Skip to main content
Log in

Commercial biocontrol—reality or fantasy?

  • Published:
Australasian Plant Pathology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Over the past 10 years, we have made substantial progress in the commercialisation of biocontrol systems for soilborne plant diseases. Numerous products are now available for use in soil-less media under controlled environment conditions, or which target pathogens with restricted infection periods. However, we still fall short of achieving a situation where biocontrol forms an integral component of plant protection. Inconsistent disease control under field conditions and prohibitive registration costs are two main barriers which must be overcome before we can realise the full potential of biocontrol. Biocontrol products based upon the use of single clonal strains provide certain practical and economic benefits that facilitate commercial development, but they may be the underlying constraint to further commercial success. Using multiple strains of the same or different species could provide more reproducible control and a greater spectrum of activity, attributes that are likely to result in products with greater market potential. Current regulatory requirements make the registration of biocontrol products a time consuming, costly and often prohibitive exercise. Research should be targeted to provide regulatory bodies with sufficient relevant biological data on common biocontrol agents to facilitate a judicious relaxation of toxicology and environmental impact requirements. Then, perhaps, we can realise our ambition of successfully integrating biocontrol systems into mainstream agriculture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Becker JO, Schwinn FJ (1993) Control of soil-borne pathogens with living bacteria and fungi: Status and outlook. Pesticide Science 37, 355–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook RJ (1992) A customised approach to biological control of wheat root diseases. In ‘Biological control of plant diseases—Progress and challenges for the future’. (Eds EC Tjamos, GC Papavizas and RJ Cook) pp. 211–222. (Plenum Press: New York)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook RJ (1993) Making greater use of introduced microorganisms for biological control of plant pathogens. Annual Review of Phytopathology 31, 53–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cook RJ, Baker KR (1983) ‘The nature and practice of biological control of plant pathogens.’ (APS Press: St Paul, MN)

    Google Scholar 

  • Deacon JW (1991) Significance of ecology in the development of biocontrol agents against soilborne plant pathogens. Biocontrol Science and Technology 1, 5–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deacon JW (1994) Rhizosphere constraints affecting biocontrol organisms applied to seeds. In ‘BCPC Monograph No 57: Seed treatment: Progress and Prospects’. pp. 315–326. (British Crop Protection Council: Thorton Heath)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fravel D (1999) Hurdles and bottlenecks on the road to biocontrol of plant pathogens. Australasian Plant Pathology 28, 53–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrett SD (1965) Towards biocontrol of soil-borne plant pathogens. In ‘Ecology and management of soil-borne plant pathogens’. (Eds KF Baker and WC Snyder) pp.4–17. (John Murray: London)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lumsden RD, Lewis JA, Fravel DR (1995) Formulation and delivery of biocontrol agents for use against soilborne plant pathogens. In ‘Biorational pest control agents—Formulation and delivery’. (Eds FR Hall and JW Barry) pp.166–182. (American Chemical Society: Washington DC)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch JM (1992) Environmental implications of the release of biocontrol agents. In ‘Biological control of plant diseases— Progress and challenges for the future’ (Eds EC Tjamos, GC Papavizas and RJ Cook) pp. 389–397. (Plenum Press: New York)

    Google Scholar 

  • Matten SR, Milewski EA, Schneider WR, Slutsky BI (1993) Biological pesticides and the U.S Environmental Protection Agency. In ‘Advanced engineered pesticides’. (Ed. L Kim) pp. 321–335. (Marcel Dekker: New York)

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell KA, Faull JL, Renwick A (1990) The commercial and regulatory challenge. In ‘Biological control of soil-borne plant pathogens’. (Ed. D Hornby) pp. 445–463. (CAB International: Wallingford)

    Google Scholar 

  • Whipps JM (1997) Developments in the biological control of soilborne plant pathogens. Advances in Botanical Research 26, 1–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Stewart.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stewart, A. Commercial biocontrol—reality or fantasy?. Australasian Plant Pathology 30, 127–131 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1071/AP01011

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/AP01011

Keywords

Navigation