Skip to main content
Log in

The role of plant pathology in understanding soil health and its application to production agriculture

  • Published:
Australasian Plant Pathology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Over the last 10 years, considerable progress has been made in defining and assessing soil health and soil quality. However, problems still exist in the interpretation of soil quality indicators due to the complexity and interrelatedness of soil processes. Additionally, the crop production system selected by growers affects the potential for the adoption of practices promoting soil health. Factors influencing the selection of the crop production system include the marketing strategy adopted by the grower, the commodity value, the cultural practices and inputs used to grow the crop (e.g. fertilisers, pesticides, etc.). To date, growers have had little time to consider the impact of soil health on crop production. Plant pathology, however, and related disciplines have made major contributions to the understanding of soil health, particularly in the area of the identification and verification of disease-suppressive soils and the agents responsible for this suppression. The linkage of plant health to the functional diversity of biological communities in the soil has been far more elusive, but is rapidly becoming more important as consumers and markets push for environmental sustainability. To further progress our understanding of soil health and facilitate its application to production agriculture, plant pathologists should identify and focus on crop production systems that are amenable to showing a return on investment in soil health.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acton DF, Gregorich LJ (1995) Understanding soil health. In ‘The health of our soils—Toward sustainable agriculture in Canada’. (Eds DF Acton and LJ Gregorich) pp. 5–10. (Centre for Land and Biological Resources Research, Research Branch, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa, ON)

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen DL et al. (1995) SSSA statement on soil quality. Agronomy News. P.7. (June).

  • Cook RJ (2000) Advance in plant health management in the Twentieth Century. Annual Review of Phytopathology 38, 95–116

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cook RJ, Baker KF (1983) ‘The nature and practice of biological control of plant pathogens’. (APS Press: St Paul, Minnesota)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook RJ, Haglund WA (1991) Wheat yield depression associated with conservation tillage caused by root pathogens in the soil not phytotoxins from the straw. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 23, 1125–1132.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Doran JW, Parkin TB (1994). Defining and assessing soil quality. In ‘Defining soil quality for a sustainable environment’. (Eds JW fnDoran, DC Coleman, DF Bezdicek and BA Steward) pp. 3–21. (Soil Science Society of America Special Publication no. 35, Madison, Wisconsin)

  • Doran JW, Parkin TB (1996) Quantitative indicators of soil quality: A minimum data set. In ‘Methods for assessing soil quality’. (Eds JW Doran and AJ Jones) pp. 25–38. (Soil Science Society of America Special Publication no. 49, Madison, Wisconsin)

  • Doran JW, Safley M (1997) Defining and assessing soil health and sustainable productivity. In ‘Biological indicators of soil health’. (Eds C Pankhurst, BM Doube and VVSR Gupta) pp. 1–28. (CAB International: Wallingford)

    Google Scholar 

  • Garland JL, Mills A (1991) Classification and characterization of heterotrophic microbial communities on the basis of patterns of community-level sole-carbon-source utilization. Applied Environmental Microbiology 57, 2351–2359.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen EM, Myrold DD, Hamm PB (1990) Effects of soil fumigation and cover crops on potential pathogens, microbial activity, nitrogen availability, and seedling quality in conifer nurseries. Phytopathology 80, 698–704.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heap I, (2000) International survey of herbicide resistant weeds. Online, Internet, May 2, 2000. Available www.weedscience.com

  • Herrick JE (2000) Soil quality: an indicator of sustainable land management. Applied Soil Ecology 15, 75–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins DL, Larkin RP, Elstrom GW (1987) Cultivar-specific inductions of soil supressiveness to Fusarium wilt of watermelon. Phytopathology 77, 607–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hornby D (1983) Suppressive soil. Annual Review of Phytopathology 21, 65–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huber DM, Watson RD (1974) Nitrogen form and plant disease. Annual Review of Phytopathology 12, 139–165

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hue NV, Sobieszczyk BA (1999) Nutritional values of some biowastes as soil amendments. Compost Science & Utilization 7, 34–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaenicke EC (1998) ‘From the ground up: exploring soil quality’s contrbution to environmental health.’ (Henry A. Wallace Institute for Alternative Agriculture: Greenbelt, MD)

    Google Scholar 

  • Karlen DL, Mausbach MJ, Doran JW, Cline RG, Harris RF, Schuman GE (1997) Soil quality: A concept, definition, and framework for evaluation. Soil Science Society of America Journal 61, 4–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Larkin RP, Hopkins DL, Martin FN (1996) Suppression of Fusarium wilt of watermelon by nonpathogenic Fusarium oxysporum and other microorganisms recovered from a disease-suppressive soil. Phytopathology 86, 812–819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larson WE, Pierce FJ (1994) The dynamics of soil quality as a measure of sustainable management. In ‘Defining soil quality for a sustainable environment’. (Eds JW Doran, DC Coleman, DF Bezdicek and BA Steward) pp. 37–51. (Soil Science Society of America Special Publication no. 35, Madison, Wisconsin)

  • Mazzola M (1999) Transformation of soil microbial community structure and Rhizoctonia-suppressive potential in response to apple roots. Phytopathology 89, 920–927.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mazzola M, Gu Y-H (2000) Impact of wheat cultivation on microbial communities from preplant soils and apple growth in greenhouse trials. Phytopathology 90, 114–119.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McSpadden Gardener BB, Mavrodi DV, Thomashow LS, Weller DM (2001) A rapid polymerase chain reaction-based assay characterizing rhizosphere populations of 2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol-producing bacteria. Phytopathology 91, 44–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Murakami H, Tsushima S, Shishido Y (2000) Soil suppressiveness to clubroot disease of Chinese cabbage caused by Plasmodiophora brassicae. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 32, 1637–1642.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (1993) ‘Soil and water quality: An agenda for agriculture.’ (National Academy Press: Washington, D.C.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Offner J (2000) Organic foods niche growing into big business. The Packer, Dec. 25, 2000, page A6.

  • Ogram A (2000) Soil molecular microbial ecology at age 20: methodological challenges for the future. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 32, 1499–1504.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Porter IJ, Brett RW, Nicholls JW, Rae JE, Mattner SW (1999b) Will fumigants, biofumigants or IPM, adequately replace MB in Australia? Proceedings of the Annual International Research Conference on Methyl Bromide Alternatives and Emissions Reduction, November 1–4, 1999 San Diego, California, USA.

  • Porter IJ, Brett RW, Wiseman BM (1999a) Alternatives to methyl bromide: Chemical fumigants or integrated pest management systems. Australasian Plant Pathology 28, 65–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter IJ, Mattner SW Brett, RW, Nicholls JW, Rae JE, Bianco V (2000) Plant back, IGR and soil health influence the selection of MB alternatives in Australia. Proceedings of the Annual International Research Conference on Methyl Bromide Alternatives and Emissions Reductions, November 6–9, 2000, Orlando, Florida, USA.

  • Postma J, Willemsen-de Klein MJEIM, van Elsas JD (2000) Effect of the indigenous microflora on the development of root and crown rot caused by Pythium aphanidermatum in cucumber grown on rockwool. Phytopathology 90, 125–133.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Raaiijamakers J, Weller DM (1998) Natural plant protection by 2,4-diacetlyphloroglucinol-producing Pseudomonas spp. in take-all decline soil. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions 11, 144–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ranjar L, Poly F, Nazaret S (2000) Monitoring complex bacterial communities using culture-independent molecular techniques: application to soil environment. Research in Microbiology 151, 167–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romig DE, Garlynd MJ, Harris RF, McSweeney K (1995) How farmers assess soil health and quality. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 50, 229–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romig DE, Garlynd MJ, Harris RF (1996) Farmer-based assessment of soil quality: A soil health card. In ‘Methods for assessing soil quality’. (Eds JW Doran and AJ Jones) pp. 39–60. (Soil Science Society of America Special Publication no. 49, Madison, Wisconsin)

  • Scher FM, Baker R (1980) Mechanism of biological control in a Fusarium-suppressive soil. Phytopathology 70, 412–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith SA, Taylor TG (2000) Production costs for selected vegetables in Florida, 2000. University of Florida, Cooperative Extension Service, Circular 1176. 65 pp.

  • Torsvik V, Goksoyr J, Daae FL (1990) High diversity in DNA of soil bacteria. Applied Environmental Microbiology 56, 782–787.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Environment Programme (1992) Montreal Protocol Assessment Supplement, Methyl Bromide: Its Science, Technology and Economics. Synthesis Report of the Methyl Bromide Interim Scientific Assessment and Methyl Bromide Interim Technology and Economic Assessment.

  • Van Bruggen AHC, Semenov AM (1999). A new approach to the search for indicators of root disease suppression. Australasian Plant Pathology 28, 4–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westphal A, Becker JO (2000) Transfer of biological soil suppressiveness against Heterodera schachtii. Phytopathology 90, 401–406.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Westphal A, Becker JO (2001) Components of soil suppressiveness against Heterodera schachtii. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 33, 9–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Workneh F, van Bruggen AHC, Drinkwater LE, Shennan C (1993) Variables associated with corky root and Phytophthora root rot of tomatoes in organic and conventional farms. Phytopathology 83, 581–589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zak JC, Willig MR, Moorhead DL, Wildman HG (1994) Functional diversity of microbial communities: a quantitative approach. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 26, 1101–1108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. O. Chellemi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chellemi, D.O., Porter, I.J. The role of plant pathology in understanding soil health and its application to production agriculture. Australasian Plant Pathology 30, 103–109 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1071/AP01008

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/AP01008

Keywords

Navigation