE Falloon, MG Cromey, A Stewart, EE Jones) pp. 11-12.

  • Horner IJ, Tustin DS, Kandula DRW, Jones EE, Bigwood EH, Breen KC, Dayatilake GA, Scheper R, Stewart A (2005) Specific apple replant disease: causes and remediation. ‘HortResearch Client Report No. 15714’. (The Horticulture and Food Research Institute of New Zealand Ltd: Auckland) p. 25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones EE, Mead A, Whipps JM (2003) Evaluation of different Coniothyrium minitans inoculum sources and application rates on apothecial production and infection of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum sclerotia. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 35, 409–419. doi:10.1016/S0038-0717(02)00292-4

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mai WF, Abawi GS (1981) Controlling replant diseases of pome and stone fruits in northeastern United States by preplant fumigation. Plant Disease 65, 859–864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manici LM, Ciavatta C, Kelderer M, Erschbaumer G (2003) Replant problems in South Tyrol: role of fungal pathogens and microbial population in conventional and organic apple orchards. Plant and Soil 256, 315–324. doi:10.1023/A:1026103001592

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mazzola M (1997) Identification and pathogenicity of Rhizoctonia spp. isolated from apple roots and orchard soils. Phytopathology 87, 582–587. doi:10.1094/PHYTO.1997.87.6.582

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mazzola M (1998) Elucidation of the microbial complex having a causal role in the development of apple replant disease in Washington. Phytopathology 88, 930–938. doi:10.1094/PHYTO.1998.88.9.930

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mazzola M (1999) Transformation of soil microbial community structure and Rhizoctonia-suppressive potential in response to apple roots. Phytopathology 89, 920–927. doi:10.1094/PHYTO.1999.89.10.920

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McLean KL, Swaminathan J, Frampton CM, Hunt JS, Ridgway HJ, Stewart A (2005) Effect of formulation on the rhizosphere competence and biocontrol ability of Trichoderma atroviride C52. Plant Pathology 54, 212–218. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3059.2005.01158.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozbay N, Newman SE (2004) Biological control with Trichoderma spp. with emphasis on T. harzianum. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences 7, 478–484. doi:10.3923/pjbs.2004.478.484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rom CR (2004) Interaction of pre-plant treatments, fertiliser application time and method, and cultivar on performance of apples in a replant site. Acta Horticulturae 635, 31–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slykhuis JT, Li TSC (1985) Responses of apple seedlings to biocides and phosphate fertilisers in orchards soils in British Columbia. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology 7, 294–301.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Szabo K, Winkler H, Petzold H, Marwitz R (1998) Evidence for the pathogenicity of actinomycetes in rootlets of apple seedlings from soils conducive to specific apple replant disease. Acta Horticulturae 477, 55–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang W, Yang H, Ryder M (2001) Research and application of Trichoderma spp. in biological control of plant pathogens. In ‘Bio-exploitation of filamentous fungi’. (Eds SB Pointing, KD Hyde) pp. 403–435. (Fungal Diversity Press: Hong Kong)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tustin DS, Horner IJ, Breen K, Dayatilake D, Bigwood E (2008) Growth responses of young apple replants induced by soil remediation treatments for specific apple replant disease. Acta Horticulturae 772, 407–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Utkhede RS, Smith EM (1992) Promotion of apple tree growth and fruit production by the EBW-4 strain of Bacillus subtilis in apple replant disease soil. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 38, 1270–1273.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Utkhede RS, Smith EM (1994a) Biotic and abiotic causes of replant problems in fruit trees. Acta Horticulturae 363, 25–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Utkhede RS, Smith EM (1994b) Development of biological control of apple replant disease. Acta Horticulturae 363, 129–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Utkhede RS, Smith EM (2000) Impact of chemical, biological and cultural treatments on the growth and yield of apple in replant-disease soil. Australasian Plant Pathology 29, 129–136. doi:10.1071/AP00021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westcott SW III, Beer SV, Israel HW (1987) Interactions between actinomycete-like organisms and young apple roots grown in soil conducive to apple replant disease. Phytopathology 77, 1071–1077. doi:10.1094/Phyto-77-1071

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Bio-Protection Research Centre, Lincoln University, PO Box 84, 7647, Lincoln, New Zealand

    D. R. W. Kandula & A. Stewart

  2. Ecology Department, Faculty of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Lincoln University, PO Box 84, 7647, Lincoln, New Zealand

    E. E. Jones

  3. Hawke’s Bay Research Centre, The New Zealand Institute for Plant & Food Research Limited (Plant & Food Research), Private Bag 1401, Havelock North, New Zealand

    I. J. Horner

Authors
  1. D. R. W. Kandula
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. E. E. Jones
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. I. J. Horner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. A. Stewart
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. E. Jones.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kandula, D.R.W., Jones, E.E., Horner, I.J. et al. The effect of Trichoderma bio-inoculants on specific apple replant disease (SARD) symptoms in apple rootstocks in New Zealand. Australasian Plant Pathol. 39, 312–318 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1071/AP09096

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/AP09096

Keywords

Search

Navigation