Abstract
Pathotypes of Cochliobolus sativus have been reported overseas but variation in the Australian population has not been investigated nor have the optimum conditions for the identification of variation been established. Preliminary experiments showed that maximum separation of infection responses of seedlings to infection by C. sativus conidia was obtained at 21°C using inocula containing 104 conidia/mL and a dew period of 40 h. Under these conditions, the existence of pathotypes in the Australian population of C. sativus was demonstrated. Using 20 lines, six pathotypes were identified among 34 isolates of the fungus. A differential set consisting of 12 barley cultivars is proposed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Dodman RL, Reinke JR (1982) A selective medium for determining the population of viable conidia of Cochiobolus sativus in soil. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 33, 287–291.
Fetch TG, Steffenson BJ (1999) Rating scales for assessing infection responses of barley infected with Cochliobolus sativus. Plant Disease 83, 213–217.
Limpert E, Müller K (1994) Designation of pathotypes of plant pathogens. Journal of Phytopathology 140, 346–358.
Valjavec-Gratian M, Steffenson BJ (1997) Pathotypes of Cochliobolus sativus on barley in North Dakota. Plant Disease 81, 1275–1278.
Waller JM, Lenné JM, Waller SJ (2002) ‘Plant pathologist’s pocketbook.’ (CABI Publications: New York)
Zadoks JC, Chang TT, Konzak CF (1974) A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Research 14, 415–421.
Zhong S, Steffenson BJ (2001) Virulence and molecular diversity in Cochliobolus sativus. Phytopathology 91, 469-476.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Meldrum, S.I., Platz, D.G.J. & Ogle, H.J. Pathotypes of Cochliobolus sativus on barley in Australia. Australasian Plant Pathology 33, 109–114 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1071/AP03088
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/AP03088