Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Genetically modified crop plants: science versus society? — A perspective

  • Keynote Address
  • Published:
Australasian Plant Pathology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Virus-resistant genetically modified (GM) plants offer the possibility of solving local virus-related production agricultural problems for local communities in both developed and undeveloped countries. However, major concerns are held regarding the safety, health (personal and environmental) and ethics of growing GM crop plants. Such non-technical factors and regulatory processes have slowed and/or prevented the field testing and commercialisation of many virusresistant GM crop plants. The intimate relationships between food, community and the environment accentuate the need for communication between science and society. Resources for active and honest interaction between science and society must be incorporated into research programs to address the issues of the public so that new technologies are developed for the communities that they serve.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bazzini AA, Asurmendi S, Hopp HE, Beachy RN (2006) Tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) and potato virus X(PVX) coat proteins confer heterologous interference to PVX and TMV infection, respectively. The Journal of General Virology 87, 1005–1012. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.81396-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bendahmane M, Chen I, Asurmendi S, Bazzini AA, Szecsi J, Beachy RN (2007) Coat protein-mediated resistance to TMV infection of Nicotiana tabacum involves multiple modes of interference by coat protein. Virology 366, 107–116.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carson R (1962) ‘Silent spring’. (Houghton Mifflin: New York)

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond J (2002) Evolution, consequences and future of plant and animal domestication. Nature 418, 700–707. doi: 10.1038/nature01019

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fermín G, Tennant P, Gonsalves C, Lee D, Gonsalves D (2005) Comparative development and impact of transgenic papayas in Hawaii, Jamaica, and Venezuela. Methods in Molecular Biology (Clifton, N.J.) 286, 399–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (1996). World Food Summit. Food for All. Rome. Available at http://www.fao.org/docrep/003/w3548e/w3548e00.HTM [Verified 30 August 2007].

  • Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (2004) ‘The state of food and agriculture 2003–2004. Agricultural biotechnology: meeting the needs of the poor?’ (FAO: Rome)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson RW, Aritua V, Byamukama E, Mpembe I, Kayongo J (2004) Control strategies for sweet potato virus disease in Africa. Virus Research 100, 115–122. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2003.12.023

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gonsalves D (1998) Control of papaya ringspot virus in papaya: a case study. Annual Review of Phytopathology 36, 415–437. doi: 10.1146/annurev.phyto.36.1.415

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence M (2006) Biotechnology, only solution to feed theworld. In ‘Kenya Times’. 6 July 2006.

  • Mackey M (2002) The application of biotechnology to nutrition: an overview. Journal of the American College of Nutrition 21, 157S-160S.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Soosaar JL, Burch-Smith TM, Dinesh-Kumar SP (2005) Mechanisms of plant resistance to viruses. Nature Reviews Microbiology 3, 789–798. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1239

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sudarshana MR, Roy G, Falk BW (2007) Methods for engineering resistance to plant viruses. Methods in Molecular Biology 354, 183–195.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tripathi S, Suzuki J, Gonsalves D (2007) Development of genetically engineered resistant papaya for papaya ringspot virus in a timely manner: a comprehensive and successful approach. Methods in Molecular Biology 354, 197–240.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tudge C (2005) Feeding people is easy: but we have to re-think the world from first principles. Public Health Nutrition 8, 716–723. doi: 10.1079/PHN2005770

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2006) The millennium development goals report 2006. The United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs DESA.

  • Vanderschuren H, Akbergenov R, Pooggin MM, Hohn T, Gruissem W, Zhang P (2007) Transgenic cassava resistance to African cassava mosaic virus is enhanced by viralDNA-A bidirectional promoter-derived siRNAs. Plant Molecular Biology 64, 549–557. doi: 10.1007/s11103-007-9175-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van Harten AM (2007) ‘Mutation breeding: theory and practical applications’. (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, NY)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wambugu FM (2003) Development and transfer of genetically modified virus-resistant sweet potato for subsistence farmers in Kenya. Nutrition Reviews 61, 110–113. doi: 10.1301/nr.2003.jun.S110-S113

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Horticulture and Food Research Institute of New Zealand Limited (HortResearch), Private Bag 92169, 1142, Auckland, New Zealand

    Robin MacDiarmid

Authors
  1. Robin MacDiarmid
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robin MacDiarmid.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

MacDiarmid, R. Genetically modified crop plants: science versus society? — A perspective. Australasian Plant Pathology 36, 516–519 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1071/AP07064

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/AP07064

Keywords

Search

Navigation