Abstract
Spray adjuvants were tested for their effects on epicuticular wax morphology, grape berry microflora and susceptibility of berries to Botrytis cinerea on Chardonnay, Shiraz and Cabernet Sauvignon cultivars. The four adjuvants used in this trial altered epicuticular wax morphology. Disintegration of the wax platelets was least for the wetter-spreader recommended for sensitive crops, and greatest for the crop oil concentrate and the activator-penetrant. Waxes did not regenerate over the season after treatment with the adjuvants. A cyprodinil/fludioxonil fungicide was effective at controlling B. cinerea infection, but when combined with an adjuvant, was less effective in the three grape cultivars. Irrespective of whether a fungicide was used, adjuvant application resulted in lower yeast and fungal populations on Chardonnay berries. There were no effects of the adjuvants on the microflora of Shiraz and Cabernet Sauvignon berries, except for the crop oil concentrate which resulted in higher bacterial populations on Cabernet Sauvignon berries. We hypothesise that spray adjuvants increased the susceptibility of grape berries to B. cinerea through epicuticular wax alteration and, in some circumstances, through the reduction of the indigenous microflora on the berry surface.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bessis R (1972) Etude de revolution des stomates et des tissus péristomatiques du fruit de la vigne. Comptes Rendus de l’Académic des Sciences de Paris, Série D217, 2158–2161
Bisiach M, Minervini G, Zerbetto F, Vercesi A (1982) Biological and epidemiological aspects of Botrytis cinerea and criteria for its control in grapevine cultivation. Vignevini9, 39–46.
Blakeman JP, Fokkema NJ (1982) Potential for biological control of plant diseases on the phylloplane. Annual Review of Phytopathology20, 167–192. doi: 10.1146/annurev.py.20.090182.001123
Commenil P, Brunet L., Andran JC (1997) The development of the grape berry cuticle in relation to bunch rot disease. Journal of Experimental Botany48, 1599–1607. doi: 10.1093/jexbot/48.313.1599
Emmett RW, Harris AR, Taylor RH, McGechan JK (1992) Grape diseases and vineyard protection In ‘Viticulture. Vol. 2. Practices’. (Eds BG Coombe, PR Dry) pp. 232–278. (Winetitles: Underdale, South Australia)
Elad Y, Kohl J, Fokkema NJ (1994) Control of infection and sporulation of Botrytis cinerea on bean and tomato by saprophytic yeasts. Phytopathology84, 1193–1200.
Fritz R, Lanen C, Colas V, Leroux P (1997) Inhibition of methionine biosynthesis in Botrytis cinerea by the anilinopyrimidine fungicide pyrimethanil. Pesticide Science49, 40–46. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9063(199701)49:1<40::AID-PS470>3.0.CO;2-Y
Hall DM, Matus Al, Lamberton JA, Barber HN (1965) Infra-specific variation in wax on leaf surfaces. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences18, 323–332.
Harper AM, Strange RN, Langcake P (1981) Characterization of the nutrients required by Botrytis cinerea to infect broad bean leaves. Physiological Plant Patholology19, 153–167.
Jespers ABK, de Waard MA (1994) Effect of fenpiclonil on macromolecule biosynthesis in Fusarium sulphureum. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology49, 53–62. doi: 10.1006/pest. 1994.1033
Keller M, Viret O, Cole FM (2003) Botrytis cinerea infection in grape flowers: defense reaction, latency and disease expression. Phytopathology93, 316–322.
Marois JJ, Bledsoe AM, Bostock RM, Gubler WD (1987) Effects of spray adjuvants on development of Botrytis cinerea on Vitis vinifera berries. Phytopathology77, 1148–1152.
Matthews GA (2000) ‘Pesticide application methods.’ 3rd edn. (Blackwell Science: Oxford)
McClellan WD, Hewitt WB (1973) Early Botrytis rot of grapes: time of infection and latency of Botrytis cinerea Pers. in Vitis vinifera L. Phytopathology63, 1151–1157.
Milling RJ, Richardson CJ (1995) Mode of action of the anilinopyrimidine fungicide pyrimethanil. 2. Effects on enzyme secretion in Botrytis cinerea. Pesticide Science45, 43–48.
Mlikota Gabler F, Smilanick JL, Mansour M, Ramming DW, Mackey BE (2003) Correlations of morphological, anatomical, and chemical features of gra pe berries with resistance to Botrytis cinerea. Phytopathology93, 1263–1273.
Mullins MG, Bouquet A, Williams LE (1992) ‘Biology of the grapevine’. (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge)
Padgett M, Morrison JC (1990) Changes in grape exudates during fruit development on their effect on mycelial growth of Botrytis cinerea. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science115, 269–273.
Percival DC, Sullivan JA, Fisher KH (1993) Effect of cluster exposure, berry contact and cultivar on cuticular membrane formation and occurrence of bunch rot (Botrytis cinerea PERS.: FR.) with 3 Vitis vinifera L. cultivars. Vitis32, 87–97.
Pillonel C, Meyer T (1997) Effect of phenylpyrroles on glycerol accumulation and protein kinase activity of Neurospora crassa. Pesticide Science49, 229–236. doi: 10.1002/(SICI) 1096-9063(199703)49:3<229::AID-PS525>3.0.CO;2-T
Rosenquist JK, Morrison JC (1989) Some factors affecting cuticle and wax accumulation on grape berries. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture40, 241–244.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rogiers, S.Y., Whitelaw-Weckert, M., Radovanonic-Tesic, M. et al. Effects of spray adjuvants on grape (Vitis vinifera) berry microflora, epicuticular wax and susceptibility to infection by Botrytis cinerea . Australasian Plant Pathology 34, 221–228 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1071/AP05031
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/AP05031